As USPS Cuts Loom, Business Owners Brace Themselves

Postal Service

First Posted: 12/09/11 12:27 PM ET Updated: 12/09/11 01:51 PM ET

"Grandma may soon have to get in the car and drive 100 miles for her medicine," worried Bill Snodgrass, the owner of a USave Pharmacy in a small Nebraska town. Each week, his store ships hundreds of prescriptions to far-flung customers, many of whom are elderly people in remote communities where the closest pharmacy can be more than an hour's drive.

Still, for years, Snodgrass has been able to count on the U.S. Postal Service's First-Class Mail system for next-day delivery to customers.

But all that could change when the nearby mail-processing plant shuts down this spring as part of a massive nationwide consolidation proposed earlier this week by the postal service, which has been crippled financially by soaring labor costs and plummeting mail volume.

Closure of the processing plant near USave would delay the pharmacy's deliveries by at least two days. "That means my customers won't get their diabetes supplies or their heart medicine on time," said Snodgrass. Medicaid restrictions prevent many customers from pre-ordering, he added. "So I'll either stop shipping prescriptions or switch to FedEx or UPS -- which cost me three times what the USPS currently charges."

Small business owners across the nation are bracing themselves for the postal service's latest plan to avert its own bankruptcy. Distribution nightmares and cash-flow interruptions top their list of fears, as regulators review the proposal to close half the nation's 500 mail processing plants and 15,000 of America's 32,000 local post offices. The cuts could save the cash-strapped agency around $2 billion a year, but will inevitably lead to slower delivery times.

Next-day mail, which accounts for 42 percent of all USPS parcels, would be delayed at least one day under the proposed plan, according to internal predictions.

"Consumers and commercial organizations will be able to adapt to the changes in the service standards," USPS officials assured regulators in hearings on Wednesday, noting that most customers said they "would not want a significant price increase in lieu of the service standards change" and tend to perceive the changes as "a very reasonable response to the financial problems the postal service faces."

But for some small businesses, the service changes will ultimately lead to higher shipping costs. That's because slowing delivery times effectively leaves many USPS customers -- including those businesses that rely on the postal service to ship time-sensitive products like overnight prescription drugs -- with little choice but to switch to private mail carriers like FedEx and UPS, which continue to offer next-day service, but at rates that are often significantly higher than those of USPS.

"They're privatizing the postal system piece by piece through outsourcing and downsizing, selling off assets, closing down post offices and driving business to private mail companies" says Steve Hutkins, a professor at New York University. "You can't just convince Congress and the country to privatize the entire system, so they're privatizing it through the back door."

Critics warn that the changes could create cash-flow interruptions for many businesses, as it starts to take longer for paper invoices shipped through the mail to reach customers and for payments to then come back to vendors. "Under the changes, that check that used to come in a day or two, if it's mailed on Wednesday, won't arrive until Monday," said Chuck Zlatkin, the legislative and political director of the New York Metro Area Postal Union. "For business owners operating on the edge economically, those extra days make a big difference."

And while business owners are increasingly switching to electronic billing, a recent study by the Aberdeen Group, an enterprise research firm, found that nearly 80 percent of businesses still use snail mail to bill clients.

"There are more hard-copy financial transactions out there than people think about, and probably even more so for businesses that aren't heavily engaged in the Internet and are in rural areas where broadband services are less accessible," said Tonda Rush, president of the National Newspaper Association, an advocacy group for local periodicals, which are also expected to suffer under the new service changes.

"The main concern for small business owners is price and reliability," says Steve Chou, the founder of Bumblebee Linens, an online wedding linens company, which has been utilizing low-cost USPS shipping since it launched as an eBay business a few years ago. "We've used USPS because it's cheap and we can pass lower shipping costs on to our customers." But USPS has been increasingly less reliable than FedEx and USPS, Chou adds. "My greatest fear with these cutbacks is that the postal service will become even more unreliable, meaning more delays and more lost packages."

Chou already uses FedEx for orders on tight deadlines and expects that, following the cuts, he'll turn to FedEx much more often. "Unfortunately," he added, "we'll have to offset the increased price of shipping with increased product prices."

Proponents of the service cuts argue that it's about time the agency recognized its next-day service was unprofitable and ended it. Increasing rates, USPS claims, was less popular with customers than service changes. Plus, the law prohibits the post office from raising postage fees faster than inflation.

