iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fuel Economy Standards: Obama Administration Proposes Doubling Fuel Efficiency By 2025


First Posted: 11/16/11 02:10 PM ET Updated: 11/16/11 02:15 PM ET

By John Crawley

WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The Obama administration proposed on Wednesday doubling auto fuel efficiency to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a White House energy priority that has come under scrutiny in Congress.

The plan grew out an uneasy agreement last spring between the administration, automakers and environmental groups to reduce U.S. dependence on oil imports and cut tailpipe emissions.

Regulators hope to finalize the proposal by summer following a 60-day public comment period. The administration wants to give industry five years to further develop fuel-saving technologies and plan products before the rule would start taking effect in 2017.

"We expect this program will not only save consumers money, it will ensure automakers have the regulatory certainty they need to make key decisions," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement.

Current standards require automakers to raise efficiency from 27 mpg today to 35.4 mpg by 2016.

Targets beginning in 2017 would require a 5 percent annual fuel efficiency improvement for cars and yearly gains of 3.5 to 5 percent for light trucks, which include SUVs, pickups and vans.

Thirteen major automakers, including General Motors Co , Ford Motor Co , Fiat SpA affiliate Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota Motor Corp and Honda Motor Co Ltd , have signed onto the fuel deal.

President Barack Obama has made auto fuel efficiency a signature environmental and energy priority since cars and trucks account for 20 percent of carbon emissions and more than 40 percent of U.S. oil consumption.

But the role of federal environmental regulators and the state of California -- a leader in efforts to reduce emissions -- in developing auto standards has rankled the Republican-led House of Representatives.

Republican members of the Oversight Committee, who are scrutinizing Obama's "green economy" agenda, have challenged administration assumptions on who can regulate gas mileage and emissions under federal law.

It is unclear whether the panel's investigation would slow or derail the regulation, especially should Obama fail to be reelected next November.

Automakers -- especially truck-heavy U.S. vehicle producers -- consider the 54.5 mpg target ambitious and would rely on numerous conventional engine, transmission and component technologies and lighter vehicle designs to meet it even though Obama is pushing electric car development.

Fuel efficiency improvements would save consumers an average of up to $6,600 in fuel costs over the lifetime of a model year 2025, but they would pay up to $2,200 on average for more fuel efficient vehicles, according to the proposal.

Because the regulation looks more than a decade into the future and automakers are pursuing a number of approaches to save fuel and reduce emissions, a mid-point review is required to determine whether the standards should be changed.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

