iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Weather Extremes Hint At Public Health Impacts Of Climate Change

Posted: 12/08/11 05:34 PM ET

After a year of unprecedented destruction attributed to weather extremes, federal officials and environmental advocates are focusing increased attention on the potential health impacts of global warming, which most scientists expect to spur not just more frequent instances of extreme heat, but also increases in rainfall, drought, snow, floods and violent storms.

"Climate change poses a serious threat to public health," Dr. George Luber, the associate director for climate change at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Thursday. Luber was speaking to reporters as part of the launch of an online, extreme-weather mapping tool developed by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

"We have to really understand the local context of these extreme events and how they impact our communities by looking at them in what we call a spatially specific way, or in a way that really gets down to the geography of risk," Luber said, "by addressing those particular aspects of our communities, our cities and our populations that make people more susceptible to the negative health consequences of climate change."

Rising temperatures are expected to have an impact on all aspects of the public health infrastructure -- from air and water quality to food safety, Luber noted. A warmer atmosphere, for example, retains more water, increasing the likelihood of historically heavy rains, which can subsequently overwhelm treatment facilities and spread disease. Rising temperatures can also exacerbate smog, causing increased instances of respiratory illness, or alter the ecology of insect-borne diseases like Lyme, West Nile virus and others.

"Recall that the largest waterborne disease outbreak in the United States -- in Milwaukee in 1993 I believe -- was preceded by the heaviest rainfall in 50 years," Luber said. That event -- an outbreak of the microscopic parasite cryptosporidium -- resulted in 403,000 cases of intestinal illness, 54 deaths, and nearly $100 million in heath-related costs.

Earlier this year, the CDC launched a Climate-Ready States and Cities Initiative, which aims, among other things, to connect state and city health and emergency preparedness officials with local and national climate scientists, to better understand the potential impacts of climate change in their regions.

The new NRDC analysis, meanwhile, provides a snapshot of weather records and extremes for the first 10 months of 2011 using data going back 30 years and compiled by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric's National Climatic Data Center. The mapping tool reveals that all 50 states have experienced record-breaking weather events in 2011 -- from record rain and snowfall, to extreme drought, high temperatures and floods. Among other extremes, from Jan. 1 to Oct. 31, the organization tallied at least 1,302 record-breaking temperatures, 1090 new highs for rainfall, and 549 new snowfall records.

While none of these events or records can be directly tied to climate change, scientists note that events like these are certain to increase as average temperatures on the planet continue to rise.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has already tracked more than a dozen weather-related catastrophes in the United States in 2011 that have caused at least $1 billion in damage -- a record number in a single year. These events have already cost more than $52 billion, and the final tally is expected to be higher when damages from hurricanes and a freak early snowstorm in the Northeast are fully assessed.

In a recent report, the Associated Press noted that the United States averaged only one such billion-dollar weather catastrophe annually in the 1980s. A decade later, that average was approaching four per year, and in the last 10 years, the average has approached five such events per year. Taking into account just the last two years, the number of billion-dollar weather catastrophes has averaged 7.5 annually.

Meanwhile, an analysis last month by a team of researchers from the Natural Resources Defense Council, the University of California, Berkeley, and the University of California, San Francisco, found that a sample of just six extreme-weather or epidemiological events over the last decade resulted in 1,689 early deaths, 8,992 hospitalizations, 21,113 emergency department visits and 734,398 outpatient visits -- with an estimated cost totaling more than $14 billion.

In November, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change issued a preliminary report suggesting that "unprecedented extreme weather" was to be expected with increases in global average temperatures. The upward trend in weather-related calamities in the United States has also been noted by the international reinsurance giant, Munich Re, which released a half-year report in July showing a steady uptick since 1980 in natural disasters tied to storms, floods, extreme temperatures, droughts and forest fires:

"Emergency planning and preparedness really needs to begin to incorporate the risks from climate change," Dr. Kim Knowlton said in a question-and-answer session during the launch. Knowlton is a senior scientist with the Health and Environment Program at the Natural Resources Defense Council who helped develop the NRDC mapping tool.

"We can improve that kind of planning and that kind of emergency preparedness by taking the effects of climate change into account," Knowlton said. "That's beginning to happen in some areas, but it really needs to become standard operating procedure, because we know climate change is here, and the effects are here."

A Yale University survey released on Thursday showed that the connection between climate change and extreme weather is becoming more clearly understood by the American populace. The survey found that 67 percent of respondents thought global warming made the summer's high temperatures worse, for example. Sixty-five percent believed the phenomenon was exacerbating droughts in Texas and Oklahoma, while 60 percent connected global warming to both the Mississippi River floods and the record snowfalls in 2010 and 2011.

