iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Teachers, Facing Low Salaries, Moonlight In Second Jobs

CHRISTINE ARMARIO   11/11/11 10:47 AM ET  AP

MIAMI — By day, Wade Brosz teaches American history at an A-rated Florida middle school. By night, he is a personal trainer at 24 Hour Fitness.

Brosz took the three-night a week job at the gym after his teaching salary was frozen, summer school was reduced drastically, and the state bonus for board certified teachers was cut. He figures that he and his wife, also a teacher, are making about $20,000 less teaching than expected to, combined.

"The second job was to get back what was lost through cuts," said Brosz, a nationally board certified teacher. "It was tougher and tougher to make ends meet. I started personal training because it's flexible hours."

Second jobs are not a new phenomenon for teachers, who have historically been paid less than other professionals. In 1981, about 11 percent of teachers were moonlighting; the number has risen to about one in five today. They are bartenders, waitresses, tutors, school bus drivers and even lawnmowers.

Now, with the severe cuts many school districts have made, teachers like Brosz, who hadn't considered juggling a second job before, are searching the want ads. The number of public school teachers who reported holding a second job outside school increased slightly from 2003-04 to 2007-08. While there is no national data for more recent years, reports from individual states and districts indicate the number may have climbed further since the start of the recession.

In Texas, for example, the percentage of teachers who moonlight has increased from 22 percent in 1980 to 41 percent in 2010.

"It's the economy, primarily," said Sam Sullivan, a professor at Sam Houston State University, which conducts the survey.

Rita Haecker, president of the Texas State Teachers Association, said cuts in education have forced many teachers to take furlough days. It's an extra strain because, unlike in the past, many teachers are now the primary breadwinner, either because they are a single parent or their spouse is unemployed, Haecker said.

"It affects their morale in the classroom," she said. "The last thing we want is our teachers worried about how they are going to pay their bills."

The average salary for a public school teacher nationwide in the 2009-10 school year was $55,350, a figure that has remained relatively flat, after being adjusted for inflation, over the last two decades. Starting teacher salaries can be significantly lower; compared to college graduates in other professions, they earn more than $10,000 less when beginning their careers.

"I think people have felt the need to supplement their teaching salaries in order to have a middle class lifestyle," said Lawrence Mishel, president of the Economic Policy Institute, which published a study this year concluding the average weekly pay of teachers in 2010 was about 12 percent below that of workers with similar education and experience.

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, which collects data on student performance across the globe, advised the United States earlier this year to work at elevating the teaching profession in order to improve student performance. The recommendations included measures like raising the bar for who is selected to become a teacher, providing better training and better pay. In many nations where students outperform the U.S. in reading, math and science, including Japan and South Korea, teachers earn more than they do in the United States.

"International comparisons show that in the countries with the highest performance, teachers are typically paid better relative to others, education credentials are valued more, and a higher share of educational spending is devoted to instructional services than is the case in the United States," the OECD report concluded.

While moonlighting isn't unique to teachers, they do tend to have second or third jobs at a higher rate than other professionals. One researcher estimates their moonlighting rates may be four times higher than those of other full-time, college educated salaried workers.

Eleanor Blair Hilty, an education professor at Western Carolina University, said most teachers make around $5,000 through outside work. Yet when asked if they would quit if given a raise in the equivalent amount, most said no. Her conclusion: teachers are getting something more from their second job other than an extra paycheck.

"A lot of it has to do with what I think is wrong with the teaching profession," Hilty said, noting that teachers have little autonomy and control over what and how they teach. "They found their moonlighting jobs to be satisfying."

Policies on moonlighting vary by district; some have no written guidelines, while others merely advise teachers to ensure any outside work doesn't interfere with their duties at school.

In North Carolina, a survey conducted in 2007 found 72 percent of teachers moonlight, whether it's an after-school job or summer employment.

"There's a culture of silence," Hilty said. "Everybody knows that moonlighting goes on and they know it's part of what teachers do but nobody likes to talk about it very much."

Michelle Hartman, a language arts and science teacher at a Plantation, Fla., elementary school, is balancing two other jobs, one as an organist with the local Presbyterian church, playing at church services, weddings and funerals, and another doing janitorial work twice a week at her father's accounting firm.

