More

Fukushima Residents Tour German Renewable Energy Village

Fukushima Residents Germany Nuclear Village

By MELISSA EDDY   11/30/11 12:38 PM ET   AP

FELDHEIM, Germany -- A group of residents from the radiation-stricken area around Japan's tsunami-hit nuclear reactors and a Tokyo actor are visiting Germany to learn how renewable energy could work in their homeland.

Among them is Tatsuko Okara, an organic farmer who lives 40 kilometers (25 miles) from the disabled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. Okara told The Associated Press on Wednesday that she first began to worry about the impact a nuclear accident could have on her family after the 1986 meltdown in Chernobyl.

After the March 11 earthquake and tsunami in Japan which caused massive radiation leaks, Okara said she decided to devote herself to sparking an energy revolution in her own nation, such as that which is taking place in Germany.

"I would like to see Japan move away from nuclear energy," Okara said. "But we will need another energy source, that's why we are here to learn how we could make it happen."

The group, organized and led by representatives of Greenpeace Japan, arrived Wednesday in the northeastern German village of Feldheim to learn how its 145 residents have taken advantage of the energy generated by a nearby windfarm and a biofuel plant that burns the waste from a local pig farm to become an entirely self-sustaining, energy-positive village.

The project has its roots in the 1990s, when farmers in the area agreed to rent some of their land to a young researcher wanting to install a wind turbine. In the following years, several dozen turbines sprouted out of the once fallow field – but Feldheim's 145 residents didn't benefit from any of the energy produced in their own back yard.

They made an agreement to receive power from the windpark in partial return for the use of the land, resulting in a 1/4 to 1/3 cut in their energy bills. They then added solar panels and a plant to burn the biofuels they were already producing – in short they drew on the natural resources at hand.

"We are willing to tell you how we did it," Mayor Michael Knape told the group. "If you want, we can even help you build a Feldheim in Japan."

In the wake of the Fukushima disaster, Chancellor Angela Merkel's government voted in June to shutter its network of 17 nuclear reactors by 2020 and instead make the expansion of renewable sources the focus of its energy policy. Germany draws 23 percent of its energy from nuclear power, compared to Japan, which drew some 30 percent of its power from nuclear reactors before the accident.

By comparison, renewable sources now provide Germans with 17 percent of their power, as compared with 9 percent in Japan.

Actor Taro Yamamoto, a resident of Tokyo who has also devoted himself to the fight against nuclear power since the accident, said the first step to bringing about change is for Japan to start educating the people about energy.

"It is important for the Japanese to realize that renewable energy can work on a large scale, and that people can make money from it," said Yamamoto, who actively asked questions about Feldheim's 43 wind turbines and the 600 pigs that produce the waste to fuel the biogas plant.

"In order to let the people of Japan know, it is important to be here, to see this," he said, standing beneath a towering wind turbine.

Knape, Feldheim's mayor, said it took about 10 years for residents in the area to come around to the idea of investing in renewable energy. They were truly convinced when they realized that building their own power network would result in a 25 to 30 percent cut in their electricity bills and annual savings of euro100,000 ($134,180) in energy costs for the farmer's co-op in the village.

The 30 local jobs created through the windpark and the biogas plant provided further proof for Feldheim residents that their decision to rely on renewables, and themselves, was the right one.

"The energy revolution is taking place in the countryside," said Werner Frohwitter, spokesman for Feldheim's energy project. "We have created a whole new perspective for these people."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

FELDHEIM, Germany -- A group of residents from the radiation-stricken area around Japan's tsunami-hit nuclear reactors and a Tokyo actor are visiting Germany to learn how renewable energy could work i...
FELDHEIM, Germany -- A group of residents from the radiation-stricken area around Japan's tsunami-hit nuclear reactors and a Tokyo actor are visiting Germany to learn how renewable energy could work i...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 170
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:06 PM on 12/04/2011
Ya'll see the article about Nuclear Gypsies? Ya think they will be included in the future studies that prove no one got cancer from nukes?

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-japan-nuclear-gypsies-20111204,0,347252.story

most people in the world are against nuclear power. http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=186243

Regulate and charge a garbage fee for pollution: heavy metals in particular, are a good proxy for fossils and nukes.

Anybody have a problem with that?

Rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels can supply all our world's energy needs: forever, 24/7, cheaper than clean coal and nukes for solar, one of the cheapest electricity source for millions of people nationally and billions of people worldwide because it removes the middle people. Wind and waste bio char are half that price or less, making them some of the cheapest utility electricity source we have with only geothermal and it's quakes being less.