"However," the Yale researchers noted, "46 percent of Americans also said that global warming made the summer East Coast earthquake worse, indicating a flawed understanding of climate change."

About half of respondents believed human beings were contributing to global warming -- up 3 points from the last survey in May.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

After a year of unprecedented destruction attributed to weather extremes, federal officials and environmental advocates are focusing increased attention on the potential health impacts of global warmi...
After a year of unprecedented destruction attributed to weather extremes, federal officials and environmental advocates are focusing increased attention on the potential health impacts of global warmi...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7,460
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (101 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:04 PM on 12/10/2011
Global warming deniers should remount their broomsticks to sweep under the rug that

a) $7.4 Billionaire Rupert Murdoch,

hired Roger Ailes, who hired the guys who tell deniers what to think on global warming. Yet, Rupert actually believes in man-made global warming enough to have pushed all his companies, including Fox News, to carbon neutrality.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/weather-extremes-climate-change_n_1137587_122628859.html

b) 14 more hockey sticks;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122581702.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122586959.html

c) 11 independent so-called “ClimateGate” reviews - are all exonerations;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122576790.html

d) Exxon, Shell, Chevron, BP, and Conoco-Phillips admitted man-made global warming years ago;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122499348.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
yeti7
don't need no stink'n badges
07:34 PM on 12/21/2011
A chart of the weather for 30 years proves what exactly? What happened in the past 30 years. I wonder how the charts looks if it is taken back 200 years?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alteredstory
Hold on to the center
10:59 PM on 12/10/2011
For those of you who don't want propaganda - for those who want to read the science as reported BY THE SCIENTISTS, here you go - This link contains every paper published through peer review on climate science since 1824.

http://skepticalscience.com/climate_science_history.php

Click on a dot, and you get a full citation for every paper published in that year, in that category. Happy reading!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shan Wells
Sciencey sun venerator + political cartoonist
06:36 PM on 12/14/2011
Nifty!
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
07:09 PM on 12/10/2011
Is that Frank Luchan character here again preaching his nonsense? His lack of understanding of the science of global warming is absolutely vomitously breathtaking. Science-free cheese is his speciality. He really deserves to be frozen out of this discussion due to his continuous intentional or unintentional repetition of errors.

Look Frank, THE THEORY OF GLOBAL WARMING PREDICTS THAT THE STRATOSPHERE WILL NOT HEAT UP AND IN FACT WILL COOL . IT WILL NOT HEAT UP BECAUSE HEAT IS BEING TRAPPED IN THE LOWER ATMOSPHERE. AND IT’S ESCAPE INTO SPACE, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE PASSING THROUGH THE STRATOSPHERE, IS BEING IMPEDED BY INFRARED PHOTONS BEING ABSORBED AND RE-EMITTED BY CARBON DIOXIDE MOLECULES IN THE LOWER IN THE ATMOSPHERE, IN THE TROPOSPHERE. THE STRATOSPHERE IS COOLING. JUST LIKE WE PREDICTED IT WOULD.

Frank, maybe you are not sufficiently informed to be able to weigh in on this discussion, or perhaps you are purposely spewing fossil fuel funded talking points out of loyalty to your superficial value system, or something else, I don't know, but what you are saying is, quite simply wrong.
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
08:04 PM on 12/18/2011
Actually, stratospheric heating would be evidence in favor of warming caused by changes in the sun's output. Stratospheric cooling is evidence in favor of warming caused by excessive CO2 in the lower atmosphere.

The more you look, the more evidence you will find that warming is caused by excess CO2 from the burning of fossil fuels. The mountain of evidence pointing to CO2 overwhelms any other possible explanation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
eaarth2
“An era ends when its illusions are exhausted
05:25 PM on 12/10/2011
Its really amazing. We live in a time when human civilization is teetering. Our small planet the 3rd from an average yellow main sequence star has choices now.

Do we evolve into more enlightened biological units, or succumb into greedy selfishness.

A Fascinating time to be alive- with a tiny but significant civilization on the edge of a cliff.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
02:11 PM on 12/10/2011
AGW "Skeptics": God Will Protect Us From Global Warming

Prominent global warming "skeptics" including Roy Spencer (a climate scientist favored by "skeptics"), Ross McKitrick (economist and purported "hockey stick" slayer), and Joseph D'Aleo (weatherman / Icecap blog) preach that per the Bible God will protect us from global warming, along with other signatories of the Cornwall Alliance's "Evangelical Declaration on Global Warming":

http://www.cornwallalliance.org/blog/item/prominent-signers-of-an-evangelical-declaration-on-global-warming/

Roy Spencer is moreover on the Cornwall Alliance's Board of Advisers:

http://www.cornwallalliance.org/about/board-of-advisors/

More from the Cornwall Alliance For The Stewardship Of Creation on their belief that per Biblical prophesy God will protect us from global warming:

-----------------------
The world is in the grip of an idea: that burning fossil fuels... is causing global warming that will be so dangerous that we must stop it by reducing our use...

