iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

EMI Group To Be Sold To Sony, Universal

By RYAN NAKASHIMA   11/11/11 07:29 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES -- EMI Group Ltd., the iconic British music company that is home to The Beatles, Coldplay and Katy Perry, is being split and sold for $4.1 billion.

The deals will open EMI's buyers, Universal Music and Sony/ATV, to regulatory scrutiny as they increase their dominance of the music industry.

Universal Music Group said Friday that it will pay 1.2 billion pounds ($1.9 billion) for the recording division, joining Universal artists including Lady Gaga and Eminem with EMI superstars such as David Guetta and Lady Antebellum.

A consortium led by Sony/ATV announced a separate deal Friday to pay $2.2 billion for EMI's publishing division. That business is in charge of songwriting copyrights for such artists as Rihanna and Norah Jones.

Sony/ATV, a joint venture between Sony Corp. and the Michael Jackson estate, said it is a 38 percent partner in the consortium. Other parties include Mubadala Development Co., Jynwel Capital Ltd., the Blackstone Group and David Geffen.

The two-part sale, if approved by regulators, would further increase Universal Music's dominance in recorded music and springboard Sony/ATV into the top spot as a music publisher, according to Impala, an association of European independent music companies that is against the deal.

The purchases would give Universal Music and Sony/ATV undue negotiating power over artists and distributors of music, even over the world's biggest music store, Apple Inc.'s iTunes, Impala said.

Both deals are expected to be carefully reviewed in Europe, the U.S., Japan and Australia. Even if regulators approve, they could force the sale of key assets or attach other terms.

Helen Smith, Impala's executive chairwoman, noted that when Universal Music bought music publisher BMG in 2007, it had to sell some assets to get smaller.

"When you have players which are dominant, even if they take over small players in market share, that can have a serious impact on competition," she said.

Jean-Bernard Levy, CEO of Universal Music parent company Vivendi SA, told analysts on a conference call that he was "very confident" the deal would be approved in as little as 10 months.

In the United States, Universal is the top music producer with a 30 percent market share compared with EMI's 9 percent, according to Nielsen SoundScan. With a combined share of 39 percent, they would tower over Sony at 29 percent and Warner Music at 19 percent.

On the publishing side, Sony/ATV will add EMI's 1.3 million song copyrights to its roster of 750,000 songs that include hits from The Beatles, Bob Dylan and Taylor Swift.

The deal leaves Citigroup, EMI's current owner, with liability for its underfunded pension plan, according to two other people familiar with the talks. One put the liability at $600 million, the other said it was about $260 million.

Neither person was authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.

Citigroup had put EMI up for sale in June, four months after it foreclosed on private equity firm Terra Firma. Terra Firma bought EMI in 2007 in a $6.8 billion acquisition financed with debt from Citigroup, but it couldn't make enough money to keep up with the terms.

Vivendi believes it is swooping in to buy a troubled asset at an "inflection point" in the music industry, Levy said. Thanks to gains in digital track and album sales, overall U.S. album sales are up 5.2 percent at 360 million units so far this year, according to SoundScan. At this point last year, overall album sales had plunged 10 percent.

Vivendi expects to cut costs and save more than $150 million a year – making the deal profitable even if the music industry doesn't grow in the future. Vivendi expects the deal to boost its profits in the first year after regulatory approval.

Morningstar analyst Allan Nichols, who covers Vivendi, viewed the deal with trepidation on fears that the music industry could resume its decline and that regulators could reject it.

But antitrust regulators could be more lenient of big tie-ups when the music industry is struggling to recover from more than a decade of online piracy, he said.

Also, Vivendi is paying less per dollar of earnings than Access Industries' Len Blavatnik did when he took Warner Music Group Corp. private for $1.24 billion in July.

"The catalog is very impressive, and they didn't pay a whole lot," Nichols said.

Sony/ATV's interest in expanding its library is due to the stability of licensing music copyrights, a business that has been profitable over the years because it relies on business customers like filmmakers instead of individual consumers.

Sony/ATV plans to reap new revenues from the EMI catalog, which includes around 100 No. 1 hits from Motown artists Smokey Robinson, Marvin Gaye, Stevie Wonder and The Supremes.

