More

HP Net Income Falls 91 Percent For Q4 2011

Hp Income

By JORDAN ROBERTSON   11/21/11 07:49 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO -- Hewlett-Packard Co.'s first earnings report with Meg Whitman as CEO highlights the troubles she faces in setting a new course for the besieged company.

The latest quarterly numbers, reported Monday after the market closed, beat Wall Street's subdued expectations. But the forecast for the 2012 fiscal year left something to be desired. HP's shares fell.

The results show a company being pulled in two directions at once. The tensions underline a key challenge for Whitman, who is best known for building eBay Inc. from its startup days into a Silicon Valley icon and now must wrestle with one of technology's oldest companies amid management dysfunction and economic malaise.

Whitman's first major decision as CEO was deciding to keep the $40 billion-plus personal computer business, which her predecessor, Leo Apotheker, had wanted to sell or spin off. That business is pulling HP toward the low end of the technology market. PCs notoriously carry thin profit margins, and customers are spending less on them amid challenges from rival technologies, mainly smartphones and tablets. HP sees PCs as an inexpensive way to get its sales hooks into corporations and sell more expensive technology.

Meanwhile, HP has spent tens of billions of dollars expanding into those more profitable areas of technology services and software. But cracking those businesses means facing entrenched enemies such as IBM Corp. HP faces serious questions about its competitiveness at the high end of those markets.

The latest earnings report showed HP's net income fell 91 percent – mostly because of write-downs and charges for Apotheker's decision to kill off HP's fledgling tablet and smartphone lines. So staying on track will be a challenge.

The company earned $239 million, or 12 cents per share, for the quarter ended Oct. 31. That's down from $2.54 billion, or $1.10 per share, a year earlier.

Excluding one-time items, HP earned $1.17 per share, more than the $1.13 analysts expect on average, according to FactSet.

Revenue fell 3 percent to $32.12 billion, but that beat the $32.05 billion analysts expected.

HP's shares briefly rose in extended trading, after the results were reported. But momentum turned against the company as investors digested the weaker outlook, and the shares fell 28 cents. In regular trading Monday, the stock fell $1.13, or 4 percent, to close at $26.86.

The forecast was lower than most analysts' targets. HP said it was being "cautious," citing turmoil in Europe amid the debt crisis there, soft consumer spending and weakening spending by businesses.

Analyst Brian White with Ticonderoga Securities called the outlook "weak" but said the stock has some appeal in investors because of its previous declines. Indeed, the stock has fallen 40 percent since CEO Mark Hurd was ousted last year in an ethical scandal.

"HP has valuation on its side and expectations are low; however, we believe this turnaround story will take time to play out, and the darkening macroeconomic environment is only likely to hinder this cause," White wrote in a note to clients.

The profit decline in the latest quarter was caused in large part by $3.3 billion in charges for HP's earlier decision to kill its tablet and smartphone businesses, as well as other write-downs and acquisition costs. Revenue in three of HP's biggest divisions – personal computers, printers and ink, and servers and networking – fell as well.

Whitman faces a real test as she attempts to pull together a conglomerate beset by growing pains and managerial strife. She is HP's third CEO in a year and a half. Though HP is the world's largest information technology company by revenue, the company has had a hard time deciding whether it wanted to grow even bigger or start getting smaller.

Apotheker, who succeed Hurd, was ousted in September over his botched handling of key initiatives, particularly the plan to sell or spin off the PC division, which leaked early to the press and which Whitman has reversed.

For the fiscal first quarter, HP expects earnings of 83 cents to 86 cents per share, excluding one-time items. That's far less than the $1.11 per share analysts expected.

For the full fiscal year, HP expects to earn at least $4 per share, excluding one-time items. Analysts expected $4.53 per share on that basis.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 66
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
09:12 AM on 11/23/2011
I'm sure if she just sends another 13,000 jobs to china and india, all her problems will be solved. It worked at Ebay, right? Even though, when she ran for governator, she claimed she'd create jobs in California. Good luck, Meggie, you'll need it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
georgeny
12:11 AM on 11/23/2011
That people starting with Fiorina can be so handsomely rewarded for destroying a truly great American company (along with the jobs that it provided) is just point blank disgusting and it's also disturbing. We all know the business judgment rule means most anything flies, but don't the directors have a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders, not management. The fealty to management could be understandable if management were still the entrepeneurs, but they aren't in a company like HP, they only want to think that they are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ARCHIETBUNKER
06:40 PM on 11/22/2011
Since she has made those wrong decisions, I wonder if she stills gets her Christmas bonus?
04:03 PM on 11/22/2011
Let's see. In the 70's I actually helped build the HP production facility in Boise, Id. They were employing my fellow Idahoans, so I always tried to buy HP. But, in recent years as much as I wanted to, I just can't buy their junk anymore. I made the mistake of buying one of their early PC's. Cost me a grand and never worked right. It was a real piece of junk. Then, I thought buying a printer would be ok, so I bought one of their MFC's. Cost me its price gain in repairs and never worked properly. Now I am highly satisfied with a Brother MFC. Then my son purchased a Compaq/HP laptop. When the screen cracked just outside warranty, they wouldn't do anything, even though it appeared to be a manufacturing defect. So, if my experiece parallels most others, its no wonder they are headed for the trash bin. My friends from HP (all former HP now), tell me that Carly Fiorino ran the company straight into the ground. That her incompetence was staggering. Now, another Republican candidate whose claim for election was business prowness, is doing the same. If a successful run as CEO is a criteria for election, then Meg Whitman will never be elected dog catcher.
03:59 PM on 11/22/2011
(Continued)
This resulted in a shift in the management style where these new managers, who were afraid of making mistakes, promoted a "consensus strategy" where the decisions were made by consensus in numerous meetings, shielding the "leaders" from any criticism that may result from their decisions (they had done their due diligence).

