iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Top 0.1 Percent Netting Nearly Half Of All Capital Gains: Report

Capital Gains

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/21/11 10:47 AM ET Updated: 11/21/11 10:47 AM ET

As large as the income gap between rich and everyone else is today, one area of the economy has an even wider gulf to bridge.

The top 0.1 percent of earners are netting half of all capital gains -- or gains on the sale of shares or property -- according to Forbes. That means that 315,000 Americans are benefiting disproportionately from the financial transaction, which accounts for 60 percent of the income of the Forbes 400.

(Read the entires Forbes piece here)

Capital gains have been featured prominently in the debate over how best to overhaul the tax code and reduce the budget deficit. That's because capital gains, which largely benefit the wealthy, are taxed at a rate of about 15 percent -- lower than the 26.5 percent top effective tax rate paid by households making less than $100,000 in 2006.

The discrepancy in tax rates exacerbates the widening wealth gap. After accounting for taxes, the top one percent of earners saw their incomes grow by 275 percent between 1979 and 2007, according to the Congressional Budget Office, while the bottom fifth of earners saw their incomes grow by just 20 percent during the same period. In addition, the richest 10 percent of Americans control two-thirds of the country's net worth, Mother Jones reports.

Billionaire investor Warren Buffett noted in August the argument of some that raising taxes on capital gains would discourage the super wealthy from investing. Buffett took issue with that claim though, writing that he hasn't seen anyone shy away from a smart investment because of the tax on the potential gain -- even when the capital gains tax rate was nearly 40 percent in the late 1970s.

Many of the super-rich manage to avoid paying taxes on much of their income through means other than a lower capital gains tax rate. Many U.S. billionaires use complicated transactions to get cash from stocks without paying any taxes, according to a Bloomberg report. The effective tax rate of the top 400 U.S. taxpayers was 18 percent in 2008, down from 30 percent in 1995, according to IRS data cited by Bloomberg.

It's not only super-rich households that have managed to lower their tax rate. Thirty of America's most profitable companies paid less than zero in income taxes in the last three years, according to a study released earlier this month by the Citizens for Tax Justice. The companies use loopholes such as the "active financing exception" -- which allows corporations to sidestep taxes on overseas profits if those profits were made through "actively financing a sale or deal" -- to lower their tax burden.

Still, some super rich households say they believe they should be paying more in taxes. A band of millionaires went to Capitol Hill last week to lobby Congress to raise their taxes, and they seem to be backed by other rich Americans. Sixty-eight percent of millionaires support raising taxes on households earning $1 million or more, according to survey released last month by the Spectrem Group.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
As large as the income gap between rich and everyone else is today, one area of the economy has an even wider gulf to bridge. The top 0.1 percent of earners are netting half of all capital gains -...
As large as the income gap between rich and everyone else is today, one area of the economy has an even wider gulf to bridge. The top 0.1 percent of earners are netting half of all capital gains -...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 263
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
08:11 PM on 12/05/2011
Any discussion of capital gains and the 1% can be highly misleading. How many of the capital gains millionaires are "one year millionaires" because they cash out real estate they have had for decades in order to retire? This one-year windfall may be the individual's primary "retirement fund". To tax it at an abusively high rate would be the equivalent of taxing the value of a civil servant's retirement as a "capital gain".

How much of the declared capital gains on assets held for decades is just imaginary inflation gains as the value of the dollar decreases over time? For example an investment that grew at exactly the inflation rate for a few decades is not a real gain, however, it will be reported as huge taxable profit. To tax these imaginary profits is a form of theft.

If you want to do away with the low capital gains rate in a way which is fair and honest, inflation adjustment must be made to the basis in calculating the capital gains.
12:45 PM on 02/07/2012
Those would be short term capital gains which are subject to regular income tax levels so these people do not count.
12:45 PM on 02/07/2012
and
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
mataylor16
You all want it one way. But, its the other way. -
02:17 PM on 11/22/2011
And amazingly, you still get people (who of course have no capital) bloviating about the wonders of 'capitalism'.
10:55 AM on 11/22/2011
A TRANSACTION TAX

Why not a single, easily administered, non-regressive tax?
It can be done, and undoubtedly will be done. The question, really, is when?
The Federal Government could replace its entire system of taxation with a levy on all transfers of value. The actual percentage rate would be quite small—one percent or less—because all transactions would be subject to this tax.*
There would be no income tax as such, nor any import taxes, or other federal taxes of any kind (and this could be the first step in the elimination of all taxes—state and local as well as federal).
The tax would be levied on stock trades and dividend distributions; wages; inheritances; retail and wholesale purchases; rents; interest; property purchases, etc. In other words, any time there is a transfer of value, the federal tax would be applied to the amount of the transfer.
Apportionment of federal revenues would then be made to the states and local governments on the basis of population, and inversely to the amount of local taxes levied. Those state and local governments with higher taxes would receive less federal revenue. State and local governments would gain the most by not levying any taxes and therefore not incurring collection costs.


