iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama: Morning-After Pill Decision 'Common Sense'

Plan B

BEN FELLER and LAURAN NEERGAARD   12/ 8/11 06:27 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Thursday it was just common sense to keep girls under the age of 17 from being able to buy a morning-after contraceptive pill off a drugstore shelf. Citing his own two daughters, Obama said: "I think most parents would probably feel the same way."

Plenty of pediatric leaders and women's advocacy groups did not, as reaction flowed in to the administration's decision to prevent the over-the-counter sale of the anti-pregnancy drug to sexually active girls of younger ages.

Critics said politics had trumped science, again.

"When President Obama took office, he pledged the administration's commitment to scientific integrity," said Cynthia Pearson of the National Women's Health Network. "This decision is a betrayal of that promise."

At issue is a pill that can prevent pregnancy if taken soon enough after unprotected sex.

It is available without a prescription only to those 17 and older who can prove their age – and that will now remain the case after Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius overruled scientists at the Food and Drug Administration. They were preparing to let the pill be sold without a prescription or age limit.

Obama rallied around Sebelius' arguments that younger girls may not be able to understand the medicine's labeling or use the pill properly. He insisted he was not involved in the decision in any way.

"I will say this, as the father of two young daughters: I think it is important for us to make sure that, you know, we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine," Obama said in a brief news conference at the White House.

Obama's daughter Malia is 13. His daughter Sasha is 10.

Obama said that as he understood it, Sebelius was wary of a 10-year-old or 11-year-old going into a drugstore and buying a medication – one on the shelves next to "the bubble gum and batteries" – that could be harmful if not used properly.

Stores, though, were never likely to put the drug near chewing gum or batteries. It was going to go on shelves by condoms, spermicides and pregnancy tests.

The rhetorical emphasis on the potential for 11- and 12-year-old girls to use the pill also rankled advocates.

There are no age restrictions on other over-the-counter drugs that could potentially have serious side-effects in young children.

"When it comes to FDA drug approvals, contraceptives are being held to a different and non-scientific standard – in a word, politics," said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. She said the comments by Obama and Sebelius would suggest no FDA-approved drug – not a Tylenol or a Sudafed – should be on drugstore shelves.

The center has a pending lawsuit against FDA over the morning-after pill restrictions and will argue in court next week that FDA should be held in contempt.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, fewer than 1 percent of 11-year-old girls are sexually active, but almost half of girls have had sex by their 17th birthdays, most of those beginning at age 15 or 16.

Plan B costs about $50 for the single-pill package, and "no 11-year-old or 12-year-old is going to have that kind of money anyway," said Dr. Cora Breuner of the American Academy of Pediatrics, a professor of pediatric and adolescent medicine at the University of Washington.

The pediatricians' group, along with the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association, has pushed for over-the-counter access as a way to reduce unplanned pregnancies.

"How would condom sales be affected if men and women had to show identification to a sales clerk before making off with that precious package?" wrote Lehigh University biomedical ethicist Dena Davis.

Taking Plan B within 72 hours of rape, condom failure or just forgetting regular contraception can cut the chances of pregnancy by up to 89 percent. It works best if taken within 24 hours.

Sebelius' decision, however, pleased many conservative critics.

"The FDA did not have the data to support a decision of this magnitude," said Rep. Joe Pitts, R-Pa. "The secretary pointed out obvious deficiencies in the research and acted in the interest of young girls."

FDA Commissioner Dr. Margaret Hamburg made clear that the decision is highly unusual. She said her agency's drug-safety experts had carefully considered the question of young girls and she had agreed that Plan B's age limit should be lifted.

A person familiar with the decision said Sebelius did not share her reservations about Plan B ahead of time with the FDA.

The HHS secretary made her decision Tuesday night ahead of an expected announcement by the FDA on Wednesday. Sebelius notified Hamburg on Wednesday morning and then told the White House before publicly releasing her determination.

The person spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue.

Planned Parenthood, a reproductive rights group, has asked for a meeting with Sebelius.

The move has election-year implications and angered many Democrats. Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a member of the Senate leadership, already was asking Sebelius to explain her decision. But it also could serve to illustrate to independents that Obama is not the liberal ideologue Republicans claim.

Presidential spokesman Jay Carney said "there was communication" between the White House and the health agency during the decision-making process. But he emphasized that it was Sebelius' decision.

