iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Nearly Half Of Working First-Time Mothers Miss Paychecks To Care For Newborns: Census

Paid Leave Moms

By HOPE YEN   11/10/11 01:24 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- After decades of worker gains in paid-leave benefits, employers are becoming more selective about granting maternity leave in an economic downturn.

A Census Bureau analysis released Thursday shows that the share of women given time off for pregnancy, birth and child care has leveled off, with about half of working first-time mothers passing up paychecks to care for their newborns.

Lower-educated mothers are nearly four times more likely than college graduates to be denied paid maternity benefits. That's the widest gap over the past 50 years.

Women with no more than a high-school diploma saw drop-offs in paid-leave benefits from the early 2000s to the period covering 2006 to 2008, which includes the first year of the recession.

"Access to paid leave is limited, and it's also sharply regressive," said Lynda Laughlin, a family demographer at the Census Bureau who put together the report. "For working families where the norm now is for both mom and dad to work, not having some kind of paycheck coming in while they take time to take care of a child can be a real financial burden."

The analysis highlights the patchwork of work-family arrangements in the U.S., which lacks a federal policy on paid parental leave, unlike most other countries. There's a longer-term trend of widening U.S. income inequality caused by slowing wage growth at the middle- and lower-income levels.

Women with higher birth rates in the U.S. are on average younger, less educated and typically Hispanic, and they are more likely to toil in lower-wage positions.

If first-time mothers don't receive paid-leave benefits, they often return to their jobs quickly after giving birth, or sacrifice a steady paycheck by taking unpaid leave or quitting to spend more time with their newborns.

"This isn't good news for women at the bottom, and the irony is that the people with the most children are now the least likely to have the supports they need," said Kathleen Gerson, a professor of sociology at New York University and author of "The Unfinished Revolution: Coming of Age in a New Era of Gender, Work, and Family."

She noted that companies typically offer paid maternity leave after weighing the costs of finding and training a new employee against a short leave of absence. "The question is whether we can politically, as well as privately, create a wider blanket of support for these families."

About 50.8 percent of first-time mothers said they used some kind of paid leave, which includes maternity, sick and vacation time, from 2006 to 2008, the most recent years for which figures are available, according to the census report. That is unchanged from 2001 to 2005, but compares with 37.3 percent in the 1981-1985 period, when federal laws barring pregnancy discrimination in employment were starting to take fuller effect.

About 66 percent of women with a bachelor's degree or higher were able to use paid leave, compared with 61 percent earlier in the past decade. In contrast, 18 percent of women who had less than a high school education received the paid-leave benefits during 2006-2008, down from 26 percent.

The nearly 4-1 gap between college graduates and high-school dropouts is the widest it's been over the half-century that the Census Bureau has tracked such data. The disparity was essentially the same in 1991-1995.

High school graduates were less likely than earlier in the decade to use paid leave, 32 percent compared with 39 percent. Among women who had some college schooling but lacked a bachelor's degree, about 47 percent said they received paid time off for pregnancy, birth and child care, unchanged from the early 2000s.

By age and race, the shares of women using paid leave increased as they got older, from 24 percent of first-time mothers under age 22 to 61 percent of those 25 and older. That reflects in part more schooling and work experience that enabled older women to find jobs with better salary and benefits. Hispanics as a whole were generally less likely than other groups to receive paid leave, at 46.6 percent.

In the recession, most jobs lost were in middle-wage occupations such as machinists, managers and teachers, while jobs added in the slow recovery have been mostly lower-wage positions, according to the National Employment Law Project. The reduction in middle-wage jobs has contributed to an increasing gap between higher-skilled employees who receive better benefits and lesser-educated workers who do not.

The federal Family and Medical Leave Act, passed in 1993, enables workers with new children or seriously ill family members to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave. But it excludes companies with fewer than 50 employees.

Past efforts in Congress to enact a paid family leave law have been unsuccessful, lumping the U.S. with Swaziland, Papua New Guinea and a few others that do not require paid benefits on a national level. Some U.S. states, including New Jersey and California, offer paid-leave programs.

Other census findings:

_Women are more likely than before to work while pregnant. About 66 percent of first-time mothers between 2006 and 2008 worked during their pregnancy, compared with 44 percent in the early 1960s.

_First-time mothers are working later into their pregnancies than before. About 88 percent worked into the last trimester, while 65 percent worked into the last month of pregnancy.

_Eight out of 10 mothers who worked during their pregnancies returned to work for the same employer within a year of the birth. About 7 out of 10 of these women returned to a job at the same pay, skill level and hours worked per week.

