More

Airline Travelers Say TSA Screening Still A Hassle 10 Years After 9/11

Tsa

Posted: 11/15/11 08:20 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- The majority of air travelers think the Transportation Security Administration is moving in the right direction with it's efforts to streamline security screening, according to a new travel industry survey. Still, most passengers say the efforts haven't translated to reduced time or hassle at the nation's airport checkpoints.

"Travelers are appreciative of some of the steps TSA is taking, but by no means content with the security screening process," said Geoff Freeman, vice president of the U.S. Travel Association, which provided The Huffington Post with its new survey ahead of a planned Wednesday release.

"It's a sign of how low the bar is set that we celebrate when 5-year-olds can keep their shoes on" at an airport checkpoint, Freeman added.

The U.S. Travel Association survey, timed to coincide with the 10-year anniversary of TSA's creation as well as the start of the busy holiday travel season, found most air travelers believe TSA is on the "right track" with its recent efforts to streamline security.

By a wide margin, those polled welcomed TSA policy changes that would largely halt pat-downs for children 12 and under, phase out the requirement to remove shoes, implement a trusted traveler program called PreCheck and install new software in full-body scanning machines to enhance privacy. On Monday, the European Union banned the use of full-body x-ray scanners in European airports over public health and safety concerns.

Half said the new initiatives would make them likely to take up to six more trips a year, an indication of how onerous and inefficient security screening may be dampening the demand for air travel.

But despite the new initiatives, a majority said they saw no improvements in checkpoint operations compared to a year ago. And of the five most cited frustrations of flying involved TSA passenger screening, four involved airport security. Those complaints included the wait time at checkpoints, the need to take off belts, jackets and shoes, and the attitudes of TSA employees.

But one complaint, the sheer number of carry-ons now going through airport security, may be less of an issue with TSA, and more of a frustration with the recently introduced luggage fees implemented by many major airlines.

The number of carry-on bags has soared 50 percent since airlines began charging fees for checked luggage in 2008, according to TSA statistics. Eighty-seven million more carry-ons were brought on planes in fiscal year 2011 than in fiscal 2010. Fifty-nine million more carry-ons were brought on planes that year compared to 2009. The increase has led to longer lines at checkpoints and strained TSA resources.

U.S. Travel has urged airlines to allow passengers to check one bag at no additional cost in an effort to reduce the bottleneck at checkpoints. But the prospects of that happening are slim given the billions that the fees have added to airlines' bottom line.

"The number of bags brought to the checkpoint may affect passenger wait times," TSA spokesman Greg Soule told HuffPost. But, he said, it wouldn't affect "the level of security we provide, which remains our priority."

"We continue to use the resources we have to provide the best security possible, in the most efficient way," he added.

Despite the annoyances, two thirds of air travelers said they were satisfied with the TSA's overall performance in providing security at the nation's airports. Just 12.5 percent said they were somewhat or very dissatisfied.

There was less satisfaction among frequent air travelers, though. Only 55 percent in that group said they were satisfied with the TSA's performance, compared to 68 percent of less-frequent travelers. And nearly three times as many frequent flyers were dissatisfied than occasional travelers.

The travel group survey was based on responses from 4,397 people and interviews with 604 people who traveled in the last year. It has a margin of error of 4 percent.

The U.S. Travel Association plans to release its report on Wednesday, the same day Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), a leading critic of the TSA, is expected to release a scathing report card called “A Decade Later: A Call for TSA Reform."

Mica, the chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, has no jurisdiction over the TSA, but that hasn't stopped him from pushing for the dismantling of the agency and transferring its responsibilities to private contractors. He's expected to use his new report to further pummel TSA, a behemoth agency that has grown to more than 60,000 employees -- most of them working as security screeners in airports.

For Freeman, the main concern is how to lower the level of frustration among the flying public.

