More

Pakistan Ambassador Husain Haqqani Resigns

Pakistan

CHRIS BRUMMITT   11/22/11 03:47 PM ET   AP

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's envoy to Washington lost a battle with the country's powerful generals to keep his job Tuesday over allegations he wrote a memo seeking U.S. help in stopping a supposed coup in the aftermath of the American raid that killed Osama bin Laden.

The resignation of Hussain Haqqani highlighted tensions between the country's nominal civilian government and the army, which has ruled Pakistan for most of its history.

Haqqani, a key ally of President Asif Ali Zardari, was well regarded by Obama administration officials in Washington, where many lawmakers view Pakistan with suspicion if not hostility.

Although Haqqani said he hoped his stepping down would end the scandal – which Pakistanis have called "memogate" – speculation remained over whether it could yet engulf Zardari. The unpopular leader has faced questions over whether he also knew about the mysterious memo, which right-wing, pro-army media outlets have described as treasonous.

Haqqani said he stood by earlier denials he had nothing to do with the letter, which was sent soon after the bin Laden raid to then-U.S. military chief Adm. Mike Mullen. The envoy and his supporters have alleged the memo was a hoax cooked up by the military establishment to get rid of him and weaken the Zardari government and democratic institutions – explosive charges in a country that has seen at least three military coups.

The memo was made public last week by a Pakistani American businessman who claimed to have received it from Haqqani and, following his instructions, passed it to Mullen through an intermediary. He claimed that Haqqani assured him that Zardari had approved the memo.

The Pakistani government initially denied the existence of the memo, as did Mullen's spokesman. But later the spokesman said Mullen had received it but considered it unreliable and ignored it.

The memo accuses army chief Gen. Ashfaq Pervez Kayani of plotting to bring down the government in the aftermath of the bin Laden raid, which most Pakistanis considered a humiliating violation of their sovereignty by U.S. Navy SEALs. It asks Mullen for his "direct intervention" with Kayani to prevent a coup.

In return, it promises help in installing a "new security team" in Islamabad that would be friendly to Washington. It also mentions policies likely to please the Obama administration but certain to enrage the army, which sets foreign policy and views itself as the sole protector of the country's sovereignty.

The memo promises the government will allow the U.S. to propose names of officials to investigate how bin Laden was able to live undetected in an army town not far from Pakistan's version of West Point, facilitate American attempts to target militants like al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahri and Afghan Taliban chief Mullah Omar, and allow the U.S. greater oversight of Pakistan's nuclear weapons.

Haqqani, who offered to resign last week when the scandal broke, returned to Pakistan over the weekend to face questioning by the army and the intelligence chiefs. He told close associates he would resign if his tenure became too much of a drag on the civilian government, but was fighting to the end to keep his job.

"I have resigned to bring closure to this meaningless controversy threatening our fledgling democracy," he said in a statement. "It was an artificial crisis over an insignificant memo written by a self-centered businessman."

A statement from the prime minister's office said an investigation into the memogate scandal would be conducted "at an appropriate level" and "carried out fairly, objectively and without bias."

The businessman who allegedly received the memo from Haqqani, Mansoor Ijaz, has led a high-profile media campaign attacking the ambassador. He said Sunday that Lt. Gen. Shuja Pasha, the head of Pakistan's main intelligence agency, flew to London to meet with him last month. Ijaz said he provided Pasha with Blackberry and computer records pertaining to the memo and implicating Haqqani. Both the memo and the Blackberry records were leaked to the media.

The conversations show Haqqani allegedly discussing the wording of the memo with Ijaz and telling him to go ahead.

"Ball is in play now. Make sure you have protected your flanks," Ijaz allegedly tells Haqqani after handing over the memo.

Ijaz has a history of making claims to be well connected with U.S. politicians. Under the Clinton administration, he said U.S. officials told him Sudan was willing to turn over then-fugitive bin Laden, who was taking refuge there. Ijaz said Clinton National Security Adviser Sandy Berger rejected the deal because he was unwilling to do business with Sudan – a claim that Berger immediately denied.

It was not immediately known who would replace Haqqani, who has no family connection to the Haqqani militant network that is carrying out high-profile bombings in the Afghan capital, Kabul. Of particular importance will be whether the next ambassador is perceived to answer to the government or to the army.

U.S. deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said Tuesday that Haqqani "has been a very close partner, of course, of the United States and we've appreciated the work we have done with him. But at the same time, we are sure that we'll be able to work with whoever the next Pakistani ambassador is as well."

The diplomatic post is a crucial one for both nations. Washington wants to work with Pakistan to defeat al-Qaida and negotiate a way out of the Afghan war. Islamabad relies on U.S. aid and diplomatic support.

Relations between the two countries have soured badly over the last year, especially over the bin Laden raid, which the U.S. carried out without informing Pakistan in advance. With many American lawmakers calling for an end to U.S. aid, Haqqani was outspoken in support of continued engagement.