___

Associated Press writer Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar contributed to this report. Feller is APs White House correspondent. Neergaard is an AP medical writer.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WOMEN

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Thursday it was just common sense to keep girls under the age of 17 from being able to buy a morning-after contraceptive pill off a drugstore shelf. Citi...
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama said Thursday it was just common sense to keep girls under the age of 17 from being able to buy a morning-after contraceptive pill off a drugstore shelf. Citi...
Filed by Jessica Pearce Rotondi  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
12:56 PM on 12/12/2011
I was lucky, I had a mother I could run to for plan b, a lot of girls don't have that mom. I disagree with this decision, and it most certainly is not "common sense".

Common sense is preventing teen pregnancy. It doesn't make sense to take away the only option to prevent pregnancy that some girls have, wether you think teens should have sex or not, they are going to.

It is a parents job to parent, not the governments...
05:15 AM on 12/12/2011
Not a big deal to me as an issue, but it seems silly to legally allow a 13-year old to buy extra-strength tylenol (which you can easily OD on) but not Plan B, which has no serious side effects.
strangetimes
Typo/grammar trolls, it's a blog not a term paper
09:08 PM on 12/11/2011
The argument that Plan B promotes sex is stupid. Kids will have sex with or without Plan B. I'd rather have plan B as an option.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:52 PM on 12/10/2011
To be honest, I'm not against there being an age limit for people wanting to take this pill. Does a 13-year-old really understand the consequences of her actions? Ignoring the question of whether or not we believe teens "should" be having sex, can we safely assume that they will understand how they will feel about this decision later? Women make these decisions everyday, and I have nothing against those who have struggled with the decision to have an abortion or to take the morning after pill. But those are adults.

We attribute a reasonable level of competency in judgment for adults that we don't trust all kids to have. We all make mistakes and learn from them, but when you're an adult, you have a much bigger pool of experience to pull from. As an adult, you can make your decisions with more information and a greater understanding than a teen or pre-teen might have.

This is more a problem with the lack of sexual education for teens than anything else. If there weren't such a stigma against sex ed and it was available in all schools, with teens fully aware of all options (condoms, birth control, etc.) then we might not have this issue. But the fact is that many schools in our country lack sex ed; or teach a limited version of it.
06:25 PM on 12/11/2011
plenty of teens have oops momnets. access to this would affect their lives less thanhaving a child or getting a abortion. Many of the other birtcontrol methods you need prespcitions for except condoms and sermicides. The more access to bithcontrol thte less basbies yuo are gonna have
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:55 AM on 12/10/2011
Science is not always the only factor in these decisions, and I think it would be wrong to let purely scientific considerations guide us every time. How many of us would be comfortable with our 14-year-olds taking one of these pills -- needing to take one -- without our knowledge? The FDA may have determined what it believes young girls can understand, but that doesn't mean it should necessarily determine what young girls should be able to do without any adult guidance.
11:36 AM on 12/11/2011
A majority of Sexual Abuse occurs in the home or by a family member - would a 14 year old girl feel comfortable telling her parents she needed plan B because her cousin/uncle/stepdad/grandpa raped her?
01:26 AM on 12/10/2011
Well. You voted for change. He changed his mind.
There you go.
11:14 PM on 12/09/2011
ABC's 20/20 tonight: Feminist are up in arms that female fetuses are being aborted at a much higher rate than males. The Indian Govt has made it illegal for sonograms to be used to determine the gender of a fetus.

The 20/20 reporter was beside herself that the Govt would ignore the "genocide" of females in India. Yea, these are the same folks who demanded that abortion be legal ... that women have the ultimate say as to whether or not they will give birth to their baby. Never mind what the dad wants ... never mind that the most current science makes it clear that fetuses feel pain early on ...(That means they feel the cutting, burning and sucking. PETA, any comment about this??)

So, what do we do now? Do those who want abortion to always be available now want that to be limited in India? I mean, they're killing female fetuses by the millions. Or is the "freedom of choice" so strong, so sacrosanct that the "genocide" can continue?? Do we really want to say it's okay to continue killing fetuses, but you can't determine the sex of the fetus you want to kill???

Houston ... we have a problem.

