iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Tribal Land Rules: Obama Administration's Proposed Changes Include Wind, Solar Energy Projects

Tribal Land Rules

SUZANNE GAMBOA   11/28/11 05:45 PM ET   AP

Washington — Ahead of a meeting Friday between President Barack Obama and hundreds of Native American leaders, the administration unveiled new rules for tribal lands that officials say will expedite home building and energy development.

The proposed changes – the first of its kind in 50 years – would open the door to badly-needed housing development on reservations, and for wind and solar energy projects that tribes have been eager to launch.

The plan gives Obama another boasting point for this week's meeting with leaders of the 565 federally-recognized tribes at the White House.

"We have for three years worked very hard to change the relationship between the administration and the nation's first Americans," Interior Secretary Ken Salazar said Monday. He said Obama tasked him with changing the federal government's relationship with tribes "in a very complete way."

Obama has been winning high praise among Native Americans. The president has appointed Native Americans to high level positions in his administration, signed laws to improve health care and law enforcement for Native Americans and resolved a long running lawsuit over royalties for minerals on tribal lands. In February, Obama nominated Arvo Mikkanen to serve as a federal judge. If confirmed, he would be the only Native American actively serving on the federal bench.

"We've had more access to federal officials to speak about these important issues in Indian Country," said Mellor Willie, a Navajo tribe member and executive director of the National American Indian Housing Council.

That was the case on the land leasing rules. Willie said the council asked the administration to consider reforming the rules during the transition between the Bush and Obama administrations. He said the Obama administration has held a number of meetings with tribes on the subject and provided draft proposals to leaders as the rules were being rewritten.

Land on American Indian reservations cannot be bought and sold because it is held in trust by the federal government on behalf of the tribes. If a tribe or tribe member wants to build a house on it or use it for multifamily housing, a business or industry, the Interior Department must approve a "lease" of the land or mortgages.

The proposed changes would set time limits for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to approve such leases. Residential leases, subleases and mortgages would have to be approved in 30 days; leases for commercial or industrial development must be approved in 60 days. If the bureau does not meet the deadlines, leases would automatically be approved. Currently, there are no time limits.

The proposed rules apply only to land development and not to oil and gas and mining leases.

Larry Echo Hawk, the Interior Department's assistant secretary for Indian affairs, said the current rules, which date back to 1961, are paternalistic. The federal government through the proposed changes is no longer trying to exercise as much federal authority over the leasing process, he said.

Although tribes have been leasing property for years for agricultural and other reasons, the process has become slow and cumbersome.

"It is not unusual to hear tribes talk about waiting two or three years for approval of a lease," said John Dossett, attorney for the National Congress of American Indians.

In recent years, Dossett said, it has been particularly frustrating for tribes applying for more complex leases like those for wind farms, which can take two to three years to review. "By that time, the tribes lose the deal. The business partner doesn't want to wait that long," Dossett said.

The administration has been pushing for renewable energy projects and working to advance solar and wind projects on public lands. It gave priority to 18 projects for this year, including the Moapa Solar Project, which will be built mostly on Moapa Band of Paiutes tribal lands in Nevada.

Developing wind and solar energy projects has drawn interest from tribes around the country, Dossett said. Tribes can partner with companies and sell the energy produced back to power grids.

Willie said the changes should also help tribal members get mortgages more quickly. Under the current rules, government approval of mortgages can take two months to two years. With that kind of delay, getting the banking industry to see tribal members as a profitable market can be difficult, Willie said.

The rules will be open for public comment for 60 days beginning Tuesday. The administration also plans additional meetings with tribes on the proposed changes.

___

Department of the Interior: http://www.doi.gov

National Congress of American Indians: http://www.ncai.org/

National American Indian Housing Council: http://www.naihc.net/

___

Suzanne Gamboa can be reached on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/APsgamboa

___

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Washington — Ahead of a meeting Friday between President Barack Obama and hundreds of Native American leaders, the administration unveiled new rules for tribal lands that officials say will expe...
Washington — Ahead of a meeting Friday between President Barack Obama and hundreds of Native American leaders, the administration unveiled new rules for tribal lands that officials say will expe...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 26
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
07:46 AM on 12/20/2011
Though it doesn't say, I imagine that within the 30 or 60 day window for Federal review, the feds can review and choose to deny an application for development, else it wouldn't be necessary to have any review period if everything is just going to be automatically approved. I think this is important, for if there are tribal activists opposed to a particular development project, they need to have some time to make their case against a project to the feds and get them to act. Not all development projects should be approved - if it is to be shoddy construction or poorly sited, it could do more harm than good. The fed review process is probably the last chance for dissenters to be heard and to have any influence. The extraction leases should definitely never be automatically approved, but from what I know, they are rarely hindered by the feds, whether or not the tribes want the mining/extraction corps to get leases to their lands - whats with that?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:44 PM on 12/04/2011
All of the western water sheds are downstream from this toxic legacy, including

Native lands and the more recently established communities.

http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/press-releases/markey-introduces-long-awaited-1872-mining-reform-measures-85899366609

“The Fair Payment for Energy and Mineral Production on Public Lands Act of 2011 responds to these issues by setting a royalty equal to what other industries have been paying for decades. …………..”

