iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NASA Mars Curiosity Launch: Huge Rover On Its Way To Mars

MARCIA DUNN   11/26/11 11:26 PM ET   AP

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A rover of "monster truck" proportions zoomed toward Mars on an 8 1/2-month, 354 million-mile journey Saturday, the biggest, best equipped robot ever sent to explore another planet.

NASA's six-wheeled, one-armed wonder, Curiosity, will reach Mars next summer and use its jackhammer drill, rock-zapping laser machine and other devices to search for evidence that Earth's next-door neighbor might once have been home to the teeniest forms of life.

More than 13,000 invited guests jammed the Kennedy Space Center on Saturday morning to witness NASA's first launch to Mars in four years, and the first flight of a Martian rover in eight years.

Mars fever gripped the crowd.

NASA astrobiologist Pan Conrad, whose carbon compound-seeking instrument is on the rover, wore a bright blue, short-sleeve blouse emblazoned with rockets, planets and the words, "Next stop Mars!" She jumped, cheered and snapped pictures as the Atlas V rocket blasted off. So did Los Alamos National Laboratory's Roger Wiens, a planetary scientist in charge of Curiosity's laser blaster, called ChemCam.

Surrounded by 50 U.S. and French members of his team, Wiens shouted "Go, Go, Go!" as the rocket soared into a cloudy sky. "It was beautiful," he later observed, just as NASA declared the launch a full success.

A few miles away at the space center's visitor complex, Lego teamed up with NASA for a toy spacecraft-building event for children this Thanksgiving holiday weekend. The irresistible lure: 800,000 Lego bricks.

The 1-ton Curiosity – 10 feet long, 9 feet wide and 7 feet tall at its mast – is a mobile, nuclear-powered laboratory holding 10 science instruments that will sample Martian soil and rocks, and with unprecedented skill, analyze them right on the spot.

It's as big as a car. But NASA's Mars exploration program director calls it "the monster truck of Mars."

"It's an enormous mission. It's equivalent of three missions, frankly, and quite an undertaking," said the ecstatic program director, Doug McCuistion. "Science fiction is now science fact. We're flying to Mars. We'll get it on the ground and see what we find."

The primary goal of the $2.5 billion mission is to see whether cold, dry, barren Mars might have been hospitable for microbial life once upon a time – or might even still be conducive to life now. No actual life detectors are on board; rather, the instruments will hunt for organic compounds.

Curiosity's 7-foot arm has a jackhammer on the end to drill into the Martian red rock, and the 7-foot mast on the rover is topped with high-definition and laser cameras.

With Mars the ultimate goal for astronauts, NASA will use Curiosity to measure radiation at the red planet. The rover also has a weather station on board that will provide temperature, wind and humidity readings; a computer software app with daily weather updates is planned.

No previous Martian rover has been so sophisticated.

The world has launched more than three dozen missions to the ever-alluring Mars, which is more like Earth than the other solar-system planets. Yet fewer than half those quests have succeeded.

Just two weeks ago, a Russian spacecraft ended up stuck in orbit around Earth, rather than en route to the Martian moon Phobos.

"Mars really is the Bermuda Triangle of the solar system," said NASA's Colleen Hartman, assistant associate administrator for science. "It's the death planet, and the United States of America is the only nation in the world that has ever landed and driven robotic explorers on the surface of Mars, and now we're set to do it again."

Curiosity's arrival next August will be particularly hair-raising.

In a spacecraft first, the rover will be lowered onto the Martian surface via a jet pack and tether system similar to the sky cranes used to lower heavy equipment into remote areas on Earth.

Curiosity is too heavy to use air bags like its much smaller predecessors, Spirit and Opportunity, did in 2004. Besides, this new way should provide for a more accurate landing.

Astronauts will need to make similarly precise landings on Mars one day.

Curiosity will spend a minimum of two years roaming around Gale Crater, chosen from among more than 50 potential landing sites because it's so rich in minerals. Scientists said if there is any place on Mars that might have been ripe for life, it may well be there.

The rover should go farther and work harder than any previous Mars explorer because of its power source: 10.6 pounds of radioactive plutonium. The nuclear generator was encased in several protective layers in case of a launch accident.

