More

Facebook Brings Back Old News Feed Option With 'Recent Stories'

Facebook News Feed

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/10/11 11:56 AM ET Updated: 11/10/11 11:56 AM ET

Following a rash of complaints over Facebook's latest tweak to its News Feed, the world's largest social networking site has restored a recently-eliminated feature that will give users more control over the stories that appear in their News Feeds.

Facebook introduced an update in September that sorted the content in users' News Feeds according to algorithms that determined story relevance in what was an attempt to make News Feed "more like your own personal newspaper." As part of these changes, Facebook did away with the option to sort posts either by "Top Stories" and "Most Recent," instead merging the feeds into a single stream and forcing users to trust Facebook's own judgment regarding the stories that they would find most relevant.

Facebook wrote Wednesday that it is bringing back a new "sort" tool that allows users to choose whether they'd prefer to see "highlighted stories first" -- that is, rely more on Facebook's algorithm to prioritize the stories it guesses will be most interesting -- or else see "recent stories first" -- an option that still relies on Facebook's algorithm, but prioritizes recent updates.

"Now you have a new way of sorting your News Feed: most recent stories first. You can also continue to view highlighted stories first, followed by recent stories, like what you see today. If you don't have the updates to News Feed yet, you can expect to see them over the coming weeks as the rollout continues," wrote Facebook's Mark Tonkelowitz in a blog post.

As with most of Facebook's tweaks, users were ruthless in their criticism of the News Feed update announced some six weeks ago.

"I had my page set up the way I WANTED IT and you idiots decided to change MY set up to the way you wanted it. My page was NOT broken, it did NOT need to be updated for YOUR benefit. I really do NOT appreciate it when other people decide what is in my best interest or what should be important to me. THAT my dears is for ME to decide NOT you," commented Candice Allen in Facebook's blog post.

"I want to choose what I want to see and what's more relevant to me, not some algorithim. its almost Big Brotheresque [sic]," wrote Bryan Pearce. "We already have the option to see top stories and never use it. I prefer a timeline and that why I always chose most recent. I absolutely HATE tickers. They are too distracting and take away from the experience of playing games etc. it just seems like a new way of Facebook trying to cram in more advertising revenue."

Users were encouraged by Facebook's News Feed revamp, taking it as a sign that the site was listening to its members, but also chided the site for billing the change as a "new" feature.

"I find it interesting that Mark is advertising this as a new option, with no acknowledgment that FB made such a boneheaded design decision to begin with," wrote Hans Boldt.

"I like that facebook listens to its users (even if it takes too long), but having the gall to call this a new way is really amazing," wrote Tiuri Elvander in a comment.

See the new/old Facebook News Feed feature in the screenshot below, via Mashable:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Following a rash of complaints over Facebook's latest tweak to its News Feed, the world's largest social networking site has restored a recently-eliminated feature that will give users more control ov...
Following a rash of complaints over Facebook's latest tweak to its News Feed, the world's largest social networking site has restored a recently-eliminated feature that will give users more control ov...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 19
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:33 PM on 11/18/2011
I liked the new Feed...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
11:52 AM on 11/16/2011
im Biancas follower but it would be cool if i was a real friend, i think she is sexy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
09:03 PM on 11/13/2011
they do not listen to the users at all..... they don't care about users privacy concerns... they don't care about the features that users want like the "dislike" button... with zuckerberg its either his way or no way...

I don't like my friends seeing my comments on other friends walls... but there is no way to keep that from happening... its little stupid things like that... that is gonna start burying facebook... people want to be "sociable" but still keep their privacy in tact... with facebook you cant do that...

you would think that if you deleted info from your facebook (posts, pictures etc) that it is deleted.... but it isn't... they keep all that history...

now they also track you where ya go using your cell phones info... how utterly intrusive...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hursh 4 ever
Smart Commenter - logical and wise
08:55 PM on 11/13/2011
Facebook knows its time is coming to an end... this is where it does a little "tap dance" to get peoples attention... everyone I know on facebook uses it less than 2 or 3 times a month now... as compared to when it first came out...

(hi Bianca ;)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkkFL
microbio refusé, je vous refusez
07:50 PM on 11/13/2011
I use FB for family, and close friends' brief communications- nothing more..They can innovate ten times over and I will never go beyond that usage for me!
So innovate- and create away Markie- I'm just not that in to your 'progress.'
12:15 AM on 11/12/2011
'eh, opting for their new "sort" thing, doesn't really revert it back completely. I opted to make just a custom list with all my friends/pages/groups on it and that I've found is the best way to see everything. It works for now, I'll keep using it.
11:23 PM on 11/11/2011
It's about time they listened to users. But I'm afraid it's too little too late. I left Facebook and will never return. Google+ is where it's at!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Realist2011
beware false profits....
04:22 PM on 11/11/2011
Don't use it. Don't need it. My REAL friends know how to reach me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aaron Kirchmann
Loose fans with your big mouth! Ask me how!
03:52 PM on 11/11/2011
I am glad they are finally starting to listen to what their users have to say. I was about to delete my profile.
03:03 PM on 11/11/2011
A social dump
12:15 PM on 11/11/2011
I wonder if they saw a decline in users or how often folks log in since the change. I didn't like it at first, but it doesn't bother me anymore. I like the "smart lists" where I can lump users together by relationship (peewee football/school/work/highschool, etc) FB traditionally had not changed when users complained in the past.
photo
invirginia
A higher double-standard.
10:44 AM on 11/11/2011
Strange how all of these Facebook users complain so much about a free service that they chose to use.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
snommel
What? Now, wait a minute...
05:56 AM on 11/12/2011
My attention and time is NOT free. It is a commodity to be purchased by the best performing social networking service. Zuckerburg and other social media moguls are smart enough to see it and make oodles of money from it. Good on the complainers-it improves service.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elicourey
It takes a nation of millions to hold me back!
09:33 AM on 11/11/2011
Facebook should go back to version 1.0 for a day....maybe that will teach all the complainers a lesson. Facebook has been able to stay on top for so long because they keep innovating, if they had stayed the same they would have failed like MySpace by now.
01:10 AM on 11/11/2011
Good work facebook its better to move back rather then fall...................http://www.saqibimran.com/
11:06 PM on 11/10/2011
i dont hate facebook, it's still fun. change tho on the other hand is never fun, takes time to see the benefits of it. change is always hard.