The single mother has a master's degree in educational leadership and has been a teacher 15 years. But she says she cannot afford to leave any of her extra jobs, which she said brings in about $6,000 year, in addition to her $46,000 teaching salary.

"I'm tired some days," Hartman said. "But no matter what, it doesn't matter because I know I need to be there for the students."

Yet working an extra job inevitably does take a toll. On top of their work in the classroom, teachers have to grade papers and plan lessons – work they often do at home. One study on teachers who moonlight in Texas cited the case of a teacher who ended up grading papers at the restaurant where she worked. The same study found that all the teachers interviewed reported that moonlighting had a negative effect on their health. In the Texas survey, a majority said moonlighting was detrimental to their work in the classroom.

"Yes, they go 100 percent, but they're still tired," said Dave Henderson, a retired professor who worked on the study for many years.

Albert Ochoa, a middle school art and publications teacher in Austin, Texas, works at least five hours a night at UPS as a shipper, a job he's had since graduating from college in 1977. Even though he is now toward the higher end of the teacher salary schedule, he said he cannot afford to quit either job.

He said he'd have to earn another $2,000 a month in order to support his wife, who is on medical disability, and son, and not work a second job. "I've had opportunities to go work full time at UPS and do other things," Ochoa said. "But I enjoy what I do. I like teaching."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

Filed by Emmeline Zhao  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 598
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:28 AM on 01/03/2012
In Hawaii, a teacher with a BA and 15 years experience makes about $60,000, but the cost of living here is through the roof. This past year the $60k was reduced by a 5% pay cut, and medical premiums that increased by about 112%!!! Many teachers here are forced to get second and third jobs. How else could they survive?

Professional develpoment days as well as teacher work days are non-existent due to furloughs. On top of the pay cuts (furloughs) and the increase in medical premiums we have more work to do because of NCLB.

Do more with less, but the scores must continue to rise. They don't ask for much do they?

The whole time we get to hear how overpaid and spoiled we are, and what a lousy job we are doing.

NCLB has single handedly turned the teachers of this country into the bad guys. Everything wrong with education is because of the teachers, and the proof is the poor test scores. Not the poor parenting, the drug babies, or even the thousands of non-English speakers we have to deal with. None of that matters. We, the teachers, are the fall guys.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:58 AM on 01/04/2012
Please, PLEASE, tell me you're not a teacher!
10:04 AM on 12/06/2011
I am working as a substitute now, but I will be getting my certificate back soon after 10 years as a stay-at-home mom. Teachers don't go into it for the money. That would be crazy. But those who think we have shorter hours, throw holidays in our face, etc. have no idea what goes on. Teachers work 10 or more hours a day or more to get everything graded, do lesson plans, and prepare for the next day. We don't get lunches off, either. We have to remain at school and often have lunch duty. So what if we appear to get more paid days off than others?

Also, with the constant budget cuts, we spend more and more out of pocket for supplies, etc. Not just classroom supplies. With the economy the way it is, we have to keep notebook paper, pencils, pens, etc. on hand for our students to use to get their assignments done. Even as a substitute, I keep these things with me.

Teaching is an honorable profession. Those who talk down about it or insinuate that you are foolish to go into it because you won't be paid well are ignorant. And we do deserve to be paid more. We are providing the education for the adults of the future. In our classrooms sit future engineers, future lawyers, future doctors, future presidents, etc. Don't they deserve the best of the best teaching them?
07:29 AM on 11/15/2011
My wife taught English in Ukraine for 12 years. When she did her MS Ed in ESL at New York University she had to student teach public school students. She found that the horror tales that she had heard in Ukraine were no exaggeration. She did her training in adult ESL - no teenagers for her.