"We think there are biopics and life stories yet to be told about them," said Sony/ATV Chief Executive Marty Bandier in an interview. "There's a depth and quality to this asset that can't be compared to anything."

In a move that may appease regulators in Europe and the U.S., Vivendi said it would sell 500 million euros ($680 million) worth of non-core assets, mostly minority stakes in companies that it did not disclose. Strategic bidders that lost out on the auction, such as Warner Music, are expected to vie for those assets.

Vivendi said that London-based EMI would find a safe home at a company headquartered not far away in Paris.

"For me, as an Englishman, EMI was the pre-eminent music company that I grew up with," Universal CEO Lucian Grainge said in a statement. "UMG is committed to both preserving EMI's cultural heritage and artistic diversity and also investing in its artists and people to grow the company's assets for the future."

Grainge said on the conference call that he would ensure the famous Beatles' recording studio, Abbey Road Studios, would remain open as a "symbol of British culture."

Universal released statements from bands in support, including from Coldplay manager Dave Holmes, who said "this can only be a positive for the artists and executives at EMI."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LOS ANGELES -- EMI Group Ltd., the iconic British music company that is home to The Beatles, Coldplay and Katy Perry, is being split and sold for $4.1 billion. The deals will open EMI's buyers, Unive...
LOS ANGELES -- EMI Group Ltd., the iconic British music company that is home to The Beatles, Coldplay and Katy Perry, is being split and sold for $4.1 billion. The deals will open EMI's buyers, Unive...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
11:15 AM on 12/04/2011
Consolidation, in some cases a healthy thing, has become an evil imposed upon the people as it ends market competition in a great many cases.

Moves such as this ARE moves toward monopolization, an aspect of the market every citizen should oppose unless it is removing market forces entirely, as with municipal water systems, for example.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whistlejackett
Hey stop doing that
08:22 AM on 11/14/2011
The price for music should be cut 50% across the board.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:47 PM on 11/13/2011
I was listening to Sgt. Pepper last night. Nothing since compares. Great job, Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alois SaintMartin
aloistmartinsequinox.blogspot.com
03:38 PM on 11/12/2011
Four Major Networks, Five or Six (?) Cable Channels, The Idea behind Cable T.V. was to be something like the Internet, and yet Federal Regulation of the www. Is just one Harsh Celebrity Review from Reality Television... Let Freedom Ring ? or The Sound of Silence !
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTroll
Prove your own claims. I'm not your intern.
11:26 AM on 11/12/2011
Oh, good, now Beatles CDs can come with Trojan horses too...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1dabut1
Power is not alluring to pure minds. Thomas Jeffer
01:25 AM on 11/13/2011
anybody that is a true beatle fan would not buy any beatle anything until the rights are sold to paul or ringo.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JoeTroll
Prove your own claims. I'm not your intern.
10:00 AM on 11/13/2011
LOL. Americans never think past their immediate wants.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:54 PM on 11/13/2011
The Beatles members lost the rights to much of their music back in the late 1960's. Michael Jackson outbid Paul for purchase of some of these rights back in the mid-1980's. I imagine the estate of MJ still ownes many of these rights. Paul's still a very, very rich guy, and he deserves it. Love that music!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigfrog
Eat more beans
09:01 AM on 11/12/2011
The business model for the music industry has changed. The only people who don't get this fact are the music business ceos. When considering these people are probably highly respected and qualified business professionals it's almost embarrassing to see them clinging to such outdated practices and only shows how little imagination they have.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:39 AM on 11/12/2011
"record label" sounds so 80s. In the age of the internet, distribution is free. The money should go directly to the artists, why do they need huge corporations nowadays?
Satirist1
All 4 d best in the best of all possible worlds
09:48 AM on 11/12/2011
Um... because a band can sold waaaaaay more product at Walmart, than on their pathetic little website?
12:20 PM on 11/12/2011
Really? I didn't know a band could "sold" anything at all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:34 PM on 11/12/2011
Indeed but on the 21st century they are selling on major websites like Amazon and itunes.

