iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

FBI Takes Major Step Toward Updating Narrow Definition Of Rape


First Posted: 12/06/11 09:15 PM ET Updated: 12/06/11 10:33 PM ET

WASHINGTON -- An FBI advisory board overwhelmingly voted to update the narrow, archaic way the agency defines rape on Tuesday, a move that women's rights advocates hailed as a long-overdue success.

Currently, the FBI defines rape as the "carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will."

This definition, which has not been updated since 1929, is narrower than the one used by many police departments around the country, and women's rights advocates say it leads to the under-counting of thousands of sexual assaults each year.

At a meeting in Albuquerque, N.M. on Tuesday, the FBI's Criminal Justice Advisory Policy Board voted to change the definition of rape in its Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Summary Reporting System, following the recommendation of a lower panel in October. The new terminology says rape is "penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim."

This new definition expands the old one by taking out the requirement of a "forcible" assault and the restriction that the attack must be toward a woman. It also now includes non-vaginal/penile rape and rape by a blood relative.

"Although long overdue, we are pleased that the FBI has vetted this change extensively with its local and national law enforcement advisors and a clear consensus has emerged that a more accurate definition will better inform the public about the prevalence of serious sex crimes and will ultimately drive more resources to apprehend sex offenders," Carol E. Tracy, executive director of the Pennsylvania-based Women's Law Project (WLP), said in a statement. WLP began the campaign to redefine rape in the UCR a decade ago.

The Feminist Majority Foundation also recently led a "Rape is Rape" campaign, calling on the public to pressure the FBI to update its definition. More than 160,000 emails were sent to the FBI in support.

"It's a great victory," said Eleanor Smeal, president of Feminist Majority Foundation, in a statement. "This new definition will mean that, at long last, we will begin to see the full scope of this horrific violence, and that understanding will carry through to increased attention and resources for prevention and action."

Although Tuesday's vote was "a very big deal," according to Tracy, the official definition is not yet changed. The recommendation -- along with all the others agreed upon by the policy board at its meeting -- now goes to FBI Director Robert Mueller for final sign-off, most likely in the new year.

The FBI's current narrow definition of rape has created complications for law enforcement agencies, which can't report all of the rapes they prosecute for inclusion in federal statistics if their state or locality has a broader definition.

For example, in 2010, the Chicago Police Department reported nearly 1,400 sexual assaults. None of them, however, appeared in the federal crime report because they didn't fit the federal government's definition of rape.

"We prosecute by one criteria, but we report by another criteria," Steve Anderson, chief of the Metropolitan Nashville Police Department, told The New York Times. "The only people who have a true picture of what's going on are the people in the sex-crimes unit."

According to the federal 2010 Uniform Crime Report, there were 84,767 sexual assaults reported in 2010, a 5 percent drop from the previous year.

In a recent survey by the Police Executive Research Forum, nearly 80 percent of the 306 police departments that participated said the federal definition of rape was outdated.

On Monday, Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.) wrote an op-ed in The Hill stating that changing the FBI's definition could critically affect her work on the House Appropriations Committee.

"In the coming months, we face a tough fight to preserve funding for critical programs that aid victims and help put their assailants behind bars," wrote Roybal-Allard. "The UCR data plays a key role in the allocation of vital resources for prevention, treatment and enforcement. With so much hanging in the balance, it is imperative that the FBI move swiftly to adopt the proposed changes. By taking this simple step and updating the Bureau's definition to include all types of rape, we can make a real difference in the fight against this horrific crime."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- An FBI advisory board overwhelmingly voted to update the narrow, archaic way the agency defines rape on Tuesday, a move that women's rights advocates hailed as a long-overdue success. ...
WASHINGTON -- An FBI advisory board overwhelmingly voted to update the narrow, archaic way the agency defines rape on Tuesday, a move that women's rights advocates hailed as a long-overdue success. ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,040
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (29 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emeraldcircle
Real talk. 2013. Believe that.
12:22 AM on 11/02/2012
If a woman isn't forced to have sex then it isn't rape.
03:33 PM on 12/11/2011
Here's our take on this 'expanded definition'. http://bit.ly/fbirape
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Geral Sosbee
04:18 PM on 12/08/2011
I HAVE NARROWED THE DEFINITION OF fbi: INCOMPETENT & MURDEROUS FOOLS:

More than ever in the history of the world the people are being tortured, imprisoned, & murdered by their governments; one such group of homicidal government thugs are found in the fbi/cia, and they must be identified by name and prosecuted for their crimes, especially murder (& forced suicide).
Thank you kindly.

*Must Prosecute fbi/cia Assassins For Clandestine Murders



*[Because otherwise,wholesale extermination of dissidents becomes public policy.]


The central question of our time is to determine how many people globally have been murdered by fbi/cia operatives in covert, illegal, counterintelligence programs, etc., by methods (among others) described in the links below.As the crime of murder has no time limits for court prosecutions, we must prosecute the criminals in the fbi/cia who are responsible for the crimes suggested herein.



http://barbarahartwell.blogspot.com/2007/08/new-reports-from-ex-fbi...



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/thefbistonyiomm.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/part16-updatefor.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/mystory.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/part4-worldinabo.html



http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2008/11/382350.shtml?discuss



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/tooth14.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/hatemailpartsix.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/non-consensual.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/hightechassau.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/tracking.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/cointelprorevisi.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/part19a-updatefo.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/letterformthemed.html



http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/affidavit2007.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrett480
02:57 PM on 12/08/2011
Watch for an article in 1 year about the dramatic increase in the number of rapes.
01:19 PM on 12/08/2011
bad choice of picture for a story about modernizing an archaic perception of sexual assault.
03:00 AM on 12/08/2011
The change is better. Am I being too cynical when I notice that the charge was led by feminist organizations and the only "rape" still not defined as rape is that where a female perpetrator forces sex on a man or boy (or woman or girl too) with her vagina, since there is no penetration? In the case of a man or boy, she could even force oral sex on him and it wouldn't be counted as there is no penetration or am I misinterpreting the law as written?

"It's a great victory," said Eleanor Smeal, president of Feminist Majority Foundation, in a statement. "This new definition will mean that, at long last, we will begin to see the full scope of this horrific violence, and that understanding will carry through to increased attention and resources for prevention and action."

Full scope, really?

"In the coming months, we face a tough fight to preserve funding for critical programs that aid victims and help put their assailants behind bars," wrote Roybal-Allard. "The UCR data plays a key role in the allocation of vital resources for prevention, treatment and enforcement. With so much hanging in the balance, it is imperative that the FBI move swiftly to adopt the proposed changes. By taking this simple step and updating the Bureau's definition to include all types of rape, we can make a real difference in the fight against this horrific crime."

All types of rape, really?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whitechicuva
05:37 AM on 12/08/2011
I know a female can 'rape' a female. I know a male can 'rape' a male. :(
01:02 PM on 12/09/2011
nobody wants to rape males. they're gross
10:06 PM on 01/16/2012
They need to bring in castration, maybe then it will stop
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
02:57 AM on 12/08/2011
People are throwing around an "eight percent unfounded" statistic without understanding it.

Unfounded doesn't equate to "false accusation". It just means that the police and/or prosecutors were unable to corroborate the claim with enough evidence or certainty that they were willing to take it to trial.

Furthermore, numerous studies find that as many as ninety percent of rapes and sexual assaults are NEVER reported to the police in the first place.

If you look at those two statistics together, it becomes immediately obvious that -- given a hypothetical 100% report rate (if every sexual assault and rape were reported) -- rather than the 10% report rate we have now -- far, far fewer than one percent of the total rape and sexual assault cases would be "unfounded" and only a fraction of these unfounded cases would be intentional false accusations.