"The big take-away here is that this security process is still not up to par in the minds of travelers," he said. "There still is great room for improvement."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TRAVEL

WASHINGTON -- The majority of air travelers think the Transportation Security Administration is moving in the right direction with it's efforts to streamline security screening, according to a new tra...
WASHINGTON -- The majority of air travelers think the Transportation Security Administration is moving in the right direction with it's efforts to streamline security screening, according to a new tra...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
07:02 AM on 01/03/2012
:Unfortunately, many of the TSA agents are dishonest. Many of my friends have had items stolen out of their checked baggage. I understand the airlines have millions in claims for missing items. The government should have severe penalties for these thieves.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
09:34 PM on 11/16/2011
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/02/tsa-transportation-security-administration-carry-on-luggage_n_1071430.html

See this link for why the security needs to be a hassle.
08:46 PM on 11/16/2011
TSA has been nothing more than a jobs program for the chronically unemployed. We are just lucky that terrorists haven’t attempted another attack, it would have surely succeeded.

While they focus on groping passenger groins and digitally strip searching them, they allow 60% of cargo in the hold to go unchecked. They also remain oblivious to the glaringly risk of a ground based attack on arriving and departing aircraft using little more than a high powered rifle.

Airport workers routinely enter the secure area with nothing more than a glance moving tubs of goods that are never inspected. Add to that the four screeners arrested this year for smuggling contraband through security. In each instance, the contraband was drugs, but could have as easily contained explosives.

The potential sources of attack are virtually infinite and it is impossible for any agency to physically guard every possible venue. TSA may the least qualified agency of all for the real task at hand. The only way to effectively intercept these plots is through intelligence, which is vastly beyond the capability of anyone employed by this agency and rightfully the realm of the FBI, NSA and CIA.

This agency has been hopelessly mismanaged and staffed by incompetent managers whose only demonstrated skills are fear mongering and misrepresenting their policies to Congress. The best way to assure airline safety and improve the travel experience is to dismantle TSA and replace it with private screening firms who have incentive to operate efficiently.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montemalone
oenophile, aquarist, francophone, radical moderate
11:08 AM on 11/16/2011
Why don't airlines charge for EVERY bag, checked or carried? The additional weight and resulting fuel consumption is the same if the bag is in the cabin or the hold.
Of course, you can't lock your luggage, so anything valuable won't make it to where you're going. Funny, pay them to rifle through your bags and steal your camera, or carry your own bag on board and keep your stuff.
08:51 AM on 11/16/2011
The Sky is falling! No it's just America's common sense being buffaloed. I can appreciate some of the views and jives about TSA. But the facts still remain that TSA does nothing to curb terrorism. Let's examined 9/11. Twenty terrorist using box cutters took over four aircraft. How? Through the cockpit doors, they were UNLOCKED. Was the aircraft the target you may ask? NO just a tool to bring down a building. Why not blow up the building? They tried it, didn't work the bomb was not big enough. So they used a plane as a bomb? Correct!
But TSA stops terrorist from bring down planes and hurting Americans! Not true! Terrorist can't use aircraft as a tool anymore, because the airlines fixed the cockpit doors after 30 years of being asked too. But terrorist could bring a bomb aboard and kill Americans! Why bring one on board they can mail it. Why blow up a plane and kill 300 hundred, when you could blow up a chemical plant and kill thousands.
So are aircraft still a target? Yes and No! At 1980 airport security levels and the cockpit doors locked and flight crews trained to land on threat. The chances someone will bring down an aircraft are very low. You have a better chance of getting killed in a car accident.
So why all the high tech invasive TSA? Because it makes Americans feel better about flying, and it makes their government look like their are doing something.
08:37 AM on 11/16/2011
I didn't think there were any repubs left with an ounce of common sense but then up jumps John Mica with a proposal to "dismantle" tsa. Yea, finally a repub idea I can get behind only how about we get rid of the bigger problem, the fiasco known as "homeland security?" Even it's name offends me! It is the biggest threat to Freedom I've seen in my 67 years. SMASH the security (FASCIST) state!
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
08:36 AM on 11/16/2011
What, people don't like being humiliated and groped in the name of security theater? News flash - these checkpoints are unconstitutional. They are designed to make people okay with being invasively searched without probable cause, and will be used to erode the 4th Amendment.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
georgecarlin76
08:22 AM on 11/16/2011
DUH! They never had any intention of protecting us from terrorists. This was and always has been about rebranding the old drug war and turning the security apparatus on the American people. They force us to go through body scanners whose radiation causes cancer (TSA lied and never proved their specs) so that Michael Chertoff could get rich. How did the underwear bomber get on a plane from Europe without a passport and whatever he did it never had a chance to damage the plane actually. TODAY these scanners just got banned in Europe due to excessive radiation (its a lie that its equal to 2 minutes in the air...that is based on unverifiable data provided by the India based manufacturer that wants to get rich and anyway the radiation is focused on one part of the body not a plane's frame). Lastly, TSA has 'VIPER" teams pulling over cars in such states as Tennessee...this is a war on the people because they anticipated the economic meltdown they were causing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pepimartinez
08:11 AM on 11/16/2011
"Get your freak on, girl."
07:56 AM on 11/16/2011
I try to look at things closely and think reasonably rather than fall prey to hysterical thinking. I have seen a huge disaster in NYC, that no one has explained in a scientific way. Buildings don't fall down like that unless they are throughly planned to. The government performed a mafia style hit against a man who completely denied involvement in the act minutes after it happened. We will never know the truth because there was no trial. The constitutional right of habeas corpus was taken away from us in the panic. It still has not been returned. Our right to illegal search and seizure went when the TSA came into being and they have not caught one single terrorist in 10 years. The TSA is not about security, it is about maintaining a state of panic. It is about selling expensive machines to the government making government corporate cronies rich. It is about controlling the populace Iron Curtain country style. We have lost so much and now pay so much more. This panic is all about money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
andwhatarmy
Life is good beyond the United Gulags of America.
08:03 AM on 11/16/2011
Agreed. Fanned and faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thegreenhornet
civil rights lawyer
07:26 AM on 11/16/2011
The libertarians dont like government telling them to take off their shoes. Wow. What an inconvenience. What does it take -- 3 seconds? The people who complain about minor annoyances may well be creating a bigger danger for everyone. Dont think for a moment that the type of sick mind that would kill hundreds of innocents in the name of a warped view of their religion would not hesitate to include a hapless child in their plot. A terrorst will exploit any weakness he is given. Im not a big fan of the airport security measures but they are minor compared to the intrusion into our privsaacy rights posed by the Patriot Act.
07:44 AM on 11/16/2011
You really believe the terrorist stories? There were 19 of them, some reported to be alive and well in Saudi Arabia. Has anyone gone after them? No , they go after average American citizens and children. One mentally ill person puts an ineffective and alleged bomb in his shoe which he tries to light with a match and everyone in America has to take their shoes off? It's ridiculous.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DakkonA
www.DisentangledReality.com
07:50 AM on 11/16/2011
Which is minor in comparison to what we could have. Yeah, yeah, there's always something worse.

