iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dakota Meyer, Medal Of Honor Recipient, Sues BAE Systems

Dakota Meyer Medal Of Honor Bae Systems

By PAUL J. WEBER   11/29/11 03:30 PM ET   AP

SAN ANTONIO -- A U.S. Marine given the nation's highest award for valor is suing a defense contractor that he says ridiculed his Medal of Honor, called him mentally unstable and suggested he had a drinking problem, thereby costing him a job.

Dakota Meyer received the Medal of Honor in September, two years after the young corporal saved 36 lives during a six-hour ambush in Afghanistan. He the third living recipient of the award for actions in Iraq or Afghanistan. After the medal was approved, President Barack Obama waited to call until Meyer's lunch break because the 23-year-old worried about taking a call on the job.

In a defamation lawsuit filed in Texas, Meyer alleges that his former employer, BAE Systems OASYS Inc., ruined his chances at landing a new job by telling a prospective employer that he was a poor worker during a three-month stint earlier this year.

A BAE Systems manager said Meyer "was mentally unstable, that Sgt. Meyer was not performing BAE tasks assigned and that Sgt. Meyer had a problem related to drinking in a social setting," according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, seeks unspecified damages.

BAE Systems spokesman Brian Roehrkasse told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the company was grateful to Meyer for his bravery but strongly disagreed with his claims. He called Meyer's actions in Afghanistan "heroic" and wished him success.

Attorneys for Meyer did not return a phone message Tuesday.

Meyer was working construction in his home state of Kentucky when he was awarded the Medal of Honor. In September 2009, Meyer was just 21 when, defying orders from his commanders, he charged five times in a Humvee into heavy gunfire and provided cover for his team, allowing many to escape likely death. He killed at least eight Taliban insurgents.

According to the lawsuit filed Monday, BAE hired Meyer in March but the relationship quickly soured. Meyer said he became dismayed in April upon learning that BAE had pursued sales of weapons systems to Pakistan, and sent an email to his supervisor expressing his disapproval.

Meyer wrote that it was "disturbing" how U.S. troops were being issued outdated equipment when better, advanced thermal optic scopes were being offered to Pakistan.

"We are simply taking the best gear, the best technology on the market to date and giving to guys that are known to stab us in the back," Meyer wrote in the email, according to the lawsuit.

Roehrkasse, the BAE spokesman, said it is the State Department and not BAE that makes the decision on which defense-related products can be exported.

"In recent years, the U.S. government has approved the export of defense-related goods from numerous defense companies to Pakistan as part of the United States' bilateral relationship with that country," Roehrkasse said.

Meyer claims his supervisor began berating and belittling him after sending the email, at one point allegedly taunting him about his Medal of Honor by calling it Meyer's "pending star status." That supervisor, Bobby McCreight, is also named in the lawsuit and is still employed by BAE. Roehrkasse said McCreight is a former decorated Marine sniper.

Meyer resigned from BAE in May. He then tried obtaining a job at a former employer, San Diego-based Ausgar Technologies, but the lawsuit claims the opportunity fell through after McCreight characterized Meyer as a poor employee during a conversation with a manager who had to approve new hires.

"Bottom line, it was determined that ... you were not recommended to be placed back on the team due to being mentally unstable and no performing on OASYS tasks assigned," according to an email from an Ausgar manager included in the lawsuit.

Valerie Ellis, an administrator at Ausgar, said the company had no comment when reached Tuesday.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
SAN ANTONIO -- A U.S. Marine given the nation's highest award for valor is suing a defense contractor that he says ridiculed his Medal of Honor, called him mentally unstable and suggested he had a dri...
SAN ANTONIO -- A U.S. Marine given the nation's highest award for valor is suing a defense contractor that he says ridiculed his Medal of Honor, called him mentally unstable and suggested he had a dri...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 AM on 12/16/2011
Good for meyers for standing up for what was right and calling BAE on the fact of suppling weapons systems to pakistan. good for the president for standing by his medal of honor award .It seems the BAE contractor is unconscionable at best for doing this to a us military service member for calling them out on a bad idea to sell to pakistan. I support meyers 100%. good call soldier , hold your post in honor over the injustices caused by BAE ~!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bigbobh
10:57 PM on 12/15/2011
Sombody is getting screwed.
10:21 PM on 12/07/2011
You know nothing but its yet to come out. here in Afghanistan back in Aug 2011, it was readily apparent that the explosives that were being used by the Taliban were much more powerful. No more kitchen sink stuff. Now we know why, Congress approved the sales of "weaponry" to Afghanistan. The plastics they have acquired is very powerful. The sales were supposed to hit 64 billion as the article states but fell short.
We lost three soldiers last week, the IED hit and they could not get out of the burning truck. Pray for the men and women of the military , they are young and the body bags are many.
Mike in Afghanistan
01:15 AM on 12/06/2011
The comment the former marine made about Pakistan echoes the prophetic words of the supreme commander of allied forces in WWII and later President "Ike" who warned not to let America become an industrial war complex and that is what greed does to corporate excuetives that have made ther wealth standing on the backs of vets as this young former marine and myself a Vietnam vet. There is a good chance we may have to fight these 2 faced hypocrites in the near future and have our own troops killed by American made weapon systems. This why if I ever decide to vote again it will be for a presidental candidate that knows the misery and destruction war brings home with it's fighting men who step up to keep the savages from our shores.
03:49 PM on 12/02/2011
Sgt Meyer is a true hero and it is a shame that this situation has escalated to this. At the end of the day everyone is in business to make money. I agree that ethics should play a significant role in this decision. The problem with selling to the Govt. is that there needs to be a requirement before they will buy equipment for our soldiers that desperately need it. It was explained to me this way one time" You could have a small black box with a cost of $100.00 that could have pin pointed the location of Bin Laden and the government would have said, we do not have a requirement. What a shame.
photo
jenna2929
Keep On Keepin' On
02:49 PM on 12/01/2011
meyer should never have worked for them in the first place. they are just another anti american company. im glad meyer is smart enough to start figuring this out.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
01:18 AM on 12/01/2011
"Meyer wrote that it was "disturbing" how U.S. troops were being issued outdated equipment when better, advanced thermal optic scopes were being offered to Pakistan."