Who buys CDs anymore? Do you use CDs on your portable CD player LOL.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:54 PM on 11/13/2011
60's.
photo
laterthanyouthink
My snark font is: ON
07:19 AM on 11/12/2011
Oh, good. Let's create another "too big to fail" entity that is also "too big to be accountable" for the purpose of manipulating the market and milking the last monopolistic dollar out of a legacy business famous for making sure that the artists receive a negligible portion of the revenue from their talent. \

Damn right that is a run on sentence. I don't care.
frankieshoes1
lookitupyerdamnedself
07:33 AM on 11/12/2011
You can run on all day-this crap is out of control.
11:40 AM on 11/12/2011
You're cool. It's not a run-on sentence.
06:42 AM on 11/12/2011
B eware The Music Industrial Complex
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:26 AM on 11/12/2011
When you listen to what The Beatles produced and you hear the stuff today, it is like comparing Mozart with a dripping faucet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwb2013
REAL EYES REALIZE REAL LIES.
07:48 AM on 11/12/2011
indeed. and the moody blues, pink floyd, bob dylan, lenny cohen, led zepplin, etc.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rockinrod
"Those that I fight I do not hate."
08:55 AM on 11/12/2011
The Rolling Stones, Jimi Hendrix, The Who, Buffalo Springfield, Delta bluesmen, Chicago bluesmen, Janice, Donovan, T-Rex, the Doors, Jefferson Airplane, Spirit, Country Joe, Frank, Elvis, on and on and on and on and on....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bldr1bob
09:00 AM on 11/12/2011
When you guys talk like this I envision a bunch of grandpas sitting on the front porch talking about how everything was better when you were kids.............oh wait! That's me in the last chair..............
Satirist1
All 4 d best in the best of all possible worlds
09:50 AM on 11/12/2011
cough..when I was young sonny, everything was better.
Our three chord bands were way better than your three chord bands... and also... um....eh....I forgot what we talking about...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:39 PM on 11/12/2011
Not so...again, I am in two bands.....I don't like Beyonce or the rest of this American Idol garbage....nor do I think gaga-bieber-madonna are worth anything creatively....art is subjective....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madmac
05:03 AM on 11/12/2011
Time for both artists & music lovers to move away from the major music companies. The real music lies with Independents. If it's approved, then it's up to you and the artists to reject their garbage products. No more for Big Music.
photo
laterthanyouthink
My snark font is: ON
07:11 AM on 11/12/2011
Hear, Hear!

I also regret downgrading my expectations for quality sound quality as I send MP3 to my car radio with an FM adapter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
al leonard
07:12 AM on 11/12/2011
Sadly, the problem lies with distribution. Indie labels need the big label to distribute the final 'product'. Sure, Prince did do it but he already had a huge fan base before he split from his record contract.
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
03:08 AM on 11/12/2011
[ ARTICLE-Q'UOTE ] "Both deals are expected to be carefully reviewed in Europe, the U.S., Japan and Australia"
=========

WHY WOULD ANY REGULATORS BE CONCERNED?

We need to apply a high level of scrutiny when GIANT ENTERPRISEs MERGE TOGETHER, and become Super-Giants, who have the ability to harm economic entities through their ability to dominate their markets based on large market share.

THAT IS WHY THE US BROKE UP ATT / MA-BELL
AND ALSO
Why they also allowed them to merge back to some degree lately since, they do not overly dominate Verizon, Sprint, & etc.

These guys are splitting up
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fireslayer
02:48 AM on 11/12/2011
Freeing the Beatles catalog to McCartney control would be the ultimate. He has no hang up about Youtube access. We will still be haunted by the elevatorization of Beatles tunes, but we could see more of the money freed up per Sir Paul for the benefit of the world we live in. I say rescramble the eggs of Northern Songs and send more Beatles songs to shareware!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:27 AM on 11/12/2011
All royalties from sales of music of The Beatles music, movies, print media, etc. should go to living former members, spouses/children of former members. After that, they should probably be put toward a fund that benefits British culture, or possibly world culture. This never-ending copyright extension business is the opposite of the spirit of Beatles music.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
st0ked
pay teachers to teach first
01:55 AM on 11/12/2011
Send this to the edit room