More

Egypt Protests: Thousands Fill Tahrir Square In Cairo For Anti-Military Demonstration

Egypts Tahrir Filling For Antimilitary Protest

HAMZA HENDAWI and SARAH EL DEEB   11/25/11 10:58 PM ET   AP

CAIRO — The U.S. increased pressure Friday on Egypt's military rulers to hand over power to civilian leaders, and the generals turned to a Mubarak-era politician to head a new government in a move that failed to satisfy the more than 100,000 protesters who jammed Tahrir Square in the biggest rally yet this week.

The demonstrators rejected the appointment of Kamal el-Ganzouri as prime minister, breaking into chants of "Illegitimate! Illegitimate!" and setting up a showdown between the two sides only three days before key parliamentary elections.

The size of the rally and the resilience of protesters in the face of the violence used by security forces in this week's deadly street battles have won back for the movement much of the strength it projected during the 18-day uprising that ousted President Hosni Mubarak in February.

Showing the sort of resolve from the earliest days of the Arab Spring, the protesters say they will not leave the iconic square until the military rulers led by Field Marshal Hussein Tantawi step down and a civilian presidential council is formed to run the country until a new leader is elected.

"They stole our January revolution because we did not agree on who should represent us," said activist Sedeeqah Abu Seadah. "We shouted 'erhal' (leave) but did not shout the name of the person we want."

The military's appointment of el-Ganzouri, its apology for the death of protesters and a series of partial concessions in the past two days suggest that the generals are struggling to overcome the most serious challenge to their nine-month rule, with fewer options now available to them.

Significantly adding to their predicament, the Obama administration brought its position on the crisis in Egypt closer to the protesters' demands, urging the military to fully empower the next interim civilian government.

"We believe that Egypt's transition to democracy must continue, with elections proceeding expeditiously, and all necessary measures taken to ensure security and prevent intimidation," the White House said in a statement.

"Most importantly, we believe that the full transfer of power to a civilian government must take place in a just and inclusive manner that responds to the legitimate aspirations of the Egyptian people, as soon as possible," it said.

The adjustment in the Obama administration's approach is significant because the Egyptian military, the nation's most powerful institution, has in the past 30 years forged close relations with successive U.S. administrations, receiving $1.3 billion annually in aid. It followed the public U.S. endorsement of the military's original timetable for the transfer of power by late 2012 or early 2013.

The choice of el-Ganzouri, who served as prime minister under Mubarak between 1996 and 1999, deepened the anger of the protesters, already seething over the military's perceived reluctance to dismantle the legacy of the ousted president's 29-year rule.

Hundreds of protesters moved from Tahrir Square and began a sit-in outside the headquarters of the Cabinet, a few blocks away, vowing to prevent el-Ganzouri from entering. "The military council must go," the crowd chanted, "Military men must not rule."

The protest movement launched an attempt to unify its demands and present an alternative to el-Ganzouri. Twenty-four protest groups, including two political parties, announced they were creating their own "national salvation" government. They said it would be headed by a presidential council led by Nobel Peace laureate Mohamed ElBaradei with deputies from across the political spectrum to which they demanded the military hand over power.

"El-Ganzouri is over and done with. We want young people to take charge of the country," said Hamdi Arban, a 50-year-old lawyer in Tahrir Square. "We will stay here and we won't get our rights except from here," he said.

Basma el-Husseini, who directs a cultural center and was also in Tahrir, dismissed the 78-year-old el-Ganzouri as a man with little energy to keep up with the multitude of challenges facing Egypt. "They (the generals) don't get the power of the people. All they are doing now is play for time to make people fed up."

Addressing a televised news conference, el-Ganzouri said the military has given him greater powers than his predecessor, Essam Sharaf, who was installed by the military months ago and has been criticized as a mere facade for the council of generals.

El-Ganzouri insisted he wouldn't have accepted the job if he believed Tantawi had any intention of staying in power.

"The powers given to me exceed any similar mandates," he said. "I will take full authority so I'm able to serve my country."

