Women Are Underrepresented, Oversexualized In Top Films: Study

Bridesmaids

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 11/22/2011 12:27 pm Updated: 02/22/2012 8:52 pm

Like a broken record that continues to stick and sputter, a new study shows that women are still underrepresented when it comes to the top movies in the country.

A study released by USC's Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism took a survey of the 4,342 speaking characters in the top 100 grossing films of 2009 and compared it to results from the top 100 films of 2007 and 2008. For women, nothing much has changed -- in these top films, 32.8 percent of actors are female and 67.2 are male -- 2.05 males to every one female. This means that less than 17 percent of films are gender balanced, even though females make up half of the ticket-buying population.

Perhaps more disturbing is the finding that women are much more frequently sexualized when they appear on screen. They're more likely to be seen in sexy clothing (25.8 percent to men at 4.7 percent) and more likely to be partially naked (23.6 percent to 7.4 percent).

Women are also more likely to feel the effect of their age on their career. Though teen girls (12-20 year olds) are more likely than adult women, 21-39, to be shown as sexy, or partially naked -- 21.5 percent to 13.8. But older women, aged 40-64, are not only less likely to be shown as attractive (3.8 percent), but less likely to be shown at all. Only 24 percent of all characters aged 40 to 64 are female.

Though New York Magazine recently suggested that we're living in the "golden age" of male objectification, for women, the golden age never ended. The ratings controversy over films like "Blue Valentine" and "Shame" have also indicated the possibility that people are more likely to find issue with full frontal male nudity, and depictions of female sexual pleasure -- though full frontal female nudity rarely guarantees an NC-17 rating.

Part of the problem may be the serious gender gap that exists in the movie business as a whole. "Gender equality does not exist behind the camera," the study wrote, looking at 1,240 positions to reach the conclusion. Only 3.6 percent of directors are female, only 13.5 percent of writers are female and only 21.6 percent of producers are female. No change has occurred in these figures over the past three years. The study also found that films with one more female screenwriters shows a 10.2 percent increase in female presence in films -- a suggestion that if things were to change behind the camera, they could also change in front.

"It’s hard to know why women have fared so badly in Hollywood in the last few decades, though any business that refers to its creations as product cannot, by definition, have much imagination," New York Times critic Manohla Dargis wrote, last year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CULTURE

Like a broken record that continues to stick and sputter, a new study shows that women are still underrepresented when it comes to the top movies in the country. A study released by USC's Annenber...
Like a broken record that continues to stick and sputter, a new study shows that women are still underrepresented when it comes to the top movies in the country. A study released by USC's Annenber...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 317
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
08:53 PM on 11/26/2011
None of this is exactly news.
08:04 PM on 11/26/2011
There is a simple reason why women have been overly sexualized in the film industry and in media in general. They allow it.

Feminism is one thing, but money trumps all.
09:16 PM on 11/28/2011
Men are in power in the entertainment industry, but hell, everyone has to pay the bills.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
06:21 PM on 11/26/2011
Also, using the top 100 grossing films gives a very skewed and pretty irrelevant group of results, since using the most popular totally ignores genres where women have far more equality in representation, such as horror and indie films.

It looks to me as if the people doing the "study" (it hurts me to even call it that) decided on a conclusion they wanted, then designed a "study" that would provide that conclusion.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
06:04 PM on 11/26/2011
"... have also indicated the possibility that people are more likely to find issue with full frontal male nudity, and depictions of female sexual pleasure -- though full frontal female nudity rarely guarantees an NC-17 rating."

I really hope that the author of this understands the difference between genitalia being clearly visible and genitalia not being clearly visible.

It doesn't seem as though, however.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
lifeofthemind
11:09 PM on 11/26/2011
I got that sense, too. I'm wracking my brain for a film that featured full frontal female nudity that wasn't by Catherine Breillat, Lars von Trier, or Bernardo Bertolucci. This article seems pretty misinformed!
09:55 PM on 07/30/2012
I have never seen a mainstream movie that showed female genitals yet could name movie after movie and shows on cable that show male genitalia. This article is spewing out the same old feminist propaganda that is a complete lie to gain and advantage for women in many areas. They play the victim very well.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taoistpunk
because the monks wouldn't have me..
02:27 PM on 11/25/2011
as for the sexism and oversexualization of the US: no shite..

as for movies: it's hard to get much more democratic than voting with your wallet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mazzo
11:53 PM on 11/24/2011
I once took a writing class and was outraged at the blatantly stereotypiĀ­cal female characters presented in class. All the female characters were also dumb-as-a-post. So, I simply said "okay, now switch all the male characters to female names and visa versa. Now read it again!" It was the clearest way I could get my classmates to understand how unflatteriĀ­ng they had written their female charactersĀ­. Once "Fred" or "Bill" had all the lame dialog and "Stacey" and "Ella" had all the smart, funny and intelligenĀ­t dialog, they realized the big "oops".
09:57 PM on 07/30/2012
Do you see how men are portrayed in sitcoms and commercials? Forever the dolt that can do no right unless led by his smarter wife or girlfriend. Open your eyes!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mazzo
11:42 PM on 11/24/2011
Ella Silver, you should be embarrassed of yourself. Honestly, your posts read like it's best to just ignore inequality and gender bias. Shame on you. If it weren't for women who DEMANDED equality, YOU wouldn't have been educated, have the right to vote, you'd be on your tenth kid by age 25, and you would not be able to own property. Yes, I get it...blah blah blah "fighting against 400 million years...blah blah blah", so that means we should just take what we get? I'm sorry but that simply doesn't cut it for me. In the 1960's, women were fighting for equality and forty years later we still earn $0.70 to every dollar a man earns. Fair? Hardly!

I'm so sick and tired of women putting up with the status quo. WE make up 51% of the population, so how is it that we're still putting up with this bias against women? Un-effing-believable!
10:02 PM on 07/30/2012
Oh here we go with the old made up wage gap yet again! Life isn't fair all the time. Things aren't always equal. Men die in wars for your freedom, gave up their lives on the Titanic to save women, and die on the job far more often than women due to working much more hazardous jobs. Men are denied custody of their children and lose their homes and money far more than women in family courts. Men also receive more time in prison for the same crime a woman commits. I could go on and on! Deal with things better!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:51 PM on 11/24/2011
ā€œā€œI think these movies are part of a frightened backlash. This constant belittling of women and bullying and hatred of anyone seen as not conforming to their gender role is part of a bigger picture. Society is changing. Gender roles are becoming outdated. And this has some people, who rely on gender roles for some personal security, scared.

They are trying desperatelĀ­Ā­y to keep the outdated past alive as long as possible. They start with brainwashiĀ­Ā­ng the children in sexist movies and encourage the punishment of anyone who does not obey their gender role. School bullying largely centers around terrorizinĀ­Ā­g people into strict gender role obedience. These movies perpetuate the lie that gender roles are natural and unchangeabĀ­Ā­le and that there is some huge difference between men and women. And that the most admirable thing you can ever do is to conform to your "dominatinĀ­Ā­g man" and "sexually attractive and available woman" gender role. Time we stood up and called this frightened manipulatiĀ­Ā­on for what it is.ā€ā€
06:20 PM on 11/26/2011
Your observation is very interesting and rings true with some people I know. Thanks for your articulation.
01:28 PM on 11/24/2011
I'm curious as to how many offended parties on this comment thread are women over 45...

Just keepin' it real.

lol....
01:41 PM on 11/24/2011
I find it hard to believe a women would post such a blatant misogynistic post.
02:20 PM on 11/24/2011
Look. I may be a female but i'm very realistic. I see things as they are.

Let's be perfectly honest honey. Genetics and sexual selection have feminism beat.

Frustrating? Yes. But fighting it won't change it. As i said in another post you are fighting 400 million years of evolution. No political agenda can win against it.

I am still a young woman but old enough that i can see how oblivious young girls are to their future and how miserable old women are because they were once oblivious to their future. The cold hard truth, whether you like it or not, is this. Young women being more attractive is not an unfortunate trend. It is reality. It is genetics and it is the hard programming in the brain of human beings.

You can call that misogynistic if you want. Unfortunately for all of us, science doesn't give a damn how we feel about it.
02:22 PM on 11/24/2011
having said that, should older women not be featured in films? Of course that's not the case. But you need to add on to that unfortunate reality that 75% of people are sort of stupid. And so they're superficial and can't see past their genetic programming. Those are the people these movies cater to.

If you consider yourself outside that 75% explore different genres of film that explore more intelligent types of issues/characters/interests. You'll find that it's not so bad in the world of the geeks. If you watch bridesmaids, what do you really, REALLY expect?
04:45 PM on 11/24/2011
FUKU! p.s. I'm 25!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gilbert Albright
01:00 PM on 11/24/2011
IT ALL ABOUT WHAT SELLS! Movies starring women (except for a few) do poorly at the box office. Movies with Female oriented storylines and plotS, do poorly at the box office too.

Making movies is all about MAKING MONEY! It's a Freaking BUSINESS, not and equality contest!

What kind of movies the industry makes is directly related to what type of movies MAKE MONEY!

They are not in the business of making movies starring women, about women TO LOSE MONEY, just to keep the Feminists happy!
01:17 PM on 11/24/2011
That is not true. Women's movies make money and stay at the box office for a longer period of time.
01:30 PM on 11/24/2011
ugh.. i hate to agree Gilbert but i do. That and there are PLENTY of indie films that do not follow this agenda and provide more of a realistic view of life and gender.

It's about what sells. Period. And more than that it's about ART. To stifle art or to demand art change it's shape to pacify political agenda is akin to communism at it's worst.
12:33 PM on 11/24/2011
Until there is equality behind the camera and at the studio level it will continue on screen. The current issue of DGA magazine is covered with pictures of Directors celebrating the 75th anniversary of the DGA. There is one woman on the cover. So this is why you get movies made mostly for men about men.

Gather a room of professional women in the industry and you would be shocked by the amount and level of sexual harassment they have endured.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
threnodymarch
Art is long, life is short.
01:58 PM on 11/25/2011
Exactly. One of the best ways to emphasize this point is to ask random people to name a female director. And not just any female director. One that is a household name, on the level of Lucas and Spielberg. You pretty much can't. Kathryn Bigelow won Best Director two years ago, and hers is probably the first name someone will bring up. After that, maybe Sofia Coppola, Jane Campion, Catherine Hardwicke, Lisa Cholodenko...and the trail ends there. There simply aren't many out there, and it's devastating. (And the ones I mentioned severely test the meaning of "household name", as painful as that is).
03:01 PM on 11/25/2011
Fanned for being able to name female Directors.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
06:08 PM on 11/26/2011
Actually, the first name that would come to mind for me is Catherine Breillat.

And I'm pretty sure that most of the people who are complaining in this thread would scream bloody murder about movies like "Anatomy of Hell" and "Romance" if they didn't know the director was a woman.
12:10 PM on 11/24/2011
Do we have to have equal number of men/women in paintings? Should church choirs make sure they have enough men to offset the women? The ballets seems to overuse women. Seriously folks--this is art. Creativity shouldn't require a political agenda or be PC. If you don't like the message in the art, don't support it. No one complained that Fried Green Tomatoes or Steel Magnolia didn't have an adequate representation of men. If you want to change things then write something, paint something, sculpt something.
12:12 PM on 11/24/2011
That's great idea. Now where are the Studios that are that will greenlight films about and made for women?
12:30 PM on 11/24/2011
its all about making money in film...if you can write and sell it, I don't think they care the content. I say go for it!!!
01:17 PM on 11/24/2011
on your own computer.

1. Adobe afterEffects is awesome video editing software
2. The internet offers sundry tutorials on how to use the software outlined in #1.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
efmo
Oh no, my micro-bio is empty!
11:15 PM on 11/25/2011
I think it's more business. Men control most of the power positions in the movie business & as movies are very, very expensive (for the most part) these days, they stick to the tried & true formula (hence their constant surprise when the 20th sequel of a movie fails to do as well as the first.) They are also always surprised when more intelligently made films do well (i.e. not the ones that appeal to my 14 year old son) but those movies are out there & when they succeed - surprise, they end up appealing to a wide range of movie goers. I think the point of the article is that if (and when) more women gain a larger number of the power positions in this business, there will be more variety in how women are presented. Besides directors - how many female producers are there? The producers are the ones who come up with the money to get the films made, right?
11:24 PM on 11/25/2011
I agree, its the business. Most movies primary objective is to make money, not 'educate' the masses. If movies that this articles espouses will make money, Hollywood will be running over their mothers (and fathers) to get there first.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
11:28 AM on 11/24/2011
What? The U.S. is sexist?
Say it’s not so!
We have equality, don’t we?
Let’s see…

We’ve had 44 presidents in our history.
How many male? 44 How many women? 0
We’ve had 47 vice presidents.
How many male? 47 How many women? 0
Score 91 versus 0
Mmmm
Wake up America. You need quotas to change this.
Demand change in the media.
Women belong in the House and in the Senate and in the White house and not as the pretty housewife.
Take us seriously, America!!
And movie makers, quit insulting us! You do major damage.
12:15 PM on 11/24/2011
So the essential qualification for making a good politician is gender? Now that might seem a little sexist. You think gender quotas are required in the poltical arena...seems like some Constitutional right might be violated. For me, I want the best candidate, and I don't really care if they are male or female. By the way, are you supporting Michelle Bachmann?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
01:08 PM on 11/24/2011
You miss the point. I want the best candidate too. There is obvious sexism in the numbers
Can you seriously believe that there was no female capable of doing these jobs in all these years.
If you think so, you know very little of women.
Other countries have a fairer record.
Female presidents/leaders
Ireland President Mary McAleese
Finland President Tarja Halonen
Germany Chancellor Angela Merkel
Liberia President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf
India President Pratibha Patil
Argentina President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner
Bangledesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed
Iceland Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurdardóttir
Croatia Prime Minister Jadranka Kosor
Lithuania President Dalia Grybauskaite
Kyrgyzstan President Rosa Otunbayeva
Costa Rica President Laura Chinchilla
Trinidad and Tobago Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar
Australia Prime Minister Julia Gillard
Slovakia Prime Minister Iveta RadicovĆ”
16 Brazil President Dilma Rousseff
Switzerland President Micheline Calmy-Rey
Peru Prime Minister Rosario FernƔndez
Kosovo President Atifete Jahjaga
Thailand Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra
But then maybe you think only American women are not worthy?
Bachmann is a dangerous fool as are all the corporate candidates.
We need democracy here too.
01:18 PM on 11/24/2011
oh ROASTED! :D
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bdunlap52
10:21 PM on 11/24/2011
Quotas in politics? So we should have 50 men and 50 women in the senate; equal parts conservative, moderate, liberal, nazi, socialist, communist, facist; equal parts black, white, japanese, chinese, vietnamese, laotian, phillipino, hispanic, indian, indian etc.; muslim, christian, jewish, hindu, atheist, agnostic, wiccan; equal parts in their 30's, 40's, 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, 90's etc.; equal parts gay, straight, bi, transgendered, undecided etc.;

Just imagine what we'd have in the House of Representatives haha.

How about in the media, politics, sports, etc. you give the job to the best person? You elect the best person. You sign the person that will make the most money for the company you work for. Is that a difficult concept for you to live by?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
11:13 AM on 11/24/2011
When I came to America I thought I had stepped into the history books.
It's like the women's movement never happened here.
I told my husband, "I can't live here. They're all Stepford wives"

Women, please make your voices heard in the new revolution.
Demand quotas and 50% representation.
Please, find your voice American women!
You deserve better!
12:11 PM on 11/24/2011
The Stepford Wives had too many female actors. I object.
01:22 PM on 11/24/2011
what country do you come from? Not being flippant.. just very curious.

I live in canada which is essentially soviet america. And I've also lived in europe. And i'm not sure what you're talking about so i need a reference to accurately identify the validity of your claim.
01:29 PM on 11/24/2011
The Stepford Wives was a book released in the 60 or 70s and a film was made then. There was a remake recently with Nicole Kidman (awful by the way).
The term "Stepford Wive" is used as a derogatory towards a wife that is submissive to her husband, looks pretty does everything he says, doesn't think for herself.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
03:53 PM on 11/24/2011
Soviet America? What Canadian says that? You were not born there I'd wager.
I'm from Ireland originally but have lived in many countries and this is the worst I've experienced in how women are viewed in the media.
There are 20 countries in the world with female leaders presently and countries that have almost 50/50 representation of women in parliaments as opposed to sad 69th position of the U.S. in the world on this score at 17%
http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/classif.htm
Read it and weep.
Quotas people, please!
And reign in the demeaning images of women in advertising and in movies.
We're fed up with it.
10:45 AM on 11/24/2011
What movies are you people watching?

Not to be a cinema snob but those of us with a sense of good cinema don't really notice this problem so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tuigim
The perils of benefactors...
11:14 AM on 11/24/2011
That's ccs you've lived with sexism so long you think it's normal.
01:14 PM on 11/24/2011
Please read what i wrote more carefully. My guess is that you're mired in the world of american cinema (and to some extent french cinema) and have no reference level.
10:11 PM on 07/30/2012
Or maybe she just doesn't see sexism in everything and doesn't need everything to be 100% equal or to a woman's advantage!