iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Prosecution Of Financial Fraud Falls To 20-Year Low, New Report Shows

Financial Fraud

First Posted: 11/15/11 07:38 PM ET Updated: 11/16/11 08:56 AM ET

Public mistrust for banks may be at an all-time high, but federal prosecution for certain financial crimes is down to a 20-year low.

The federal government is on track to file just 1,365 prosecutions for financial institution fraud in fiscal year 2011, according to a new report from a watchdog group. That would be the lowest number of such prosecutions in at least two decades.

The report, from the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, comes at a time when the protest movement known as Occupy Wall Street has gained nationwide visibility -- and no small degree of public support -- by criticizing what its members see as a close relationship between big banks and the federal government.

The falling number of fraud prosecutions is striking given what many claim is a strong pattern of financial-sector misconduct in recent years, culminating in a housing crisis characterized by alleged rampant mortgage fraud and improper foreclosure, as well as the weakening of the national and global economy.

The TRAC report, which compiles Justice Department data obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, notes that 2011's relatively low number of financial fraud prosecutions is only the continuation of a trend spanning more than a decade.

Every year since 1999, the number of such prosecutions has gotten smaller and smaller, the report states. This means, for example, that there were more prosecutions in any given year during the presidency of George W. Bush than in any year during the presidency of Barack Obama.

David Burnham, a co-director of TRAC, told The Huffington Post that the fall-off in financial fraud prosecutions most likely does not reflect a fall-off in financial fraud itself.

"The fact that prosecutions go up or down is almost never an indication of whether that particular crime is going up or down," Burnham said.

Though the government has pursued a number of smaller institutions this year -- including Illinois bank First Midwest Securities and Long Island-based Salomon Whitney LLC -- critics say it has been remiss in investigating possible improprieties among the nation's largest banks in the years leading up to the mortgage crisis.

The declining number of fraud prosecutions in 2011 may reflect the increasingly widespread use of deferred prosecution agreements, a less-aggressive legal strategy that allows companies to voluntarily report their own misconduct and avoid harsh consequences in court. Since 2008, the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission have both adopted deferred prosecution tactics and put less emphasis on punitive measures for financial crimes, according to The New York Times.

What the report says is a broader, decade-long trend toward fewer fraud prosecutions may stem in part from more federal resources being directed toward anti-terrorism efforts in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, as suggested in a 2008 New York Times article about declining stock fraud cases.

Besides losing personnel to counterterrorism agencies, regulators have had to contend with political opposition and difficulty getting funding, which may have also played a role in limiting their ability to pursue cases. Congressional Republicans have made a number of attempts to weaken organizations like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. This week, the CFTC's 2012 budget was slashed by about $100 million as a result of congressional pressure. Earlier this year, the House Appropriations Committee cut the 2012 budget request for the SEC by $222.5 million.

While financial fraud cases are down by more than half from where they were a decade ago, a number of cases are currently active or have been recently settled, including multiple prosecutions for mortgage fraud, insider trading and embezzlement.

Jeffrey Connaughton, former chief of staff to Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.), who chaired the Congressional Oversight Panel for reviewing the Troubled Assets Relief Program, used the language of Occupy Wall Street when speaking to HuffPost about the decline in financial fraud prosecution.

"I wouldn't blame anyone who believes they're part of the 99 percent of Americans who has to follow the law, while 1 percent of the country doesn't," Connaughton said. "And a big part of the reason for that is lawyers and accountants are failing in their role as gatekeepers, and the Justice Department is too often deferring to these lawyers and accountants, which is like outsourcing the interpretation of the fraud laws."