Solutions? Thoughts?
11:33 PM on 12/09/2011
If those girls are born, they are likely to be killed or abandoned shortly after birth. Being born does not mean their parents will suddenly want them and change their minds. There are already many of them who are horribly neglected because their parents don't think they're worth the time and energy to care for them.
11:39 PM on 12/09/2011
Yet the head of India is female ... go figure.
05:14 AM on 12/12/2011
IMO we let India deal with their own problems and stay out of it. The US is already way to involved in other countries' business.
photo
averagezoe
Don't breed or buy while homeless animals die!
07:53 PM on 12/09/2011
I most certainly disagree with Obama on this issue for reasons that should be obvioous to anyone with common sense.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:57 AM on 12/10/2011
Sudafed is locked up at Target and Walmart b/c of abuse, yet this drug should be available to an 11 year old? Let's hope you aren't a parent.
12:54 PM on 12/12/2011
Let's hope no elleven year old is a victim of abuse also.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
05:52 PM on 12/09/2011
This is a petition to Sebelius to let her know how you feel: http://www.change.org/petitions/hhs-secretary-allow-over-the-counter-access-to-plan-b-birth-control#
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AgainstAnimalAbuse
The end justifies the means
08:31 PM on 12/09/2011
Thank you I will, I sign a lot of petitions on change.org.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mrs young
Benghazi.......answers please..
03:01 PM on 12/09/2011
Do parents really want to give their minor children such serious health decisions to make? Without your knowledge? Some even advocate for abortion for minors without parental consent. There are choices in this regard that must have some form of guidance.

If you are truly worried your child will be denied access to this pill buy some yourself and keep it in the medicine cabinet.
04:44 PM on 12/09/2011
Yes, I absolutely want my girls to feel as if they could go and get this if they needed it.

