iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Pakistan NATO Helicopter Attack: 24 Troops Reportedly Dead

Pakistan Nato Helicopter

First Posted: 11/26/11 01:34 AM ET Updated: 11/27/11 01:35 PM ET

By SEBASTIAN ABBOT, The Associated Press

ISLAMABAD (AP) - Pakistan blocked vital supply routes for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan on Saturday after coalition helicopters and fighter jets allegedly killed 24 Pakistani troops at two posts along a mountainous frontier that serves as a safe haven for militants.

The incident was a major blow to American efforts to rebuild an already tattered alliance vital to winding down the 10-year-old Afghan war. Islamabad called the carnage in one of its tribal areas a "grave infringement" of the country's sovereignty and warned it could affect future cooperation with Washington, which is seeking Pakistan's help in bringing Afghan insurgents to the negotiating table.

A NATO spokesman said it was likely that coalition airstrikes caused Pakistani casualties, but an investigation was being conducted to determine the details. If confirmed, it would be the deadliest friendly fire incident by NATO against Pakistani troops since the Afghan war began a decade ago.

A prolonged closure of Pakistan's two Afghan border crossings to NATO supplies could cause serious problems for the coalition. The U.S., which is the largest member of the NATO force in Afghanistan, ships more than 30 percent of its non-lethal supplies through Pakistan. The coalition has alternative routes through Central Asia into northern Afghanistan, but they are costlier and less efficient.

Pakistan temporarily closed one of its Afghan crossings to NATO supplies last year after U.S. helicopters accidentally killed two Pakistani soldiers. Suspected militants took advantage of the impasse to launch attacks against stranded or rerouted trucks carrying NATO supplies. The government reopened the border after about 10 days when the U.S. apologized. NATO said at the time the relatively short closure did not significantly affect its ability to keep its troops supplied.

But the reported casualties are much greater this time, and the relationship between Pakistan and the U.S. has severely deteriorated over the last year, especially following the covert American raid that killed Osama bin Laden in a Pakistani garrison town in May. Islamabad was outraged it wasn't told about the operation beforehand.

The Pakistani army said Saturday that NATO helicopters and fighter jets carried out an "unprovoked" attack on two of its border posts in the Mohmand tribal area before dawn, killing 24 soldiers and wounding 13 others. The troops responded in self-defense "with all available weapons," an army statement said.

Pakistan army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani condemned the attack, calling it a "blatant and unacceptable act," according to the statement.

A spokesman for NATO forces, Brig. Gen. Carsten Jacobson, said Afghan and coalition troops were operating in the border area of eastern Afghanistan when "a tactical situation" prompted them to call in close air support. It is "highly likely" that the airstrikes caused Pakistani casualties, he told BBC television.

"My most sincere and personal heartfelt condolences go out to the families and loved ones of any members of Pakistan security forces who may have been killed or injured," said Gen. John Allen, the top overall commander of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, in a statement.

The border issue is a major source of tension between Islamabad and Washington, which is committed to withdrawing its combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014.

Much of the violence in Afghanistan is carried out by insurgents who are based just across the border in Pakistan. Coalition forces are not allowed to cross the frontier to attack the militants. However, the militants sometimes fire artillery and rockets across the line, reportedly from locations close to Pakistani army posts.

American officials have repeatedly accused Pakistani forces of supporting - or turning a blind eye - to militants using its territory for cross-border attacks. But militants based in Afghanistan have also been attacking Pakistan recently, prompting complaints from Islamabad.

The two posts that were attacked Saturday were located about 1,000 feet apart on a mountain top and were set up recently to stop Pakistani Taliban militants holed up in Afghanistan from crossing the border and staging attacks, said local government and security officials.

There was no militant activity in the area when the alleged NATO attack occurred, local officials said. Some of the soldiers were standing guard, while others were asleep, they said, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

Pakistan army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas said map references of all of the force's border posts have been given to NATO several times.

Pakistani Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani summoned U.S. Ambassador Cameron Munter to protest the alleged NATO strike, according to a Foreign Ministry statement. It said the attack was a "grave infringement of Pakistan's sovereignty" and could have serious repercussions on Pakistan's cooperation with NATO.