When Mullen blamed Pakistan for aiding the Haqqani militant network after its spectacular attack against the U.S. embassy in Kabul over the summer, the ambassador went into overdrive, working the phones and persuading U.S. officials to meet him at his office, or at the Army Navy Club near the White House – discreet conversations that helped keep some forms of military cooperation moving forward.

Haqqani is also a visiting scholar at Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington and an adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md. He is the author of a respected book on the army and Islam in Pakistan, in which he argues against a military role in the country.

"He was an extremely effective interlocutor," said Shuja Nawaz, the director of the South Asia Center at the U.S.-based Atlantic Council. "It will be difficult to find someone with his ability to translate difficult situations into a workable relationship."

Christine Fair, assistant professor at Georgetown University, said she didn't expect the resignation would lead to a further downturn in U.S.-Pakistan ties, noting that both countries were continuing with cooperation on targeting al-Qaida and on drone strikes in the Afghan border area.

"So we're still getting from them what we need in terms of a bare minimum," Fair said. "It would be surprising if a new ambassador would try to sabotage that ... but you can't rule it out."

___

Associated Press writers Sebastian Abbot in Islamabad and Kimberly Dozier and Matthew Lee in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's envoy to Washington lost a battle with the country's powerful generals to keep his job Tuesday over allegations he wrote a memo seeking U.S. help in stopping a supposed co...
ISLAMABAD — Pakistan's envoy to Washington lost a battle with the country's powerful generals to keep his job Tuesday over allegations he wrote a memo seeking U.S. help in stopping a supposed co...
Filed by Clare Richardson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 124
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
07:40 AM on 11/23/2011
ISLAMABAD (AP) — Pakistan appointed a democracy activist who has faced militant death threats as its new ambassador to the United States on Wednesday, moving quickly to replace the old envoy who resigned after upsetting the country's powerful military in a scandal dubbed "memo-gate."
________________________________________________________________

This is Pakistan's newest way to scam the U.S. for financial aid. Put a new face
on the hand that reaches out for the money......and call her a democracy
activist.

Yea....that's the ticket....democracy activist. Now where's the $$$$$$$$$$?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alexey Braguine
Author of Kingmaker, a novel
06:54 AM on 11/23/2011
US strategists voluntarily drove their country to become the ham in the Afghan-Pakistani sandwich. Hot sauce, anyone?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:07 AM on 11/23/2011
Eyewash! Pakistani Generals and Government Officials playing the old CYA game with the usual scapegoats! Pakistan is Bad News for the US!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yasser Yousufi
Parthian
02:07 AM on 11/23/2011
My dear American friends, this is an entirely internal matter of a sovereign country. If Hussain Haqqani did write a memo to a General of a foreign country seeking help against his own Army Chief is an act of treason which ever way you look at it. Most Pakistanis know Mr. Haqqani has always been more of a friend of US than Pakistan. He had commercial interests in US before he became ambassador. He was most likely to join a think tank in Washington for a hefty amount after his job as ambassador ended. If he is arrested in Pakistan and even hanged for conspiring with a foreign Army General for attempting to destroy the top tier of his own Army, it is none of your business. Otherwise would some of you please explain me why Bradley Manning is currently being tortured and kept in solitary confinement 23 hours a day for months in spite of the fact that he has not been charged of any crime yet. Most of the leaders of the Republican Party have said that they are against anything short of death penalty against this guy. Dont you think Pentagon has forced the hand of Obama in this case regarding torture of Bradley Manning?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
11:38 PM on 11/22/2011
Obviously,he had no choice and had to resign.It also put Pakistans government in another rather sticky situation i would think.Their gonna have a very hard time trying to downplay this whole thing and gthe actions of their military
10:38 PM on 11/22/2011
Bush administration was pandering the Mushraff and giving him the millions of dollars to keep Obama safe!! That was the Pakistan American coalition was viewed until President Obama declared that he would go to Pakistan in his election campaign if they cannot hunt down BIN Laden, and to everyone's amaze Obama did it without even letting the CONGRESS know anything to do with the plan !!!
10:02 PM on 11/22/2011
Too many curry Indian roaches on these boards pretending to be American. But you can tell from their one sided hateful anti Pakistan rants.
11:36 PM on 11/22/2011
Who is an American by the way? You mean European settlers??
08:06 PM on 11/22/2011
Haqqani should have phoned that resignation in rather than return to Islamabad to have the memo "investigated" and face what passes as justice in Pakistani courts these days. Why the U.S. failed to provide him asylum once the memo surfaced publically is a major oversight when other "whistle-blowers" see the ramifications that will no doubt be forthcoming for someone who attempted to aid our agenda and potentially protect more American lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Morgan378
05:12 PM on 11/22/2011
Ya know, I don't think anyone was asking the Pakistani's to bend over and kiss our asses - but at least it was believed that we were fighting the same enemies. Guess we're at odds about tactics and overall strategy since the Pakistani's are negotiating with the Taliban and put out feelers for the Haqqani Network. If we were to find Mullah Omar hiding out in Pakistan - even if it meant war - we should take this one eyed jack out in a similar operation to the one for bin Laden or strike with a Predator regardless of the Pakistani's "sovreignity" claims. Allies are supposed to act as allies and since no one seems as yet to account for the $60 billion lavished on war lords and the like and our "blind eye" towards the opium production (never higher) in Afghanistan there's little doubt the Pakistani's think they'll control the insurrgents and Kabul when the American's leave. The longer they play their games the longer we're there and if they'd had half a brain they'd know that chopping off the heads of these snakes would be in their own best interests. Idiots.
04:57 PM on 11/22/2011
Asking the U.S for help, o'really.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:41 PM on 11/22/2011
Pakistan is the sewer of Asia, and it has nothing to do with the government or the religion. It is the military.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TekiyaGedolah
05:20 PM on 11/22/2011
which keeps it's citizens subjugated by iron age mysticism, ignorance, poverty, and hatred for all things enlightened and democratic.
02:57 AM on 11/23/2011
That seems to be somthing most Mus.lim countries have in common. That is what happens when the people have no control of their leadership.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christina-Xena
That little Voice in your Head...is mine.
04:22 PM on 11/22/2011
I wonder how much of our imperative to maintain relations with Pakistan is related to the fact they have nuclear weapons, and could/have distributed some of that knowlege, materials or bomb to other countries?

