More

HuffPost Social Reading

Michigan Charter And Cyber School Bills Lack Quality Controls

Michigan Charter Cyber Schools

First Posted: 11/21/2011 12:49 pm Updated: 11/21/2011 5:03 pm

Among the bundle of Republican education bills snaking its way through Lansing is a pair of measures that, at first glance, appears to capitalize on national bipartisan trends in education reform: two bills that would dramatically expand both charter schools and cyber schools in Michigan. But the bills contain so few quality controls that even the education groups most likely to support them say they can't back them in their current forms.

Experts say that if passed unmodified, the bills could have dire consequences for Detroit, which is bound to explode with charters as the first major site for the expansion of the Education Achievement System. The EAS, a statewide special district for the worst performing schools, will pilot in the Motor City and perhaps elsewhere in Michigan next year.

Both bills passed the state Senate and are awaiting approval by the House, where conservative Rep. Tom McMillin (R) just took over the education committee following Rep. Paul Scott's (R) recall.

The Michigan Education Association backed the Scott recall in protest of the lawmaker's pushing through cuts for K-12 funding and reforming teacher tenure. McMillin, described by an MEA lobbyist who declined to be named as "the most conservative of all House members," stepped into Scott's committee leadership spot Nov. 9. McMillin is expected to continue supporting Scott's education policies, as well the charter school and cyber school bills.

Those bills are the products of a Republican legislature -- specifically state Sen. Phil Pavlov, who has taken in money from the DeVos-financed Great Lakes Education Project, according to campaign finance records filed with the state. The bills face vigorous opposition by the state's teacher's union, the MEA and some left-wing education reform groups.

McMillin and Pavlov did not return calls seeking comment for this article.

"They're going to go down as the worst laws we've looked at," said Sen. Bert Johnson, a Democrat who has accepted campaign money from both the teacher's union and Democrats for Education Reform, a national Democratic group that support candidates with education platforms that often differ from those of the unions, according to campaign finance records filed with the state. "It's being done in a willy-nilly way and doesn't amount to any accountability."

MORE CHARTERS, FEWER GUIDELINES

The charter-school bill would lift the state's cap on charter schools -- Michigan currently has 255 -- without installing any significant quality safeguards. The bill also eases regulations, making it easier for out-of-state charter-school operators to set up shop.

Charter schools are publicly financed but can be privately run. Charter school performance is mixed overall nationally and in Detroit. While some chains, like the Knowledge Is Power Program, are known for sending more low-income kids to college, others, such as charter schools in states like Ohio with lax charter-school laws, are notorious for stale curricula and baseless profits.

While many education-reform groups support school choice and competition through the development of charter schools, Sen. Johnson said the Michigan bills put Democrats between a rock and a hard place.

"For those Democrats that support choice, we have been put in an awful position because of the heavy-handed approach that Republicans have taken," Johnson said. "Because they put together these bills in secrecy, we end up being hands-off."

Meanwhile, the EAS is in its planning phases and charters are expected to figure into the special district in a big way, though the special district's chancellor, John Covington, has kept mum about the details.

"The EAS is going to be the governing body that eventually oversees the conversion of these schools into charters or be granted 'empowered school' [status], which are basically charters but keep their public identity," said Greg Harris, an education policy expert who recently ran Excellent Schools Detroit, a local coalition of education players and fundraisers. "The teachers will be paid less, younger. The savings they achieve will be used to refinance the debt of the old public school system. The problem [with the EAS] is it's not going to be better."

But the district is embracing charters.

"The war between Detroit public schools and charters is over. We're going to have charters," Detroit Public Schools Emergency Manager Roy Roberts, who is also the chair of the EAS board, told The Huffington Post. "We're going to have all kinds of schools."

The lowest 5 percent of underperforming schools statewide will be transferred to the EAS. But according to Wayne State University education professor Mike Addonizio, some worry that the school choice bill could attract low-quality charter managers that are so bad, they affect which schools are brought into the EAS, pushing out still struggling public schools.

