iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Diabetes Test Could Utilize Tears To Measure Glucose Levels Instead Of Blood

New Diabetes Test Tears

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/11/2011 4:03 pm Updated: 01/11/2012 5:12 am

Good news for diabetics: The painful finger prick tests used to measure blood sugar might become a distant memory. Now researchers say tears could provide that same information.

Scientists at the University of Michigan developed a sensor that detected diluted levels of sugar in tears in animals, reports Fox News.

Published in the Journal of Analytical Chemistry, the researchers tested 12 rabbits and discovered the glucose level in tears correlated with the rabbits' blood sugar levels.

The University of Michigan research team is not alone. MSNBC reports Jeffrey LaBelle, a biomedical engineer at Arizona State University, has collaborated with the Mayo Clinic to develop tear glucose monitoring technology with a simple device. The aim is to produce a sensor you touch to the white of your eye. After five seconds, you then press into a device for a reading of your glucose levels.

Diabetes is a disease where people have too much sugar in their blood because of resistance to insulin or the inability to make insulin via the pancreas.

Some diabetics are required to take up to 10 finger prick tests per day to determine accurate blood sugar levels, so the new study provides hope for those looking for an alternative, accurate, bloodless and pain-free test.

If diabetics don't regularly monitor and control their blood sugar, complications from poor glycemic control may arise, notes Medical News Today. Diabetes is the leading cause of kidney failure, non-traumatic lower-limb amputations, and new cases of blindness among adults in the United States.

Scientists and engineers have long tried to find alternative solutions for diabetics.

"People have been trying to read glucose through skin, through measurements attached on the earlobe. There have been machines on the market that got taken off the market because of unreliability and poor reproducibility," said Dr. George Grunberger, who serves on the board of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, in an interview with Fox News.

According to the American Diabetes Association, some 25.8 million children and adults in the United States -- 8.3 percent of the population -- have diabetes. And with 79 million people pre-diabetic, there could be even more of a demand for other ways of measuring glucose levels.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

Good news for diabetics: The painful finger prick tests used to measure blood sugar might become a distant memory. Now researchers say tears could provide that same information. Scientists at the...
Good news for diabetics: The painful finger prick tests used to measure blood sugar might become a distant memory. Now researchers say tears could provide that same information. Scientists at the...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:06 PM on 11/13/2011
Promising development.
12:40 AM on 11/13/2011
wow it's new for me
as a doctor wanna be, i just know about blood glucose test for diabetic
:)

http://theonlinephotography.com
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
ConfuciusSay-
Aglets: their purpose is sinister.
12:55 AM on 12/05/2011
http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2010-08/mit-glucose-meter-checks-blood-sugar-levels-painless-ir-light

You might be more interested in this far more sensible development.
photo
dickn2000b
omnes autem stulti me
10:23 PM on 11/12/2011
Oh yeah..and why is this "Hope" for diaetics? The test is impractical. No one can cry on Que...except actors.
photo
dickn2000b
omnes autem stulti me
09:29 PM on 11/12/2011
Great... now all I need is someone to kick me in the nuts every time I want to measure my blood glucose level. That should produce a few tears.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
firewired
Compared to what?
08:07 PM on 11/12/2011
But how do your force the tears, and how often?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tlpfliger
old fart
08:45 PM on 11/12/2011
review your finances...
05:37 PM on 11/12/2011
maybe they could test for glaucoma, while they're at it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Womack
12:09 PM on 11/12/2011
Sounds good to me ,those finger pricks hurt!
01:24 AM on 11/13/2011
i test my urine by pissing on a urine strip you know the one that changes color
i dont have a sugar problem .i know bloodworks are better .
09:29 AM on 11/12/2011
This just more of the 'money grubbers' that have no intention of finding a cure but selling everyone technical junk.
photo
gregrob
I used to be concerned, but now I'm merely amused
01:18 AM on 11/12/2011
Unfortunately, the researchers found that the easiest way to promote tear production was to poke your finger with a needle...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Leslie Robinson Goldberg
Writer
12:52 AM on 11/12/2011
My husband, a Type 1 tests about 10 times a day. He says it doesn't bother him, it's not painful.
09:31 AM on 11/12/2011
the above is just more 'junk' from those who like to keep diabetics "on the hook" instead of a cure
gov111w
Truth-Justice-And the American way !
11:20 AM on 11/12/2011
His finger tip are mostly likely scared, as mine are...its is a small painful price to pay for control. I remember when you had to test your urine..that was very unrelible..with the blood test the control and life expectency for diabeticswent way up....I embrace every advance to fight d control this desease
12:39 AM on 11/12/2011
Just need to read the GOP post everyday, then you won't have to poke your eyes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roger Womack
12:11 PM on 11/12/2011
AND if you want to flow a river just listen to a Democrat !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ranveig Elvebakk
Innovator, author and lecturer on weight and nutri
04:33 PM on 11/11/2011
Better yet, no test, just new life as a well person If you are among the more then 90% of diabetics type, you can become well within months. True. www.FoodTreeMD.com
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:15 PM on 11/11/2011
You know, poking yourself in the eye just doesn't seem better than poking yourself in the finger.
photo
fusillijerry
Stand back. Try to move away slow.
05:48 PM on 11/11/2011
My thoughts exactly. When my blood sugar is low, sticking a foreign object in my eye is not an option.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Haig
02:39 PM on 11/12/2011
Co-sign.