We believe that idea... fails the tests of theology... with a worldview of the Earth and its climate system contrary to that taught in the Bible...
 
God’s wisdom, power, and faithfulness justify confidence that Earth’s ecosystems are robust and will, by God’s providence, accomplish the purposes He set for them.
------------------------
http://www.cornwallalliance.org/docs/a-renewed-call-to-truth-prudence-and-protection-of-the-poor.pdf

FrankLuchan: "..,the Church of Climatolog­y..."

Science denier irony is eternal.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:59 PM on 12/10/2011
Global warming deniers should remount their broomsticks to sweep under the rug that

a) $7.4 Billionaire Rupert Murdoch,

who hired Roger Ailes, who hires the guys who tell deniers what to think on global warming, actually believes in man-made global warming enough to push all his companies, including Fox News to carbon neutral. So who's getting punked here? eh;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/weather-extremes-climate-change_n_1137587_122628859.html

b) 14 more hockey sticks;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122581702.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122586959.html

c) 11 independent so-called “ClimateGate” reviews - are all exonerations;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122576790.html

d) Exxon, Shell, Chevron, BP, and Conoco-Phillips admitted to man-made global warming years ago;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122499348.html
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:00 PM on 12/10/2011
(cont.)

e) 11 of the world's 14 largest publicly traded corporations have greenhouse gas mitigation programs, including Walmart (conservative Waltons), along with 73% of America's 500 largest corporations. While the other top 3 includes Berkshire Hathaway and two Communist Chinese banks, all of whom are major coal investors;

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/weather-extremes-climate-change_n_1137587_122593388.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/weather-extremes-climate-change_n_1137587_122592277.html

f) The Dept. of Defense, CIA, and Billionaires with net worth 1/3rd $Trillion have publicly stated beliefs in man-made global warming, along with 200 more CEOS, and investment groups controlling $20 Trillion.

http://www.defense.gov/qdr/images/QDR_as_of_12Feb10_1000.pdf
https://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/center-on-climate-change-and-national-security.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15352764
http://investorsonclimatechange.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/2011-Investor-Global-Statement.pdf
01:07 AM on 12/10/2011
http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php

save yourselves a little time
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
11:45 AM on 12/10/2011
Absolutely!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:55 AM on 12/10/2011
Seconded!
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
12:49 AM on 12/10/2011
You simply cannot explain science to some people.

Here's why: http://theconversation.edu.au/why-do-people-reject-science-heres-why-4050
12:45 PM on 12/10/2011
That's an excellent article! Thanks for the link.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hk usp 45
Land of the free not freebie
10:28 PM on 12/09/2011
The March, April 1993 cryptosporidium outbreak was due to the heavy summer rains in 1993.

It had nothing to do with the filter practices at Milwaukee's Southern water treatment plant.

Amazing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:33 PM on 12/09/2011
Que=Che
photo
BluePhantom2
The Blacksmith & the Artist reflected in their art
09:17 PM on 12/09/2011
Another chart, another threat to life and limb from a trace gas essential for life.
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
09:27 PM on 12/09/2011
Must be miserable being such a hopeless cynic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
10:22 PM on 12/09/2011
Cynic spelled i-d-i-o-t.
09:29 PM on 12/09/2011
No one disputes that CO2 is a trace gas essential to life.

But it punches way above its weight in infrared absorption, and that's important.
photo
buckydumpster
owns "They Live" sunglasses
08:44 PM on 12/09/2011
“100 frogs sitting in a pot of slowly warming water. 99 say, "Hey, this water is getting warmer. Maybe we should do something DIFFERENT.­"
1 says, "Wait a second! The warming of this water is providing us with jobs! Besides, WE aren't the reason it's happening"
at that point, fearing something might fundementa­lly change, 53 join the one.”
ubrew12
that crazy uncle from Amarcord
10:02 PM on 12/09/2011
Lets not insult a frog's intelligence, shall we? Us humans bow down to our ribbeting future-overlords...
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
10:16 PM on 12/09/2011
That's right, we may need to retreat back to the sea soon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimspy
Quod quae operibus sufficit.
11:50 PM on 12/09/2011
Future overlords? They're disappearing by the millions! Allegedly due to...wait for it...

