iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Afghanistan War Withdrawal Backed By Bipartisan Group Of Senators


First Posted: 11/17/11 05:50 PM ET Updated: 11/18/11 08:25 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan group of senators is calling on President Obama to accelerate the United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan, arguing that the timetable the administration has laid out is not rapid enough as the nation grapples with its own economic problems at home.

The sense of the Senate amendment will be offered to the defense authorization bill, which is likely to come up after Thanksgiving recess.

The resolution says Obama should "expedite the transition of the responsibility for military and security operations to the Government of Afghanistan," in addition to "expediting the drawdown of United States combat troops in Afghanistan and accelerating the transfer of security authority to Afghan authorities prior to December 2014."

It also orders the president to send Congress a timetable and completion date for the accelerated transition no later than 90 days after the resolution passes.

The amendment has bipartisan support; it's backed by Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).

"We went to Afghanistan to destroy al Qaeda training camps and bring to justice those responsible for the September 11th attacks. With the death of Osama Bin Laden, we have now accomplished those goals. It is time to end our presence in Afghanistan and refocus our attention on fighting terrorists wherever they may be," said Merkley. "At a time of high unemployment, a wave of foreclosures and growing debt, we need to be concentrating on nation building here at home."

In June, Obama announced that 33,000 U.S. troops will be leaving Afghanistan by the autumn of 2012. Five thousand troops were to be pulled out immediately, with another 5,000 leaving at the end of 2011.

The 33,000 troops withdrawn were part of the "surge" that Obama announced in his 2009 speech at West Point. That will leave approximately 68,000 U.S. troops still in Afghanistan, which is still significantly higher than the amount that was in the country when Obama took office.

In July, Merkley, Udall and Paul called for the removal of all regular combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2012, a timetable that is significantly shorter than Obama's.

In a New York Times op-ed, they pointed out that the United States is spending $10 billion a month in Afghanistan while back home, the United States is struggling with "high unemployment and a flood of foreclosures, a record deficit and a debt that is over $14 trillion and growing."

Full resolution:

Purpose: To express the sense of Congress regarding the expedited transition of responsibility for military and security operations in Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan.

SENSE OF CONGRESS ON TRANSITION OF MILITARY AND SECURITY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN.

FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following findings:

(1) After al Qaeda attacked the United States on September 11, 2001, the United States Government rightly sought to bring to justice those who attacked us, to eliminate al Qaeda’s safe havens and training camps in Afghanistan, and to remove the terrorist-allied Taliban government.

(2) Members of the Armed Forces, intelligence personnel, and diplomatic corps have skillfully achieved these objectives, culminating in the death of Osama bin Laden.

(3) Operation Enduring Freedom is now the longest military operation in United States history.

(4) United States national security experts, including Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta, have noted that al Qaeda’s presence in Afghanistan has been greatly diminished.

(5) Over the past ten years, the mission of the United States has evolved to include a prolonged nation-building effort in Afghanistan, including the creation of a strong central government, a national police force and army, and effective civic institutions.

(6) Such nation-building efforts in Afghanistan are undermined by corruption, high illiteracy, and a historic aversion to a strong central government in that country.

(7) Members of the Armed Forces have served in Afghanistan valiantly and with honor, and many have sacrificed their lives and health in service to their country.

(8) The United States is now spending nearly $10,000,000,000 per month in Afghanistan at a time when, in the United States, there is high unemployment, a flood of foreclosures, a record deficit, and a debt that is over $15,000,000,000,000 and growing.

(9) The continued concentration of United States and NATO military forces in one region, when terrorist forces are located in many parts of the world, is not an efficient use of resources.

(10) The battle against terrorism is best served by using United States troops and resources in a counterterrorism strategy against terrorist forces wherever they may locate and train.

(11) The United States Government will continue to support the development of Afghanistan with a strong diplomatic and counterterrorism presence in the region.

(12) President Barack Obama is to be commended for announcing in July 2011 that the United States would commence the redeployment of members of the United States Armed Forces from Afghanistan in 2011 and transition security control to the Government of Afghanistan.

(13) President Obama has established a goal of removing all United States combat troops from Afghanistan by December 2014.

