More

Vacant Homes Impose Big Costs On Cities Amid Budget Crises: GAO

Vacant Homes

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 12/06/11 08:27 PM ET Updated: 12/06/11 08:27 PM ET

The foreclosure crisis is costing cities at a time when they can least afford it.

Millions of homes in America are standing vacant, and in many cases they represent a financial sinkhole for their communities. Local governments -- forced to absorb the costs of maintaining or razing these homes, and seeing property taxes plummet in response to the spread of urban blight -- are increasingly shouldering the burden of the country's slumping housing market, according to a report released Tuesday by the U.S. Government Accountability Office.

Assuming responsibility for millions of vacant homes comes as just one more source of economic pressure for many American cities, which are straining to do more with less in an atmosphere of budget cuts and dwindling tax revenues.

The report notes that the number of vacant properties in the United States grew by more than 50 percent between 2000 and 2010 -- a decade that included two recessions and a catastrophic collapse of the national housing market.

In 2000, there were about 6.8 million vacant homes in the U.S., according to the GAO. By 2010, that number had jumped to 10.3 million -- a rise encompassing countless homeowners in default, with their wealth all but erased in the sharp plunge of real estate values that accompanied the burst of the housing bubble.

The rapid spread of vacant homes has taken a toll on local governments, which often incur costs as a result of so many properties standing empty. The municipal costs of high foreclosure rates have been observed for some time, but the GAO report makes clear the scope of the problem.

While the upkeep and maintenance of a vacant home is technically the responsibility of either the homeowner or the mortgage owner, in practice it often falls to the town, which has to pay for basic services -- like cutting the grass, boarding up windows and draining swimming pools -- to keep the property from falling into total disrepair. Alternatively, the town can have the vacant property demolished.

Either way, the tab for cities and towns is often high. Detroit, for example, has paid $20 million to demolish 4,000 properties in the past two and a half years, the GAO found.

Communities incur costs in other ways as well. The GAO noted that vacant homes are often associated with crime and accidental fires, which require the attention of police and fire departments, thus tying up city resources. And cities often see their property taxes fall as vacant homes drive down the value of homes around them.

The foreclosure crisis -- which has pushed home values down to historic lows in recent years, and directly resulted in many of the vacancies that came into being between 2000 and 2010 -- is thought to be less than halfway over, according to a recent report from the Center for Responsible Lending.

This week, the Occupy Wall Street movement -- which has faced increasing resistance in its attempts to inhabit various public spaces -- aligned itself with distressed homeowners in a day of mass action. Occupy protesters moved into foreclosed homes, and took up the cause of homeowners facing eviction, in about 25 cities Tuesday, saying they were working to bring attention to a national crisis.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
The foreclosure crisis is costing cities at a time when they can least afford it. Millions of homes in America are standing vacant, and in many cases they represent a financial sinkhole for their ...
The foreclosure crisis is costing cities at a time when they can least afford it. Millions of homes in America are standing vacant, and in many cases they represent a financial sinkhole for their ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 148
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sam D man
I'm not always right but I'm not always wrong.
12:01 AM on 12/10/2011
I got a letter from BOA
Stating they where goin to foreclose
on my home in 3 days.
I sent it back with a note that read
I don't own I rent.
A week went by and I got a reply.
Come on by We have the
mortgage plan for that house you've
been dreaming bout.
So I called them up so they get of
my nerves.
On the other end was an operator
from Bangladesh.
I hung up and wrote them a note
TAKE YOUR PLAN AND STICK IT
UP YOUR _ _ _ _ !!!!!!!!!
photo
orion52
You are what you think!
08:56 AM on 12/08/2011
Just another way the tax payer is flitting the bill for the banks.....
CAN we keep record and send them a bill?????
06:26 PM on 12/07/2011
Put your D.A.'s to work and start going after the banks that are the mortgage holders. They got us into this mess so make them pay to at least maintain the property!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BonnieDoon
Fool me once...
03:30 PM on 12/07/2011
According to the mortgage contract if the mortgagor defaults and the bank forecloses then the home and property are bank assets. The same thing if the bank agrees to accept a deed in lieu of foreclosure.