"It's not because the lowest 5 percent will have gotten better, but that these new schools are actually worse," Addonizio explained.

Already, 80 percent of Michigan's charter schools are run by for-profit companies.

In Lansing, several education-reform groups are trying to fix the bill by adding quality control standards. But after several conference calls in which the groups -- including Excellent Schools Detroit, former Washington, D.C. schools chancellor Michelle Rhee's lobbying group StudentsFirst and Democrats For Education Reform -- discussed solutions, it became clear that they could not agree on the details. They disagreed on language that would add standards to the bill in order to check new charter schools for quality -- so they went their separate ways.

DFER's Michigan arm is trying to iron their differences out.

"Our organization and other organizations that we're working with are not against lifting the charter-school cap. The other side is trying to paint us that way," said Harrison Blackmond, who heads up DFER's Michigan activities. "Our issue is: How do you go about doing this in such a way that it protects children?" He added that he's not confident the language could change before the bills' passage.

Tim Melton, a former Michigan Democratic legislator who recently began working as StudentsFirst's national legislative director, is less pessimistic. "That's something that we're working hard on right now to make sure that these bills reflect quality," Melton said.

Excellent Schools Detroit's current director Dan Varner said Pavlov seemed open to "convening conversations" on altering the bill. "He's now talking about what we can add after this is passed," Varner said.

But Doug Pratt, a spokesperson for the MEA, said his group wouldn't support the bill even with quality measures added. "The charter cap in and of itself is an important piece of accountability," Pratt said. "If you don't have a limit on charter schools, there's no pressure to ensure that they are performing and what they're trying to do is working."

Charter-school effectiveness is not a given in Detroit. A recent Detroit News analysis found charter high schools in Detroit performed worse than traditional public schools. According to the report, just six of 25 Detroit charter schools had higher math or science proficiency rates on the Michigan Merit Exam than those in Detroit's traditional public schools.

For his part, Roberts has thrown up his hands regarding the charter school legislation. Instead, he's working with local groups to devise Detroit-specific standards for new charter schools. "I want to spend my energy doing everything I can to ensure that we have good quality in the city of Detroit," Roberts said. "It's a waste of time to go back to the legislature."

ONLINE, OFF STANDARDS

Depending on what happens in Lansing, cyber schools, whose quality is just as mixed as that of charter schools, could also explode throughout Michigan.

Like the charter bill, the cyber school bill would lift the state's cap on cyber schools. There are currently just two cyber schools in Michigan, serving 1,400 students. The bill would also allow online programs to receive the same financial allocations per student from the state as brick-and-mortar public schools. Pavlov, the bill's sponsor, has said that the bill aims to get Michigan's educational innovation up to speed.

Different cyber schools use varying models, but they all exist online, without a physical institution. They are most useful for families who live in remote areas, and sometimes employ certified teachers. Advocates say that families are lining up for Michigan's cyber school options -- a reason to increase their offerings. Pavlov told the Kalamazoo Gazette that the new bill would create “a power­ful way to deliver learning in the 21st century."

The bill is worrisome to some, because there is little proof that online schools are effective. A recent study produced by the union-backed National Education Policy Center found "serious flaws with full-time virtual schools." For example, only one quarter of schools managed by large cyber-school provider K-12 Inc. are making "Adequate Yearly Progress" under federal standards. Studies elsewhere have also found the quality of cyber schools to be inferior to those of traditional public schools.

Cyber schools were the subject of a recent investigative article in The Nation about a small group of lobbyists who stand to profit from legislation like that in Michigan. The piece noted that former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, the de-facto leader of these lobbyists, has been to see Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder (R) twice to press for more open cyber school laws in Michigan.

Johnson said he voted no on the cyber school bill in late October because of quality concerns. "It's difficult to enact a policy into law and say it'll be successful when there's no example of that success lying around to visit," he said. "To say that this brand new way of educating students should be available at a large scale -- we can't say where that money is going."

The virtual school bill passed the Senate in a narrow 20-18 vote at the end of October. It is unclear when the House will take up the issue.