Keeping one on hand in their bathroom is a good idea, especially since it's very rare that they would have $50 in cash to go buy it should the need arise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
05:56 PM on 12/09/2011
And getting pregnant isn't a serious health issue? This doesn't stop kids, it just makes them to get an older sister of a friend (or 18 year old boyfriend) to get it for her. I can't believe how people are turning this into: Kids shouldn't have this power over themselves! They do whether we think it's right or not. I'd rather have a teenager take this without my knowledge than try to get an abortion without my knowledge. We DON'T have this power unless we keep our kids in sight at all times and NO ONE does that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:14 PM on 12/10/2011
Older kids uby alcohol and cigarettes for teenagers. Still doesn't mean that these items should be readily available for them also.
02:02 PM on 12/09/2011
The science states that Plan B is not a risk for girls under the age of 17. So not putting it on the shelves of the local drugstore means we're inentionally trumping science? Seems as though this issue crosses into more territory than just scientific research, ie. morality, parenting, health, etc.
Putting it on the shelves based solely on scientific research would be trumping the rest of those. Time for the scientists to realize they are a supportive voice for our lives, not the dictating voice.
From their own mouths regarding the cost of the drug...." no 11-year old or 12-year old is going to have that kind of money anyway.."... so if they can't afford it anyway, why the big deal about not putting it on the shelves? Leave it as-is. Having to have a parent or doctor involved seems much safer than even taking a chance that it's going to lead to a higher percentage of unsafe sex practices by our children.
04:39 PM on 12/09/2011
What if they don't feel as if they CAN go to their parents?
06:08 PM on 12/09/2011
I know that surely happens. I'm only trying to weigh the percentages. In my mind, I feel that a higher percentage of children are going to be more apt to have unprotected sex if they have a "bail-out" anti-pregnancy drug at their disposal. leading to STD's etc.
This isn't like they find out they're pregnant and then they need help. They knew they had unprotected sex and are using the drug to their advantage the next day.
I just can't bring myself to thinking that putting this out there for girls 12-16, who are just starting to think for themselves in life, is a good idea.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
06:02 PM on 12/09/2011
What's might be "safer" (a moral opinion) is not reality. Kid's think they're bulletproof already. If a girl is responsible enough to know that she made a mistake and needs to protect herself, well, then she's plenty responsible. This is a drug that most girls don't know or think about until it's too late. We can't stop them from drinking, no matter how we try. We can't stop them from smoking, we can't stop them for having sex. The least we can do is give them another choice. This isn't difficult at all for kids to get around. Everybody has an 18 year old friend or a friend with an older sibling. People HAVE to realize that what we ant and what kids are going to do are (and always be) two different things.
06:14 PM on 12/09/2011
I certainly can see validity to your point about kids doing what they want to do.
All I'm saying, is that putting this on the shelves increases those tendencies even more.
And anytime we condone ( by our actions ) the act of unsafe sexual practices, I don't see that as a good idea.
For the ones who are already doing it, they can get it from their 18 year old friend.
For the ones who are not doing it for fear of pregnancy ( and getting caught for having sex ), then not having this OTC is a good idea.
Based on some of what you said, we should do away with minimum ages for buying liquor and cigarettes, because we can't stop them from drinking it or smoking it anyway.
I don't hear anybody beating that drum.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
07:55 PM on 12/09/2011
And that's what adults don't seem to understand. It IS available, we'd be idiots to think that kids aren't smart enough to figure out how easy it is to get it. They don't have to go through a doctor and the buyer doesn't have to be the one using it. Kids are having sex. 99% of them aren't going to do a darn thing till they find out they're pregnant, not having the foresight or knowledge available to them that this is available if they have a condom break or they get drunk and don't know what happened or if they get raped. I was a teen in the late '70's and maybe half the girls were sexually active back then. Now, they start in middle school. What's not being represented here are the health risks from abortion or how many things can and do go wrong in pregnancy and that the pregnancy itself and especially the birth can lead to the death of a woman. You might as well tell kids not to listen to a kind of music you don't like. They might appear to obey, but when you're not around, they're doing what they darn well need. I'd rather they have the ability to prevent a pregnancy than have to deal with the enormous, lifelong consequences of a pregnancy.
01:49 PM on 12/09/2011
Gutless, as usual. And to respond to those of you commenting on my comment on another article (the moderators kept me from responding there but let an anti-abortion nut with horrendous spelling keep posting) yes I do believe that a 14 year old should be allowed access to Plan B.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
06:04 PM on 12/09/2011
They have access - they just have to get an 18 year old to buy it for them. Adults don't give teens credit for their creative ways around our rules.
06:18 PM on 12/09/2011
That is too much bother in a "time's a wastin'" situation in my opinion. My great grandfather fought in WWI at 16 and married my great grandmother when she was 14, my grandfather left with the CCCs when he was 16, I trust a 16 year old to read the instructions on a package.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AgainstAnimalAbuse
The end justifies the means
08:33 PM on 12/09/2011
I get censored so much it's not even funny. Who moderates the moderators? Are there super moderators, and then super duper ones?
photo
averagezoe
Don't breed or buy while homeless animals die!
09:32 PM on 12/09/2011
I used to think it was because of profanity or some perceived slur towards the idiot I'm responding to, but I'm pretty sure now that that's not it. I've come to the conclusion that if you write something that offends the sensibilities of that particular moderator, you are as good as gone. It must be the luck of the draw - he who gets your comment is holding all the power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
01:20 PM on 12/09/2011
Christian fundamentalists think that "allowing" girls under 17 to have this pill is equivalent to giving them "permission" to have sex. This philosophy presumes that all women should be under the control of the patriarchy, their fathers, their husbands, their brothers, the church, or whatever. This mindset also presumes that if a girl refuses to follow the standards set by the patriarchy for HER sex life (by having sex out of wedlock or under a certain age), that she should be "punished" with a pregnancy.

Make your thoughts known:
Kathleen.Sebelius@hhs.gov
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Retrofuturistic
see things as they really are
11:41 PM on 12/09/2011
Thanks for the info.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
April Pells
11:40 AM on 12/09/2011
Why not treat this hormone-tampering medication as the dangerous product it is? Hell, treat it like Claritin, behind the counter and allowed only a few at a time. And what are the drug interactions? What are the hormonal effects of this drug on those who are still developing their hormonal balance? And considering how so many 12 year olds end up having sex, drunk or on drugs, can we trust them not to panic and take a whole lot of Plan B? While I agree that access to these pills should be easy and judgment-free, I do think there needs to be a lot of regulation on something this potentially harmful.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PhloxJeana
Never baptize a cat.
06:09 PM on 12/09/2011
You clearly have no idea the amount of rigorous testing and trials this drug had to go through to get introduced. And then further testing and research to be made OTC. And more testing and research for the FDA to RECOMMEND that it be available on the shelf, not behind a pharmacist. Even the American Academy of Pediatrics urged that it be made readily available because abortion is far more dangerous and pregnancy is exponentially more dangerous and life threatening.
08:00 AM on 12/09/2011
It just proves what everybody knows that obama has no common sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
illus2003
Praying for Sanity to take back over.
10:58 AM on 12/09/2011
No you just probed your lack of it.