...Climate Change!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Andrew Harvey
Don't F with the Jesus
08:37 AM on 12/10/2011
All analogies break down at some point, but yours was broken at the very start.
photo
buckydumpster
owns "They Live" sunglasses
09:46 AM on 12/10/2011
SNAP! I've just changed my mind. You denyers were right all the time. Thanks for setting me straight.
photo
Aladdin Sane1
"Are you the police?""No, ma'am, we're musicians."
07:18 PM on 12/09/2011
It's come to my attention recently that those on the "anti" side of the debate should not be referred to with metaphors such as "head in sand," nor even "head inserted rectally." No, the proper metaphor is "stuck in the mud." Think about it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:41 PM on 12/09/2011
Why worry? The world is slated to end in 2012.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
07:21 PM on 12/09/2011
Only if you think having a really long calendar cycle is a good reason.
photo
wetbonder
Educating liberals one day at a time
05:38 PM on 12/09/2011
Don't any of you ever wonder why Mann and Jones can't figure out which data goes to which station, and why they won't release all their data for others to attempt to replicate their results?

Aren't any of you bothered by the proxy switching? I mean, one group of trees???

Hello?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:01 PM on 12/10/2011
Their results have been replicated at least 14 times, the most recent by Muller et al. last month.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/maxwells/neil-degrasse-tyson-climate-change_b_1134054_122581702.html

Maybe you can try to read them before you re-state your claim. Then, at least you'll know you're entirely wrong before you say it again.
05:04 PM on 12/09/2011
The subject of global warming always attracts the know-it-alls who think they have the skill and intellect to gainsay professional climate experts and scientists.

They come here and flaunt their ignorance with conspiracy theories, emotional rhetoric, cherry-picked illusions, and very few, if any, relevant or accurate scientific or policy issues to discuss.

Every time one of their mindless cut-and-paste accusations thoroughly demolished, it just pops up again somewhere else. They never apologize, explain or justify their position. They simply just move along and repeat the same drivel over and over again.

If there is any insight to be gained from this endless repetitive exercise, it is that the self-deluded are apparently very useful and consistently reliable tools for the denial-industry echo chamber.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NewportMac
05:35 PM on 12/09/2011
I'd also include alarmists, environmental groups like 10:10, and people like Al Gore in the annoying "know-it-al­l" group.

What about journalists who write articles? Here's an example:

Forbes: 12/07/2011
Climategate's Michael Mann Channels His Inner Palpatine

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/12/07/climategates-michael-mann-channels-his-inner-palpatine/

"The ongoing Climategate scandal, including 5,000-plus Climategate 2 emails released two weeks ago, reveals prominent global warming advocates acknowledging flaws in the theory that humans are causing dramatic climate change, coordinating efforts to hide such flaws, coordinating efforts to misrepresent scientific data, coordinating efforts to destroy evidence of these inconvenient truths, and coordinating efforts to blackball or induce the firing of scientists and editors of peer-reviewed science journals who publish evidence contradicting the alarmist storyline. The most important revelation from the Climategate scandals is that global warming scientist-activists are misrepresenting the scientific data regarding global warming. The second most important revelation is that scientist-activists are waging a brutal and dirty war of personal and professional destruction against skeptical scientists who disagree with them.

"Make no mistake, the scientific misconduct revealed in the Climategate emails is severe and undeniable. The Climategate scientist-activists openly acknowledge substantial scientific evidence that contradicts their theories, then work to together to hide that evidence from the public."
BlackbirdHighway
Brawndo's got electrolites!
05:43 PM on 12/09/2011
Yes, Forbes "journalists" are definitely in the "annoying "know-it-a­l­l" camp.
05:46 PM on 12/09/2011
The flagrant distortion of stolen email snippets served up by ruthless propagandists will not change the course of man-made global warming.

It's still happening. The glaciers are retreating, the sea ice is in decline, the composition of our atmosphere is changing and the oceans are acidifying. In the face of this overwhelming evidence, all the deniers can do is create more scientifically substance-free distractions as part of their ongoing malevolent campaign to harass and persecute climate scientists.

By publicly vilifying the scientists who are trying to warn us of the risks we're facing, the propagandists and their corporate masters are attempting to stall a significant and timely move away from fossil fuels with the ultimate goal of protecting their own financial interests.
07:35 PM on 12/09/2011
Indeed. At HP subject of global warming also attracts a few folks who spend all day every day arguing any and every issue on HP. They are folks who appear to be addicted to conflict and do everything they can to foster empty conflict. Of course, much like your description, they don't have the skills to actually counter anything that the knowledgeable post.

I wonder if they particularly like to argue on global warming articles because the scientists and scientifically knowledgeable folks here are persistent in disproving their empty assertions. Seems that way to me, anyway. The know-nothings are a waste of time.
09:00 PM on 12/09/2011
They are, indeed, a waste of time.

But there are those lurkers out there. If they're allowed to spread their lies without being challenged, the political climate bends their way. It's all standard propaganda techniques.

I have to say, NewportMac kind of cracks me up. He appears to be a classic "concern troll", taking an oh-so-reasonable tone as he spouts propaganda from the machine.