iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

'60 Minutes' Hit On Boehner, Pelosi Falls Short

First Posted: 11/14/11 10:05 AM ET Updated: 11/14/11 04:59 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- A "60 Minutes" investigation of stock trading by members of Congress singled out House Speaker John Boehner and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi as having personally profited from investments into companies whose interests were before Congress. The investigation makes a strong case that members of Congress have the ability to profit in the market from non-public information, but in the cases of Boehner and Pelosi the claims made by "60 Minutes" fall short under scrutiny.

Honest graft, as "60 Minutes" calls it, is a serious problem in Washington, with a massive industry called "political intelligence" devoted to digging up inside regulatory and congressional information so traders and companies can take advantage of it.

But by swinging and missing at Boehner and Pelosi, "60 Minutes" undermined its case.

The CBS News program flagged Boehner (R-Ohio) for buying health insurance stocks shortly before the public health insurance option was killed as part of health care reform. Boehner, of course, strongly opposed the public option as a matter of ideology, as did the entire House GOP.

The public option wasn't killed by Boehner, who had no real power in the previous Congress; it was done in by Blue Dog Democrats and a White House that didn't push for it. The public option returned from the dead repeatedly before finally being laid to rest -- and there's no reason to think that Boehner had any better insight into what was happening within the House Democratic caucus than anybody else reading news reports at the time.

And as Boehner says in the "60 Minutes" segment, the trade was decided upon and carried out by Boehner's longtime broker without any input from him. In context, it seems even less suspicious: Around the same time, Boehner broker purchased a range of other blue chip stocks, not just health care companies, a defense that a Boehner spokesman reiterated to the Huffington Post.

"The idea that the Republican Leader in the House opposed the 'public option' -- policy favored by the left of the left -- for personal profit is, frankly, stupid," a GOP aide, who didn't want to be quoted criticizing CBS, said.

Similarly, the knock on Pelosi (D-Calif.) leaves out critical details. "60 Minutes" charges Pelosi with purchasing 5,000 shares of Visa stock as part of an exclusive initial public offering and implies that her financial connection to the credit card industry had something to do with the halting of credit card industry reform.

"Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her husband have participated in at least eight IPOs. One of those came in 2008, from Visa, just as a troublesome piece of legislation that would have hurt credit card companies began making its way through the House. Undisturbed by a potential conflict of interest, the Pelosis purchased 5,000 shares of Visa at the initial price of 44 dollars. Two days later it was trading at $64. The credit card legislation never made it to the floor of the House," CBS reports.

But CBS leaves out that fact that the bill passed out of committee at the very end of the legislative session, as Congress was dealing with the Wall Street implosion and bailout, and that the chamber then adjourned until the election. More importantly, Democrats didn't have the votes for it in the Senate and the notion that President Bush would have signed it if they did is far-fetched.

CBS goes on to report: "Congresswoman Pelosi pointed out that the tough credit card legislation eventually passed, but it was two years later and was initiated in the Senate."

The implication is, apparently, that the Senate forced Pelosi's hand. Throughout 2009 and 2010, the House consistently passed stronger and more progressive legislation than the Senate, but in the scenario laid down by CBS, it was the other way around when it came to credit card reform. But in 2008, before the stock transaction, the House had already passed the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights over the objections of industry lobbyists.

"Tonight's report failed to note that the legislation in question in this story was reported out of the Judiciary Committee on October 3, 2008 -- the day the House was consumed in passing TARP and also the last day the House was in session before the November election," Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said. "It failed to note than in September 2008, the House passed the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights. In the next Congress, the House and Senate passed and President Obama signed the Credit Cardholders' Bill of Rights and the Dodd-Frank legislation, which included a stronger, more direct approach to addressing swipe fees."

Pelosi's office also noted that there was no preferential treatment. Her husband purchased the shares, participating in the largest IPO in history, which raised $17.9 billion. He continued to buy shares on the open market as the price continued to rise.

Operatives on both sides of the aisle, meanwhile, pointed out to The Huffington Post that Majority Leader Cantor (R-Va.) had dodged the "60 Minutes" bullet. The segment did not mention Cantor, who made several trades in 2005 that have come under scrutiny.

In March 2005, he bought stock in Merck and Encore Medical Corporation. In July, the GOP House passed medical liability reform, which Democrats at the time charged was a gift to Merck, which was under fire for its drug Vioxx, as well as other device makers.

CBS may have pulled its punch because producers worried about access: "60 Minutes" is working on a profile of the Virginia Republican and was with him over the past weekend, and Lesley Stahl will visit him Monday on the Hill, according to a source familiar with the arrangements.

CBS did not respond to requests for comment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A "60 Minutes" investigation of stock trading by members of Congress singled out House Speaker John Boehner and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi as having personally profited from investments...
WASHINGTON -- A "60 Minutes" investigation of stock trading by members of Congress singled out House Speaker John Boehner and former Speaker Nancy Pelosi as having personally profited from investments...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,096
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (91 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
supergenius02 01:31 PM on 11/14/2011
The 60 Minutes piece was destined to fall short. No journalist is going to stop the Congressional money machine which has turned a great many members of Congress into millionaires and made the rich even richer. People blamed Bush for the housing crisis but the reality is that the #1 asset held by members of Congress was real estate and Congress made no serious efforts to reform the system be it Democrat or  Read More...
01:28 AM on 03/07/2012
I love love love Charlotte Olympia shoes. Her designs are very modern with the exaggerated platform, funky, fun, sexy, loud and so much more. And I think it is so cute her logo is of a gold tone spider web under her shoe. Some favorites below.http://www.charlotteolympiaoutlet.com
01:47 PM on 12/30/2011
This article reeks of Congressional apologetics. How much HuffPo stock is Congress buying nowadays??