___

Online:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- After decades of worker gains in paid-leave benefits, employers are becoming more selective about granting maternity leave in an economic downturn. A Census Bureau analysis released Thu...
WASHINGTON -- After decades of worker gains in paid-leave benefits, employers are becoming more selective about granting maternity leave in an economic downturn. A Census Bureau analysis released Thu...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 582
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
09:09 AM on 11/14/2011
I was granted maternity leave when my children where born. My husband asked for maternity leave and was laughed at, he had to take all his vacation time to stay home to help raise our child the first month.
01:12 PM on 11/14/2011
A one month maternity leave is a medical leave. If you didn't notice, men don't have babies and therefore no physical recovery is required. If you'd ever actually had a baby, which is unlikely since you're a man, you'd realize that even a month is a very inadequate time to recover.

Granting a man paternity leave could not be done in lieu of maternity leave because the mother's body needs to recover, and there's no substitute for that.

If we lived in a more enlightened social democracy such as they have in Europe, both parents would have been entitled to parental leave. However we live in the Capitalism is King country of America, and mothers are lucky if they can get even two weeks to recover medically from the ordeal of childbirth.
01:21 PM on 11/14/2011
There was a lawsuite a while back, a man sued for materity leave and won. Now men are allowed maternity leave.
04:32 PM on 11/12/2011
Well, duh! Aside from the past 20 years or so, women worked, quit working, then raised their children well into grammar school or beyond, and may or may not return to work. Used to be, before our economy was destroyed, that even educated women used their skills to raise the next generation and to volunteer for worthy causes. Part of the problem the 99% face is the issue of healthy families, good home lives, and so on. It really is not healthy for children or parents to have 2 working parents. This is just plain common sense. And while we're at it, I demand respect as an educated woman trying to return to the workplace after raising children for years. Don't diss us all you young HR people. While you've all been stuck in a room, we have been getting further education, reading, running fundraisers, and meeting people from all walks of life!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hiddenfangs
Four legs good, two legs bad
04:43 PM on 11/12/2011
Guess what? It has been the norm throughout much of human history that both parents worked, be it in the fields, in the mines, etc. Most children do just fine with two working parents.
05:53 PM on 11/12/2011
And others cared for the children... extended families, community members, etc.

Throughout history, most humans did not live in the isolated, insular conditions that most Americans live in now.
05:50 PM on 11/12/2011
I agree that children should have two parents and stability. That seems to have gone by the wayside in recent decades. Even the nuclear family has been supplanted in large part by single mothers trying to raise children on inadequate salaries. The standard of living for married women falls dramatically upon divorce.

If we still had a culture of extended families and caring neighbors who looked out for others, we'd be painting a better picture. JMO.
bipolarbears60
common sense isn't so common
03:47 AM on 11/13/2011
But the neighbor isn't home either. She/He are also at work. I've been a full time parent since '95. Do you think I could find anyone to take care of my kids when I needed to attend a parent-teacher conference? Nope. Hubby worked 3 to 11 pm and so did my neighbors. I was the ONLY at home Mom in my neighborhood. I drove 7 kids to and from school, fixed breakfast, read to them, supervised homework, took them to Bible School in the Summer -- I was THE support system of my neighborhood. But, if I needed support no one was available--they were all working. And those 7 kids? Five of them aren't mine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Joyal
retired bum
03:39 PM on 11/12/2011
When the good jobs left so did the good benefits. The US has slipped in to the third world level of care for it's citizens so the rich and corporations can pad their pockets.
Unless we end free trade agreements that are unequal we will continue to slide downward even though we are being told how great the economy is recovering there are no jobs especially good jobs to the working class even engineering and other jobs that would require a degree are being exported thanks to the tax breaks that allow this.
03:00 PM on 11/12/2011
I'm a staunch supporter of BIRTH CONTROL.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mchcallow
Celebrating 145 years: 14th Amendment
03:38 PM on 11/12/2011
As am I. I wish that there were a way to detect ignorance in the womb so that we could take the appropriate precautions to rid the world of the silly nameless and ignorant.
05:02 PM on 11/12/2011
The silly nameless are not always ignorant, mchcallow.

People shouldn't reproduce carelessly.

Employers should provide benefits for employees who become parents.

Government should be "of, by, for" the people, not the Corporations (who should never have been granted personhood.

Reverse Citizens United! Sign the petition:
http://petition.reversecitizensunited.com/p/dia/action/public/index.sjs?action_KEY=5007

If wishes were horses...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mchcallow
Celebrating 145 years: 14th Amendment
05:15 PM on 11/12/2011
The article was based on a census report which gathered data on the experiences of first time mothers. Those who responded didn't say that their children's entrance into the world was careless, but I imagine that as first time parents that they never invisioned the amount of time and energy that come with being a new parent. Althought these parents appeared to struggle with the limited time that they were given, I think that folk like you have read a little extra into the article.