But el-Ganzouri appeared uncomfortable, grasping for words and repeatedly pausing as he spoke, giving rambling answers when pressed whether he could form a government that will satisfy the public when many prominent figures have shunned joining the new administration.

The military inadvertently sparked the ongoing unrest by pushing plans for a political "guardianship" role for itself and immunity from civilian oversight even after a new parliament is seated and a new president is elected.

The last straw came when the military ordered the use of force against a small protest in Tahrir Square last weekend and then launched a failed, joint army-police raid to evacuate a larger crowd. Nearly 40 protesters have died in the past week.

The latest crisis has overshadowed Monday's start of Egypt's first parliamentary elections since Mubarak was replaced by Tantawi. The vote, which the generals say will be held on schedule despite the unrest, is now seen by many activists and protesters to be serving the military's efforts to project an image of itself as the nation's saviors and true democrats.

The next parliament is expected to be dominated by Islamists, whose political groups have decided to boycott the ongoing protests to keep from doing anything that could derail the election. However, the outcome of the vote is likely to be seen as flawed given the growing unrest and the suspension by many candidates of their campaigns in solidarity with the protesters.

The Social Democrats, a political party born out of the January-February uprising, said Friday that it has suspended its election campaign, arguing that the vote would not be fair given the tension caused by the unrest, which it blamed on the military.

Supporters of the military staged a rival demonstration Friday across town from Tahrir, but only several thousand people turned out. They waved identical, brand new Egyptian flags that prompted activists to post on social network sites their suspicion that the demonstration may have been staged by the military.

State television, whose coverage of the crisis shows a clear, pro-military bias, gave prominence to the supporters of the generals and hosted commentators discrediting the Tahrir protesters as irresponsible youths and violent football hooligans.

Friday's protest in Tahrir was dubbed by organizers as "The Last Chance Million-Man Protest." Swelling crowds chanted, "Leave! Leave!" and "The people want to bring down the field marshal!"

ElBaradei was mobbed by hundreds of supporters as he arrived in the square and took part in Friday prayers, leaving shortly afterward.

"He is here to support the revolutionaries," said protester Ahmed Awad, 35. "He came to see for himself the tragedy caused by the military."

Fireworks lit the sky in the evening and a large banner was strung over a side street called Mohammed Mahmoud, where most of the fighting occurred, declaring that it would be renamed "Eyes of the Revolution Street," in honor of the hundreds of protesters who suffered eye injuries as a result of tear gas used by police.

About 500 protesters camped out in front of the Cabinet office, vowing to remain to prevent el-Ganzouri's government from entering the building.

Thousands of pro-democracy protesters also rallied in other cities, including at least 10,000 in Alexandria and smaller crowds in Luxor and Assiut in southern Egypt.

The military has rejected calls to immediately step down, saying its claim to power is supported by the warm welcome given to troops who took over the streets from the discredited police early in the anti-Mubarak uprising as well as an overwhelming endorsement for constitutional amendments they proposed in a March referendum.

Tantawi has offered another referendum on whether his military council should step down immediately.

Such a vote, activists say, would be divisive and likely open the door for a deal between the military and political groups, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood. Egypt's largest and best organized group, the Brotherhood is notorious for its opportunism and thirst for power. It was empowered after the fall of Mubarak, regaining legitimacy after spending nearly 60 years as an outlawed group.

1  of  20
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
An Egyptian woman shouts slogans during a demonstration in Cairo's Tahrir Square on November 24, 2011 as Egypt's military rulers apologized for the deaths of demonstrators at the hands of police and a truce brought calm back to the outskirts of the square. (Getty)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