After this evolution, it was impossible to pursue anything visionary at HP because the "consensus" always took a minimal risk approach and the end result was "me-too" technology. When a company embraces the low-risk me-too paradigm, the only way to succeed is competing on price. Although they could still turn heads with the strength of their brand, there was nothing left of the corporate strategy that had produced that brand. It was the end of HP as we knew it.
03:56 PM on 11/22/2011
I worked for HP for many years. The problem goes much deeper than their recent string of bad CEOs. I saw the company start to abandon its winning business strategy during the "get rich quick" reign of Carly Fiorina but one can't really blame her. Why? Because if she hadn't been selected to pilot HP, some other moron would have been. In short, HP had lost it's vision.

Both HP's rise and fall in the technology industry was the result of a legacy set by it's original leaders. They were brilliant people. they were Visionaries. They were renegades by any measure during those early years. They created an unmatched brand for excellence and innovation. The broke all the rules. They were managers who got their hands dirty, knew the technology deeply and were committed to unmatched quality.

As their success created enormous growth, those same "renegade managers" needed a layer of middle management that would carry out their directives faithfully and not challenge the envisioned direction of the leaders. They were yes-men. This formula worked for many years and HPs success during this time was unmatched.

But then, those brilliant leaders started to retire. When they retired, that enormous pool of middle management yes-men moved into key leadership positions. The problem was, they didn't have any ideas and there was no one left to tell them what to do.
12:17 PM on 11/22/2011
Meg will get it back on track....
photo
matt spedale
Let's be like Europe, they are killing it...
11:27 AM on 11/22/2011
More proof pushing Mark Hurd out was insanely stupid.
11:58 AM on 11/22/2011
but what about Meg Ryan?
photo
matt spedale
Let's be like Europe, they are killing it...
12:07 PM on 11/22/2011
She just got there. Has it even been a month yet? Can't say anything about her for a few more months at least. Leo left a mess behind. The CEO can't change things overnight. Even if she were to completely overhaul HP we wouldn't see the changes for 6 months if even that.
01:50 PM on 11/22/2011
and don't forget Tom Hanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
filo
We're all Bozos on this bus.
10:40 AM on 11/22/2011
Meg will layoff half of the company so she can get her bonus.

I like HP printers. I had one that lasted 12 years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Albright
08:29 AM on 11/22/2011
This is what happens when you put a woman in charge of running a company! Maybe Meg can hire some Illegals for low wages to pump up profits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhillyKing
10:48 AM on 11/22/2011
"This is what happens when you put a woman in charge of running a company"..... what a truly sad person you are....
photo
matt spedale
Let's be like Europe, they are killing it...
11:29 AM on 11/22/2011
This has nothing to do with her. It was Leo that did this. So on this same level of thinking you think Obama is entirely responsible for the last three years with no blame at all going to Bush?
07:06 PM on 11/22/2011
Obama caused the 1929 stock market crash and 9/11 ( he was flying the planes...all of them) stop trying to skew the facts!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brandon20678
Corporations have 99 problems and I'm 1
06:58 AM on 11/22/2011
Yes, HP has made bad decisions but people still buy PCS I have an Hp Notebook and printer both are great haven’t had a problem and customer support is better than DELL. Also another plus is that Companies and Governments buy PCs because of the cost. Hp doesn’t have to worry about Companies and Government Leaving for Apple because of Apple’s cost and Platform.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Thomas River
My micro-bio is now half-full.
06:23 AM on 11/22/2011
I'm no fan of Meg Whitman, and I gave up on HP long ago.

That being said, painting a big red headline around NET profit during a restructuring is tabloid reporting at best.

This is an easy one. If you believe in Whitman, buy in now. If you are unsure, wait a quarter for signs that the restructuring is beginning to pay off.

And, if you think Whitman is in so far over her head, she needs a depth finder just to take the next step, then hold and wait for an acquisition offer.
04:47 AM on 11/22/2011
Tell Meg I cancelled the computer I was ordering when I heard she was taking over.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stoopid American
Trooth, justice, and the American way ...
03:03 AM on 11/22/2011
Couldn't have happened to a nicer company. Here's hoping for another few more quarters like this one ...
photo
Harvey32
Wheresoever you go, go with all your heart
01:03 AM on 11/22/2011
I blame the Board. If I were an institutional investor who had a big piece of HP, I'd be after scalps.

Let's hire Leo Apotheker WITHOUT ANYONE EVEN TALKING TO HIM FIRST.
Let's buy Palm.
Let's screw up the roll out of the Pre with crappy marketing.
Let's take forever to update the Pre, and when we do, make no great improvements.
Let's launch the long-awaited Pre3 (announced at some big event) - ONLY IN EUROPE with nary a press release.
Let's launch the Touchpad. Let's kill the Touchpad. Ooops, let's sell them off at fire sale prices.
webOS? What's that?
Let's announce we're getting out of consumer products. Oops, let's wait a week and change our mind.

Honestly, then next time I hear some politician say how businesses are always run better than the government, I'm pointing them to HP
06:15 AM on 11/22/2011
9 - 9 - 9
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
georgeny
12:14 AM on 11/23/2011
Perfect. You get it. And look at the timestamps. I wrote a comment saying the same thing before I read yours. Bravo. I really think it you just held Boards to a higher standard, and disallowed currently serving executives from sitting on Boards of any publicly listed company you might go a long way to restoring real American business.