Most municipalities have laws that obligate the bank to pay the real estate taxes and maintain the property until it is sold.



Sounds like the TBTF banks that didn't do the "due diligence" to confirm the mortgagor was qualified to pay back the risky loan products those banks designed, created and enriched themselves from are dropping the ball - just like many of the unfortunate unemployed, bankrupt or underwater homeowners they foreclosed on.


Except that the TBTF banks have been raking in humongous profits and have the means to pay the taxes and the maintenance on the properties [ assets ] they own. They are, by definition, the Real Deadbeats.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
10:33 PM on 12/07/2011
Fanned and faved!  Well said.
photo
orion52
You are what you think!
08:58 AM on 12/08/2011
They swapped the loans around so much no one can tell who owns them... Put it all together split it up and send the ALL the banks a bill!!!!
And that's with property tax included!! GREAT POST!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
03:07 PM on 12/07/2011
What banks don't have to pay taxes on Foreclosed Homes ???

Really ??

if that,s not a scam I don't know what is !
11:43 AM on 12/10/2011
The problem for the municipality is chasing down the bank to maintain the house or reimburse the city for maintenance. There is a database to help cities chase down who is responsible, but it is very time-consuming, labor intensive work for cities with lean staffs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
05:48 PM on 12/10/2011
plus add the fact know ones who own,s it !!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
03:04 PM on 12/07/2011
I don't quite understand the loss of property taxes. If the bank has foreclosed on the home then the bank owns the property and should be liable for the taxes. Force the banks to pay the tax.
11:48 AM on 12/10/2011
The taxes may get paid, but the banks do not take any initiative to maintain the houses. Then the municipality has to run a big bureaucracy of the banks to find who is responsible. Most cities will clean up a property so it doesn't blight a neighborhood and place liens against the property. But when no one wants the property to begin with, the liens make it even less attractive. The liens then grow interest, and even trying to move the property at tax sale to recover the liens will find no one showing up for the tax sale. That's how bad things have gotten. Even places that would go for dirt cheap at tax sale have no takers.

The tax issue is more of a drop in value than an unpaid tax. If a house was previously assessed at $200,000 in value, then drops to $150,000, the municipality loses 25% of its tax revenue on that house.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jabailo
(Participant) Texeme.Construct()
12:17 PM on 12/07/2011
Overly dense cities need to re-ruralize. I would start from the center by razing vacant and obsolete office towers, and then move into neighborhoods, thinning out the chafe from the wheat.

You could have lightly more dense corridors (3 stories, no more) around light rail lines which would then fade into parks, greenery and other suburban style amenities.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tom95134
03:11 PM on 12/07/2011
Actually, the quickest route would be to bundle houses when they are adjacent and offer these to prospective buyers at bargain basement prices as long as the buyer will occupy and renovate one of the houses and raise the rest. This should also include a tax abatement for some number of years and making low interest loans available to the buyer for the renovation and demolition. Some cities are trying to take this approach but there are legal challenges.

The reason to start with residences is it will bring people back into the city. If you just demolish office towers you end up with open park spaces and still no people. In addition, as people return to the city they may wish to keep the older buildings because of the "personality" of their architecture as compared to the sterile glass and steel towers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cavegal
The Revolution Will Not Be Privatized
10:39 PM on 12/07/2011
They did that in DC back in the late 80's or early 90's to gentrify the blight in certain areas.  Really nice old brick row houses for $1, the stipulation was you had to invest $50k in upgrading the property and live there a minimum of 5 years.  Now the areas are gorgeous.
photo
orion52
You are what you think!
08:59 AM on 12/08/2011
Well Tom you should run for office with great ideas like that!
08:48 AM on 12/07/2011
Government needs to take over vacant houses and use them to revitalize communities - provide housing for the needy, teachers, firefighters, unemployed and elderly.
ReaItors Are Liars
NAR is corrupt
08:46 AM on 12/07/2011
Folks,

Housing is worth just a mere fraction of current inflated asking prices. Prices are falling.

