More

Vaccine Shows Promise At Halting Spread Of Breast, Ovarian Cancers

Breast Ovarian Cancer Vaccine

The Huffington Post   Posted: 11/11/11 12:12 PM ET

A new vaccine has proved promising at halting the spread of metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, according to a new, small study.

The poxviral vaccine seemed to be effective at completely ridding one person involved in the study of cancer, WebMD reported.

"In January, it will be four years [for her]," study researcher Dr. James Gulley, of the National Cancer Institute, told WebMD.

However, the vaccine wasn't as overwhelmingly successful in the other 25 patients -- for some of those people, the vaccine seemed to extend the amount of time before the cancer progressed by a few months, WebMD noted.

The Los Angeles Times reported that the vaccine was given monthly to the women (12 of whom have breast cancer, and 14 of whom have ovarian cancer).

The Clinical Cancer Research study was small, and didn't compare the results of the vaccine with what would have happened if women didn't have any treatment, the LA Times pointed out.

But still, the results are promising, especially in the woman whose cancer seemed to go away after receiving the vaccine, TIME reported.

TIME explained:

One woman with breast cancer who had already undergone a lumpectomy, radiation, chemotherapy and a hysterectomy that included removal of her ovaries showed a complete response to the vaccine; after three years, tumors that had spread to her lymph nodes had regressed. "We don't need a control group to say [these results] are a good thing," says Gulley. "We don't see this in breast cancer. We don't see tumors spontaneously going away."

When breast cancer spreads, it's most likely to spread to the lungs, liver and bones, according to the National Cancer Institute. And when ovarian cancer spreads, it's most likely to spread to the peritoneum (a membrane that lines the wall of our abdomen), liver and lungs.

Metastatic cancer is notoriously hard to treat -- the National Cancer Institute explains why:

Although some types of metastatic cancer can be cured with current treatments, most cannot. Nevertheless, treatments are available for all patients with metastatic cancer. In general, the primary goal of these treatments is to control the growth of the cancer or to relieve symptoms caused by it. In some cases, metastatic cancer treatments may help prolong life. However, most people who die of cancer die of metastatic disease.

Recently, researchers from the University of Pennsylvania have found that a leukemia treatment seems to be extra-effective at destroying leukemia cells in three patients who have the disease.

And this summer, researchers from Leeds University developed a vaccine that seems to be effective at shrinking prostate cancer tumors in mice. That study, published in the journal Nature Medicine, suggests that the method could be used on other cancers, too, Reuters reported.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

A new vaccine has proved promising at halting the spread of metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, according to a new, small study. The poxviral vaccine seemed to be effective at completely riddin...
A new vaccine has proved promising at halting the spread of metastatic breast and ovarian cancers, according to a new, small study. The poxviral vaccine seemed to be effective at completely riddin...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 42
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
11:53 PM on 11/13/2011
Here are some safe therapies that are likely more effective for breast cancer:

Vitamin D
Coenzyme Q10
Iodine
Vitamin C
Vitamin K2
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ddanimal
11:52 PM on 11/13/2011
Lets see, this was an uncontrolled study with lame results. Why is this news?

Vitamin C has been shown to be much more effective than this vaccine nonsense, in a controlled study.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:09 PM on 11/14/2011
It's a Phase I study. They're usually not controlled.