Munter said in a statement that he regretted any Pakistani deaths and promised to work closely with Islamabad to investigate the incident.

Pakistan moved quickly to close both its Afghan border crossings to NATO supplies, a reminder of the leverage the country has.

A Pakistani customs official told The Associated Press that he received verbal orders Saturday to stop all NATO supplies from crossing the border through Torkham in either direction. The operator of a terminal at the border where NATO trucks park before they cross confirmed the closure. They spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

Saeed Ahmad, a spokesman for security forces at the other crossing in Chaman in southwest Pakistan, said that his crossing was also blocked following orders "from higher-ups."

The U.S., Pakistan, and Afghan militaries have long wrestled with the technical difficulties of patrolling a border that in many places is disputed or poorly marked. Saturday's incident took place a day after a meeting between NATO's Gen. Allen and Pakistan army chief Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani in Islamabad to discuss border operations.

The meeting tackled "coordination, communication and procedures ... aimed at enhancing border control on both sides," according to a statement from the Pakistani side.

The U.S. helicopter attack that killed two Pakistani soldiers on Sept. 30 of last year took place south of Mohmand in the Kurram tribal area. A joint U.S.-Pakistan investigation found that Pakistani soldiers fired at the two U.S. helicopters prior to the attack, a move the investigation team said was likely meant to notify the aircraft of their presence after they passed into Pakistani airspace several times.

A U.S. airstrike in June 2008 reportedly killed 11 Pakistani paramilitary troops during a clash between militants and coalition forces in the tribal region.

____

Associated Press writers Anwarullah Khan in Khar, Pakistan, Riaz Khan in Peshawar, Pakistan, Matiullah Achakzai in Chaman and Deb Riechmann in Kabul, Afghanistan, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

By SEBASTIAN ABBOT, The Associated Press ISLAMABAD (AP) - Pakistan blocked vital supply routes for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan on Saturday after coalition helicopters and fighter jets allegedly ...
By SEBASTIAN ABBOT, The Associated Press ISLAMABAD (AP) - Pakistan blocked vital supply routes for U.S.-led troops in Afghanistan on Saturday after coalition helicopters and fighter jets allegedly ...
Filed by Melissa Jeltsen  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,674
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (51 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ver1tas
One nation under surveillance.
01:14 AM on 11/29/2011
Yeah, how DARE they get upset that the US is killing their troops (it was just an oopsie after all) and droning innocent civilians to death on an almost daily basis during their little 'missions.'

So, let me get this straight. The entire Neocon platform was, we don't need the world nor the UN, unilateralism is the way to go and we shall start two-three wars on our own because we are the mighty hegemon and we can. Now we expect everybody else's help, and we reserve the right to retaliate if they dare get upset about us 'accidentally' killing their civilians. (By the way, explain that one to the families... I would LOVE to see some of you to stand there and explain how their loved ones were 'accidentally' killed... futhermore place yourself in their shoes and ask yourself how you'd react if the same happened to you... who would be the first you'd sue for 'wrongful death'??)

Iraq and Afghanistan was all Bush's work.. the man you people voted into office TWICE, and now you expect the entire region and the world to help you clean up the mess you started all on your own... and you think socialists have an entitlement mentality. Un-freaking-believable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Evie Glodic
01:54 PM on 11/28/2011
If Pakistan wants to act like a bunch of children for an episode that seems clearly to be an accident then maybe the US & all the other Allies troops should be pulled out of their country immediately! See if they can defend their country like the US & our allies have been doing for years. We help these people & now they refuse let supplies be taken to our troops - no way! Our government needs to take whatever measures they deem necessary to supply & support our fighting men & women!
Evie Glodic
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ver1tas
One nation under surveillance.
01:02 AM on 11/29/2011
LOL oh please!

I am willing to bet ANYTHING that you would be singing a very different tune if those were 24 Americans killed by Pakistani troops. I can totally just picture you saying "well we shouldn't act like such children, it was just 24 lives and it was an oopsie so it's all good."

Secondly, don't forget that innocent Pakistani civilians are killed almost daily by US drones. That should have been reason enough for Pakistan to kick out the US once and for all. Funny how you start a bunch of wars on your own that you think you can handle, and then ask for everyone else's help, and then get offended when you don't receive it for something YOU got yourself into in the first place.

