iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Solyndra Scandal Emails: Energy Department Tried To Delay Solar Company Layoffs

Solyndra Scandal Emails Energy Department

MATTHEW DALY   11/16/11 05:51 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Energy Secretary Steven Chu won a Nobel Prize in physics, but his handling of a solar energy loan has some critics calling him clueless.

Chu undoubtedly will face hostile questioning Thursday from House Republicans who are investigating the $528 million federal loan received by solar panel maker Solyndra before it went belly up, laying off its 1,100 workers.

Some Republicans, including presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, have called for Chu to be fired. Newly released emails show the White House considered doing just that earlier this year as the Obama administration braced for a political storm brewing over Solyndra.

The White House says Chu retains the president's confidence, but that trust could be challenged when the energy secretary faces GOP critics for the first time. Chu is scheduled to be the sole witness as the House Energy and Commerce Committee continues a nine-month investigation.

"Although several red flags were raised over Solyndra's financial stability, the Department of Energy and the White House decided to put taxpayer funds at risk," said Rep. Cliff Stearns, R-Fla., who is leading the GOP investigation. "I look forward to asking Secretary Chu why these warnings were ignored."

Besides the initial loan, Chu also will be asked to explain why he approved a restructuring of Solyndra's debt that allowed two private investors to move ahead of taxpayers for repayment in case of default. He also will be asked about possible political influence by two major Obama campaign donors, Steve Spinner and George Kaiser.

Chu, in remarks prepared for delivery Thursday, was ready to play defense. He said the Solyndra loan was subject to "proper, rigorous scrutiny and healthy debate" before it was approved in 2009.

"While we are disappointed in the outcome of this particular loan, we support Congress' mandate to finance the deployment of innovative technologies and believe that our portfolio of loans does so responsibly," Chu said.

Solyndra was the first renewable-energy company to receive a loan guarantee under the 2009 stimulus law, and the Obama administration frequently promoted the company as a model for its clean energy program. Chu attended a September 2009 groundbreaking when the loan was announced, and President Barack Obama visited the company's Fremont, Calif., headquarters last year.

Since then, the company's implosion and revelations that the administration hurried a review of the loan in time for the groundbreaking has become an embarrassment for Chu and Obama and a rallying cry for GOP critics of the administration's green energy program.

The Energy Department hired Spinner, a former sports fitness executive, to help monitor the loan guarantee program. Emails released to the committee show Spinner was actively involved in the Solyndra loan, despite pledging to step aside because his wife's law firm represented the company.

Kaiser, an Oklahoma billionaire, invested $400 million in the solar company through an investment vehicle connected to a family foundation. Kaiser has said he played no part in helping Solyndra win the 2009 loan, but emails released last week show he discussed Solyndra with the White House on at least one occasion. Kaiser also directed business associates on how to approach the White House and Energy Department to help Solyndra deal with its financial problems.

Chu also may face questions about emails released Wednesday showing that Energy Department officials asked Solyndra to postpone an early round of layoffs until after the 2010 midterm elections. The company complied.

Chu said he still believes in renewable energy despite the Solyndra debacle.

"When it comes to the clean energy race, America faces a simple choice: Compete or accept defeat. I believe we can and must compete," he said.

Chu's department has cooperated with the energy panel's investigation, providing more than 186,000 pages of documents, appearing at hearings and meeting with committee staff eight times, Chu said.

But the investigation became so combative that the committee voted along partisan lines to subpoena the White House for internal communications about Solyndra. GOP investigators have complained they've only received partial responses from the administration.

There's little question the Solyndra case has tarnished Chu's once-sterling reputation, a standing that caused Obama to belittle his own Nobel Peace Prize. At a speech earlier this year, Obama said Chu "actually deserved his Nobel Prize."

Salo Zelermyer, a lawyer and former Energy Department official, said Chu's political standing has been diminished by the Solyndra flap, but not beyond repair.