CAIRO — The U.S. increased pressure Friday on Egypt's military rulers to hand over power to civilian leaders, and the generals turned to a Mubarak-era politician to head a new government in a mo...
CAIRO — The U.S. increased pressure Friday on Egypt's military rulers to hand over power to civilian leaders, and the generals turned to a Mubarak-era politician to head a new government in a mo...
Filed by Jade Walker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 871
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (15 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
09:24 AM on 11/28/2011
Think the picture shown for this particular blog is very revealing. It seems more and more WOMEN are protesting, young women and old women. That probably signals an end ultimately for Sharia law,
02:28 PM on 11/26/2011
When are they going to turn power over to civilian leaders here in America?
The republicans will probably nuke us all first while they hide underground in bunkers that have been built for decades, yes they ARE that selfish. we are doomed in this country because we don't have the USA to help us out, they are the ones oppressing us and telling us lies, to greedy for their own good, they will be the cause of our destruction in 2012 when Americans finally get tired of the BS and take a stand they will nuke us before they admit they're wrong.
May God have mercy on us all.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mjc
Avoid printing any..
09:26 AM on 11/28/2011
As long as wars are our number one export there will be more and more military and military expenditure. Your question is quite relevant.
01:11 PM on 11/26/2011
I am laughing at all of you that are blaming Obama for this mess. Did you read the article?
The adjustment in the Obama administration's approach is significant because the Egyptian military, the nation's most powerful institution, has in the past 30 years forged close relations with successive U.S. administrations, receiving $1.3 billion annually in aid.

30 YEARS people.....long before Obama. In addition, the people squacking about pulling $ aid, Obama cannot do this by himself. This is something that would need to be voted on by Congress. The vote would never pass for the simple fact that if the Dems requested it, the GOP would vote NO, and if the GOP requested it, the Dems would vote No.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bjay0421
Live the Golden Rule
04:56 PM on 11/26/2011
kimpjones, thank you for your comment. F&F.
I really wish you were wrong with your assessment of why a change would never pass, but, you are completely correct.
That sums up, also, why we are having so many problems in this country.
This is sad, so very sad.
The only way we can help ourselves, at this point, is to VOTE. And we must make informed decisions, voting for people who will work TOGETHER, so that this country can go forward once again. We pay highly for our politicians, so they will do what is best for the American people. We have been short changed so often that people have forgotten that we CAN and MUST do what is necessary to stop the greed and corruption.

If they don't do the job, we must send them packing and VOTE for someone who will.

VOTE. VOTE. VOTE.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bmitche
12:47 PM on 11/26/2011
I don't know how effective the protests will be, but there is definitely not a lack of support.
01:36 PM on 11/26/2011
Why don't we do this here in the U.S.A. Hand over power to the people instead of the elected puppets that run this country now. Why do we get involved in the resy of the worlds problems. When we can't even feed the people here.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:21 PM on 11/26/2011
From reading these posts, you'd think the U.S. is the only country putting any pressure on Egypt. It is one of several.
12:15 PM on 11/26/2011
This protest makes no sense. There are elections coming up in which they could make their choices known. Once a Parliament is in place, then it can decide who it wants as a spokesperson, and it could choose ElBaradei, if he's enough of an Islamist to suite the Brotherhood. Right now there is nobody for the military to hand over to and there is a US-approved plan and timetable in place to do it in an orderly way. This protest seems like a shortcut to produce another Somalia, a country with no functioning government.
11:58 AM on 11/26/2011
Isn't it odd how we love protesters in Cairo but beat them at home and spray them like insects?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Coconspirator1
12:24 PM on 11/26/2011
Just like Hillary Clinton traveling to Myanmar to make sure they are complying with human rights, while we're clubbing unarmed students, shooting them with rubber bullets, and pepper spraying 84 y/o grandmothers.
11:56 AM on 11/26/2011
And here's another 2,5 $BILLION$ that could be cut, or reduced by half if they had been on time, now we have 12,000 people sitting around down in FL for another 8 months drawing huge paychecks while this thing coast to Mars. Why haven't all the other "rovers" done the job?

Curiosity's mission — The rover was originally scheduled to blast off in 2009, but it wasn't ready in time. Launch windows for Mars-bound spacecraft are based on favorable alignments between Earth and the Red Planet, and they open up just once every two years. So the MSL team had to wait until 2011.

