iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Farm Bill Delay May Give Green And Public Health Advocates Voice In Revisions

Farm Bill

First Posted: 11/30/11 12:20 PM ET Updated: 11/30/11 12:20 PM ET

Some U.S. farmers are paid to leave their land wild; others are compensated when weather devastates their cultivated land. Still others receive money when crop prices drop -- all from the same federal funds set aside through the current Farm Bill.

To call it the "Farm Bill," however, is something of a misnomer. The federal government's primary agricultural and food policy legislation comprises hundreds of programs, which extend well beyond cows, corn and cotton to everything from food stamps and an array of environmental and public health safeguards.

"The totality is overwhelming. Nobody can grasp it," said Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University. "This makes the Farm Bill profoundly undemocratic since the public -- and, I would maintain, congressional representatives -- cannot possibly understand it."

At least now the public and their representatives will have a bit more time to wrap their heads around the bill and all its implications. Earlier this month, to the relief of many advocates concerned about the lack of transparency and what they perceive as the undue influence of the industrial agriculture lobby, the congressional super committee failed to reach an agreement on future budget cuts. This means the legislation will follow the same, more open route that it has taken every four or five years since its debut in the 1930s.

The last edition came in 2008; the House and Senate are now expected to begin debating the next iteration in 2012.

"The Farm Bill is currently up for grabs and nobody knows what will happen with it now that the budget process collapsed," Nestle told HuffPost in an email.

For people not lucky enough to have enrolled in Nestle's Farm Bill-focused course at NYU this fall, tools are available to help decipher the massive legislation. (The 2008 version filled nearly 700 pages.) An interactive online application created by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health's Center for a Livable Future, for example, demonstrates the relative sizes of the Farm Bill budget.

"We hope this makes it clearer how the pieces fit together," said Roni Neff, research and policy director at the center, who helped to build the visualizer "piece by piece," combining broader budget data from the 2008 bill with figures from the USDA.

Some of the colored rectangular chunks are noticeably smaller than others. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (formerly called food stamps) consumes about two-thirds of the budget -- necessitating a button for users to "hide SNAP so more budget items are visible" (as reflected in the screenshot below).

A few more clicks and it becomes apparent that the production of fruit and vegetables receive several-fold fewer funds than commodity grains and food animals. (The lightest color blocks represent programs that primarily address their production.)


"The Farm Bill could do a lot to bolster that spending," Neff noted.

And, according to some experts, promoting the production of fruits and vegetables would go a long way to reduce Americans' waistlines and hospital bills.

"If we judge by its impact on human health, the American food supply is a disaster," said Dr. Walter Willett, chair of the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health during a recent forum at Harvard. He's particularly frustrated with the quality of food used in the SNAP program: "mostly junk and soda," he said.

Dr. David Ludwig, a professor of pediatrics and nutrition at Harvard, suggested that humans evolved eating hundreds of different foodstuffs throughout the year, including a variety of fruits, vegetables, beans, nuts, seeds, grains and animals.

"We now have a massive number of products in our food supply," he said during the forum. And yet, he added, most are produced from the same four commodities: corn, wheat, soybeans, rice or the animals that are fed on those commodities.

Ludwig linked this "profound transformation of the diet" to agricultural policies that include farm subsidies via the Farm Bill that have made these inherently cheap crops "even cheaper" to produce. Meanwhile, he said, fruits, vegetables and other whole foods that are inherently more labor-intensive and expensive have become "relatively even more so."

This may at least partly explain the country's rising rates of obesity, heart disease and other chronic diseases. Ludwig cited an eight-year-old girl he had recently at the obesity clinic who weighed over 200 pounds, with high cholesterol and pre-diabetes. "And this is not genetic," he said, "it's dietary."

"Ultimately, we are going to need to rethink agricultural policy," he said, "if we're going to do anything about the obesity epidemic and the epidemic of diseases related to obesity in the United States."

Other experts emphasize a similar need for the Farm Bill to support sustainable agriculture.

Overdrawn aquifers, erosion and polluted surface and ground waters are just some of the consequences of conventional agriculture cited by experts.

And yet conservation programs are "very popular with farmers," noted David Degennaro, legislative and policy analyst at the Environmental Working Group. Unfortunately, he added, only one out of every three or four who apply are able to participate in the programs, which can mitigate the costs of projects such as installing fences to keep cows out of waterways or building terraces to prevent erosion.

"There is an imbalance between the big commodity industrial food system and the stewardship of the land and the rebuilding of local food infrastructure," added Dan Imhoff, co-founder of Watershed Media and author of the forthcoming book, "Food Fight: A Citizens Guide to the Next Food and Farm Bill."

But Imhoff is hopeful that the food system can be revamped to boost the health of America's land and people, especially in light of the legislation's delay. "I can't say we're going to win, but I'm relieved this wasn't just rushed through without the discussion it deserves," he said.