Teaching is a difficult job in the first place, particularly in this popular culture. The salary is not commensurate with the work required (when you include lesson planning, material acquisition and preparation, and grading) - particularly if you have alternative options, such as working in the STEM areas. With people trying to blame the teacher for the student's failings, there is little reason to go into teaching when other alternatives are available.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chipper1
10:31 PM on 11/14/2011
Isn't this a shameful state of affairs? Many teachers have as much education as doctors, engineers, dentists but are so little valued and poorly paid that they have to resort to moonlighting. Many Americans have such weird ideas about teachers and administrators, you'd think they never attended a school. Some people believe that college teachers are paid way more than public school teachers. Or that high school teachers are smarter than elementary teachers. Or that if you're a really good teacher you get promoted to administration, maybe even get to be a principal. I even had a relative ask me if you have to to college to be a teacher. Duh!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CunningStunts
01:11 AM on 11/14/2011
I wonder, how many of these moonlighting teachers (especially the younger, female ones) are making extra money doing something they would never want their schools, or students, to ever find out about?
11:04 PM on 11/13/2011
How much does Mr. Brosz, who was discussed first in the article, make? Is the need for a second job because he is living beyond his means? What kind of car does he drive, where does he vacation, and where does he live? The salaries discussed here seem low compared to those you see when you do some internet snooping and see what teachers make. Try a google search on "Wisconsin teacher salaries" or "Ohio teacher salaries" and you will slug the person who told you, "Don't become a teacher because teachers don't make much." The $80,000 teachers Rush Limbaugh mentions seem right in the ballpark with what county and state internet sites report.
09:07 AM on 11/14/2011
The first hit, on a google search for "teacher salaries" is http://www.teacherportal.com/teacher-salaries-by-state. It states: "Finding accurate beginning and average salaries for teachers by state is a tricky business. In our effort to build the most accurate list of teacher salaries by state, we have averaged the salary from multiple sources, including the National Education Association, job surveys, and private data analyses to create the Salary Comfort Index."

Starting salaries range from $24,872 to $35,829. Average salary is $34,709-$59,825. Both of those seem contrary to what you suggest.

I myself started at around $28K in 1994. I taught clarinet/saxophone lessons after school for the first 7 years of my career to supplement my income. I lived in a modest apartment, drove a small, used car and saved little, in favor of paying off college debt. I felt I was paid well for a new teacher, but I can't imagine how I would have fared making that same $28K today.
08:46 PM on 11/13/2011
In the Chicagoland area most suburban teachers in HS start at roughly 45-50k a year. They then receive automatic step raises and contractual raises which vary from district to district and once tenure is secured they will not be laid off for performance issues.

In Evanston District 2002 a 1st year BA teacher makes 51000 and a BA with 10 years makes 70K.
A first year MA gets 56K and a teachers with a Masters and 10 years experience is making 82K a year. An MA with 17 years is making 100k.

These types of salaries are very common in suburban Chicagoland and there are multiple districts with average teacher salaries over 90K a year. When we had our layoffs over the last 2-3 years the only people being let go were the untenured new hires. Didn't matter if some of them were outstanding or better then tenured staff. Simple FIFO. Tenured staff also had the opportunity to save new teachers in many cases if they renegotiated their contract but for the most part there was no solidarity and the newbies got the boot.

This is HS so it represents the top dollar for teachers. Middle school is generally 10-20% less and elementary is 20-30% less.

I do not see a pattern of very low salaries here in Illinois. A new teacher may struggle in their 20s for a few years but by and large an experienced teacher makes a living wage and then some.
photo
angelcakesinc
Silence is death
10:18 PM on 11/13/2011
You're talking about an affluent area. Of course teachers in a rich neighborhood are going to be well paid. That has nothing to do with the rest of the country.
10:47 PM on 11/13/2011
I disagree. This salary level schedule is only a bit higher than the the norm for any part of the country that is not rural and/or poor which happens to be where the majority of the US population lives. That makes it pertinent. As originally stated the majority of suburbs surrounding Chicago pay in the 40K-125K range for HS. This is quite common in any major city in America. City of Chicago teachers start at 50K and also enjoy average salaries of around 70-80K at 10 years out if they have a Masters but they do not top out as high as some of the more affluent suburban areas. Of course major hubs like Chicago, New York, LA, etc. will have higher salaries but if you live in a region where houses cost 400K vs 150K there should be a differential.

There are a lot of well paid teachers out there making 75K plus. That is my point and it is impossible to refute.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Aissatou Sunjata
Contrary, Insanity is NOT the new Black!
04:52 PM on 11/13/2011
Moonlighting is when you are doing something to earn extra money for something you would not ordinarily purchase or to supplement in order to do something more than your regular salary would allow due to being used for living expenses. This is an old observation as teachers have always worked in retail and any other place that will garner them money to continue to live and provide till school starts up again. Today, this is not moonlighting, it is surviving in the midst of wanting to educate the children of others in a day and age that hopefully just briefly teachers are being devalued. I pray for all those active teachers that this will pass like plus size cheetah spandex. Enjoy a wonderfully educating week ahead!
04:35 PM on 11/13/2011
Okay -- so here's a simple idea.