Get real.
rockymtnal
The spaces between your words make the most sense.
10:08 PM on 11/29/2011
Don't forget for a minute that Pakistan refused to allow us to use their country as an entry point into Afghanistan before the invasion began. Don't forget for a minute that Pakistan provided safe haven to bin Laden. Don't forget for a minute that we support the Pakistani government with $40 billion in aid and end up getting kicked in the face for it.

Get real.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lowrodiay65
11:06 AM on 11/28/2011
Will we ever get out of these BUSH wars?
02:34 PM on 11/28/2011
Sorry, this is Obama's war now
rockymtnal
The spaces between your words make the most sense.
10:09 PM on 11/29/2011
Your guy has been in office three years. Bush is gone...get over it. BO owns them now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ayesha Khan
10:02 AM on 11/28/2011
Kick out the bloody Americans and the NATO from Pakistan no body can ever make them happy. Cut off their supplies and teach them a lesson that the world should see and tremble. It is also the fault of Pakistan that they keep extending the rope to them and never learn a lesson. More than 24 precious soldiers died and its a joke for the world. The more Pakistan will be flexible the more smart they try to play. Reject their bloody Aid we spend more in protecting their deploys and safe guarding them from fear. Let them handle their own affairs. The amount of money, precious life's and resources Pakistan spend on these American's is 100 times than their pittance, and that's the only thing they brag about in the whole world. For them precious lives has no meanings and if one of their people die they start screaming in front of the whole world. Ungrateful IDIOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!
08:47 AM on 11/28/2011
When in doubt, empty your magazene.
photo
ewd4610
Commerce with all nations, alliance with none
08:45 AM on 11/28/2011
The price tag for purchasing allies just went up. More aid will get dumped into this hole.
08:14 AM on 11/28/2011
Whatever it costs extra to reroute supplies to troops in Afghanistan should be deducted from financial aid to Pakistan. All losses should be deducted from financial aid. If Pakistan continues to block routes then no financial aid should be offered. If it is too expensive to run war, then pull out all troops is the only solution. If any business continued to run at a loss, the business would run out of money and go bankrupt. Whatever natural resources are available in terms of minerals should be used to pay for war expenses.
rockymtnal
The spaces between your words make the most sense.
10:10 PM on 11/29/2011
I have a suggestion: Stop aid to Pakistan and let them control their own border. Let's see how long their government lasts without the U.S. protecting their sorry @$$es.
08:01 AM on 11/28/2011
Its time to bring our troops home, we also have to stop funding these people, they are idiots.
07:52 AM on 11/28/2011
Maybe the next "raid" should be the capitol building in islamabad. More terrorist there than in Iraq and Afgannistan
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rodneyvgt
07:07 AM on 11/28/2011
the latest I hear is Pakistan asked for the raid
12:42 AM on 11/28/2011
good 24 more dead terrorists. only 200 million to go.
12:20 AM on 11/28/2011
wow!! HP readers are really war mongers at heart after reading a lot of these comments. Thank goodness it was Obama who did this and not Bush. Who is lying to the American people now. They all do. Ron Paul may be the only one who has a clue about the middle east.
robertste998
We get what we deserve if we don't ask for details
11:45 PM on 11/27/2011
You can't dance with the devil! We pay them billions thinking these people will work with us. Each dollar buys the exact munitions that will one day be used to kill our kids in combat against this yet unoffical enemy. Its a matter of time, no need to make it a matter of stupidity. Cut off the aid to them now. Tomorrow is too late. Contact your congressman, they aren't doing anything else usefull anyway. Give them and Pakistan a good boot in the ars.
11:04 PM on 11/27/2011
2014? Mission accomplished. Let's bring our people home. Screw Pakistan. They've never been much of an ally.
photo
cobry4949
cobry1112
10:33 PM on 11/27/2011
General Clark the truth http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jlf7XYtBVlY&feature=player_embedded
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
looneydoone
not a "cookie"
06:45 PM on 11/28/2011
Yep, 7 wars in 5 years was the plan...only Lebanon and Iran remain on the neocons "hit" list