Cheap, clean, safe, no oil wars, coal mining damage and deaths, or world nuclear disasters.
11:30 PM on 12/04/2011
And Santa is going to bring me a puppy this Christmas!

Wishing it to happen doesn't mean it WILL happen.
photo
ShamsT
The door has opened, so there's no escape...
07:50 PM on 12/03/2011
If actor Taro Yamamoto wants to educate the people of Japan about renewable energy, he needs to be honest about it's liabilities as well as it's assets.

Instead of just going to Germany, he should also visit the people living in Gaolong, China who have to live with the devastatin­g effects of inadequate­ly controlled wastes from the manufactur­e of photovolta­ic panels:

“It’s a green energy company, producing polysilico­n destined for solar energy panels…the by-product of polysilico­n production­—silicon tetrachlor­ide—is a highly toxic substance that poses environmen­tal hazards.”

After reporting that buckets of the substance have been dumped almost daily near an inhabited village in China, the article quotes Professor Ren Bingyan of Hebei Industrial University­:

“The land where you dump or bury it will be infertile. No grass or trees will grow in the place…it is poisonous, it is polluting. Human beings can never touch it.”

A villager near the dumping site said:

“It’s poison air. Sometimes it gets so bad, you can’t sit outside. You have to close all the doors and windows.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/08/AR2008030802595.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:38 AM on 12/03/2011
Heard today that Germany was loading up on coal, lots of it.

Talk about the old bait and switch.

Greens, you just got taken for patsies.

Coal is dirty and more radioactive emissions from coal operation than nuclear.

Supplies!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
12:32 PM on 12/02/2011
sheila wrote: 'it is beyond obvious that emissions from rooftop panels (which always coincide with efficiency upgrades and reduced consumptio­n) are exponentia­lly lower than those from remote, centralize­d Big Energy of any type - why would you try to argue against that?'

I would argue with that because it's not necessarily true. One obvious problem is that some thin film solar cell technology relies on potentially toxic cadmium telluride. The data for and against seem to be lacking so far, but it goes to show that nothing is totally without its drawbacks.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:49 PM on 12/12/2011
It's not emitted like coal. It will be recycled.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gneep
if it wasn't always the same, it'd be different
11:25 AM on 12/02/2011
they've already destroyed the planet, we just wont be around to see the final effect that the most toxic substance ever known will have on future generations..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:28 PM on 12/02/2011
God made plutonium not man. Its naturally occuring. Refer to Oklo

Now the most dangerous substance is one that kills on contact. That would be any host of biotoxins.
02:13 PM on 12/02/2011
Yep, like ricin from castor beans!
02:13 PM on 12/02/2011
If you think plutonium is that "most toxic substance ever known" then you need to stop listening to the agenda driven antinuke ideologues. Toxins like ricin (from castor beans) are FAR more toxic and can k ill far more people on a gram for gram basis. You can hold a piece of plutonium in your hand with no ill effects at all. I wouldn't go near even one gram of ricin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:41 AM on 12/03/2011
I was watching the movie The Jackal with Bruce Willis and that stuff he put on the door handle that kills you on contact seems to be more truth than fiction.

Hey if antinukes can trudge out fiction from the China Syndrome, so can I.

Plus cyanide, the stuff they put in gas chambers, kills instantly.

Here is the test:

Get 4 on death row in Texas

In the first chamber, electrocute, the second, cyanide gas, the third ricin, and the fourth give him about 4000 rad a lethal dose from a PuBe source.

Guess which one lives the longest - yup the one given the lethal dose of radiation.

He will live for about 1-2 months. The others die instantly.

So why then would the "most toxic substance" take the longest?
09:09 AM on 12/02/2011
The Fukishima disaster is far from over and is not yet under control.

Had that been a solar plant or a wind farm the plant would be back producing energy by now and the evacuated people would all be back home.

It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy.

Wind, solar, wave energy and geothermal are the future.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
11:19 AM on 12/02/2011
Faved for an honest post.
I have not heard of a solar array killing anyone.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
08:06 PM on 12/03/2011
Roofing kills people, as should be instantly obvious if you think about it. Roofing will especially kill anyone inexperienced with proper safety procedures, like DIY rooftop solar installers.