"There's very little documentation about his personal involvement" in the Solyndra loan, Zelermyer said. Still, the case has raised doubts about the government's role as an investor in clean technology and its ability to act as a sort of venture capitalist for renewable energy, he said.

"And obviously the plain facts of the loss of a half-billion dollars and 1,100 jobs for folks out in California have certainly cast a black cloud" over the renewable energy program, Zelermyer said.

Chu came to the administration as a scientist. His last job was director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. While Chu's intellect is held in high regard, the Solyndra case has raised questions about whether he could manage a politically fraught, $36 billion renewable energy loan program.

Kevin Book, an analyst at Clearview Energy Partners, called Chu's testimony the culmination of months of political posturing by both sides.

"This is a political showdown and it should be interpreted as such," Book said. "Questions are being fielded by a scientist, not a politician, and you get different kinds of answers in Washington than you get in a national lab," Book said.

Fielding pointed questions about his judgment is a steep fall for Chu, who has won a reputation not only as an Obama favorite but as one of the smartest people in government. Obama repeatedly credits Chu with helping to plug the massive BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year.

In hindsight, Obama may have been better served by an energy secretary with more experience dealing with Capitol Hill, Zelermyer said.

The secretary's job is more about leadership qualities than scientific knowledge, he and other experts said, noting that the department is a large bureaucracy with 20,000 employees and four times that number of private contractors.

Daniel J. Weiss, director of climate strategy at the liberal Center for American Progress, said he expects Chu to survive the Solyndra crisis.

"Dr. Chu didn't get (the energy secretary's job) because he's good at glad-handing or giving a speech. He got it because he understands at a level most of us can't the science behind global warming and clean energy," Weiss said, calling Chu an effective advocate for clean technology.

Weiss and others said the more likely casualty of Solyndra is the clean-energy loan program, which has come under withering assault from Republicans and even some Democrats.

"You don't need too many Solyndras before public support for this kind of funding collapses," Book said.

___

Matthew Daly can be reached at http://twitter.com/MatthewDalyWDC

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON — Energy Secretary Steven Chu won a Nobel Prize in physics, but his handling of a solar energy loan has some critics calling him clueless. Chu undoubtedly will face hostile questioni...
WASHINGTON — Energy Secretary Steven Chu won a Nobel Prize in physics, but his handling of a solar energy loan has some critics calling him clueless. Chu undoubtedly will face hostile questioni...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,816
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (33 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:53 PM on 11/30/2011
Solyandra installed 100MW of solar worth .5 to 7B$ in electricity over the the next 20 years or so.

Meanwhile nukes get 54B$ in loan backing plus 500M$ per year per reactor.

When are you fools going to get it?

This is a witch hunt against green energy and Democrats
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:10 PM on 11/18/2011
I'm just wondering how much the rabid Conservatives posting here tonight get for each outrageous post? They're out in force tonight!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:01 PM on 11/18/2011
This is to politicians of BOTH parties. If caught in a political scandal and you have messed up.
1). DO NOT try to cover it up. Things have a way of coming to light.

2). Cooperate fully with an investigation, taking your full share of the responsibility.

3). Have all documentation available.

4). Apologize immediately to the American people. Say "This situation has happened. I messed up. I take full and complete responsibility for it, and want to apologize to the American people."

5). Don't give evasive answers. Answer all questions fully and honestly.

If President Nixon had simply done that in Watergate....if President Reagan had done that in Irangate....if President Clinton had done that in Whitewater and Monica Lewinski....if President Bush had done that with Valerie Plame....a great deal of problems in our nation's history would not have been problems. These guys let their over-sized egos get in the way of solving a problem. AND Congress needs to stop assigning blame and simply solve problems.
HopeWFaith
We the People
05:25 AM on 11/18/2011
In pursuit of clearly his own personal agenda, not that of the nation, Rep Tim Murphy of PA was the most abusive in his tactics, barely allowing any response to any question he presented to Mr. Chu. This is not in my estimation a goal to reach the facts, but rather a psychological badgering of the witness. Mr. Murphy, being a psychologist, was evidently chosen for that reason, with some purpose in mind, other than getting at facts.