CORRECTION: A previous version of this post mistakenly said Ted Kaufman is the chair of the Congressional Oversight Panel. Kaufman chaired the panel from 2010 to 2011.
FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Public mistrust for banks may be at an all-time high, but federal prosecution for certain financial crimes is down to a 20-year low. The federal government is on track to file just 1,365 prosecutio...
Public mistrust for banks may be at an all-time high, but federal prosecution for certain financial crimes is down to a 20-year low. The federal government is on track to file just 1,365 prosecutio...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 373
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kris Rosvold
REAL repub. (aka OLD school progressive)
09:49 AM on 02/03/2013
The short version: Wall Street has purchased the "Justice" Dept. just as Monsanto et al have purchased the FDA and the EPA....Too bad Holder isn't in an elected position...maybe it NEEDS to be an elected position, just as we do with our local Sheriffs and DAs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reality-2011
03:39 PM on 12/28/2012
Maybe this reflects that Obama and the Democrats got more donations from wall street than the republicans did.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cnakao534
02:42 AM on 04/26/2013
WHERE IS WARREN ? WELL LIKE HUSSEIN , WARREN JUST KEEP HER HIT SONG SELLING.
ALL TALK AND NO SHOW.
FOOLS ARE ONLY LISTEN TO THERE SWEET TALK. AND VOTE THEM BACK IN.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justhope
02:16 PM on 06/14/2012
What the authors failed to report is the fact that financial transactions which would've been illegal before the Glass Stegall Act was destroyed in 2001 was no longer illegal in favor of Republican Bill Gramm /Leach/Bliley Act which gives deference to Wall Street. It means things which were illegal no longer are. Also, Repubs continue to defund the Agencies which prosecute, leaving sparce prosecutors. Therefore you'll see prosecutions of things which were illegal then and are still illegal are being prosecuted now. The new Dodd/Frank Bill will make a lot of things illegal again. Unfortunately Repubs & Wall Street banksters have filed suits against Dodd/Frank to prevent things like the Volker rule from being implemented, therefore ensuring a stay of implementation of many rules which will again make these acts illegal. Had Volker been implemented, the $2-5 billion loss at JP Morgan Chase would be illegal or just deterred it from happening period had Dodd/Frabk been fully implemented. I wish journalists would be HONEST!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FREEAMERICA2
09:47 PM on 06/02/2012
GOP/TP protecting there buddies by under funding the agencies that are supposed to prosecute wall street , natural for them to do. However it has the added benefit of making O look bad. Don't be fooled.
10:54 AM on 01/17/2012
Some interesting articles regarding the governments decision not to prosecute bankers, et al, for fraud and the impact it has on economic recovery are listed right here on HP. BTW, the last one is very telltale and in my opinion, it appears that a criminal conspiracy case can be made.

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2011/07/no-fraud-prosecution-no-recovery/

http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/nov/10/should-some-bankers-be-prosecuted/?pagination=false

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/failing-prosecute-financial-fraud-either-side-atlantic-extending-our-economic-crisis
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justhope
02:28 PM on 06/14/2012
Here's the TRUTH about prosecutions of Financial Fraud!. Eric Holder DOJ has been prosecuting ad nauseum since 2009 and they're posted every month at :
http://www.stopfraud.gov/news-index.html
Simply because the media refuses to talk about it. The DOJ doesn't talk about it because they will be accused to politicizing the DOJ. The President doesn't talk about it or they too will be accused of politicizing the DOJ. Of course the Media refuses to highlight even when there are large catches that are prosecuted, convicted and currently serving decades in jail. Anyone interested in looking at the prosecutions, go to and look at each month from 2009 up to June 2012. There are billions recovered and dozens of people spending time in jail.,. not just little fish but execs. Unfortunately, I'll repeat, many things Wall Street did wasn't illegal and still aren't because the Republicans in Congress and Wall Street have sued to prevent implementation of Dodd/Frank with things like the Volker rule which would have prevented JP Morgan Chase losing $2-5B Yet the greedy banksters don't care. Well, we should care about telling the truth!
10:44 AM on 01/17/2012
Part 2
Morgan Stanley pocketed 20 million in fees and profits for setting up a series of complex financial transactions that paved the way for the two private power plant operators to rig the wholesale electricity market, yet the justice department settled for a 4.8 million dollar fine. The State Legislators are asking Judge Pauley to order Morgan Stanley to forfiet all of the ill gotten gains of 21.6 million as refunds to consumers.

Judge Pauley approved a settlement of just 12 million paid by National Grid, who took over Key Span in 2008, ignoring calls from state government and consumer advocates to reject the deal and order hearings that would have led to consumer refunds.