But the question before the regulators charged with finalizing the cuts still remains: should the postal service, a quasi-governmental agency that receives no funding from Congress, be allowed to act like a business and reduce the frequency of deliveries to cut costs, or does it owe to its tax-paying customers -- including small businesses -- to provide services that have proved incapable of turning a profit?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST SMALL BUSINESS

"Grandma may soon have to get in the car and drive 100 miles for her medicine," worried Bill Snodgrass, the owner of a USave Pharmacy in a small Nebraska town. Each week, his store ships hundreds of p...
"Grandma may soon have to get in the car and drive 100 miles for her medicine," worried Bill Snodgrass, the owner of a USave Pharmacy in a small Nebraska town. Each week, his store ships hundreds of p...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 234
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
11:14 PM on 12/15/2011
It's unfortunate to see the dismantling of the post office. The testimonials in this article is proof the post office delivers overnight(first class)t at a much lesser rate than UPS/fedex overnight delivery. What the post office needs to do is innovate and streamline the process through cheaper flat rates through priority shipping.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Charles Queen
I am a disabled nam vet
08:50 PM on 12/14/2011
Discussions are going on in washington pertaining to help out the USPO.I think that they should do it.We mostly all depend on it for one reason or another as does washington as well.If they do help them,I suppose there will still be some cuts made as far as closing some offices,but if they can get the help,then I think it's a good thing for all of us
10:39 AM on 12/14/2011
Of course this has a significant impact on small businesses like mine but what I'm betting that some entrepreneneurs consider this a potential business opportunity for them. Someone's going to have to deliver the mail. It's not going away. I wonder who will step up and do it the cheapest?
Realist2011
beware false profits....
12:36 PM on 12/10/2011
I'll try to look up the article, but the last report showed the USPS "overhead" factor at some ludicrous number, if I remember it was between 20% & 30% overhead costs. NO business can survive that level of inefficiency.
Realist2011
beware false profits....
12:33 PM on 12/10/2011
I found it interesting that the USPS is closing half the sorting sites and almost half the post offices, and service will only be "slightly" delayed.

So my first question is, why were all these post offices and sorting centers needed in the first place?

Next, why is it that the "customer" would rather have slower service than higher prices? Where's the third option, USPS actually becoming more efficient?

Why not start charging the bulk mailers a price that adequately reflects the cost of the service they're currently getting for next to nothing?

This is just another example of a "government" agency that cannot manage its money. I know it's not a "government" agency, but the reality is, that's the effect and it correspondingly is as inefficient as any true government agency.

They have continuously dropped pricing for bulk mailers so the mailers can make additional profits. Everything needs to be either "First Class" at full FC rates, or Parcel Post at slightly cheaper rates and delivery for PP would be as it is now, "whenever it shows up".

If you don't want to change, then just do us all a favor and let's dump you entirely and let's bid out the service to UPS or FEDEX directly. This is just years and years of increasing incompetence that I grow weary of.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:42 PM on 12/10/2011
Lots a business are inefficient, UPS fed ex and HDL all had to reorganize thier business because of drops in demand. They also charge a lot more, and next day letter sent fed ex is at least 23.00 thats a huge difference in pricing. So at the .42 cents the USPS charges they must be doing something right. Banks didnt manage thier money very well either
Realist2011
beware false profits....
06:16 AM on 12/11/2011
I agree wholeheartedly. Now, what is the solution? You see, recognizing the problem is only half of it. The USPS is inefficient AND losing huge amounts of money. So do we just acknowledge it and let them continue to lose, or do they change?

UPS and FEDEX and any truly private business either adapts and changes, or fails. What are we asking of the USPS? Change? Fail? Continuing as they have been should not be an option.
09:42 AM on 12/10/2011
We are already there in my area. My last prescription took 14 days to get here. I mail my bills six days early or pay late fees. My County Clerk tested first class to see when to mail absentee ballots and found six days to be required for local mail.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
10:55 AM on 12/10/2011
2 thoughts,

1; pay bills online to avoid late fees

2 Use Xpress scripts to keep the pills on schedule.

The USPS did this to themselves. I had to get a PO Box ( $100 fee) because the local mailman wouldn't get his butt off the seat to reach over a small snowbank to deliver to my curbside mailbox .
First snow storm this year, same thing.

My 2012 goal is to eliminate the mailbox altogether.