Steve Scalise used the same approach, not allowing answers, but rather testifying himself. Making all sorts of claims, but clearly having no evidence of fact based illegal activity.

Clearly, all the testimony and the facts presented regarding not only the outside investors' beliefs in this company, but also the government's own due diligence, show that Mr. Chu was certainly attempting to behave in a lawful and upstanding way throughout this process of supporting the investment in this company. Clearly he was not attempting to do harm to the nation or behave in an illegal manner.

I do not understand how this Represents what the nation needs in this investigation. From my point of view, it does not help us or guide us to the facts. Getting at the facts in this case, does not require badgering, but rather in depth review. This Republican side of the Committee is out of line and being abusive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:03 PM on 11/18/2011
On either side, it's their egos that do the talking. They don't care about facts. They care about their 15 minutes of fame in the spotlight. Both sides disgust me. Republicans disgust me slightly more.
HopeWFaith
We the People
05:18 AM on 11/18/2011
Clearly it is not the goal of the Republicans on this Committee to get at the facts, but rather to smear a man and his President, as much as they possibly can. To simply repeatedly claim the law was broken, does not make the law broken. In this case, I believe that the Republicans are determined to make the nation believe it is.

I watched the questioning of the Committee. In almost each and every questioning round, the pounding away of Mr. Chu was filled with the type of questioning methods which strongly indicate a predetermined decision had been made. He was questioned and not allowed to answer, again and again, particularly when questioned by the Republicans on the committee.
05:26 AM on 11/18/2011
Oh no!!! Pointed questions of a public official that gave a half billion taxpayer dollars away to a connected Obama fundraiser despite warnings from the o.m.b and the previous administration. How Shocking!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:05 PM on 11/18/2011
No one is objecting to proper pointed questions. What anyone, regardless of party, should object to is the badgering of a witness rather than questioning to get to facts. I'm sick of these Congressional show "hearings" no matter which side conducts them.
bansidhe54
uh oh...my micro-bio is empty....
07:23 PM on 11/19/2011
That's because they already had many answers to the questions they were asking--because they had obtained documents from Chu, his staff and WH staff through document discovery. This was not an initial hearing. It was a follow-up hearing of Mr. Chu. To repeat the claim again: it is blatantly against current statutes (the law) to subordinate the taxpayers' loans to those of other investors or lendors. Period. In fact, it is so illegal, by the wording of the statute, that the subordination clause in the loan document is possibly invalid and unenforceable. The Democrats on the committee are there to protect Mr. Chu. That's why the tough questions mostly came from the Repubs. You should have watched hearings when Democrats were questioning Bush administration staff. At least the Repubs mostly stick to the facts.
01:08 AM on 11/18/2011
"Today's liberals would have you believe they occupy the moral high ground on every political and cultural issue. But have you ever taken inventory of their double standards? ... Democrats maligned former President George W. Bush's economy for the better part of his two terms, despite the robust growth, unemployment below 5 percent and a 2007 deficit less than 10 percent of what it is today. They tell us that President Obama's horrendous economy, on the other hand, is not even his fault. ... Democrats have slandered genuine grassroots Tea Partiers as lawless, racist, AstroTurf scofflaws who are sometimes even domestic terrorists, despite the Tea Partiers' peaceful, respectful behavior, no evidence of racism and almost no arrests at any of their events. ... But when leftist Occupy Wall Street protesters have truly been organized from above, have engaged in lawless and violent behavior leading to many arrests and have spewed anti-Semitic bile, liberals, including President Obama himself, have lionized them and identified with their cause. ... I'll stop here, even though I'm not yet halfway through my list." --columnist David Limbaugh
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:02 AM on 11/18/2011
That nailed it! Of course the big media goes right along.
photo
mikedavid1
America first
11:12 PM on 11/17/2011
Yes, I agree that the Obama administration is most definitely transparent...to the point, anyone can easily see their level of incompetence...allowing politically connected private investers in Solyndra to move ahead of taxpayers...ED asking them to postpone layoffs until after the 2010 elections...crony capitalism at work and very transparent! So much for those so anxious (as well as Obama) to blame the approval of the loan on Bush...now we hear that the project was "subject to "proper, rigorous scrutiny and healthy debate" before it was approved in 2009"...really...and this is how our "stimulus" dollars are gambled away by people without a clue.....obviously just the tip of the iceberg...as we are already beginning to see.
10:53 PM on 11/17/2011
Obama is having Chu fall on the sword then Obama can claim he is Sargent Schultz,, "I know nothing"...
10:42 PM on 11/17/2011
As hard as they look, the corrupt media just can't seem to find any significant evidence of political based crony capitalism in this pure and transparant administration. The fact that it's not a Repbulican administration makes their effort a little less urgent and detailed, but it's not like they're not trying. Honest! After all, they're constitutionally protected to look out for the best interests of the American taxpayer, and they'd never let their personal political ideologies betray that constitutional responsibility. Honest!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
psnyder325
Yep, I'm a Socialist. Deal.
08:07 PM on 11/18/2011
You DO realize that almost all of the media, including now the Huffington Post, is owned by Conservatives, right?
09:30 PM on 11/18/2011
You do realize you're delusion, right? I'd start the list, but really.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:27 PM on 11/17/2011
Don't look behind the curtain, look at the banks...over there quick look...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noknrc
happy to be retired
06:36 PM on 11/17/2011
Chu lied and is trying to take all the blame. It is nice of him to fall on the sword for this administration.
photo
des946
Consultant
05:54 PM on 11/17/2011
In psite of Dr. Chu's purported technical knowledge and expertise, he undoubtedly is not so profescient in buwiness realte matters or business management . . . . but that is all at a cost to the American tax payers.