NASA expects to put at least 12 miles on the odometer, once the rover sets down on the Martian surface.

McCuistion anticipates being blown away by the never-before-seen vistas. "Those first images are going to just be stunning, I believe. It will be like sitting in the bottom of the Grand Canyon," he said at a post-launch news conference.

This is the third astronomical mission to be launched from Cape Canaveral by NASA since the retirement of the venerable space shuttle fleet this summer. The Juno probe is en route to Jupiter, and twin spacecraft named Grail will arrive at Earth's moon on New Year's Eve and Day.

Unlike Juno and Grail, Curiosity suffered development programs and came in two years late and nearly $1 billion over budget. Scientists involved in the project noted Saturday that the money is being spent on Earth, not Mars, and the mission is costing every American about the price of a movie.

"I'll leave you to judge for yourself whether or not that's a movie you'd like to see," said California Institute of Technology's John Grotzinger, the project scientist. "I know that's one I would."

___

Online:

NASA: http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/

Lego: http://legospace.com/

LOOK: Images of the Mars Rover Curiosity:
1  of  8
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
This artist's concept features NASA's Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover, a mobile robot for investigating Mars' past or present ability to sustain microbial life. Curiosity is being tested in preparation for launch in the fall of 2011. In this picture, the rover examines a rock on Mars with a set of tools at the end of the rover's arm, which extends about 2 meters (7 feet). Two instruments on the arm can study rocks up close. Also, a drill can collect sample material from inside of rocks and a scoop can pick up samples of soil. The arm can sieve the samples and deliver fine powder to instruments inside the rover for thorough analysis. (NASA)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A rover of "monster truck" proportions zoomed toward Mars on an 8 1/2-month, 354 million-mile journey Saturday, the biggest, best equipped robot ever sent to explore anoth...
CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — A rover of "monster truck" proportions zoomed toward Mars on an 8 1/2-month, 354 million-mile journey Saturday, the biggest, best equipped robot ever sent to explore anoth...
Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 4,544
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (67 total)
09:39 PM on 12/02/2011
no
09:38 PM on 12/02/2011
why use nuclear power? unless nasa has another motive to go to mars. maybe the other previous rovers discovered caves or structures where sunlight can not go. what other secrets does nasa have??
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Disappointed Democrat
10:51 PM on 11/30/2011
This is a huge step backward. A 10kg plutonium-powered snap is on that thing.

That's a lot of plutonium. And it's going to result in a lot of radioactive contamination - eventually.

What would an alien species think of us if they encountered that thing on mars? Hardly a good way for us to be putting our best foot forward as explorers!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:58 PM on 11/28/2011
Huge with 10KG of plutonium. I love NASA, I love their mission, but the previous rovers did great with solar.

This is a step backward.
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
11:32 PM on 11/28/2011
Not really, small nuclear power units have proven themselves quite well. Many remote radio and monitoring stations used them in the US and Russia during the cold war with great results.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:15 PM on 11/29/2011
NASA lied about the danger of the Cassini nuclear power probe in a very deceitful way. They correctly claimed that the nuclear material was unlikely to be dispersal even takeoff failure.

What they "forgot" to mention, was that on the later Earth flyby, the velocity would vaporize the entire probe and spread it evenly over the planet.