Of course if we cut off aid and support to them, then their seems to be suitors waiting in the wings to fill that relationship void...like China...or Russia...maybe even Iran, who would gain greater influence in the area. And then how would all that affect our relationship with India? Are they counting on US involvement there to keep the Pakistan's military aggression in line?.

Seems like a case of being damned if we do....and double-damned if we don't situation and policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Morgan378
05:20 PM on 11/22/2011
Very true Christina-Xena - the fact that the Pakistani's invited China to come look at their situation is enough to cast dipersions on the relationship ourselves and the Pakistani's are SUPPOSED to be having. It was thought we were fighting the same enemies - but Pakistan beleives that they will be able to control the insurrgent factions and run rough shod all over Afghanistan after we leave. What they don't understand is that this is NOT 2001 PRE-9/11 of that year when their ties to the Taliban were symbiotic and in alliance. They're people hate if not dread Americans on principle alone while Madrassas continually churn out fanatics that have no skills or brains to get into the colleges for futher studies and if the US is still taking students in to our bastions of higher learning we'd better think again 'cause it wouldn't surprise me to find out what they're studying here right in our own nation on the taxpayer's dime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christina-Xena
That little Voice in your Head...is mine.
05:48 PM on 11/22/2011
We do provide public education to foreign future terrorists as a matter of governmental policy. Then they still want to hate and destroy us.

Anyways....F&F!
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
04:16 PM on 11/22/2011
pakistan another reason to get out out the region.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:06 PM on 11/22/2011
Heads up. Where did we derive an expectation that any country would put another country's agenda before it's own? Start from reality. We stand a better chance of working out problems if we get real.

Destroy any country that doesn't agree with us? Oh, come on now, not a problem solver.

This weird distorted view that we have of our self as a nation in the eyes of other nations is not sustainable. I'm not defending Pakistan or any other country for its policies. Pakistan is a particularly troubled nation. Exploiting its paranoia about India and the Khasmir province is not likely to help those countries work out their differences.

We aren't particularly adept at solving our own internal problems at present, and that fact doesn't speak well of our ability to say we can solve our international neighbors' problems, tempting though it is to distract us from our frustration on the home front.

You might want to read, Playing with Fire: Pakistan at War with Itself by Pamela Constable.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
savvy7
A closed mouth gathers no foot
05:04 PM on 11/22/2011
"Heads up. Where did we derive an expectatio­n that any country would put another country's agenda before it's own? "

Remember these words the next time you read about U.S. contemplation of hostilities with Iran because of Israel's imagined fears of an impending nuclear attack. That would be an illustration of the unthinkable question you've just asked.
03:04 AM on 11/23/2011
Imagined fears? Why is it that the Saudis and other Mus.lim countries in the region fear a nuclear Iran almost as much as Israel does.

Being that Iran supports Hezbollah and Hamas, both of which at.tack Israel every chance they get, Israel is worried about Iran getting nuclear weapons, and with good reason.
04:05 PM on 11/22/2011
It is so difficult dealing with these muslim countries. Why? Because they lie so much. They are all double dealing, underhanded, lieing, backstabbers. Thats the way those people are raised. The Taqqiyya is a way of life for them and one requirement of thier religion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
savvy7
A closed mouth gathers no foot
05:06 PM on 11/22/2011
Newsflash! All countries (ie., leaders) lie. Think of it as a survival skill.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Yasser Yousufi
Parthian
01:43 AM on 11/23/2011
Dont forget the Taqqiya of the born again Christian President of US! Remember the lies of Satellite images of WMD's shown in front of the entire world?
01:19 PM on 11/27/2011
The western media has blind folded its people and has shown them only that was needed to form an opinion. They have the technology and means to fool their own people but this is not going to last for ever. They should worry about China who is driving them financially bankrupt. It is only a matter of time