More

OR-7, Wandering Wolf, Inspires Hope And Dread (PHOTOS)

By JEFF BARNARD   11/29/11 12:21 PM ET   AP

GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- A young wolf from Oregon has become a media celebrity while looking for love, tracing a zigzag path that has carried him hundreds of miles nearly to California, while his alpha male sire and a sibling that stayed home near the Idaho border are under a death warrant for killing cattle.

Backcountry lodge owner Liz Parrish thinks she locked eyes with the wolf called OR-7 on the edge of the meadow in front of her Crystalwood Lodge, on the western shore of Upper Klamath Lake, and hopes someday she will hear his howls coming out of the tall timber.

"I was stunned – it was such a huge animal," said Parrish, who has seen her share of wolves while racing dog sleds in Alaska and Minnesota. "He just stopped and stared. I stopped and stared. We had a stare-down that seemed like a long time, but was probably just a few seconds.

"He just evaporated into the trees. I stayed there awhile, hoping he might come back. He didn't."

Cattle rancher Nathan Jackson has not seen or heard the wolf, and hopes he never does.

"In this country, we worked really hard to exterminate wolves 50 years ago or so, and there was a reason," said Jackson, who ranches on the other side of Upper Klamath Lake from Parrish's lodge.

"A lot of people who don't have a direct tie to the agricultural community tend to view wolves as majestic, beautiful creatures. They don't seem so majestic and beautiful when they are ripping apart calves and colts."

Last February, OR-7 was in a snowy canyon in northeastern Oregon, when a state biologist shot him with a tranquilizer dart from a helicopter, then fitted him with a tracking collar and blue ear tags. State biologists have been able to chart his journey from GPS positions transmitted from the collar. They show he has traveled 730 miles on his meandering route, getting as far as 320 miles from home. And each time he crosses a county line, OR-7 makes it into the newspapers and on TV news.

The conservation group Oregon Wild has begun a contest to give OR-7 a different name, hoping to make him too famous to be shot, either by a poacher, rancher or government hunter. One entry came from as far away as Finland. The first came from a little girl in OR-7's home territory of Wallowa County, who suggested "Whoseafraida."

OR-7 set out on his trek on Sept. 10, just before state wildlife officials issued a death warrant for members of his Imnaha pack for killing cattle. The kill order specifically mentions OR-7's father, the alpha male, and one younger wolf with no collar. Since OR-7 and two siblings took off, that would leave his mother and one pup.

The department reports a government hunter had a shot but missed, and did not get another before conservation groups won a stay of the kill order while their legal challenge is settled by the Oregon Court of Appeals.

Wolves started moving into Oregon from Idaho in the late 1990s, from packs introduced into the Northern Rockies as part of a federal endangered species restoration program. From trail cameras, radio tracking collar data, and sightings, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife figures the state has at least 23 wolves. All four packs are in the northeastern corner of the state. Two produced pups this year.

Federal protection for wolves was lifted in Eastern Oregon, but they remain under state protection. West of U.S. Highway 97 they are back under federal protection.

When wolves reach about 2 years old, they typically strike out on their own, looking for a mate and an empty territory they can call their own. And that's what OR-7 has done.

He's trekked across mountains, deserts and major highways from his pack's turf.

Once in the Cascade Range, OR-7 meandered through the Rogue-Umpqua Divide, where Oregon's last known wolf was shot by a bounty hunter in 1946. He skirted Crater Lake National Park, and dropped down to the flatlands near Upper Klamath Lake, climbed back up in the Cascades, and crossed over the crest south of Mount McLaughlin, a snow-capped volcano visible from Interstate 5.

So far there have been no reports of cattle killing along his path.

Russ Morgan, the wolf coordinator for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, has been surprised by the way the public has embraced the wandering wolf. Much of Morgan's time is spent on a more difficult task, trying to build acceptance among ranchers.

"With all that's going on right now with management of wolves in Oregon, this is kind of a different side that people across the state have taken a shine to," Morgan said.

OR-7's travels are not unusual, said Ed Bangs, the retired U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wolf coordinator for the Northern Rockies. A female from Montana headed south through Wyoming, crossed southeastern Idaho, dropped down to Utah, crossed northern Colorado, and headed back up to Wyoming, where she ate poison and died.

"If you connect all the dots, she walked something like 3,000 miles," said Bangs. "Wolves are amazing travelers.'"