Blackmond said that DFER is just as cautious of the cyber school bill as it is the charter bill.

"We're opening the door to more cyber schools without putting in place accountability and quality measures," he said. "We don't want to subject our kids to five years of mis-education before we realize we were doing it wrong."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST DETROIT

Among the bundle of Republican education bills snaking its way through Lansing is a pair of measures that, at first glance, appears to capitalize on national bipartisan trends in education reform: two...
Among the bundle of Republican education bills snaking its way through Lansing is a pair of measures that, at first glance, appears to capitalize on national bipartisan trends in education reform: two...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:58 PM on 01/12/2012
In 2009, our Michigan based, non-profit educational consulting group, AIDEC, applied with a strong cyber-charter application to GVSU. We worked closely with the Michigan Association for Public School Academies to present a strong application and they also were supportive of our endeavor. Dara-Oak was rejected by GVSU; who replied that the state was not prepared for a cyber or virtual charter and yet; six months later, GVSU approved an application for a cyber-charter that was opened by a for-profit, out of state group.
Our founding members are parents, educators, instructional designers, and business managers. All are highly qualified in the field of education. Our main goal is to provide a quality 21st century education to students based on individuality, respect, and responsibility. Our curricula and assessment framework is strongly based on a research driven and proven plan. Our instructional design model is one that has been used with success for over 15 years; especially in high-risk educational settings.
While the cap on cyber-charters still exists even after the cap on charter schools has been extended and lifted; we are once again applying for our virtual charter. We, along with our future students and their parents are hoping that the State of Michigan recognizes that it is to the benefit of all involved to look at local, non-profit applications to create a strong educational community.

~Dr. Deborah Ash; Founder of Dara-Oak Academy
01:36 PM on 11/27/2011
Thanks for this report. Cited at PolicyMic —

• http://www.policymic.com/articles/2565/only-as-good-as-their-teachers#comment-36822
04:39 PM on 11/23/2011
A good class is valuable. But a class with a lot of disaffected students is not and will not be a good learning environment. In such situations on-line classes, despite their limitations, can look good indeed.

My 14 year old daughter is taking AP Biology on-line. We have definitely noticed shortcomings in the class. The real question is how she will do when she takes the AP exam. So you could say that the AP exam is a measure of the AP online class - and of the student.
photo
Lifeisdone
"Chickens are decent people"
12:19 AM on 03/14/2012
I am enrolled in a cyber School and I love it. I attended a public school for most of my life and I feel it had its shortcomings as well as the Cyber school. I don't have any problems with online schooling, it is staying focused that gets me. I am enrolled in the AP English class with k12. What do you view as shortcomings in the cyber school?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rjk111
09:53 AM on 11/23/2011
Billionaires, DeVos (Betsy & Dick), chase the money - Duh. Money first, quality controls later. Get ready for DeVos Elementary, DeVos Middle School, DeVos High School, and, yes, DeVos University. With all that education, then, you can get a job at DeVos' AMWAY Corporation.
12:36 PM on 11/22/2011
If liberal politicians would offer true school choice and allow poor kids to take the government $ allotment for their education to attend private school even BETTER. However, I've come to realize liberals/Democrats want to keep their base poor, uneducated and wanting for everything under the sun (but yet send their own kids to some of the best schools). I am so glad I wised up to their games over the last decade.

I happen to live in a decent area now and the public school is not too bad (as it's a mostly suburban locale), but I still hope to send my now 14 month old to private school in time. I really don't trust public schools after my own personal experience growing up within the confines NYC 'learning' institutions. It was certainly low quality learning and social engineering at its best in retrospect.

Just 2 cents from someone who's been there.
12:31 PM on 11/22/2011
As someone (age 37, female and Hispanic) who attended public school in the ghetto (P.S. 75 in the South Bronx), I think a cyber charter school is a great option to low-income kids and families who cannot remove themselves from such an environment and are forced to attend crappy and/or dangerous schools. Funny how the study that found "serious flaws with full-time virtual schools" was union-backed. Typical teacher union sabotage. Forget poor kids getting something close to a real quality education.