We'll increase your salary but from now on your pay your own benefits, get no further pension, and work 265 days a year. You put money away for retirement like a 401k. You get 7 days off for holidays and another 2 weeks in vacations but can earn up to 4 based on length of time.

For those of you who have already contributed to pensions -- your pension values as of today are converted to 401k and no further beneifts of this type are incurred to you. You lose all medical benefits except those that typical private sector worker has.

Ready to sign up?

What -- I'm being unfair -- that's what 90% of the private sector does and they pay your salary and benefits.

As I talk to people it's becoming clear that teachers should be paid more but that there back-end benefits need to be reduced. But teachers want the best of both worlds. They CHOSE to go into lower paying jobs to get better pension benefits. Now they are complaining about pay but they also don't want to give up their pensions.

Maybe they need to rethink their priorities and join the rest of us. Then again -- the unions will never go along so it's probably a whole bunch of nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raggedhand
05:33 PM on 11/13/2011
You're right. That's what my computer tech husband gets. I'm a teacher, so I understand what you are saying.

He also gets double time when he's required to work over 40 hours a week, and triple time when he works on holidays. (I don't. All of my extra hours are unpaid, even though they are required, not optional.)

When he's sent to training out the area, his expenses are paid and he gets a generous food and travel allowance. (I don't. When I'm sent to training that's required by my school district, I get minimal food and travel allowance and I"m required to share a room with a stranger. My district does not pay for the training itself. If it's not reimbursed by the state I have to pay for it out of my pocket.)

Any of his supplies and customer supplies are provided by his company. (Not me. I have to pay for my own teaching supplies such as tape, pens, copy paper, etc. I also pay for my own trade manuals, student supplies, classroom decorating supplies and supplies that are used for lessons. It comes to over $100 a month.)

He never brings home work. (Not me...sigh... I put in about two hours a night grading, researching and lesson planning.)
11:07 PM on 11/13/2011
How much is your food and travel allowance? Also, you didn't tell us what district you teach in and how much you actually make. (One state of Ohio worker first level supervisor gripes at me that he is limited to $15 per day for meals. He makes $165,000 per year. I think he can kick in a little for his meals.).
01:29 AM on 11/14/2011
sounds like your hasband has good gig -- but that's certaintly not the norm.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
raggedhand
05:48 PM on 11/13/2011
To continue....

My husband pays $250 a month for his health insurance. (Not me. I pay over $300 for the exact same insurance HMO at the same local hospital.)

He has a 401K that is employer matched at 3%. When he retires he'll get full Social Security on top of what he saves. (Not me. I pay $300 a month for Texas teacher retirement plan. After 20 years I'll be paid at 50% of my salary, or about $25K a year. I won't get any SSI because even though I've paid in to it, it's considered a windfall to collect both SSI and TRS. That's call the WEP offset and you can look that up. It's going to be tough to maintain my house in Cannes on 25K a year, but I'll try.)

My husband's 401K has the opportunity to grow (OK, stop giggling...I did say "opportunity"). (Not me. TRS retirement has not COLA and doesn't grow. What I retire with will be what I make when I'm 90, inflation be damned).

My husband can be fired or RIF'd at any time. (YES, ME TOO! Texas is a right to work state, like over half of the US, so no union protections for me. I'm on a 187 day contract and every year it's up for renewal. I can be fired one year away from retirement and that would just be too bad.)
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
09:32 PM on 11/13/2011
My friend was "not renewed" three years short of her rule of 90 full retirement.

She has renters in her house covering the mortgage, utilities and taxes. In a few years they'll buy it from her.

She sold almost everything she owned.

She's living in her Mother's basement, trying to stick it out until she qualifies for her retirement.

She has lost her healthcare.

She is currently on unemployment but will be applying for welfare and food stamps this week.

I've encouraged her to homestead her house, then declare bankruptcy.