And patient. One male hung out four years in Idaho, howling and leaving scent markers, before a female found him, Bangs said. They established a pack, and the male lived to the near-record age of 13 before lying down and dying next to a dead elk.

Bangs said most of the wanderers become biological dead ends, but even if OR-7 dies alone, the trail of scent posts he has left will be followed by others.

And OR-7 already may have company. Tracks and sightings from last winter indicated other wolves made it to the Cascades. Parrish spotted a track last May in a muddy area of her meadow.

1  of  8
PLAY
FULLSCREEN
ZOOM
SHARE THIS SLIDE 
This Oct. 25, 2011 photo provided by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife shows OR-11, a male pup from the Walla Walla pack, waking up from anesthesia after being fitted with a radio tracking collar in northeastern Oregon. Another wolf, OR-7, from the Imnaha pack, has become a celebrity by trekking 730 miles on a zigzag course from near the Idaho border tot he southern Cascade Range. His GPS tracking collar has traced his trail across the state. (AP Photo/Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife)
FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- A young wolf from Oregon has become a media celebrity while looking for love, tracing a zigzag path that has carried him hundreds of miles nearly to California, while his alpha ma...
GRANTS PASS, Ore. -- A young wolf from Oregon has become a media celebrity while looking for love, tracing a zigzag path that has carried him hundreds of miles nearly to California, while his alpha ma...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 153
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donna Street
11:49 AM on 12/09/2011
Some folks just don't have a brain to think with, does he not know there are alternatives to killing wildlife? After all, aren't we suppose to be the intelligent species? He could contact the Wildlife Admin. or any of the Wolf Centers for help in protecting his livestock and the wolves.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ms.understood
pro-choice | liberal | womanist
12:39 PM on 12/07/2011
cattle rancher nathan jackson just sounds terribly stupid! these are wild animals in search of food and shelter. of course if given the opportunity, they will attack calves, etc. after all, they are on the menu. and i don't think those two wolves should be on a kill list for killing cattle.



wolves are just beautiful creatures, and we have completely taken over their natural habitat for the most part, so clashes are likely to be dangerous. humans will find a way to destroy anything they have their hands on and seems they won't be happy until there's no wildlife left!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donna Street
11:31 AM on 12/09/2011
I agree....
photo
carolineeaton
I am a Goddess who runs with the wolves
08:04 PM on 12/01/2011
I guess it's all right when humans eat cattle, just not wolves.
photo
escher3360
A nation in distress
06:47 PM on 12/01/2011
How tragic that an animal would wander endlessly in its natural habitat in search of a mate and fail. Their fate as a "biological dead end" further justifies support for planned parenthood and the effective use of human birth control.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donna Street
11:32 AM on 12/09/2011
Right on....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
justanotherbushhater
I've stopped evolving. Look around: why bother?
01:44 PM on 12/01/2011
The wolf in the first photo is a beauty. I agree: removing the wolf from the ecosystem produces imbalances in the whole. We're infringing on their territory, and not the inverse. Species eradication benefits no one.
03:15 AM on 12/01/2011
do wolves really do enough damage to cattle to warrant a contract on their heads? how often do they take more than one cow at a time? How many dollars are we talking here?