…………..“The Abandoned Mines Reclamation and Deficit Reduction Act would start to address the estimated 500,000 abandoned mines on public lands.”…………

“The mining of gold, uranium, and other hardrock minerals is still governed by a law signed by President Ulysses S. Grant in 1872. This statute gives mining companies “free and open access” to the majority of public land in the West, and in 2010 alone it allowed at least $2.4 billion in valuable metals to be taken from public land without taxpayer compensation, according to the House Natural Resources Committee’s correspondence with the Congressional Research Service. The Obama administration and members of Congress from both sides of the aisle have called for modernizing the law. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxics Release Inventory has identified the hardrock mining industry as the nation’s top polluter. More than $2 billion in federal spending went to mine cleanup in the past decade.”
08:46 PM on 11/29/2011
Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae, cellulose and waste are the future.
WonderingNThinking
Think Before We Sink
12:17 AM on 12/05/2011
The here and now, preferably.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildoc68
Frustrate government...be a thinker not a follower
03:57 PM on 11/29/2011
Put Hermin and Perry on a tower somewhere...they produce enough hot air to power something
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:43 AM on 11/29/2011
native americans want alternative energies....most americans want alternative energies...but guess what...the fossil fuel fascists and their 1 percenter mouth pieces have monopolized energy in this country for 120 years...."competition is a sin"....john d rockefeller...king of the drill baby drillers....the FFF needs to be removed by force just like the FFF is removing the 99 percenters by force from their constitutionally protected assemblies....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Texas Justice Party - Chairperson
12:08 AM on 11/29/2011
There is no reason why the Federal government needs to be involved in land leases. These are autonomous zones and responsibility should be delegated to the tribe. Our treatment of minorities is appalling, even more so our treatment of Native Americans and descendents of former slaves. We need to identify projects that will help these communities create jobs and spread the wealth. Energy projects are great, but we need more than just some windmills, we need manufacturing as well. Who should we protect, Chinese workers or our own Native American ones?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Ipswich, Mass. 1641
08:18 PM on 11/28/2011
it's about time someone paid attention to the Native Americans. way to go, Mr. President.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:35 PM on 11/28/2011
so now Big Energy can colonize them where Big Pilgrims left off? yikes. why not empower them with solar panels on their own rooftops instead of pillaging their land for boondoggles?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:29 PM on 11/28/2011
You nailed it! ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:37 PM on 11/28/2011
http://www.motherboard.tv/2011/11/9/motherboard-tv-the-thorium-dream

The Earth Mother is sending a unambiguous message and GIFT.

Earth friendly Technologies require REE (Rare Earth Elements) so necessary for all those wonderful

wind mills, electric cars, etc., are buried in mounds of THORIUM!

Thorium the fuel used in Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reacror(LFTR)s!

“These include the tailings of ancient tin mines, rare earth mine tailings, phosphate mine tailings and uranium mine tailings. In addition to the thorium present in mine tailings and in surface monazite sands, burning coal at the average 1GWe power plant produces about 13 tons of thorium per year. That thorium is recoverable from the power plant’s waste ash pile.
One ton of thorium will produce nearly 1 GW of electricity for a year in an efficient thorium cycle reactor. Thus current coal energy technology throws away over 10 times the energy it produces as electricity. This is not the result of poor thermodynamic efficiency; it is the result of a failure to recognize and use the energy value of thorium. The amount of thorium present in surface mining coal waste is enormous and would provide all the power human society needs for thousands of years, without resorting to any special mining for thorium, or the use of any other form or energy recovery.”

http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4971

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BOoBTufkEog
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
10:25 AM on 12/01/2011
Ha Ha
More pro Nuclear R & D talk!

Thorium is Borium:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/jun/23/thorium-nuclear-uranium
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:46 PM on 12/03/2011
References to articles with no references is

No references

http://www.triplepundit.com/2011/08/thorium-reactors-carbon-free-answer/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
07:09 PM on 12/12/2011
The thorium claim is back, but the promises are suspect.  Thorium is not an environmentally safe alternative type of nuclear energy, Norwegian report says - Bellona
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beautyontheinside
I've never dropped anyone I believed in. Marilyn
06:33 PM on 11/28/2011
Fantastic!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
ronkw
Molon labe
06:26 PM on 11/28/2011
Wind farms!?

Though wind turbines frequently kill bats—hundreds of thousands each year—this was an endangered Indiana bat, only the third ever found dead at a wind farm. Scientists estimate that there are 387,000 Indiana bats in existence, a roughly 50 percent decrease in the population since 1967, when the bat was listed as an endangered species. Duke had to balance suspending energy production that could power up to 21,000 homes against a potential lawsuit.

http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/the-gist/Battened-Down.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linus521
In wildness is the salvation of mankind
01:22 AM on 11/29/2011
Windmills kill bats and vast populations of birds as well as native invertebrates. I was stunned the first time I saw acres and acres of windmills in the desert, placed as close to one another as humanly possible. Nothing could make a living with the monstrous, slicing swords. As far as the Earth is concerned and all life, they might as well have slathered the valley, the hills and mountains with concrete or a massive oil spill.

That much of the Earth is now as life creating and supporting as the dead, lifeless tumble of rocks on Mars. Few comprehend, that all life is inextricably tied to the existence of bats, birds and all biological diversity. Science compares the extinction of biological diversity as a threat to mankind, right up there with global, thermonuclear war. Today, the extinction rate is 100, to 1,000 times higher than normal, and this pushes mankind closer to extinction.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loco48
TRUTH trumps ideology!
07:18 AM on 11/29/2011
Cars kill bats and birds. In my 47 years of driving, I have killed a couple of dozen biirds that fly into my cars front end. Should we outlaw cars too? power lines kills birds and squirels , should we out law the power lines?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
07:18 PM on 12/12/2011
Bird and bat deaths have been shown, in every study, to be less than other collisions with buildings, cars, power lines, less than cat kills. The bird death talking point is a false issue.
recently declared the turbines' impacts on local eagle and osprey populations to be negligible
Rhetoric vs. Reality: Wind Energy and Birds
Common Eco-Myth: Wind Turbines Kill Birds : TreeHugger
Offshore wind farms are good for wildlife, say researchers | Environment | guardian.co.uk
photo
relians
the interconnectedness of all things
05:57 PM on 11/28/2011
about time!