This is the first in a series that will look at how the next Farm Bill could affect the food system, the environment and public health. Over the next couple weeks, HuffPost will discuss the key issues from nature conservation to food safety.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Some U.S. farmers are paid to leave their land wild; others are compensated when weather devastates their cultivated land. Still others receive money when crop prices drop -- all from the same federal...
Some U.S. farmers are paid to leave their land wild; others are compensated when weather devastates their cultivated land. Still others receive money when crop prices drop -- all from the same federal...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 151
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
11:48 AM on 12/02/2011
the left would like you to believe it is better to import canned veg from china
11:48 AM on 12/02/2011
keep the farm bill and keep food prices stable!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
seckhoff
Famous in the apple barns
10:38 AM on 12/02/2011
Appalling, isn't it, that elsewhere on this site yesterday the HuffPo was crowing about the reintroduction of horse slaughter to the U.S.—a rider on this very same so-called "Farm Bill" that food safety and humane advocates strongly oppose. In a cutesy article stating that eating horsemeat is "quite the taboo" in America, the HuffPo evoked commentary from its readers that the insane cruelty horses suffer during slaughter is OK as long as the meat is tasty.
In an era when people are much more proactive about where their food comes from, this site dropped the ball on accountability. At least here we're discussing it. Sigh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:43 AM on 12/01/2011
This is just one giant pork barrel. The sheep and goat producers need their 20 million a year special loan program to keep the domestic angora wool coming. I am sure everyone has their favorite pork barrel waste story.
photo
Kasado
en jolt of terminus
04:04 PM on 12/03/2011
But corn subsidies are insane
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:25 AM on 12/01/2011
USDA employee for 36 yrs. Policy has always been a cheap food supply for Americans. It has gone too far for the large agribusiness, the few meat packers that control markets, Cargill, Monsanto, Archer-Daniels, etc. Stop all subsidies to these corporations. Use these funds for the smaller and medium sized farms that meet certain conservation standards, e.g. recent Conservation Stewardship program. USDA-Natural Resource Conservation Service has a presence in almost every county in the US. They work exclusively with private farmers and ranchers. The big boys get some of this too but they probably need the technical expertise even more. Conservation programs have been very successful in the US farming/ranching community. NRCS is one of the most highly rated gov agencies for decades. Especially the conservation programs. We learned 50+ yrs ago not to cover the full cost of implementation - the farmer and rancher needed some financial stake to take ownership of the project. The NRCS now has digital detailed soil maps for most private land in the US. This data is used by all types of professions, not just farmers. Google NRCS for more info. Strangely many of the NRCS people I worked with are gop conservatives. But most soil scientists are progressive -they've been on the ground,seen the degradation of our most important natural resource, soil, foundation of life on the planet. I wonder how my ex-coworker conservatives feel about the proposed pay freeze? Knowing them they'll agree it's their turn to sacrifice!
10:36 AM on 12/01/2011
Thank you for this posting, and I am sure that your conservative former colleagues not only are enthusiastic about their coming pay freeze but also voted in to the office the people to do it!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
10:51 AM on 12/01/2011
I agree as most of the soil scientists I know are progressives. They would love to work for the NRCS or any governmental agency who could hire them and their skills if so much work hadn't been contracted out. I will put in my plug for the US Forest Service since too many of the current wildfires are burning so hot they are destroying all the nutrients in the forest soils. An Oregon State University Forestry professor stated forest soils are the most important factor in healthy forests.
12:51 AM on 12/01/2011
Unfortunately, he added, only one out of every three or four who apply are able to participate in the programs,

Yep, our real farmers, the ones actually out their breaking their backs, can't afford to keep up with all of this. And they aren't seeing a dime of all that federal aid. Disgusting.

The farmer is about the most under represented, and undervalued carreer in america.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Shook
01:29 AM on 12/01/2011
megsy123 wrote, "The farmer is about the most under represente­d, and undervalue­d carreer in america."

Take heart, my friend. That will change as the fossil fuel inputs diminish and become too expensive. When the Soviet Union collapsed, the American blockade intensified, and Cuba lost half of it's oil and became the first country to experience peak oil, however artificial, a funny thing happened. The country became quite undernourished for a few years in their "Great Emergency." The average Cuban lost 20 lbs. They managed to switch agriculture to 80% organic in about 5 years, along with their equivalent of victory gardens, and are now some of the healthiest people on the globe with steadily more fertile land and healthier oceans.

Oh yeah, farmers are now some of the best paid and respected members of the community. Some day, not too distant, Americans will have to rediscover what's really important.
Oginikwe
I think therefore I'm dangerous
12:01 AM on 12/01/2011
While 60 percent of American farmers must get along without a dime in federal subsidies, the so-called farm “safety net” benefits a narrow band of the wealthiest agri-businesses and absentee land owners and the lobbyists who ensure that the subsidies keep flowing.
The last farm bill, passed in 2008, was supposed to prevent people who weren’t actively engaged in farming from getting farm payments. It is clear those reforms didn’t work.