That would have caused million of cancers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
treasure hunter.
05:43 PM on 11/28/2011
It's an old universe. One can only imagine the posibilties. Once man could only look into the heavens and imagine, then he found a way to see it through Optics.later he would break the surley bonds of earth and explore, He has been to the moon. He has establish a Hubble telescope to see more clearly the miracle of space.Now he will go to mars! Surely he is the off spring of the Gods, for if he can imagine it, he can do it through time and hard work.We are new to this game. We are like a small bird leaving its nest for the first time, finding its wings, and direction.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
09:42 PM on 11/27/2011
...Dad, are we there yet?
07:46 PM on 11/27/2011
Is it me or did NASA post a shot of Tara Reid's plastic surgery?
07:45 PM on 11/27/2011
This is cool. Someone captured a series of time lapse photos of the night sky as Curiosity was flying rapidly away from Earth on its hyperbolic escape orbit: http://www.slas.us/gallery2/main.php?g2_itemId=4776 It's the one object moving very quickly from the lower left to the upper right of the animation. Curiosity was about 290,000km away in this shot, and it is much farther away by now. A group of amateur satellite radio enthusiasts has picked up the X-band communications signal from Curiosity. Our Mars rover is chatting with mission control on 8401.323 MHz: http://pjm.dyndns.org/twtr/msl_261111a.jpg
JDOK
Listen, Read, Think and then Post
05:37 PM on 11/27/2011
That was one of the most beautiful launches that I remember ever seeing. The wonderful technology that we developed and refined over the last 55 years was on full display yesterday at Cape Canaveral. NASA and all of the engineers that conceived and designed Curiosity should be rightfully proud of this marvelous achievemen­t. Congratula­tions to all who have contribute­d to the advancemen­t of science, the developmen­t of new invention, and the further growth of our knowledge of the universe in which we must live. This is where America should invest because we are so good at developing and applying new technology­, risk taking and scientific innovation­. I sincerely hope our Congress is wise enough to fully fund and support our continuing effort to discover who we are and what we are ultimately able to achieve.
02:58 PM on 11/27/2011
Why the obsession with NASA on finding evidence of th existance of life on Mars? Better to develop the machines and techniques for all sorts of activity on the planet. We need to learn to send equipment to Mars, we need better and better machines and robots to operate on the planet.

I think NASA is overly focused on finding evidence of past life because most of the people who run the agency are left wingers who want to discredit religion. Better to have NASA be areligious and be run by engineers.
03:01 PM on 11/27/2011
Are you suggesting that finding life on another planet discredits religion? If so, I feel bad for those religions.
03:11 PM on 11/27/2011
I am saying that is the obsession with the left wingers who control the government funded sciences in the US and those who control NASA. Mars is a long term engineering project. We need to be building bases there for our robots and experimenting with terra forming to see if the place can be made habitable.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
03:46 PM on 11/27/2011
What you think is only really of interest to your shrink.

Undue policy impact from a bunch of godbothering engineers is what killed the crews of Challenger and Columbia. It took one of them famous heathen scientists to spray the truth over Challenger.
02:28 PM on 11/27/2011
Super excited by NASA's project, I wish they were given the budget to launch a mission like this every single month. If the Pentagon gave their annual budget to NASA for just a single year, the discoveries we could make would be staggering.
03:24 PM on 11/27/2011
I hear you, but the orbital mechanics of transport between Earth and Mars is such that there are periodic launch windows every 780 days (two years and change). It would be very nice to have a Mars spacecraft to launch in each window.

There are launch windows to Jupiter every 399 days, Saturn every 378 days, and to Venus every 584 days. A truly space-faring civilization would take advantage of each departure opportunity, operating a an interplanetary transport network running on a regular schedule dictated by the synodic periods of each pair of planetary terminals. Here's a link to the interplanetary transit schedule:

http://clowder.net/hop/railroad/sched.html
02:21 PM on 11/27/2011
To people who want to defund NASA so they can cure cancer or end poverty, I ask the following:

First, provide a viable plan able to accomplish those goals, with actual deliverables. Simply saying "we'll spend more money on X" is not good enough, since we already spend plenty of money on these things and you need to demonstrate what the extra money will accomplish. This is the same thing NASA has to do to justify their funding, and they have a track record of proven success, so it's only natural that you be asked to do the same.

Second, explain why the money needs to come from the NASA budget, as opposed to from defense, or oil subsidies, or any of the other big ticket items in the U.S. budget. Remember, you're advocating for the elimination of a very successful research program that employs many of our brightest scientists and has a high return on investment. Think carefully before making your decision.
02:16 AM on 11/29/2011
Amen, Brother. NASA's annual budget of $18 billion (soon to be reduced further) is swallowed up EVERY EIGHT DAYS at the Pentagon. Don't even debate with people who think they can balance the budget on NASA's back. They're arguing over the crumbs...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endogenous Light Nexus
There actually is light within you
02:13 PM on 11/27/2011
What some people may not understand is that this succession of ever-increasing Rover capabilities is setting the stage for a manned (and maybe womanned?) trip to Mars. The big showstopper so far though is the physical debilitation caused by extended exposure to microgravity. Bone mass is lost, muscles atrophy, autonomic reflexes maintaining blood pressure against the force of gravity are significantly reduced (but those only temporarily, they come back), and so much fluid is lost from the body that some astronauts have actually required intravenous fluids aboard Shuttle after landing before they could stand up and walk off without fainting. Probably the only way to get humans to Mars in good enough shape to be able to handle the (lesser) gravity there will be to build large enough spacecraft that they can be spun to create artificial gravity, à la Arthur Clarke's 2001: A Space Odyssey but not necessarily quite so big.
02:41 PM on 11/27/2011
The cheaper way to do artificial gravity is to divide the spacecraft into two halves connected by a tether line. Then they can be put into a counter-balanced spin using the tether as the radial member of the centrifugal system.