As for other types of solar-related deaths:

http://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/solar-panels-kill-worker/story-e6freoof-1111117646765

And here is a fatality overview from NIOSH. Note multiple entries from solar installation:

http://www2a.cdc.gov/NIOSH-FACE/state.asp?Category=0007&Category2=ALL&Submit=Submit

Further, note that one of the solar installers was an employee of a large solar company who was not following proper safety procedure.

http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/face/stateface/ca/10CA003.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
02:29 AM on 12/04/2011
Those things kill people. You can get crushed to death. Also didnt someone receive a Darwin Award recently. He decided to get a fake bake by lying on a solar array.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:48 PM on 12/02/2011
Disagree. We have a different definition for "over". While you might say any single atom emanating from the site makes it not over, I say for all intents and purposes, its over save the cleanup. There is no danger of melt though containment, no danger of recriticality, no danger off site for a dose rate which annually amounts to a single CT scan.

The only thing I can think of that is ongoing is the stress. That is a human function, not a Fukushima function.
07:41 AM on 12/02/2011
http://www.treehugger.com/urban-design/german-autobahn-covered-giant-public-park.html

cover highways with solar panel roofs?

and city streets with green roof and pedestrian/bicycle paths?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
11:23 AM on 12/02/2011
Inventive.
I would rather do things like these than put more money into the nuclear, oil, and coal industries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:49 PM on 12/02/2011
It wont make up the demand. You dont realize that the very act of responding on this blog takes energy. 20% or more of your words are made possible by clean running nuclear power, right now.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:47 PM on 12/01/2011
As is the rest of the world. Nuke power is dying. Most people in the world are against nuclear power. http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=186243

Rooftop solar, offshore wind, waste bio char bio fuels, efficiency, underwater turbines, and plug in hybrids.

NOTHING else satisfies all the requirements: Carbon, land and water negative, clean, safe, forever, 24/7, cheaper enough now, cheaper in the long run, fast to install, already 1%, and doubling every year or so, thus able to replace fossil and nukes within 7 to 15 years.

Nukes cost as much as solar 15 cents per KWH.

Clean coal is a fantasy, a nightmare of geological storage that a quake will release.

Fracked gas contaminants and uses vast amounts of water.

Waste bio char is carbon negative when you use the char for fertilizer of bury it. NO OTHER TECH IS AS MASSIVENELY CARBON NEGATIVE AS BIO CHAR. not even close.

Waste bio char and bio fuels eliminates the need for hydrogen of storage batteries, instead allowing us to use the existing fossil peak generators.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/10/solar-power-graphs-to-make-you-smile/

energy source amounts: http://cleantechnica.com/2011/08/23/solar-power-intro-3-key-solar-power-points-top-solar-power-news/

“Wind’s costs have dropped over the past two years, with power purchase agreements being signed in the range of 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt-hour recently.” http://cleantechnica.com/world-wind-power/5/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
11:25 AM on 12/02/2011
Faved for excellent points.
My solar array has made all my power + for three plus years now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:50 AM on 12/03/2011
If I had 25k I'd put a solar array on my roof. Not everyone has surplus resources.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
08:46 PM on 12/03/2011
That's great, and I may soon follow suit actually, but it depends on a few things breaking my way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:50 PM on 12/02/2011
The new paradigm for nuclear is a game changer. LFTR, IFR, SMRs, Gen IV.

You think people gave up on air travel early on when they saw first generation aircraft crash?
photo
PoloniumMan
America - First in Freedom...First in Fission
08:05 PM on 12/01/2011
Tonight is eve of the 69th anniversary of Chicago Pile-1, were scientists produced the world's first man-made self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction. Merry critmass to all and a happy neutron.
08:40 PM on 12/01/2011
May the nuclear force be with you!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
12:51 PM on 12/02/2011
The Safety Control Rod Axe Man, Norm Hillberry was ready to SCRAM the reactor if necessary. Fermi was on his A game that day.

"The Italian Navigator has landed."
ItsGettingWeird
(or is it just me?)
12:41 PM on 12/01/2011
Without a doubt, the green energy revolution is already here. The exciting part is watching how this revolution unfolds. If "The energy revolution is taking place in the countryside," we will see a large-scale decentralization of the power industry. In more ways than one, this will empower communities and individuals as never before.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
01:05 AM on 12/03/2011
If the Green Revolution is here, then please tell me why Japan and Germany plan to replace nuclear with COAL?

Dirty, polluting coal, that emits more radiation per MW than an operating nuclear plant.