This is the thanks she gets for dedicating her life to the education of other people's children. She is destitute and has lost a lifetime of earnings and everything she owns, except her cats.

And we're surprised our young college graduates don't want to become teachers.

Only a fool would choose teaching as a profession these days.
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
10:31 AM on 11/17/2011
HC says --

She can't "ask" for anything. IF she were hired (at 55 real likely) her salary would be determined by the school's salary "schedule" which is figured by the highest level of education she has added to the number of years experience she has. So, theoretically, she should receive a pretty good package. HOWEVER, that is precisely why she will NOT get hired now, because she is too expensive during these days of school budget cuts. Boards of education will pick a fresh college graduate with a BA and no years so they can pay them the lowest rate on the schedule.

Individual teachers cannot negotiate their salaries. The logic is that, with salaries already so low but jobs tight, if individuals could negotiate their own salaries, the pay would get so low that other teachers would be harmed with pay cuts and the school/students hurt because fewer competent, dedicated and skilled teachers would seek those positions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
billtmore
Must read..Bush on the Couch
03:05 PM on 11/13/2011
Anyone who has not been there should remember, you are always "ON" It is physically, emotionally and mentally draining By the end of your shorter day you are so fried......
11:11 PM on 11/13/2011
A teacher is not "on" during a period they are not teaching, and teachers do not teach every period. Are you telling me accountants and engineers and lawyers are not always "on"?
01:49 PM on 11/14/2011
you really have no idea, do you? When teachers aren't actually teaching, they may well be herding kids around in lunchrooms or watching to make sure a fight doesn't break out in recess.

Add in all the "other" activities, like coaching and so on, and it's quite common for teachers to be on all the time.
photo
dakotawoman
I dreamed I saw Joe Hill. . .old time Progressive
10:57 AM on 11/17/2011
I just love it when people who went to school think they know what teaching is like because they watched others teach. Or, as you claim, run down students on the way to the parking lot at the last bell. That might be what you saw. But, did you ever think that maybe they were in a hurry then because they very likely would return later to coach a sport or activity, take tickets at a game, have play rehearsal, ride the pep bus (and endure the screaming) until 10:00 that night, among the many other extracurricular duties teachers have? Or that maybe they had to get to that second job they needed to help pay off their college loans?

As the majority of dedicated teachers will attest -- you don't know and can't know.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dede Eagleburger
Beauty is in the eye of the makeup brush holder
09:36 AM on 11/14/2011
i know...that's how I feel when that final bell finally rings...
photo
NJBill
I didn't build that!
07:32 PM on 11/12/2011
Teachers are teachers by CHOICE. No one is forcing them into this career. The GOOD teachers are the ones that love their job and love children. A higher salary is not going to make them a better teacher. They work about 185 days a year (kids go to school 180 but they work about 5 extra days) MOST people work 251 days (5 days/wk with 2 weeks vacation), and MANY work 303 (6 days a week, 2 weeks vacation- using the average that HP mentioned, that's the equivalent of a 6 day worker making almost $91,000/yr or a regular worker making about $75,000/yr. And let's not forget, teachers have shorter DAYS... Not too shabby.
If I'm missing something here, let me know, but this is how I see it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calamityjohn
08:44 PM on 11/12/2011
A higher salary is not going to make them a better teacher. .. but yet you could say that about many highly payed caring professionals in other higher payed fields/
04:36 PM on 11/13/2011
true -- but they made a decision about their career and I would say the same thing to them if they complained about their compensation.
06:35 PM on 11/13/2011
And unless you believe liberals, more welfare money won't make parents do their job any better either.
09:14 PM on 11/12/2011
Why do you think teachers work shorter days? Once the students leave, there is a lot to do to get ready for the next day. I often work a nine hour day at school with time at home grading papers/planning lessons as well. On top of that, there are meetings, conferences with parents, making copies, cleaning up the room, etc. that all need to be done. The problem is that the general public assumes that we come when the students come and leave when the students leave, and that's not accurate.
photo
NJBill
I didn't build that!
09:21 PM on 11/12/2011
There are MANY jobs that have people take home work with them. Many jobs that you only SEE the person working X amount of hours, but they are doing a LOT more behind the scenes, not just teachers.
04:38 PM on 11/13/2011
I love teachers but they are clueless about the amount of work many private sector people do. The typical worker that actually wants to keep a job in this economy is pushing 50-60 hours. Employers are getting away with it. So honestly -- stop complaining and be happy you have a job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:32 PM on 11/12/2011
"International comparisons show that in the countries with the highest performance, teachers are typically paid better relative to others, education credentials are valued more, and a higher share of educational spending is devoted to instructional services than is the case in the United States," the OECD report concluded.