Ideally, the habitable modules occupied during the cruise phases of the mission would be on one end of the tether, and other elements such as propulsion and power systems would be on the other end. When the spacecraft approaches Mars, the tether would be retracted and the two halves mated back together for the capture maneuver into orbit around Mars.

The tether length and rotation rate would likely be designed to produce a centrifugal force equivalent to the gravitational force on Mars (3/8g). Besides making the engineering a bit easier, the crew would already be acclimated to Mars gravity when they land. And there is good reason to speculate that the human body is considerably more adaptable to long durations in 3/8g than in 0g. 

In my view, the bigger showstopper for human missions to Mars is the entry, descent, and landing vehicle. We really do not know how we'd land even a 5-ton capsule on Mars, let alone a 20-40 ton habitation module suitable for long surface stays. We have a better idea about artificial gravity and radiation shielding (e.g. water storage bladders integrated into the shell or skin of the vessel).

The EDL vehicle for high landed mass is the big unknown. That's where even Mars evangelists like Dr. Zubrin struggle to offer specific solutions that are workable and practical.
edtheengineer
Retired engineer with 40 years experience.
05:36 PM on 11/27/2011
Thank you for the explanation of both the problems associated with human missions and some ideas for addressing them. Information like this is much more beneficial to rational discussions than simply yelling "shut down NASA".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Endogenous Light Nexus
There actually is light within you
03:03 AM on 11/29/2011
Good post. There are a number of ways to implement artificial gravity and your suggestion of two modules connected by a tether is probably much better than a huge rotating spacecraft. Even better IMO would be to resurrect the original Orion concept of a huge spacecraft powered by atomic bombs, which was pretty far along in its engineering development when the test ban treaty of 1963 banned atomic explosions in the atmosphere and effectively scuttled the project. Since then an alternative plan has been developed that would put huge payloads into orbit with a giant gun somewhat like Jules Verne first envisioned, powered by a single small nuclear bomb or pulsed nuclear reactor at the bottom of a deep hole in the ground comprising the barrel of the gun. No people could be launched this way of course due to the enormous acceleration that would kill them instantly but the raw materials for building Orion spacecraft could be launched this way and humans sent up aboard conventional rockets to do the assembly. With perhaps 10,000 nuclear bombs on board, Orion could maintain close to 1G acceleration halfway to Mars, then turn around and decelerate at 1g for the rest of the way there to make the trip in as short as 3 days!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
terry63
treasure hunter.
05:46 PM on 11/28/2011
Intersting concept.
01:42 PM on 11/27/2011
How would you feel about a Cadillac with a diesel engine? Those of you in America shouldn't bother answering that question, however – it's strictly for the Europeans...Read more »http://new3tech.blogspot.com/2011/11/cadillac-diesel-back-on-table.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SHIRLEY CARR
optimist with experience sez
01:12 PM on 11/27/2011
Up and away goes more money today! What about keeping some money here for education, medical, necessities of life, more jobs HERE ON EARTH!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
01:48 PM on 11/27/2011
We need more missions like this. Not men in space. Robots in space. Its far cheaper and the rewards are higher. More bang for the buck.
photo
Hitchcockcameo
In the shadows, directing your every move.
02:11 PM on 11/27/2011
What do you think investment in NASA gives us? Jobs! And when you educate our young in science and math, where will they work? The defense department building weapons? Or perhaps a more altruistic pursuit in space and Earth exploration at NASA?