But I agree that it's not really news yet.
01:16 PM on 11/13/2011
I like how this is being reported as a "success." one person was helped and in a few of 25 people there was slowed progression. Even these results may have been due to other factors. The recent study that showed HPV vaccine "preventing" heart disease in women was very suspect, even according to a McGill oncological epidemiologist. It seems they 'forgot' to take into consideration factors like married VS unmarried, never mind that the samples.reported an unusually high % of HPV infection for the age group (according to same doc who felt the study was a bust). I also want to point out that when one person out of x number suffers a vaccine reaction (yes including encephalopathy resulting in autism) they are left to hang in the wind- not even compensated half the time in "vaccine court." look at the derision MS sufferers have to deal with re. Zamboni treatment. Pharma is happier if you keep using their meds/treatments.
09:43 PM on 11/12/2011
Amazing news. I really believe we are, at long last, within 10 years of several serious breakthrough cancer treatments. People have been saying as much for 60 years, but I'm really convinced this time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VanTroi
10:29 AM on 11/12/2011
Oh great another vaccine to shove down our throats. How long till its mandatory for babies? Ugh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No death panels
There's no man with a trumpet. Only me.
04:33 PM on 11/12/2011
pssstt...ya might wanna read the article...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:35 PM on 11/12/2011
This vaccine, and others like it, offers hope for people with terminal diseases. How dare you scoff at it?
04:35 PM on 11/19/2011
Again, the false premise that a person will die if they do not get this vaccine.Nothing more than uneducated fearmongering.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
09:15 PM on 11/11/2011
My feeling is that most if not all of these sorts of immunotherapies (whether passive or active) are going to be most useful when combined with other therapies, and certainly with earlier stages of disease. It's tough for any sort of immune response to keep up once metastatic disease has set in.
07:35 PM on 11/11/2011
Interesting article, but can I point out that we already have strong dietary options to address the development and spread of breast cancer?

http://nutritionfacts.org/videos/soy-breast-cancer-3/
http://nutritionfacts.org/videos/soy-breast-cancer-survival/
http://nutritionfacts.org/videos/cancer-prevention-and-treatment-may-be-the-same-thing/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No death panels
There's no man with a trumpet. Only me.
08:24 PM on 11/11/2011
Soy hasn't been proven to fight breast cancer. Those video links are by a GP named Michael Greger. His blog's soy/breast cancer update http://nutritionfacts.org/blog/2011/08/29/soy-and-breast-cancer-an-update/ references a soy study
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21742946 that looked at estrogen levels in nipple aspirate fluid and serum with either a high or low soy diet. " CONCLUSION: Soy foods in amounts consumed by Asians did not significantly modify estrogen levels in NAF and serum."
So he's referencing a NEGATIVE soy study to support his position. This means either he's a fool or he's lying-either way I wouldn't take advise from him.
09:16 PM on 11/11/2011
What Dr. Greger said about the study was accurate: "researchers found a trend towards lower estrogen levels". The actual study said "the trend points toward lower [estrogen] levels during the high-soy diet".

In terms of soy food intake and breast cancer survival we didn’t really have a clue until 2009 when the LACE study, Life After Cancer Epidemiology, came out. About 2000 California breast cancer survivors followed for 9 years. Postmenopausal women who got the most of this soy isoflavone in their diet had the lowest rate of breast cancer recurrence.

Then came the famous Journal of the American Medical Association study, the biggest yet, 5000 breast cancer survivors. “Conclusion: Among women with breast cancer, soy food consumption was significantly associated with decreased risk of death and recurrence.” Now this isn’t taking soy isoflavone supplements, this was actually eating soy foods. “the potential benefits are confined to soy foods, and inferences should not be made about the risks or benefits of soy-containing dietary supplements. Patients with breast cancer can be assured that enjoying a soy latte or indulging in pad thai with tofu causes no harm and, when consumed in plentiful amounts, may reduce risk of disease recurrence.”

And then finally, May 2011: Soy Food Consumption and Breast Cancer Prognosis. A third study, and soy is three for three. As isoflavone intake increased, risk of death decreased.

What more do we need to know?
01:49 PM on 11/11/2011
These vaccines are more likely to give you some kind of cancer or disease than to help you. Sheeple go ahead and line up. They are going to help you to an early grave. Depopulation at its best.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No death panels
There's no man with a trumpet. Only me.
04:01 PM on 11/11/2011
Hey Einstein, the patients all had terminal cancer-that's what made them eligible for the study. Anti-vaxxers are much more like sheep.
12:16 AM on 11/12/2011
We will see sheeple.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
sabelmouse
my micro bio is emty
06:38 AM on 11/12/2011
i don't think your last sentence is at all true. most people i know don't even stop to think for a second before the have their children vaccinated.
most '' anty vaxers '' try to inform themselves and think things through. you may not agree with them but to call them sheeple ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
09:13 PM on 11/11/2011
Are you implying that people with metastatic breast cancer should be more worried about OTHER cancers and diseases than their metastatic disease?

That makes no sense.
12:17 AM on 11/12/2011
Only to the uneducated.