Kind of says it all, doesn't it? What the article doesn't say is why aren't we buying these scopes for our soldiers? Where's all the "true Americans" and "patriots" on this one? Only 15 comments? Really?
photo
Robson
Apolitical / nonpartisan blogging on HP since 2005
01:05 PM on 11/30/2011
This story illustrates clearly how military defense contractors often exemplify the harm that the conversion of once American patriotic companies to global corporations, and interested only in making sales and profits, regardless of the harm it does to the USA. These multi-national corporations of all sectors and flavors work only for themselves and are essentially mercenaries willing to sell out the USA for a 2% increase in margins or profit. They have no allegiance and the more powerful they as a group, such as the US Chamber of Commerce or Business Roundtable become, the less sovereignty and influence American citizens will have.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom Theodosiades
12:33 PM on 11/30/2011
Telling truth in times of universal deceit...

Semper Fi, Devil Dog. Get Some!!!
11:33 AM on 11/30/2011
I worked for BAE Systems when they took over my company. They could care less about America or Americans. I was a senior executive and all they are interested in is profit. They are into total control of all employess and McCreight was probably directed to say those things in order to pre-empt any retaliation against BAE. I left BAE because they tried to screw me over on my bonus. They wound up giving me the money they owed me but they tried to black ball me in the industry for several years after. The US Government should never have allowed BAE to take over my company as it was a major defense asset. As this atticle points out, BAE is a world wide marketer of weapons and will sell them to anyone who has the money. Money, money, money is all BAE cares about. The current CEO of BAE is derisively called "the Queen" by her American subjects. Horrible place to work.
10:19 AM on 11/30/2011
From what i know, Defense Contractors do NOT get to decide who they sell their weapons to. They HAVE to get the approval of the State Dept and Pentagon to do a technology technology transfer.

Pakistan has been receiving weapons during both Republican and Democratic administrations.

If Meyer does'nt not agree with the sale, he should Quit his Job and sue the Pentagon or the State Dept.
11:37 AM on 11/30/2011
The key word in your response is "HAVE." Yes, they have to get approval but the question is what moral code do they follow if they sell these weapons to Pakistan knowing that they will be turned on American (and British) soldiers? Just because you can get approval to do something doesn't mean that you should do it. But the bigger question is why is the US Government approving these sales? But then, the US Government is run by politicians who are on the take from companies like BAE. It is a vicious circle.
12:33 PM on 11/30/2011
BAE has been fined a total of $448 MILLION for violating arms control restrictions in the past.
09:33 PM on 11/29/2011
This is no different than the situation doctors find themselves in if they complain about the quality lapses occurring under the PPACA, except that for physicians, the defamation is codified under the guise of "peer review." The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 allows, and even requires, that hospitals report physicians if their complaints become too strident. At least Seargent Meyer has the right to sue BAE; doctors don't even have the right to see the defamatory remarks that have been written about them.

These are examples of "crony capitalism" at its worst. Any employee who takes a principled stand which might interfere with the profits of the corporate world can be crucified by the system. I wish Sgt Meyers the best in his lawsuit; one can only have sympathy for the hundreds (thousands?) of physicians whose careers have been destroyed after similar ethical complaints.
07:20 PM on 11/29/2011
Thank God there are instances of veterans returning who know how to speak up. They are the experts first hand on what the war costs. We have armed future enemies a number of times.
07:13 PM on 11/29/2011
It is diabolical how arms profiteers have used "patriotism" as a screen and soldiers as pawns. Eisenhower warned us, but we haven't listened in 60 years. We eat our young, murder prophets, and pour our resources into the sand.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ffny
06:29 PM on 11/29/2011
War Profiteering is big money and Dakota Meyer may have blown it for BAE....
Their concern is their stockholders and bottom line.....Least of all the American soldiers who come last!

But BAE says Meyer is wrong and we know how honorable and truthful theses corporation have proven themselves to be.