There is no mention of any fines levied on Astoria Generating Company, which has three generating operations in New York City. Worst of all, this scheme to defraud New York consumers will more than likely not result in criminal prosecutions. I watched the youtube video noted in earlier posts and sadly, what was portrayed in the skit is relevant today, 40 years later.

The Morgan Stanleys, et. al., must be pumping a ton of cash into political coffers on both sides of the aisle.
10:43 AM on 01/17/2012
In yesterday's NY Post on page 6 was an article titled "Pols' Power Play." It concerns a price rigging scam from 2006 to early 2009 involving Key Span, Morgan Stanley and Astoria Generating Company, an Energy Supply Company (ESCO). Deregulation of the utility industry was designed to generate cheaper energy for consumers through ESCOs which places this swindle up there with Bernie Madoff.

Key Span hired Morgan Stanley to set up a complex series of "swaps" with Astoria Generating Company. The "swaps" had the effect of fixing prices for power generated by the two Queens plants according to federal investigators.

No one knows how much the scam cost New York ratepayers but it was estimated that in the first year 157 million in illicit profits were generated. The two state legislators have petitioned Judge William Pauley opposing the settlement. State Senator Michael Gianaris and City Councilman Peter Vallone should be commended for serving their constituents and going up against the federal justice department.

No one is exactly sure how much money Morgan Stanley and the generating companies stole from Con Ed customers but it is estimated at "nearly 300 million" (probably a low ball figure considering the first year profit of 157 million).

Part 2 to follow...
08:56 AM on 12/06/2011
This is incredible, but believable, and I personally can attest to this ridiculous situation. As a whistle-blower myself (and former bank auditor), I caught a bank red-handed for fraud, turned them in to the regulators, and actually received death threats from the bank and their lawyers. I even received the documents from the bank's response to the FDIC and that their CEO lied to the FDIC. As a punishment for working with the FDIC, the bank released my personal financials and resulted in identity theft (which the FDIC tied back to the bank). Now I can't sue them, since a local judge/shareholder of the bank, has barred me from suing the bank on the identity theft, and declared that I should pay the debt racked up under it ($400K to be exact).

Through all of this, when the FDIC caught the lies and threats, the CEO stepped down, and that was that. No prosecution, no nothing; yet I am stuck with death threats and legal bills trying to protect my family. The FDIC is stating that it's hands are tied now, and that I was only an "isolated, but well documented incident".
11:24 AM on 11/20/2011
365 days a year>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFky3TdYsuY
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:41 AM on 11/18/2011
Not only is the justice dept not pursuing prosecutions, they are actually pushing immunity for the people who crashed the economy. Thank you, Obama!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:57 PM on 11/17/2011
It just never ends with this president. If you're the 1% or an Obama relative, you can break the law with impunity.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gonzo333
07:50 AM on 11/17/2011
What do you expect the corporations have bribed congress members for years and and the game is rigged. Fascist United States of America.
11:21 AM on 11/20/2011
You might enjoy this>>>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFky3TdYsuY
11:18 PM on 11/16/2011
The Single - Solitary - "All Time Classic" - "Required Watch" William K. Black Interview on Fraud:

PBS Bill Moyers Interview with Legal Scholar William K Black
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04232010/watch.html
photo
TJ Logan
Fifth Generation Real Republican
07:09 PM on 11/16/2011
Given that our large multinational companies, which often pay no taxes, essentially own the US Government and control its policies, I am a bit surprised that any fraud prosecutions occur at all. I guess we need only wait a few years and there will be none. Then a little later the government will prosecute only the honest.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WSWatchdog
citizen
06:09 PM on 11/16/2011
In a related note, Professor William Black, former bank regulator, has pointed out that NO Bank executive has gone to jail for the fraud in the mortgage meltdown vs. HUNDREDS going to jail during the Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980's when Reagan was President. Why?

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/10/19/former_financial_regulator_william_black_occupy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ztck5356
When in doubt, Google it.
11:20 PM on 11/16/2011
Yes, sadly when you own the government, the prosecutor is in your pocket. It's called payoffs.
11:26 AM on 11/20/2011
Hope you caught this>>>>>>>>>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFky3TdYsuY