Why buy a house today when you can buy later for 65% less?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
stargazer13
To Love One Is To Love All
03:17 PM on 12/07/2011
who has the money or the credit rating

since 2008 people who lost there jobs and home
if they do be lucky and find another job ?can,t even rent through property management companies because of great hit to credit score ! NO not even when I offered to pay lease in full before move in !!
in 18 month my life,s work in building credit was forever marred
see it does not matter if you paid all your bills on time for five years ten years twenty years

depending on age of person ! you now are not worthy of shelter !

that,s what I learned in the fall hard lesson for some one my age
ReaItors Are Liars
NAR is corrupt
03:22 PM on 12/07/2011
And you didn't learn that you paid a grossly inflated price for a traditionally depreciating asset?

No wonder you're flailing in all directions.
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
08:45 AM on 12/07/2011
Were i holding a lot of these things, would be tempted to partition off a simple residence - the garage & a a bathroom say, & install responsible homeless as caretakers

do a good job & we can repeat if it is sold.
ReaItors Are Liars
NAR is corrupt
08:47 AM on 12/07/2011
Then do it to your own house. Nobody is stopping you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bldr1bob
09:12 AM on 12/07/2011
finding "responsibl­e homeless" would be the problem.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can!
09:19 AM on 12/07/2011
Many "homeless" are responsible individuals, although many homeless individuals weren't responsible...
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
09:25 AM on 12/07/2011
agree - am lucky & have spare room & it would suit to share - but have just met too many damaged people to be game for it

Still, many are stand up guys, recently w/ mortgages, on whom the banks have good records. You dont get cute when u kids risk being out on the street.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
08:37 AM on 12/07/2011
There is no reason for a person to be homeless when there are so many homes that are vacant. Unless there is something else going on, this makes absolutely no sense. It would make sense to renegotiate the loans to what they are actually worth or to charge rent to the people who used to live there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Southern Rational
08:51 AM on 12/07/2011
Unfortunately, the way present law is structured it is often worth more to the bank--when you consider the strings attached to the subsidies it got courtesy of TARP--to foreclose than negotiate with the borrower.

There are also more downsides than upsides to becoming a landlord. Because these are foreclosed properties, the whole object of the bank is to sell them and get them off the books. It is almost impossible to sell a house with a tenant. It is also almost impossible to get a tenant if they don't know how long they may be living in a place before it is sold.

Average people see a simple solution. The homeowner can't pay the mortgage on a house now worth far less, but they could pay rent. Banks should want income, even if it is a reduced rent, rather than let a house stand vacant. The amount of law, regulation and vested interest standing in the way of this outcome is legion. One example: If the property is in a subdivision with a Homeowner's Association, start with the recorded restrictions against rentals and go from there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
09:03 AM on 12/07/2011
My family is in the landlording business. It is not true that it is impossible to sell a property with a tenant. The bank can easily look at the market in Nevada or CA and see what the likelihood of a property from being sold. Your chance in Nevada is not likely. A lease can be drawn up for a tenant that would be reasonable before the bank tries to sell the property again. Homeowner's associations should prefer a tenant to an empty house that will likely begin to fall apart.
08:33 AM on 12/07/2011
I have a great idea!  These communities should order their police departments to stop all evictions!  Then they won't have as many abandoned properties.
08:27 AM on 12/07/2011
Gasp, its the grapes of wrath all over again, demolish peoples homes so they can't pay the debt and sent them off to live in tent cities and scrape for work at any wage. Welcome back 1930-39.
photo
MSROADKILL612
am not convinced geothermal energy is above ground
08:22 AM on 12/07/2011
Surreal - modern ghost towns.

It would be good to hear from brits about how their equivalents to detroit like liverpool, bradford...? are faring
ReaItors Are Liars
NAR is corrupt
07:57 AM on 12/07/2011
Excellent news! House prices still falling!

http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/12/06/9249872-distressing-news-house-prices-still-falling