The simple truth is that the fact that taxpayer-funded legislators are allowed to own ANY stock is a criminal conflict of interest. You couldnt create a more corrupt relationship if you tried. The only investments Congress should be allowed to make are in government-issued bonds, that way they will have a vested interest in passing laws that keeps America healthy and which protect its credit rating.
01:34 PM on 12/30/2011
Sixty Minutes should have reported about the vast sums "earned" through insider trading of Tenet Healthcare stock by Jeb Bush and Bob Kerrey. Tenet was fined nearly a Billion Dollars for defrauding Medicare out of tens of billions from 1998 through 2002. It's resposne was to move corporate headquaretsr to dallas Texas, and to add Jeb Bush and Bob Kerrey to its Board of Directors. Since then, these two scallywags have "earned" hundreds of thosuands through stock options. I'm positive these two are not alone. This is all public information but nobody seems to care.
08:47 AM on 12/28/2011
Its time that all senators, members of the house of Represenatives, senior members of the executive branch, and others in goverment that can effect policy in a significant way put ALL of their assets into a blind trust, just as President Obama and other Presidents have been required to do for many years."Avoid the appearance of evil"
01:36 PM on 12/23/2011
Boehner certainly wasn't a supporter of the public option, either: he as well as the rest of his Republican co-workers were dead-set against it from the beginning all the way til the bitter end (despite it being introduced by one of their own in the 90s). I'm always going to be dubious of any report that calls 60 Minutes' journalistic integrity into question: of all the evening news reports, theirs is the most informative and authentic.

Bottom line, politicians shouldn't be able to play the stock market, period: their ability to influence public policy (which greatly affects the market) is a clear conflict of interest. At the very least, congresspeople should be limited to only investing in companies where they are not currently influencing policy (I don't even know if that could be enforced, honestly). Corporate money has been eating away at our government for decades now: it's time to go into rehab.
photo
domnogin
Nemesis of Bush #41 & #43, waiting for George III.
11:08 AM on 12/20/2011
http://domnogin.blogspot.com This is a @60Minutes trap whenever Steve Kroft tries to talk about the stock market. @Mark_Cuban had to explain to Kroft why he set a protective put on his Yahoo stock; not out of fear, but as a normal precaution! Someone please give him a book on finance or a course from Rich Dad Stocks. Maybe if he watched the 10/19/1987 NIGHTLINE Muppet special; the real game here is the need to replace pay-to-play politics with public finance where every candidate gets $1/voter each in the primary and in the general election and no personal contributions.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
RumiSouth
Caerbannog!
10:50 AM on 12/14/2011
"and a White House that didn't push for it" OH COME ON RYAN. By my count, the public option "died" at least seven times in House committees, a Senate committee, the Senate bill, the conference committee, the Senate again, and then the House. Which "death" was the one where the White House didn't want it enough?

This mythology has been debunked again and again (see http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/obama-never-secretly-killed-the-public-option-its-a-myth/2011/11/17/gIQAZQt0UN_blog.html for just one example) but it has taken on a life of its own, like Obama's birth certificate, and become a persistent pestilence on the conversation.

There's plenty to criticize about the president, but we have to at least be TRUTHFUL -- because we're NOT teabagging wingnuts, we're fact-based liberals. Right?
09:06 AM on 12/14/2011
Did you see the look on Pelosi's face when she was confronted? Pelosi, you are a self serving pig!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kim BEE
06:13 PM on 12/10/2011
I don't believe this fell "short"......hats off to CBS for its exposure to the problem....

Lets pray Congress has the backbone to pass legislation making it illegal.
06:20 PM on 12/07/2011
Are we so divided politically as a country that some people are actually posting comments in support of a dem or republican as if this practice isn't legal political corruption.people are actually attacking Croft and 60 minutes?Wake up people!
02:52 AM on 12/06/2011
This is a not-that-broad brush stroke that further clarifies the picture of America's mess: political self-service and hypocrisy. Let's cool the rhetoric among ourselves and let our votes do the talking.
10:27 PM on 11/27/2011
Ninety days must be a joke. This act covers Stock as well as Commodities markets. We could be in a drought when the trade is made, by the time 90 days has past the new harvest can already been in and sold. The reporting of securities transactions should reveal to the public, hidden information that is happening now. Not some historical record of events gone past. Disclosure of confidential legislative information should be at least as timely, as confidential corporate information.

Why not consider the bill on par with corporate and hedge fund insiders reporting periods, perhaps with an amount higher than one thousand dollars. An article in the Wall Street Journal suggested $5,000.00 reported in five days. Brian Baird who originated the bill said, “Really it should be 48 hours.” I tend to think trades above $5,000.00 reported with in 48 hours after the transaction might be a useful compromise.
02:30 PM on 11/25/2011
Steve Kroft is right wing zealot funded by Karl Rove

How dare he accuse Nancy Pelosi ? She is the most honest law maker who serves the people
06:42 PM on 12/12/2011
Ha ha that's funny, ROFLMAO! Er...you are joking, right?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rgray222
03:09 PM on 11/23/2011
One really has to ask how Nancy Pelosi can participate "8" IPO's in the same year. Many people that I know regularly attempt to participate in IPOs and it is virtually impossible to get in on these offering. I guess when you are part of the 1% like Pelosi doors open that are closed to the rest of us!
06:45 PM on 12/12/2011
Batface Pelosi is absolutely the most corrupt politician I have ever seen. I wish she would hang herself.
11:30 PM on 11/21/2011
The 60 minute report did leave out the Madoff-Pelosi connection:
http://www.thegopnet.com/nancy-pelosi-hot-investment-adviser-95956