Nevertheless, even one intentional false accusation is terribly, terribly wrong.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elliot Miller
May you be happy!!!
01:23 AM on 12/08/2011
Trust me if a woman doesn't consent you will know. If you don't know then too bad. Off to San Quentin. Yay Feminism!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
12:16 PM on 01/06/2012
Callous and very revealing.
photo
jlglaze
A simple man
10:38 PM on 12/07/2011
Well, I don't know when the US changed the law according to rape, and I'm probably older than most of you posters. I can remember a time when rape was punishable by death. It needs to be that way today. Too many women, boys and girls lives are ruined and even death doesn't stop rapist from doing their dirty deed and moving on to the next victim. It's time your FBI took a good look at what is happening.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
isfturtle
11:16 PM on 12/07/2011
IF I believed in the death penalty as a punishment for any crime, I would believe that it was appropriate for rape. However, I have read entirely too much about problems with the death penalty (costs, innocence, etc) to advocate its use for anything.
09:16 PM on 12/07/2011
More explicit laws are always a good thing, the law should still be open to interpretation and not closed by a specific definition. It is good to see progress for victim rights, I hope you write more about it Amanda.
09:12 PM on 12/07/2011
I enjoy reading this journalists articles, it gets sent right to my email. Life is so easy sometimes...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jachavez
08:25 PM on 12/07/2011
Rape could be defined simply, but the FBI definition is both vague and restrictive. I say that rape is any unwanted or forced sex towards anyone regardless of gender.
http://realesttalkblog.blogspot.com
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
FZliveson
Beating the Conundrum
12:20 PM on 01/06/2012
"Sex" must be defined. Remember Slick Willie Clinton's linguistic (pun intended) gymnastics?
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
05:50 PM on 12/07/2011
What we need is a 100% fool-proof lie detector.

We're getting closer every day. Current brain scanning technology can map when people are accessing memories vs. making something up (those two acts involve different parts of the brain.)

Soon, the entire question of doubt over "he said/she said" will be laid to rest.

I hope I live to see the day when 100% of rapists are convicted and 100% of the innocent are exonerated. That would be something, eh?
photo
Ajax Johnson
Am I myself or is it just me?
06:35 PM on 12/07/2011
Until then a presumption of innocence might be nice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
livefortruth
There is only ONE truth.
06:59 PM on 12/07/2011
Do you 'honestly' presume Sandusky is innocent?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
phoo-doo
10:08 PM on 12/07/2011
If we used your definition of what rape is, that would mean that virtually any man who had sex with a woman would be in prison. Your bitterness towards men seems to have no bounds.
photo
StrawHat
Eat veggies, don't vote for them
02:47 AM on 12/08/2011
Your inarticulate accusations are...weird.

I'm not with the FBI. This is not "my" definition of rape. It's the FBI's definition of rape.

What exactly is it that you don't understand? The "no consent/no sex" part? That seems pretty standard and easy to understand to me.

I never do things to other people's bodies that they don't want me to do.
04:25 PM on 12/11/2011
"bitterness towards men"?? Where did you get that in what StrawHat said?
03:08 PM on 12/07/2011
There are some pretty sick comments here. Are Faux Noise and Storm Front both off-line?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kalzakath
fighting right wing hypocrisy
03:00 PM on 12/07/2011
Kinda scary that you really have to put a specific definition on rape. No means No. If they dont want it, dont do it. This was often to the consternation of coquettish females in college that thought they should make you chase it..If ya say no, then it aint happening
photo
GOODDOC1
"civil war" is an oxymoron
07:16 PM on 12/07/2011
That's the way it SHOULD be, but unfortunately it isn't.
09:21 PM on 12/07/2011
@Kalzakath
I agree with you, I would assume the loose definition of rape is due to that fact it will could possibly make lawyers jobs easier in the defense of the criminal. There are some technical variables in the legal process that have likely been considered and that is why the laws and definitions have not been amended. I can assure you that there is no conspiracy to maintain rape as a crime that is easy to get away with.