According to the Environmental Working Group’s updated 2011 Farm Subsidy Database, the government sent $394 million in farm subsidy payments in 2010 to residents of U.S. cities with populations of 100,000 or more

From: http://www.ewg.org/agmag/2011/06/city-slickers-continue-to-rake-in-farm-payments

Farmers receive about 0.19 on the dollar for all their hard work. People who aren't "actively engaged" in farming, i.e. on the land, should NOT receive any farm subsidy payments. Period.
08:40 PM on 11/30/2011
Go to the Environmental Working Group Site and check out farm subsidies.
I know some of those farmer. They are not even close to poor.
And check out where some of them live. Try Venice CA if you can not think of a city.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
06:54 PM on 11/30/2011
As a welfare farmer (blue stater actually) I hope I get to keep rolling in your taxpayer dollars

My corn subsidy made up huge gigantic 0.7% of my gross pay from corn this year. I am rolling in the dough and bathing myself with 100 dollar bills from the taxpayer.....

wait...I am bathing with pennies. But thanks anyway.

Aren't the hysterics about "corporate farms" so much more fun than all those pesky facts that people keep ignoring.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
07:52 PM on 11/30/2011
Thanks, Hazel. I am a blue stater and a welfare farmer as well. I was going to tell my story, but mine is too easy to attack. I hoped there were other stories to support me.

I own nearly a mile of a river that empties into 20% of the worlds fresh drinking water. I am paid farm subsidies to protect the drinking water of millions of people from Mi, Oh, PA, NJ, NY, and the largest provinces of Canada. I plant what the government tells me to plant to filter the runoff before it hits this river.

For the honor of protecting your drinking water, I am paid almost enough to make up 80% of my property taxes on the same property. This would be about half of its productive capacity if I put this property back into production.

So, vote to reduce farm subsidies, but be prepared to filter the manure from your drinking water.
photo
Kasado
en jolt of terminus
04:17 PM on 12/03/2011
You say a miles length, but how far from the river do your Gobment crop extend.
photo
Dahveed
step softly & speak easy
06:48 PM on 11/30/2011
Thank God citizens are waking to the hijacking of farming and food production. Citizens get slipped GMO foods without their knowledge, animals are fed chemicals and mistreated by corporations to increase profits, corporate farms receive federal subsidies, etc., etc. Citizens!! We deserve better!
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:01 PM on 11/30/2011
thank god citizens are waking up to the antiScience/antiGMO L0000nies on this website.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
stuart100s
I started with nothing, & still have most of it.
06:47 PM on 11/30/2011
Is there anyone on here, that gets a farm subsidy and would be willing to tell why?
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
06:59 PM on 11/30/2011
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

me me.... pick me. read my post above.

and you don't get subsidies?......a home mortgage interest tax break maybe? How about a subsidized student loan? A public university? student grant?
07:10 PM on 11/30/2011
I knew there was more than one reason I fanned you
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:36 PM on 11/30/2011
...and those deals probably pay a heckuva a lot more than a crop subsidy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:20 AM on 12/04/2011
$1,100 this year for our last corn & cotton history payment. About $15,000 over 2 years for permanent orchard cover crop, moisture meters for more efficient irrigation, and hedgerow plantings for bee/pollinator habitat. Why? The corn & cotton history came with that particular property. As for the other money, it would have taken us over 10 years to warrant investing in those things with money from the farm's operation.

Quite honestly, I think direct crop subsidies serve to keep food prices lower & more stable for the consumer, but it would be great if any payments received were capped for those farming businesses making over, say $150,000/year.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
06:39 PM on 11/30/2011
And 83% of the costs on the bill goes to nutrition programs and conservation.

Commodity programs make up 7% of the bill's cost. Wow man.....I am so glad some here are on the ball and only worrying about that 7%.
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
07:03 PM on 11/30/2011
One of many sources of this data:
http://thedairymom.blogspot.com/2011/01/majority-of-us-farm-bill-funds-food.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:04 PM on 11/30/2011
I have an idea: Move SNAP to Health and Human Services, move the agencies that inspect food over there too, turn all the National Forests over to the states, and abolish the Dept. of Ag. Since gov't agencies never die and they never fire anyone they eventually get filled up with useless timeservers to the detriment of society.

Create a Dept. of Science and move all the scientific agencies over to it, like USGS, NOAA, etc. Then abolish the Departments of Commerce, Labor, Education, and Housing and Urban Development. If these have any agencies that do something useful, like OSHA, transfer that agency to another dept. such as HHS. However I believe that at least 90% of what these agencies do is a complete waste of time and energy.
photo
robear6987
oops ! did i offend you , my bad .
05:39 PM on 11/30/2011
bill is too big and cant be fully understood? well then scrap it and start over and make it transparent and fair. it seems to me the whole federal government has gotten too big and complex and it needs to be scraped and re-built , but this time done right with much input from the people it is SUPPOSED to serve., thats why im voting for ron paul 2012, he wants to scrap the current gov and rebuild it with tranparency , accountability and make the new government follow the law of the land THE CONSTITUTION OF AMERICA . just like a virus infected computer , america has to be re-booted .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:28 PM on 11/30/2011
Eat more wildlife and don't support the farmers. That will put'em out of business.
07:06 PM on 11/30/2011
Havn't you ever heard "No farmers, no food"?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:50 PM on 11/30/2011
No farmers, no food, no food stamps, no fraud.