By John Crawley WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The Obama administration proposed on Wednesday doubling auto fuel efficiency to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a White House energy priority that ...
By John Crawley WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The Obama administration proposed on Wednesday doubling auto fuel efficiency to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a White House energy priority that ...
By John Crawley WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The Obama administration proposed on Wednesday doubling auto fuel efficiency to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a White House energy priority that ...
By John Crawley WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The Obama administration proposed on Wednesday doubling auto fuel efficiency to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025, a White House energy priority that ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 37
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheCarCzarsPage
12:51 PM on 02/13/2012
The Vapor Fuel Technology fuel system solution http://mpgleader.com helps automotive OEM's and their franchised dealers solve the 54.5mpg CAFE requirement and will be available as a bolt-on system for older vehicles as well.
09:15 AM on 11/18/2011
fuel Economy standards can only improve so much with my previous inventions for new ones if possible there going to have more concern for paying the actual conciever or were going nowhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ferrarimanf355
ZOMG TEH REI!
07:19 PM on 11/17/2011
Anything fun-to-drive is going to be neutered. This is the twilight of the gearheads. Hail to our new beige econobox overlords.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RhynoH
micro-bio [here]
01:56 PM on 11/17/2011
Seatbelts made cars more expensive. Air bags made cars more expensive. But you know what, the auto industry figured it out...they can figure out better fuel mileage as well.
ruburnt
Live Free or Die....
12:17 PM on 11/17/2011
Great...soon it's going to be too expensive to own a car.....Think Chev Volt...$41.000.....
11:18 AM on 11/17/2011
Same blah, blah, blah over and over and over....again and again! Remember the oil crisis of the mid 70s? Smart Japanese started building small, gas efficient cars and beat the crap out of Detroit. For a while the US built small cars but...larger profits are made with big cars, so back it is...large, gas guzzling cars. What will it take, how many more years, to learn this lesson?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
02:50 AM on 11/17/2011
It should have been 50 mpg 10 years ago. At least. The delay is caused by oil industry lobbying to extend their profits, nothing more. Good ol' corporate America, gleefully destroying the planet and offing people for the sake of greed.
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
02:14 AM on 11/17/2011
We're beyond baby steps being able to help. Time for some foot stomping stides: zero emissions vehicles by 2015!
02:01 PM on 11/17/2011
Tell me again how to do that?
photo
snowballinhell
Humans have a 100% chance of extinction
04:58 PM on 11/17/2011
Start walking.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
12:37 AM on 11/17/2011
My Prius gets close to that already...
photo
mlaiuppa
Pres. Sarcasm Society. Like we need your approval.
12:29 AM on 11/17/2011
I'm getting 46 now and 52 highway.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
06:27 PM on 11/16/2011
We could do it in 5 years if we were a dictatorship, or if we had an enlightened population. The winner of a recent mileage contest was designed from the ground up, abandoning traditional suspension. It weighed 800 pounds. The prodution model, with safety and convenience items added, would weigh 1200 pounds and need a 25 HP engine.
04:47 PM on 11/16/2011
He is on the right path -- this has been long over due -- something that could have been done as early as the 1980s -- yet he is the FIRST to do something bold. Others have had the chance -- and others will need to follow and build on this tiny first step (the problem ain't going away). But we can do this or come very close to it NOW -- my 2001 VW Jetta TDI gives me more than 600 miles (over 1000 km) per tank at close to 50 mpg. Why don't more do this? Why is it necessary for people to be forced by government to do the right thing?
06:03 PM on 11/16/2011
I agree, it kills me that its so low today. A bunch of my friends drove 80's Rabbit diesels to work because they got close to 60mpg. New cars are averaging 30 at best. My 1993 1-ton dodge truck still gets 26 mpg today, while my 2010 version gets 14! I have a 1969 6 cylinder plymouth valiant that gets 31mpg if I'm careful... How does all this modern computer controlled efficiency equate to half of what was possible 20 years ago?
I'm in the hot rod business and we're getting better mileage from 600hp cars than the automakers get from 300hp cars. Not to mention, all the modern lightweight materials equal out to cars that are 1000lbs heavier than old cars. New stuff is safer, but they can be designed ALOT lighter and the efficiency would skyrocket.
I'm about to start building an all-electric hot rod, based on some friends getting me hooked on it - the costs are comparable, they're doing 0-60 in 5 seconds, topping 100mph, and getting ranges over 125 miles with charge times of a couple hours. The automakers cant come close to this for any price.
I'm a car guy for life, but the auto industry is rigged - it HAS to be rigged in order to produce less efficient stuff now than in the 80's.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
02:52 AM on 11/17/2011
Follow the money. It's all about oil industry profits, nothing more.
04:32 PM on 11/16/2011
Oil is still going to run out. What are you gonna do when it's all gone?:
http://youtu.be/gXI5r8pieI0 Music Video of Tangeray's "All Gone"
03:54 PM on 11/16/2011
This will not save the consumer any $. The auto makers will pass the cost of engineers redesigning on to the consumer. Another government is mandate on auto makers. First it was seat belts, front and back. Then air bags , front and side. Unleaded gasoline , catalitic converter. The list is endless. We as consumers pay for all the engineering and technology being forced on auto makers.
04:00 PM on 11/16/2011
this will be a GREAT thing for the US economy. Not only will we reduce imports by a large amount , but the oil that we still have to import will be at a lower price ( supply & demand ).
The result will be BILLIONS of dollars staying at home powering our economy.
12:43 PM on 11/17/2011
I'm not disagreeing at all about it helping the economy. I just know it cost $ to redesign vehicles and that engineering cost will be passed on in the price of the vehicle.
04:49 PM on 11/16/2011
There is no cost to pass on if you but a VW TDI product -- it is almost at the 50 mpg mark NOW!
ruburnt
Live Free or Die....
12:16 PM on 11/17/2011
I loved my 1984 VW Jetta Diesel but....the new ones do have issues. Make sure you have it properly maintained by a dealer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
REMEMBER2050
Bring on that War on Women, GOP! I'm game.
03:20 PM on 11/16/2011
Wow. This sure sounds like a partisan issue. Obviously Republicans are going to be screaming about our right to consume and waste as much gas as we feel like, in spite of this incredibly interesting paragraph: "Thirteen major automakers, including General Motors Co , Ford Motor Co , Fiat SpA affiliate Chrysler Group LLC, Toyota Motor Corp and Honda Motor Co Ltd, have signed onto the fuel deal."

See, this isn't really an environmental issue at all. Any attempt to restrict our emissions is INSTEAD a blatant attack on the rights of all Americans to spend money on a dwindling natural resource, as well as a blanket suppression of our freedom to choose to ruin the planet.

That all takes us back to the first paragraph: no wonder this crazy idea is coming "under increased scrutiny from Congress!"