(b) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) the President should expedite the transition of the responsibility for military and security operations in Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan;

(2) the President should devise a plan based on inputs from military commanders, the diplomatic missions in the region, and appropriate members of the Cabinet, along with the consultation of Congress, for expediting the drawdown of United States combat troops in Afghanistan and accelerating the transfer of security authority to Afghan authorities prior to December 2014; and

(3) not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the President should submit to Congress a plan with a timetable and completion date for the accelerated transition of all military and security operations in Afghanistan to the Government of Afghanistan.

This article was edited to reflect the updated text of the resolution.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan group of senators is calling on President Obama to accelerate the United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan, arguing that the timetable the administration has laid out is n...
WASHINGTON -- A bipartisan group of senators is calling on President Obama to accelerate the United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan, arguing that the timetable the administration has laid out is n...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 241
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
02:43 PM on 06/10/2012
If all the antiwar types can muster is 9 congressmen, they have a long, long way to go in persuadin anyone to change anything about what is going on over there. 9 congressmen is barely a momentary blip on the radar of anyone with any say-so in gvt or politics.The American people seem to be accepting the war in AfPak as a fact of life and as long as it doesn't pinch them individually too much, so be it it. What a sad commentary on the USA.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
03:43 PM on 11/20/2011
Now they have groups in eastern afghanastan protesting us.This is going to turn into a one massive nightmare completely if we do not get out of there very soon
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
12:12 AM on 11/19/2011
3 million afghans face hunger this winter.Hell more than that face hunger and being homeless right here in this country.We need to take care of our own before we take care of others
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
05:07 PM on 11/18/2011
So,3 million afgans face hard winter,homeless,no food etc.Well how about the well over 3 million people right here that are also facing a very bleak and cold and foofless winter?what about them?I think they should come first befire we help out any other country
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1776 or 1984
IT'S AN EMPIRE, NOT A REPUBLIC!
07:50 AM on 11/18/2011
Song and dance..

Iran is next.

Don't get sucked in by the war propaganda this time ok? Did you fall for the last oil war in Libya? If you did, don't worry, you can still have the opportunity to see through the next oil war in Iran.

They're gonna regime-change Iran before the country can guard its oil with nukes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
05:55 AM on 11/18/2011
Afghan was justified. Just not to continue on this long. I supported the war but now its time to come home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jzannoni
11:51 PM on 11/17/2011
this war is not worth one life
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Glackin
W Nature dsnt do will be done by our fellow man
01:30 AM on 11/18/2011
You are over a thousand too late for that sentiment.
John Kerry asked the question back in the '70's.
"How do you tell a man he is going to be the last one to die for a mistake?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
11:30 PM on 11/17/2011
Well,no problem with what to do with the troops in Afghanastan.Seems washington in it's infinite wisdom,likeobooboo think it might be a good idea to use our military to riegn in Pakistans military,sounds like a plan doesn't it?Plus he's got chuna pised off at us right now so thats not a good thing.Give hime another month or two and he'll have us waist deep in another war
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conchop
logic ethics quality
11:19 PM on 11/17/2011
Well now, here's something we can all agree on. MAKE IT SO!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cccoyote
America couldn't be bought by corps.
10:57 PM on 11/17/2011
Problem is, the bipartisan group of war contractors will require another money pit of greater volume before they allow such an action to take place.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goserenee1
ℒℴѵℯ Your Enemies-It Messes With Their Head
10:50 PM on 11/17/2011
I would love to see us end our war in Afghanistan. The have been too many lost in these wars, I know someone is going to say we always lose men in every war believe me I know this and I know how lives are affected both by the loss of those and by the affect on the men that return home. I just want them to return home.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:47 PM on 11/17/2011
war & pizza... but not the economy.. go figure
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flashfyre
Honore de Balzac
10:46 PM on 11/17/2011
No offense but I trust Hamid Karzai than any of the loons in the Paul family tree. Not that I'm a great fan of Karzai either, although he has his moments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inkhosi
10:42 PM on 11/17/2011
They should at least get their facts straight. Vietnam was a longer war than Afghanistan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph Glackin
W Nature dsnt do will be done by our fellow man
11:03 PM on 11/17/2011
NOT!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
inkhosi
08:54 AM on 11/18/2011
Actually it was, fool
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TEHelms
Still learning....
10:14 AM on 11/18/2011
Inkhosi is correct...our troops on the ground from 1965-1975, but our involvment including helping the French was 16 years...
10:40 PM on 11/17/2011
It is about time for Congress to meet its responsibility to end these misguided Presidential wars.