Thank God for e mail, FedEx and UPS. Sorry to see jobs go but they obsoleted themselves.
Life is about adjusting to challenges, adapt or die.
dididangerlove
subverting political perversion
11:11 AM on 12/10/2011
Right - adapt or die. FedEx and UPS should be forced to prefund 75 years of benefits within a 10 year time frame to level the playing field.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:43 PM on 12/10/2011
Really a next day letter from fed ex 23.00 post office 00.42.
11:25 PM on 12/15/2011
You are either being untruthful or the pharmacist in this article is making up a story. Quote from the article "Still, for years, Snodgrass has been able to count on the U.S. Postal Service's First-Class Mail system for next-day delivery to customers". I believe you have highly exaggerated your comments to make a fictitious point.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soldier123
Ask not what your country can do for you but what
02:21 AM on 12/10/2011
Mr Obama and the rest of the legislators, the post office must not go down. This is the United States of America and you must act now before it is to late. You already allowed America to loose the space program and now the Post Office service. This cannot happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
10:56 AM on 12/10/2011
Funny you say that, I suspect a lot of mail is in orbit,,,,,,,, somewhere, lost in space
photo
crws
Grew tired of seeing "your micro-bio is empty"
01:59 AM on 12/10/2011
Gotta Love Mr. Nader
NADER FOR PMG
http://nader.org/index.php?/archives/2335-Time-to-Save-the-Post-Office.html
photo
des946
Consultant
01:53 AM on 12/10/2011
So what do those who claim that the USA is NOT sliding into being more like some third world country have to say about this "perfect example" of our regression in spite of the untold BILLIONS that have been spent on our postal system?

Having an effective and efficient postal system is a basic measure of any socitety. So the USA has spent BILLIONS of dollars on computerized systems that they are NOW going to essentially scrap.; and then provide an inferior level of service at the same time. What does that say about the state of our economy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Raccoon1
These are the times that try men's souls........
10:17 AM on 12/10/2011
Had the Republicans in 2006 not passed a law requiring 75 years of pensions and benefits by the post office in 10 years, we wouldn't be where we are today. It was a poison pill designed to break the largest union in the US. They get the added enjoyment of many thousands more unemployed to blame on Obama.
12:53 AM on 12/10/2011
Need to stop giving other countries our money, We all work very hard to pay our taxes only to give it to these foreign countries. Let them take care of themselves. Give the post office the money, Bail out the auto makers and the banks but, not the post office ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Raccoon1
These are the times that try men's souls........
10:19 AM on 12/10/2011
China is currently in Africa developing future allies, markets, and sources of raw materials for their future. Relatively small investment considering they'll become the economic super-power of the future with these investments.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
10:59 AM on 12/10/2011
Our foreign policy is always the same, drop in weapons and start a war.
photo
crws
Grew tired of seeing "your micro-bio is empty"
12:01 AM on 12/10/2011
This is ridiculous just give the post office the money it needs.

Cut all foreign aid and give that money to the post office instead.
dididangerlove
subverting political perversion
11:13 AM on 12/10/2011
Actually, USPS doesn't need a handout. It needs to stop having Congress suck it dry.
11:51 PM on 12/09/2011
Aside from the fact that the USPS employed a lot of people of color, people without advanced education, while still being one of the last businesses that provided decent benefits AND a living wage, it's clear that our legislators gave up on caring on saving this institution. It makes one wonder that BECAUSE of the employee demographics, it was easy for legislators to let it deteriorate, probably w/ lots of "financial input" from lobbyists representing FedEx or UPS. I mean, this plan is designed to ensure that our mail service will ultimately fail and they've done nothing w/in the past ten years to be competitive. It makes me wonder if the same fools that ran our car industry into the ground are making these retarded decisions?

I get that "everyone" uses email, but there's a good portion of the country: rural, the South, that aren't as connected to the internet as many of 'us' seem to believe. I also know that there's no better resource for sending a written letter. Finally, there's something DEEPLY wrong w/ a so-called powerful country that is unable to get their own mail service right and at the expense of tens of thousands of jobs! Shameful and truly unfortunate.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
soldier123
Ask not what your country can do for you but what
02:24 AM on 12/10/2011
You said it perfectly. We must support the Postal Service
08:49 PM on 02/06/2013
Well said! I wholeheartedly agree. This plan will have a very negative effect on our economy in the long run. I personally could care less if my junk mail and Amazon goodies don't show up on Saturday. But I do care about people losing jobs with decent pay and benefits, small business people having to "brace themselves", and whatever other catastrophes will come as a result of this. My neighbors are now fighting the closing of our rural P.O. so we will have to leave our island to do P.O. Business. I hope people stop looking at this with narrow perspectives.
11:21 PM on 12/09/2011
I post this every time there's something about the post office, so I'll post it again :
I sent this letter I sent to everyone I know, even people at some post offices, and that's about as far as it went. ( