iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Texas Redistricting: Federal Court Proposes Interim Map

CHRIS TOMLINSON   11/23/11 09:45 PM ET  AP

Alamy

AUSTIN, Texas — Minorities will make up the majority of voters in three additional Texas congressional districts under a proposed redistricting map released by a federal court Wednesday, but the Republican attorney general immediately appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to block the maps.

If the 2012 elections were held under the interim maps, Democrats would have an advantage as they seek to win back the U.S. House and try to claim more seats in the GOP-controlled Legislature.

Minorities currently are the majority in 10 out of 32 Texas districts and the new map will raise that to 13 out of 36, if the court gives the map final approval as expected.

The San Antonio-based federal court drew the maps after minority groups sued the state claiming a redistricting map drawn by the Republican-controlled Legislature does not reflect the growth in the state's Hispanic and black population. In a separate case in Washington, a federal court refused to approve the lawmaker-drawn map without a trial, agreeing with the Department of Justice that there was sufficient evidence to question whether it hurt minority representation.

Also on Wednesday, the San Antonio federal court issued final maps for state Senate and House districts that are very similar to ones proposed last week that could also lead to greater minority representation. The court dramatically redrew those maps from what the Legislature passed, giving Democrats a chance to add as many as a dozen seats in the Legislature.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott and other Republican leaders have denied that any of Legislature's redistricting maps would diminish minority voting power and denounced the map issued on Wednesday.

"It seems apparent that the proposed map misapplies federal law and continues the court's trend of inappropriately venturing into political policymaking rather than simply applying the law," Abbott said in a statement Wednesday on the congressional maps. "Perhaps worst, in the name of protecting Hispanic voting power, the court seems to be discarding already elected Republican Hispanics in favor of drawing maps that may elect Democratic Hispanics."

A spokeswoman for Abbott said late Wednesday that he has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to order that all of the maps drawn by the Legislature be used in place of the court-drawn maps.

"We cannot allow any map that so grossly misapplies federal law and continues a trend of inappropriately venturing into political policy-making to move forward unchallenged," Lauren Bean said in a statement on behalf of Abbott.

Republican lawmakers insist the maps drawn by the Legislature merely reflect the Republican majority in Texas. Experts say three of the new seats would have gone to Republicans under the legislative map. When drawing the interim map, the court gave priority to ensuring minority voting strength was protected in the 2012 election. The court-ordered map will remain in place until the legal fights are resolved.

Lawmakers redraw districts every 10 years to reflect changes in census data. Texas is adding four additional congressional seats in 2012, a reflection of the state's rapid population growth.

Texas, among other states with a history of racial discrimination, can't implement the maps or other changes to voting practices without federal approval under the Voting Rights Act. No federal approval and looming deadlines for county election officials made it necessary for the San Antonio court to issue their own plans that could be implemented immediately.

"It is certainly a map we are very, very proud of. We are talking about four (new) congressional districts and we've long maintained the lion's share of those should belong to Latinos and minorities who grew this state," said state Rep. Trey Martinez Fischer, the leader of the Mexican-American Legislative Caucus, which participated in the San Antonio lawsuit.

The court redrew congressional districts 23 and 27 in West Texas and along the southern coast to make them more heavily Hispanic and created a new district 35 in Central Texas that also is majority Hispanic. The court also drew a new district 33 in the Dallas-Fort Worth area where whites are a minority.

The changes to districts 23 and 27 put incumbent Republican U.S. Reps. Blake Farenthold and Francisco "Quico" Canseco at risk of losing their seats.

"Court releases TX Congressional map wiping out several Republican seats," Republican state Sen. Dan Patrick said on Twitter shortly after the maps were released.

In creating district 35, the court made a major departure from the Republican-drawn map by dividing Travis County, which includes Austin, into three congressional districts rather than five. The Legislature's draft map pitted Democratic incumbent U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett against a Democratic challenger from San Antonio, state Rep. Joaquin Castro. They'll run in separate districts under the court-drawn map.

"I'm pleased that the court drew a map that better represents the state of Texas. I'm confident that these are the maps that we will run under in 2012," Castro told The Associated Press. "Any time you can do without having a primary opponent, that's always a good thing."

More than 87 percent of the population growth in Texas since 2000 has been among minorities. In 2010, whites in Texas dropped to less than 50 percent of the population, but they still make up the vast majority of election officials.

Texas Democrats were pleased with the proposed map.

"We are pleased that Texas is on the road to fair elections in which the voters, rather than Republican mapmakers, will get to determine the outcome," said Boyd Ritchie, chairman of the Texas Democratic Party.

The court will now accept comments on its proposed maps until noon Friday before issuing a final version of the maps before Monday, when candidates will begin registering to be placed on the ballot.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jimm Milenski
11:13 AM on 11/26/2011
A thousand dollars? That's peanuts. Massachusetts proudly displays littering signs with fines up to 10 thousand dollars.
04:11 PM on 11/25/2011
"At the beginning of the legislative redistricting process I advised colleagues and map drawers that my goal was to present a map that gave every incumbent in the Rio Grande Valley a legislative district that they could win. We did just that. Unfortunately, the map drawn and designated by the three judge federal redistricting panel undid that work. The district I have been placed in is a 75% Democratic seat. It is unwinnable by me or any Republican candidate and I will not move into another legislative district to run against a colleague."

Texas State Rep. Aaron Peña
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
05:38 PM on 11/25/2011
Good. You don't get to gerrymander districts that clearly violate the 15th Amendment.
05:53 PM on 11/25/2011
How did the legislature's districts in the Rio Grande Valley "clearly violate the 15th Amendment"? Or, the Voting Rights Act?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
10:14 AM on 11/25/2011
I kind of like that Republicans are trying to redistrict minorities into irrelevance. It foments even greater animosity between minorities and the Republican party.
03:14 PM on 11/25/2011
I see that you live by your micro-bio. You're not getting the whole story, and you've demonstrated that you don't want the whole story: The Republicans are redistricting to maximize the growing number of Hispanic Republicans in Texas. The Democrats can't stand that, and don't consider Hispanic Republicans as Hispanic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
04:30 PM on 11/25/2011
You seem to think its important that "...Republican­s are redistrict­ing to maximize the growing number of Hispanic Republican­s..."--with a heavy emphasis on "Republican" making it clear that your goal is to 1) make districts Republican and; 2) maximize the number of hispanics. That's fine except you HAVE to make it a representative sample of the population and Republicans did not. Ten majority-minority districts does not come close to a representative contingent of minorities. Its your party that failed.

If you want to blame someone blame Republicans who drew the map.
01:31 AM on 11/26/2011
You misread. The imbalance of the maps had Republican in the "majority" when it needed the balance of Democrats. Neither did the Hispanic Republicans oppose it. Perhaps those Republicans that are fair-minded don't think in the way of the "popular" Republicans in the news every day with all the negativity and hatred to spare. Perhaps too, some of these people are related? Are you really going to be negative if your family member, also in politics, even if they are in another party? Not all Republicans regard Democrats as "the enemy" or vice versa. The article is about fairness in voting. For you, I reccommend www.votesmart.org and see where all information is there. Good luck and happy voting! (I said HAPPY--not negative!)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mamadea
DEM WAVE 2014
01:58 AM on 11/25/2011
Confederates are in a tizzy trying their best to "hold power" from them "brown folks".

LOL!!
10:53 PM on 11/24/2011
The legislature’s maps haven’t been declared to violate the law, yet. Democrats and minority advocacy groups were going to throw a whole deck of race-cards at whatever the legislature drew. It’s what they do and the only legal basis for challenging the maps. Don’t assume the legislators didn’t know that, from the beginning.

The major complaints against the maps made by the legislature aren't about the lack of districts with minority majorities; they're that the majorities aren't big enough to compensate for low minority turnout. Apparently, they don't think it's fair that a White voter's vote counts more than a Hispanic non-voter's non-vote. Notice how the previous and court districts break down by majority are given, but not the legislature's.

The legislature's map increases Republican seats in the House by three and one new Democrat. Like it or not, political gerrymandering is legal. One third (2/6) of Texas' current Hispanic Reps are Republican. The court's map gives all four new seats to Democrats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
10:19 AM on 11/25/2011
Like it or not, the Voting Rights Act restricts that gerrymandering, especially in the south, so as not to discriminate against ethnic minorities.

Stop with the red herring about which party the seats will go to. This has nothing to do with political party. Its a minority issue not a party affiliation issue.
11:29 AM on 11/25/2011
This everything to do with party and fomenting even greater animosity between minorities and the Republican party, using lies about minority representation. Before all the lawsuits, the complaint was that all four seats should go to minorities, instead of only three. Now that three seats still go to minorities but all four go to democrats, Democrats are cheering the map. Harris County Democrats claimed to deserve two new minority sets, even though they're population growth only allows for one, now that their one new district is Democrat, Democrats are cheering the map.
photo
TommyObama
Abuse of power comes as no surprise.
08:56 PM on 11/24/2011
"Texas, among other states with a history of racial discrimination," Sounds like it's in Texas's present, too. The GOP might as well get used to more competition and more minority voters in the SW, and there's no time like the present. Because if they get their way on THIS redistricting, in 2020 the demographics will be much heavier to latinos, and the map changes will all but destroy the TX GOP. Might as well segue into it gracefully.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SuperMex
03:48 PM on 11/24/2011
If memory serves me correctly two of the three judges hearing this case in San Antonio are Latino. One of the judges a Latino actually ran for US Congress. He out spent his Republican primary opponent 10 to 1 and lost. When voters in the congressional district were asked why they did not support the Latino (cannot think of the judges name) the simply said because of his spanish surname. Well this Latino is one of the two Latino judges hearing this case.

Now do you think this judge, actually thinks that a Latino could win in a Tom Delay gerrymandered district? After what happened to him, I hope not.

Former US Congressman Tom Delay belongs in "el calabozo."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FatherH
01:19 PM on 11/24/2011
Its over in Texas for the Republicans, the last thing they want are fair districts which will lead to fair elections. This has been long over due in Texas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CBasilJr
62 Retired Vet
05:19 PM on 11/25/2011
The Reapublican motto regarding elections has become "If we can't win an election honestly, then we'll cheat and win it dishonestly."
11:57 AM on 11/28/2011
So sad but so true. LOL!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
01:07 PM on 11/24/2011
Soon, Texas will be primarily a Democratic state and the Republican party will be decimated!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mamadea
DEM WAVE 2014
01:58 AM on 11/25/2011
F&F!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:58 AM on 11/24/2011
The most controversial aspect of the original redistrcting map was moving affluent non-Hispanic whites from an Hispanic "safe" district into a predominately non-Hispanic white district represented by a non-Hispanic white Democrat. The Democrats complained that moving affluent voters into a mostly working class district put the Democrat at risk, if challenged by a Republican. The court drawn map once again makes the district noncompetitive. The most emotiona; aspect involved redrawing school board election districts. Affluent non-Hispanic white residents of a Fort Worth neighborhood can no longer vote in the district where their children attend school, which is a majority Hispanic district. Hispanic leaders complained that voting turnout was too high among the non-Hispanic white residents.
photo
TommyObama
Abuse of power comes as no surprise.
09:00 PM on 11/24/2011
Seriously?! Complained that anglos vote too much?! What an admission of failure among the hispanic voter registration crews. Sadly, no one is surprised. Their voter turnout is pathetic here in AZ.
11:22 AM on 11/24/2011
Farenthold won his district which is ALREADY 70% HIspanic wihle he is Anglo. So I doubt that the new one will make much difference to him.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
11:01 AM on 11/24/2011
Thye federal court rejected a 1990 Texas redistricting map drawn by a computer progam designed to create districts of equal population in a contiguous grid because it ignored race and political parties. The federal courts force Texas to racially gerrymande­red voting districts to create "safe" districts for minority candidates­. Since turnout is greater among non-Hispanic whires, the districts have to be drawn to create districts in which minorities make up 60% to 65% of voters. So, you get very weird looking district maps. The process also leads to polarization, since politicians no longer have to appeal to a diverse electorate. You get extremists from both sides. Racials gerrymandering has pretty much killed off white Democrats in Texas. In Texas, both Republican­s and Democrats have a history of drawing districts to protect their own candidates.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
10:09 AM on 11/24/2011
'"We cannot allow any map that so grossly misapplies federal law and continues a trend of inappropriately venturing into political policy-making to move forward unchallenged," Lauren Bean said in a statement on behalf of Abbott.'

She has it exactly backwards. The trend in Texas has been to marginalize the hispanic vote and break up liberal leaning districts to further marginalize the progessive voice as a whole. What we cannot allow is the undermining of democracy by the Republican party.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
12:06 PM on 11/24/2011
Do you have any idea of what "political policy-making" might mean? Does it mean politicians shouldn't make policy?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
12:21 PM on 11/24/2011
The policy has already been set. Its formally known as The Voting Rights Act. That's what the court ruled on. That Abbott doesn't understand this is astoundingly incompetent.
09:56 PM on 11/24/2011
It means judges shouldn't make policy.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
den1953
The National Inquire of Politics the GOP!
10:06 AM on 11/24/2011
Those darn Liberals left the Conservatives screw the Republicans again!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
scooter1
Bias is irrelevant to truth
05:34 AM on 11/24/2011
This is exactly why we had to pass the Voting Rights Act: conservatives are cheaters and don't want hispanics or blacks to have fair representation in Congress. Why do conservatives hate democracy?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wisdom67
To each his reach
09:47 AM on 11/24/2011
They love Democracy so long as they are in control. They are colonists in America...where minorities are subjected to colonial control...think Native Americans an reservations...its part of our history that we are so proud of.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:07 AM on 11/24/2011
Here is the historical proof of "wanting control" from documentary film "We Shall Remain".

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/weshallremain/the_films/episode_1_trailer