It's about stupid and inefficient reactionary policies put in place to make people feel safer rather than actually making people safer. The "any weakness" bit is a poor argument too--body cavities are currently a weakness, why aren't we blocking them? Etc.
07:11 AM on 11/16/2011
Article has a grammatical error ("...with it's efforts...") in the first paragraph. FAIL
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cyberfringe
When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.
07:01 AM on 11/16/2011
TSA is an ineffective bureaucracy, invasive of personal dignity and privacy, not to mention an unacceptable compromise of civil rights. It should be dismantled immediately.

- a very frequent traveler.
06:58 AM on 11/16/2011
The Europeans banned the X-ray machines, and flight crews and children are exempt, does that tell you something? TSA administra­tors are so arrogant and don't care for the our long term health, they are actually ramping up the number of full body scanners at airports, and on a trip this week I was scanned 5 times in 3 days - it's an absolute nightmare that I know will impact my health eventually since TSA recently admitted radiation levels were 10 times higher than previously reported, but the pat downs are just too invasive and take too long (they designed it that way to make you go through the death machines). The whole situation is insane, have the Obama family go through this every day and see how they like it. I also agree about the attitude, they treat everyone as if they are criminals!
01:27 AM on 11/16/2011
Meanwhile, Americans who travel from one part of America to another by plane are subjected to degrading pat downs and naked body scans that by no means has been proven medically safe.

Because some bad men attacked us ten years ago, we created a nanny security state in which poorly trained bottom rung employees of a vast security apparatus are given god-like powers over those poor schlubs who find themselves in need of a plane ride.

Nothing degrades this nation more than the cowardly ways in which we responded to a one-day flurry of terror. Out of fear of terrorism, we opened the doors wide to fascism.

DHS is nothing more than a conduit through which Congress shovels money to security contractors and the military-industrial complex.