So, where did all of the money go to? That is a critical question that I havven't seen any comments on. How much did the CEO and upper managment receive as salaries and bonuses as the copaney sink into bankruptcy?
04:25 PM on 11/17/2011
Excuse me Chu lied. Joe and OB knew all this and planned a lot of it. You left love this lying cheating Gov.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spmazanek
04:14 PM on 11/17/2011
I just see in the news that some peaceful Obama supporters seriously injured some police at an OWS rally.
04:15 PM on 11/17/2011
Never happened at a Tea Party Rally Hey Left what you think?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
09:29 PM on 11/17/2011
Let's make a list: How many businesse have been affected either by vandalism or their filth? How many raped, how many fights, how many drugs? How many died either by drugs or attack? Every single one who has spoken as a representative is from another Hemisphere. Part of their message rang 1/5 reasonable, but the rest of their demanded were from potheads cause it was pathetic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:03 PM on 11/17/2011
Pretty soon the REAL 99% in this country is going to have enough of this anarchist Obama mob and will stomp them out!
photo
des946
Consultant
05:56 PM on 11/17/2011
Don't be a "fool", Obama is only a part of the overall problems . . . A corrupt and dysfunctional Congress is a much bigger part of our problems. (And "NO, I didn't vote for Obama; and I don't support ObmaCare or any of his other "socialistic programs".)
03:39 PM on 11/17/2011
The longer these congress members stay the more corrupt they become. Power = Money
arb24529
Micro Bio? sounds like an abbreviated tweet
03:56 PM on 11/17/2011
term limits and no retirement benes until 20 yrs of service, if its good enough a deal for the military it works in congress too
Congress 3 term max
senate 2 term max
and the limit is already on the white house.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spmazanek
04:07 PM on 11/17/2011
They would just steal from us quicker if term limits were enacted!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
smburwick
07:06 PM on 11/17/2011
Only no more for BO.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sam Huston
Fair, Balanced and Informed
04:48 PM on 11/17/2011
You can't pin this on Congress, this and all the other green energy / jobs swindle is all Obama.