That two-year slip helped boost the mission's overall cost by 56 percent, to its current $2.5 billion. But Saturday's successful launch likely chased away a lot of the bad feelings still lingering after the delay and the cost overruns.
11:56 AM on 11/26/2011
Obama and US need to stay OUT Of it! We will have enough on our Hands when we pull out of IRAQ !!! it will go into civil war and everyone knows it I think we have done enough We have issues in our own country that this president has not handled!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bjay0421
Live the Golden Rule
04:09 PM on 11/26/2011
pisturi, I agree that, if possible, we should stay out of it. I also agree that there are many issues in this country, needing attention.

However, it cannot all be blamed on our President. There are plenty of issues that he has tried to work on, and find solutions for, only to get no cooperation from Congress. I am not saying that he has come up with the perfect fix for the problems. How, though, is anything going to improve when Republicans are determined to undermine anything that the President has proposed, and will not even consider offering any worthwhile assistance to modifying or correcting problems with his ideas?
In my adult years, (I'm now 70) I have never seen so much division and lack of compromise between the political parties. It is now such that it is greatly hurting our country and our people.

So, I hope, as you said, we can stay out of it physically, offering only friendly advice. I hope we will also be able to do that with Iraq. And most of all, I hope all of our government representatives will start working together to fix some of OUR problems, which is why we voted them into office to begin with. THEY need to make our problems a priority, all of them, not just President Obama.
11:54 AM on 11/26/2011
Just imagine if there was nothing in that entire region that we wanted or needed. That as a nation we were producing enough of our own natural resources to meet our needs. Virtually none of us would even know or care about the politics of those countries. With us having little or no need for foreign supplies of oil we could have more jobs available to our citizens and have more funds to go towards domestic issues. We have spent untold trillions and forfeited so many lives over that foreign oil supply. The US would have no need for the war on terror. There would be very little terror directed towards us. Time to pull back and take care of our own. Let the European and Asian nations squabble over it. We have it, let's use it!
11:45 AM on 11/26/2011
Here's over a $BILLION$ that can be cut.

WHY DOESN'T OBAMA CUT THE BUDGET DOWN TO THE AMOUNT OF MONEY BEING TAKEN FROM US IN TAX??

"receiving $1.3 billion annually in aid"
freerangevoter
Live Free or Raise Hell
01:23 PM on 11/26/2011
To start anywhere else is the definition of irresponsibility. Once this is done, the real work of cutting the government down to fit within the Constitution begins.
11:45 AM on 11/26/2011
Being on the side of the people is always the correct thing to do, but this doesn't mean you give them everything they want. What they think they want in the heat of passion, and what is really what they want long term can be two different things. Guidance and time allows them to work out what is right for them so a worse form of dictatorship doesn't arise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bjay0421
Live the Golden Rule
04:25 PM on 11/26/2011
tjbooth01, I agree. F&F
You have made a very good point. After something of this magnitude, people rarely can come up with the next step correctly, without taking time out to consider the full ramifications of their actions. It is understandable that they want everything at once, but it is not practical.
Let's hope they do think things through, so they don't end up jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.
Hopefully, they will find peace and freedom for all.
11:42 AM on 11/26/2011
Why are we in their business? Or doesn't Obama know any better?
01:12 PM on 11/26/2011
The adjustment in the Obama administration's approach is significant because the Egyptian military, the nation's most powerful institution, has in the past 30 years forged close relations with successive U.S. administrations, receiving $1.3 billion annually in aid.

30 years...not just Obama
freerangevoter
Live Free or Raise Hell
01:32 PM on 11/26/2011
The older (and wiser?) I get the more I believe that 90% of all politics is about what is best for the politician with little re guard for the country he represents. My guess is that the average kickback for foreign aid is 5% to 10% of the gross, but I confess that I have no proof and I doubt that many politicians would be impeached or even voted out if it were proven beyond a doubt. Where is the outrage about Nancy Pelosi's insider trading?
razaminaz
What would George Carlin say about us now?
11:41 AM on 11/26/2011
Let's get into another country's business, we're already telling too many nations what to do.
11:38 AM on 11/26/2011
With Obama's help and parroval, it will end up badly with the Sharia Law Muslim Brotherhood running it.