So again, your careless thoughts are being called out and put on display. Your unfortunate post will never sway me to sign onto a petition that you might suggest. I'll pass...
05:18 PM on 11/12/2011
Okay, then don't support the petition to repeal "Citizens United" and let Corporations be deemed "persons" and continue to turn the United States of America into The Corporate State of America, simply because you didn't like my comment.

YOU are the "silly" one.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
05:54 AM on 11/12/2011
"For working families where the norm now is for both mom and dad to work, not having some kind of paycheck coming in while they take time to take care of a child can be a real financial burden."

Like anything else, decisions come with consequences. Business owners shouldn't be penalized for what goes on in employees' personal lives.
photo
sindurrella
now where did I put my bootstraps?
03:16 PM on 11/11/2011
Until Pro Life Republicans fix this, they can take their Forced Pregnancy agenda and.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
04:15 PM on 11/11/2011
Forced Pregnancy? Republicans force people to get pregnant? How?
photo
sindurrella
now where did I put my bootstraps?
04:42 PM on 11/11/2011
Pro Life extremists, like the ones in MIssissippi are not only trying to outlaw abortions, but some methods of birth control. Thank goodness the citizens of Mississippi didn't fall for that one!
Anyone who advocates for no abortions, period, is advocating for forced pregnancy. I do not believe the life of a zygote trumps the life of a monther! I do not believe a 58 year old woman who has already raised her family should be forced to give birth to a menopause baby if she doesn't want to. I don't believe a woman should be forced to carry her rapist's child. The morning after pill would take care of the possibility of becoming pregnant from a rape but that could be outlawed under the "fetus is a person" law.
If we lived in a perfect world, and all women were happily married and waiting to concieve a much wanted child who they could suport both emotionally and financially, I could really be Pro-Life. But, until that day, the decision to bring a life into this world, or not, should be a decision made by the woman, her doctor and her god. It is no one else's business - no one else's decision.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Joyal
retired bum
03:40 PM on 11/12/2011
Ask Herman Cain
01:59 PM on 11/11/2011
So?

If you cannot afford children, don't have them....
03:01 PM on 11/12/2011
Exactly. Don't have 'em until you can afford 'em.

Stop bringing children into a life of poverty.
05:21 PM on 11/12/2011
See my comments above.
08:21 PM on 11/19/2011
Easier said than done for people without proper access to birth control. Do you expect married people to also practice unreliable abstinence?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dogspeed
Your mico-bio is empty.
01:52 PM on 11/11/2011
Mothers should be home taking care of their babies, not daycare workers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hiddenfangs
Four legs good, two legs bad
06:48 PM on 11/11/2011
And the fathers? You know, women don't make those babies alone.
MommyMD
MD, Professor, Mom
05:33 AM on 11/13/2011
So simple. So fanned. Hubby and I both have the same Ivy Degrees, are both MDs....when other moms extol my husband for staying an hour for our girls' ballet, I simply say, "I know. He's wonderful. Treats those kids just like they were his own."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bethab
04:22 PM on 11/18/2011
Grandpa? Is that you?
photo
fatuglynerd
Be careful ... You are what you pretend to be.
01:47 PM on 11/11/2011
That's because we only care about_babies until the moment_they are_born.

I know this is a tired point, but it's 100000% true.

And it's only true because_Abortion is used as leverage to garner votes_for_major_corporations_ie_Republicans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
01:42 PM on 11/11/2011
What I get from the few extremists that have responded to my post, it seems that these women want to be worshiped as gods for being women and thus having the ability to bear children. In their extreme view they believe that the world of men should pay them homage for being the "creators" of humanity.

Well, I'm not a religious person, therefore I'm going to have to pass. LOL
photo
fatuglynerd
Be careful ... You are what you pretend to be.
01:58 PM on 11/11/2011
You slander women, including your own mother with your misogynist statement.

You probably don't even realize how much you_hate women ...

What a disgusting approach to this discussion. I hope you do not have a wife, or children ... and I hope your mother doesn't know the way you really feel about her.

Women SHOULD BE respected, as your statement is true ... THEY GIVE LIFE!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
02:07 PM on 11/11/2011
Yes your right, you got me....I hate my mother, LOL, I don't know how I forgot that. SMH, lol.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
02:08 PM on 11/11/2011
Who decides the sex of the child?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
squirrely girl
Assistant Professor ~ Developmental Psychology
02:53 PM on 11/11/2011
Wanting a few weeks off after giving birth to physically recover while not being destitute isn't exactly wanting to be worshiped as a god. That you think it is says a lot about what you think of women... it's kind of sad.