I just saw a local TV news story featuring one of the Michigan charter schools and how it was positively benefiting a young black family with 3 kids. This particular school arranges outdoor school projects for their students and have students and teacher physically convene on a periodic basis. The notion that students are at home trapped behind a computer with no human interaction is baseless. On-site school isn't for everyone and virtual education is being offered by colleges everywhere, so why not offer the OPTION to parents with primary, middle + high school aged children? It's stupid not to in this technologically-geared world.

Certainly there should be standards, and I am interested to know what state testing scores are (this should have been noted in the story), but if these schools are producing positive results, who cares if they profit?! They deserve it if they are! And it's a no-brainer to shut down those that aren't.
photo
Lifeisdone
"Chickens are decent people"
12:27 AM on 03/14/2012
"Funny how the study that found "serious flaws with full-time virtual schools" was union-backed. Typical teacher union sabotage. Forget poor kids getting something close to a real quality education."
Thank you. I am not from a poor neighborhood, but I chose to do schooling online as I felt it was better for my educational and emotional well being. These people keep providing "facts" about the cyber school and they are complete fallacies. With parental involvement it is just like regular home schooling, which statistics show children actually scoring higher on standardized tests and are more well rounded than that of public schoolers.
10:03 AM on 11/22/2011
I currently teach at a charter school that is staffed from top to bottom with educators. I have taught at charter schools where the only educators were the teachers. The difference is astounding. Here, the focus is on education. Other places, the focus is on test scores and "teacher accountability," professionalism, and making sure the bottom line is solid.
11:02 AM on 12/15/2011
Wonder why? You are forced to be judged this way or lose $. When I retired 4 years ago I was teaching first grade. 30+ tears as a primary teacher. I had to spend 2 days testing in reading. Three days of teaching reading in 1st grade is not going to work. We were forced to do this because of testing tied to money. You say your focus is on education not test scores etc. This is why I retired when I could. My focus was education until I was forced into too much testing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Chingaso
Fighting for mental superiority...
05:07 AM on 11/22/2011
"Michigan Charter And Cyber School Bills Lack Quality Controls"

Doesn't matter. Michigan has become...a non-factor. Roll with the bill...
03:23 AM on 11/22/2011
Here is video trailer on the educational system, focusing on Detroit. http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2011/01/war-on-kids.html#axzz1dtPmCHoA
03:19 AM on 11/22/2011
The concern of the legislation should not be focused on quality controls as the entire concept of quality controls is non-existent in anything dealing with child and youth funding. What should be a matter of contention is the funding and its appropriations.

Cyberschools may not be perfect but they are finally changing the paradigms of old: the agrarian model of learning; the factory school model; and, the school-to-prison pipeline.

http://beverlytran.blogspot.com/2011/08/why-michigan-is-going-schools-of-choice.html#axzz1dtPmCHoA">desires of students

Cyberschools operate on a reduced budget, providing for a greater profit margin. There are no physical buildings and everything is electronic. The cost of a computer and internet is priceless when it comes to empowering a student to investigate their full potential outside the confines of the 3R curriculum.

To make a long story short, technology has made progress cheap and are forcing schools to compete in the free market of education.
08:16 AM on 11/22/2011
Education is not a marketplace and learning takes place best in a face-to-face environment. End of discussion.
photo
Lifeisdone
"Chickens are decent people"
12:21 AM on 03/14/2012
how do you know learning takes place best in a face-to-face environment? And if you do not feel education should not be a marketplace are you also against private schools? I have attended both public and Cyber and the only difference is the people. I am able to concentrate now that I am home, I was not able to do so in a crowded classroom.
08:32 AM on 11/22/2011
Cyberschools are definitely not perfect. From what I've seen (and it's enough for me to feel confident in forming an opinion), they're a poor excuse for even a mediocre classroom experience.