The only thing I can conclude from this is that our country doesn't WANT to have an educated populace.
Tara Hunkoff
I could have been Sheila Noyeau
08:56 PM on 11/12/2011
I agree with your conclusion, and I am dismayed.
09:45 PM on 11/12/2011
It's a sad state of affairs. They have no idea...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
04:05 PM on 11/12/2011
I realize that teachers don't go into the profession because they are in it for the money. They do it, because they want to make a difference for the better in this world we live in.

But how sad is it, that in this supposedly great country we live in, that a professional has to take another job, because they can't survive on what they make.

Yeah I understand the economy is bad and all that, but even when the economy wasn't there were teachers out there taking 2nd jobs.
11:21 PM on 11/13/2011
Please state a dollar amount you are referring to as rendering one unable to survive. How do you know he isn't a little wild-eyed with what he wants. In Connecticut, people were saddened to hear a brand new teacher, just graduated and starting her first year of teaching, was killed in an automobile. The NEW AUDI she just bought was totalled, the dealer said. Is buying an Audi as your first job straight out of college typical? Is an Audi necessaty to survive?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mr Anonymous
Mumpsimus, I am not entertained!
09:27 AM on 11/14/2011
You have a link to that?
How do you know she isn't from a family with money and it wasn't a graduation gift?
Did she buy it or is making payments?
Was it really a NEW AUDI or a 1 or 2 year old NEEW TO HER AUDI?
Since when do reporters talk to car salesmen about specific car accidents?
02:12 PM on 11/12/2011
I retired from teaching in 2007 after spending a life time teaching in an inner city high school. I know that teaching is really 24/7. If teachers have to moonlight to make ends meet, in one way or other, students are getting short-changed.

The problem is not teachers. It's the public's attitudes toward them. The public should be thankful that some young people still want to go into teaching. I certainly would not recommend the teaching professions to any of my former students.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:48 AM on 11/13/2011
mnyegele:

I retired in 2009 after 44 years of teaching. I absolutely loved teaching. But because of attitudes of those such as NJBill, I actually discouraged my students from going into teaching. The low pay, long hours, and endless duties I could live with, but the total disrespect shown on the part of much of the public, I would not ask anyone to endure.
11:22 PM on 11/13/2011
How much did you make? What is your retirement package like? How much are your health care insurance payments?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:03 AM on 11/14/2011
HC says

You weren't adressing me, but: In Texas retired teachers use Medicare as their primary insurance coverage. The teachers themselves pay 100% of the premiums.
photo
captainindustry
then that will be my story.
02:00 PM on 11/12/2011
How could a MASTER'S degree in Education ever ever help you teach children or young adults?

Outside of giving you a more inflated image of yourself than you already have??? Or grubbing out more money? Or getting promoted??

A Masters in your subject area would make sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Julien Henry
04:57 PM on 11/12/2011
With all due respect- there are so many teachers with a Master's degree in their corresponding pedagogical content area.......In other subjects areas, the Masters degree, coupled with education classes, gives them the ability to to understand the process for development of curriculum and better teaching practices due to the cognitive calculus of young adults...Hope this helps you buddy.....
photo
captainindustry
then that will be my story.
09:57 PM on 11/12/2011
"so many"

Wow.. You certainly won THIS argument. But you got to say cognitive calculus.

Next time, try and drop a "paradigm shift" in there.

Let me guess. You have a master's in education. Phoenix was it?
05:56 PM on 11/12/2011
I have two Bachelors degrees, in History and Geography, a Masters in History and a good chunk of a PhD in History. I also hold Masters in Curriculum Development and Design and Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. That being said, I do agree that an actual degree in one's subject matter is invaluable.
photo
captainindustry
then that will be my story.
10:01 PM on 11/12/2011
Congrats!! Very impressive.