By the way, as a lady taxpayer and working mother you fail to recognize that I would also be funding these paid maternity leaves for other women. The men folk aren't the only ones paying taxes... you might learn that if you step out of your "world of men" for a few minutes each day :/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EdCorey1971
03:03 PM on 11/11/2011
I clearly see that you feel the need to "check" me and I find that quite amusing. I also find it amusing that you claim to know me so well....you must because your statements are fueled by assumption. As far as have a few weeks or even a month off of paid leave. I'm cool with that and I think it's a good thing, but 6months to a year...no way.

I don't know why your telling me about taxpayers, (should shrug), but I'm speaking from the employers POV. But you free to worship your self lady goddess. lol
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marlaannchristenson
Well when you say it like that...
08:03 PM on 11/12/2011
Fanned and faved.
01:34 PM on 11/11/2011
For the crowd taking the "your problem not mine" stance, you couldn't be more wrong. If parents can't afford to raise their children, those kids are more likely to become drains on society. Society is all of us. Plus, the paycheck moms would get during that time enable them to spend money helping to contribute to economic circulation locally and nationally.

For the "why only women, why not men" crowd, you might be forgetting that women pay a heavy, physical toll when carrying and delivering a baby. They physically cannot work in many cases until weeks or months after delivery--depending on many things including what their job may be. Since they are recovering, AND their body produces the best food for babies in those times, it makes sense for them to stay with the newborn more than it does men.

Plus, it's just right. Shouldn't we all want a better world for all of us instead of bitching incessantly that somebody somewhere may get something good?
01:36 PM on 11/11/2011
Stop it ; you make to much sense!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Torres
01:31 PM on 11/11/2011
"Past efforts in Congress to enact a paid family leave law have been unsuccessful, lumping the U.S. with Swaziland, Papua New Guinea and a few others that do not require paid benefits on a national level. Some U.S. states, including New Jersey and California, offer paid-leave programs."

I swear we are just going backwards on all fronts.
01:33 PM on 11/11/2011
another area where my beloved country needs to play catch up, and quick

Maternity (and Paternal) leave is important to decreasing many problems in our society, and should be government subsidized to the max, after all, you want to cultivate the newest crops of citizens to be happy and productive, that starts with proper neonate care
01:28 PM on 11/11/2011
the people with the most children are now the least likely to have the supports they need. Stop having intercourse, stop having children. It's not something you need like food and shelter.

This is a bit of a rant I know, there is so much hurt in the news lately that has to do with sex. Is the drive for sex so strong that it supersedes reason and common sense as well as decency?
01:36 PM on 11/11/2011
Uh, it's a pretty important part of marriage, not to mention human existence. I take it you haven't gotten any lately.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Henry Torres
01:39 PM on 11/11/2011
Just want to say we just had our first baby and the paid leave i got and my wife is a joke. We had to use all our vacation time just to be at home with our newborn. I know you are specifically looking at people with many children but all women who want children are affected by this. Please don't be so closed minded and realize that this will help all women not just the ones that can't say no to sex.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hiddenfangs
Four legs good, two legs bad
07:24 PM on 11/11/2011
But that's just it. You made the choice to have a child. Using all your vacation time--yes, that's to be expected because you made the choice to have a child. If someone makes the decision to go abroad or do something with their life requiring time off, they should plan accordingly, right? You chose a child. Someone else may chose Tahiti. Both valid choices and both that should require planning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wingin it
Got all life to live, got all love to give
01:28 PM on 11/11/2011
If you haven't given birth or understand what recovery from giving birth involves, then you have no right to say that a woman doesn't deserve some help during recovery and bonding with her baby. Not to mention the health and developmental benefits for the baby. Geesh, were talking about a temporary benefit, a potential maximum 12 weeks of partial pay. Substandard compared to other first-world nations. And to say that a woman should just not have children is shortsighted and not realistic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marianproletarian
01:30 PM on 11/11/2011
And these are the "family values" types. It's mind boggling.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Hiddenfangs
Four legs good, two legs bad
01:37 PM on 11/11/2011
Why is it wrong to say a woman (or man) should not have kids? Kids are not a necessity. A child is a luxury. If you chose to have a child, fine, but plan for that event.
01:52 PM on 11/11/2011
How are they supposed to plan when sex education, birth control, abortion and Planned Parenthood are all being systematically attacked by the "family values" party?
01:53 PM on 11/11/2011
A child isn't a luxury. They are a beautiful gift that is dependent on their parents and society. They aren't a car or a watch. They are our future in this country. Without kids, there isn't a workforce, no more pay into taxes, and no future. We planned for the event so my wife could take unpaid time off. But without having at least 6 weeks off it would have been almost impossible. You must be for the forced sterilization too.