Hmm?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:00 PM on 12/12/2011
Absolutely. Rooftop solar is cheaper than nukes, and wind and waste bio char are half that. Efficiency is half that again!
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
12:02 PM on 12/01/2011
Ironically the villians of WWII are now the ones trying to save the planet while the heros are mired in dirty energy that is destroying the environment..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
04:03 PM on 12/01/2011
The only dirty energy that is destroying the environment is fossil, and both Japan and Germany will increase their usage in the short run.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
05:14 PM on 12/01/2011
Atomic too. They will be the first countries off of it completely though.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
11:28 AM on 12/02/2011
In the short term maybe , but they are going in the right direction while America is stalled.
10:07 AM on 12/01/2011
Germany and Japan toghether again
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sdmartintc
If it's broken, fix it!
02:38 PM on 12/02/2011
The original Axis of Evil are now the Axis of Green.
01:22 PM on 12/03/2011
heh don't forget italy they are big on solar.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
08:47 PM on 12/03/2011
They will be the Axis of Coal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
05:26 PM on 11/30/2011
Beside solar, (you'd never think Germany a good candidate for solar but it works just fine) Japan could (and should have done) wind and tidal energy. Japna also has geothermal resources.
Even without accidents there are cancer cluster around all nuclear energy facilities. The spike of cancer deaths from the Fukishima accident is yet to come. It will be massive.
Hopefully this the death knell of the nuclear energy industry; an industry that should never have been.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
04:06 PM on 12/01/2011
There are no credible studies of cancer clusters around nuclear plants. None that I know in the reputable scientific journals or peer reviewed studies.

There is no spike from Fukushima and I think this is all Sterglass and Gould hysteria.

If there are cancers, it will be within the normally expected statistical distribution for a large population. From the previous Huff Po article, it will be in the noise.


The nuclear industry will continue. Allready Fukushima has not had an impact on US or UK opinions or policy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
04:18 PM on 12/01/2011
Perhaps 'not credible' to those in the pay of the nuclear power industry but credible to the physcians organization I got them from. Stop defending these people. You're doing real harm.
photo
PoloniumMan
America - First in Freedom...First in Fission
08:11 PM on 12/01/2011
I still don't think Germany is a good candidate for solar. German solar power systems can't even deliver 10% of their installed capacity, which clearly is not a power system that works just fine. Germany will be able to purchase nuclear generated electricity from France and the Czech Republic to make up those long, cold winter nights (and days) with no sun. Japan, an island nation, won't have that option.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
09:38 PM on 12/01/2011
France is sensibly phasing out their nuclear plants for the right reasons. Here's what I learned about Germany. They set up a pilot program for solar energy, giving incentives to homeowners to install solar panels and even developing a model village. Producers were guaranteed a fixed price on surplus energy. Using a tiny fraction of available producers, within one year their grid was overwhelmed. It takes 5 years to build a conventional power plant which of course will drive global warming closer to the edge of no return. Nuclear power is NOT carbon neutiral. It takes a lot of conventional energy to mine, transport and refine the fuel. The Fukushima meltdown happened because conventional energy supplies were cut off and they were unable to cool it down.
My son's biology professor called nuclear energy using a cannon to ring a doorbell. It produces way too much energy and with so many alternate ways that don't poison the planet and everything that lives on it, it doesn't make sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nirek
Proud progressive Vietnam vet. against WAR
11:31 AM on 12/02/2011
Germany is leading the way. You need to read up on solar.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert 999
Duck and Cover
03:46 PM on 11/30/2011
Good for Japan, lets get more in office here that are willing to move in the same direction as Germany. More Green, less Nuclear, and less CO2.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cadawa
05:28 PM on 11/30/2011
Contrary to popular belief, nukes are not carbon neutral. It takes a great deal of conventional energy to mine, transport and process the fuel. It was the failure of the conventional energy supply (the pumps that cooled the plant) that brought Fukushima to its knees.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Richard Bartholomew
My micro-bio isn't empty.
06:55 AM on 12/01/2011
Don't neglect to point out that so-called 'green' power generation facilities aren't carbon neutral either. Wind turbines, solar cells, and the like have to be manufactured and maintained too---and that consumes fuel as well. It would be interesting to see a study comparing the various generation methods' embodied energies.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atoms4Peace1
Applying the atom peacefully since 1978
04:07 PM on 12/01/2011
Your first sentence applies to all energy.

What is carbon neutral is the power genreation. The backup systems for the Gen 1 plants are diesel, however Gen 3+ and Gen 4 designs incorporate passive safety that use nature (gravity) for natural circulation cooling.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
03:36 PM on 11/30/2011
In March 2011, German investigators reported that 850 million euros disappeared when shady companies swarmed into carbon trading, emissions and energy businesses. Kind of sounds like our Guaranteed Government Loan Program from the DOE doesn't it? Whole New Definition of "Green Energy" isn't it?