But they're much cheaper, so there's more room for profit. And as long as the people that matter are making big profits, who cares if the children of the people who don't matter aren't learning much of anything?
photo
Lifeisdone
"Chickens are decent people"
12:22 AM on 03/14/2012
Learning much of anything? I have attended both public and Cyber schools and I can say that that is complete trash. I have gained more knowledge from k12 than I did in the public school system. We had old books and crowded classrooms and there is not much learning going on there.
11:21 PM on 11/21/2011
Governor Snyder cut $470.00 per public school pupil in Michigan this year.The cuts did not have to happen, the State budget actually had a surplus, it's what Snyder likes to call 'shared sacrifice' meanwhile these cuts had to happen as businesses were granted unbelievable tax cuts.

Moreover, why the push for charter schools? It's all about the profit folks, they can't wait to get their hands on public money and siphon it off to non-union, non-accountable schools, non-regulated schools. Do charter schools have to accept any and all students? No. Do they have to provide special education accomodations?

Neil Bush, bro of George, runs an educational software company Ignite. Read on....

In 1999, Bush co-founded Ignite! Learning, an educational software corporation. Bush has said he started Austin-based Ignite! Learning because of his learning difficulties in middle school and those of his son, Pierce.[6] The software uses multiple intelligence methods to provide varying types of content to appeal to multiple learning styles.

To fund Ignite!, Bush raised $23 million from U.S. investors, including his parents.

As of October 2006, over 13 U.S. school districts (out of over 14,000 school districts nation-wide[8]) have used federal funds made available through the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 in order to buy Ignite's products at $3,800 apiece.[9]

A December 2003 Style section article in the Washington Post reported that Bush's salary from Ignite! was $180,000 per year.[4]
08:41 PM on 11/21/2011
Education in the US is supposed to be about preparing the next generation of informed citizens who are capable of governing themselves. Instead, for-profit management companies find ways to maximize profit, teachers work for the company instead of the school board, and the whims of the 'market' drive decisions. We've already seen what lack of regulation and absence of quality controls gets us. Detroit is already suffering from lack of accountability and now the Republicans want to open the entire Michigan educational system up to anyone who can figure out how to sign papers of incorporation? Sounds like more money for 'consultants' and less money to support the classroom.
08:27 PM on 11/21/2011
When a school is run as a for-profit enterprise then the teachers are working for the company, not for the school board. Decision are made to ensure profitability, not problem solving skills. Public education in the United States is supposed to be about preparing the next generation of engaged citizens, NOT preparing brainwashed consumers. We already know what lack of regulation and quality control does. We should not be leaving education up to the whims of the market.
06:07 PM on 11/21/2011
"Our issue is: How do you go about doing this in such a way that it protects children?"

The best way to protect children is NOT to do this.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
03:50 PM on 11/21/2011
The point is obvious. It's not about quality it's about profit. Eliminate teachers, classrooms, books, et al and there's more profit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie VanderMolen
take media to task
04:06 PM on 11/21/2011
May I add that it's also about selling off the commons. With the dire economic conditions of Michigan, This governor and legislature are licking their chops to privatize all of Michigan's commons. Then the people's voice is limited. We elect our boards of education in our communities. We can run for the school boards. We can attend board meetings. We can do all those things but, when it comes to private charter schools, it's free-market. Which means you don't have a choice disguised as, you have more choices. They're going to whittle down school budgets to a shoe-string and expect high test scores. It's never going to happen. And, when it doesn't they will privatize the schools.
photo
miaontia
56%'er that votes...
04:14 PM on 11/21/2011
DPS spends $10k per student for a less than 25% graduation rate. If they spent $40k per student I doubt they would even reach a 30% graduation rate. I know it's not the teachers fault, but it certainly can't hurt the families that give a rip about their childrens' education to be able to move them somewhere away from the worst of the worst.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
10:24 AM on 11/22/2011
First you provide no evidence for either your 10k or the 25% graduation rate. Your speculation is disproven simply by comparing the charter costs to the public costs.