I heart wolves, I sure hate to see them shot, esp. from airplanes.
photo
IndyGuy
Et tu, Brute?
09:43 PM on 12/01/2011
And how much land are we encroaching on their habitat. A lot of the problem is mankind pushing an animal species into other area.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mu chowdhury
Truth is elusive
02:35 AM on 12/01/2011
As far as ecosystem is concerned, greater wolf population in the forest is more desirable. Greater the number of wolves, lesser is the number of deer, rabbits and other chaotic small species; greater is the jungle peace !!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mu chowdhury
Truth is elusive
02:29 AM on 12/01/2011
Reminiscent of Wolfwitz !!
photo
darkmark
religion, the veil of evil.
10:15 PM on 11/29/2011
a wolf kills a cow. that's what comes from sharing the land. humans need a new protocol on living with the other animals. we need better skills in how to confront wolfs, lions, bears, skunks and other animals living around us. skills other than going bang bang you're dead.
06:20 PM on 11/29/2011
Wow, that's fantastic. I've got some acres of meadow just a few miles south of Crystalwood lodge. Cattle were trucked off a couple of weeks ago, so no worries there. (summer tenants.) I'm skittish enough about the little bears around, so I wouldn't want to run into OR-7 in the middle of the dark woods, but it's cool just knowing he's out there. Gives the area more "wild" cachet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Polar Shift
Stop the censorship!!
12:30 AM on 12/01/2011
Bipesimplumis, There is little historical evidence they attack humans. They WILL take a pet, of course, but coyotes are more apt to do that. There's a great book about a guy who lived in northern Canada next to a pack of wolves. The book is called 'Cry Wolf', and he actually crawled into the den once, when he thought it was empty, and came face to face with the alpha female, who just stared back. He backed out without incident, and they continued their good neighbor policy. He DID follow their practice of 'marking territory' the wolf way. A good read. He said they survived on voles mostly, until the Caribou migrated through their territory.
05:04 AM on 12/01/2011
Oh yeah, well tell that to Red Riding Hood! :-)
Just kidding, I agree with you. Most hatred of wolves is just historical prejudice. Although, it only takes one delicious pet to enrage people. I'd be wary around a pack of wolves, but I'm still more scared of a human mob.
02:43 PM on 11/29/2011
No wolves in California ... Yet!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
janibowe
Doubt = the enemy. Flirting = the ultimate weapon.
12:37 PM on 11/29/2011
While I'm sure that wolves provide enough headaches for ranchers, the truth is that a decreased wolf population is far worse. Without a natural predator around, deer and coyote populations skyrocket, causing much more problems for the ecosystem all around. This is why you have MN and IA trying to re-introduce and boost wolf populations.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:50 AM on 11/29/2011
Leave Jacob alone!!!!!!!!!
photo
collettethehedgehog
My micro-bio is So running on empty
03:09 PM on 11/29/2011
Exactly what I was thinking. You need a name that will bring this guy into the limelight. Team Jacob!!!
photo
IndyGuy
Et tu, Brute?
09:44 PM on 12/01/2011
SAVE JAKE!
02:55 AM on 11/29/2011
Mankind...the deadliest bacteria on earth. He will eventually destroy all other life forms.
Why? G-R-E-E-D. He is the only animal with an ego...the catalyst which drives him to always pursue more than he really needs to survive, with the ultimate goal of trying to impress other humans. How obnoxiously disrespectful to other life on this planet.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:22 AM on 11/30/2011
when you say he ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:40 AM on 11/29/2011
can't believe cows are worth exterminating this species for. how many cows do we need?? how many millions or even billions of them are there? They are only there so someone can have the umpteenth hamburger. So sad.
photo
CarlyQ
Without followers, evil cannot spread.
10:09 AM on 11/29/2011
That kind of puts it in perspective. It is sad.
12:50 PM on 11/29/2011
Its nice that you feel someone else's livelyhood is the real problem here. The fact is whether your raising sheep, cattle, horses etc. wolves are a direct threat to them no matter how well protected you have them. Livestock is much easier to kill then wildlife such as elk or moose.
It would be great to come up with a non lethal means of keeping wolves away but they are doing what they are designed to do. Sadly they will pay the ultimate price for being what they are predators..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Polar Shift
Stop the censorship!!
12:58 AM on 12/01/2011
judge, While I empathize with a rancher, I cannot condone an industry that treats animals strictly as commodities, uses cruel but speedy methods of slaughter, feeds them EACH OTHER, adds chemicals and antibiotics, fattens them unnaturally, and the raising of them contaminates their environment because of overproduction, crowding, etc. This is similar to the introduction of RBGH in dairy production which is to increase milk production when we are AWASH in milk, and are paying dairy farmers to produce LESS, and they are making those cows so sick, they then have to keep them pumped with antibiotics. Some of THOSE cows end up on our plates as well. And the milk is full of drugs and PUS. We eat WAY too much meat protein as it is.
But, after my 'soap-box', I would like to suggest another method. Pay the rancher for any calf taken. Simpler. I know agents have done this in the past, and the poor rancher has to prove without DOUBT that the calf was lost to a wolf, but we could just pay him for the calf without needing him to prove it was a wolf instead of a bear, or cougar, if we just put a numerical limit of the number of calves he could collect on in a year.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Polar Shift
Stop the censorship!!
12:58 AM on 12/01/2011
And it would be cheaper than paying for all the 'investigation' necessary to produce that proof. The gov't makes things too complex sometimes. We NEED our wildlife in as much variety and diversity as we can keep it. Things don't need to be complicated. We end up knocking these 'systems' out of whack, with our inability to live WITHIN the system. Am I making SOME sense? I just think we don't 'get it' sometimes.