*EXCEPTION: For obvious reasons, an exception and the ONLY exception to the “transfer of value” rule would be the tax collection, itself.
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
10:33 AM on 11/22/2011
So, "315,000 Americans are benefiting disproportionately from the financial transaction, which accounts for 60 percent of the income of the Forbes 400" - through tax advantage written for them by their bought politicians.
I think America would be a lot better off without that 0.1%, and there would be lot's of money to spread around too. How can they justify themselves to the 99.9% of us American's?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
12:13 PM on 11/22/2011
Simple. Their media outlets spew li/es 24/7 telling people that this is "freedom" and that they too will be rich one day, and the poor so/ds buy it every time.
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
12:34 PM on 11/22/2011
So, why do we allow that? Why do we allow this small minority group to take advantage of us? This is stupid. We should stand up to their charade.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VFausone
10:25 AM on 11/22/2011
If you own everything and control all the money- you get most of the benefit of that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
montemalone
oenophile, aquarist, francophone, radical moderate
10:02 AM on 11/22/2011
Well d'uh!
When you control all the capital, you net all the gains.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
05:43 AM on 11/22/2011
Today's republicans are a cancer on American Prosperity, and have been for 30 years, and every decade, they've become more malignant.
02:07 AM on 11/22/2011
Oh no!! Our social utopia is even further from reach.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanaGarrett
01:42 AM on 11/22/2011
Yeah, that's right, conservative thinkers. There is no evidence that the USA's economic system is rigged for the benefit of the ultra wealthy. Get real.
02:05 AM on 11/22/2011
Yeah I know, just ask John Kerry next time your on his yacht. Maybe the CEO of Solyndra has some insight on this?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanaGarrett
02:33 AM on 11/22/2011
How silly. You think an ideological argument based on an economic fact can be dismissed by a mere partisan reply? LOL. Learn to make arguments.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
05:30 AM on 11/22/2011
You use talking points to argue against America's greatest social issue these days?? Really?? I will attribute your pitiful reasoning to you being loaded on Keystone Light.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
VFausone
10:27 AM on 11/22/2011
Both sides are sold to the highest bidder. They're like red and blue prostitutes.
12:55 AM on 11/22/2011
It's exactly as designed. The game is rigged to perfection.
photo
Bluedrgn
Truth has a liberal bias.
12:40 AM on 11/22/2011
"Sixty-eight percent of millionaires support raising taxes on households earning $1 million or more"

It doesn't mater what the people want, all that matters to Republicans is that raising taxes is against their idealogy. They'll let the entire country go right down the toliet before they even think of budging and inch.
02:08 AM on 11/22/2011
9 9 9 or something similar?
photo
Bluedrgn
Truth has a liberal bias.
02:47 AM on 11/22/2011
Right. 9 9 9 equals a huge tax break for the rich and a huge increase on most every else. But it would probably bring in significantly LESS tax revenue, so in Republicans are okay with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SelfCentered
Live life or die trying!
11:38 PM on 11/21/2011
It just keeps getting better.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bugweed
11:28 PM on 11/21/2011
What I can't figure is why we have become so sheep like? Is it fear, is it complacency? Your children are not going to have more than the little we have left, are you content to let them be the boot lickers and shoe shiners of the .01 percent? I forget, the baby boomers (of which I am one) are the most self absorbed, greedy and cowardly generation in history. We don't fight for anything we can't buy.
photo
BBackSoon
Hello, I must be going.
11:03 PM on 11/21/2011
I for one am shocked that people making $30k a year are not able to invest and enjoy Capital Gains.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
B Powell
Accurate fact trumps loud emotion, always.
05:35 AM on 11/22/2011
They should be able to, when they are not paying income taxes, and getting the EIC and CTC! Free money to invest, I say. -- sarcasm.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Key
When criminals take over the Market it is not Free
10:03 PM on 11/21/2011
Where's Congress? We will remember this.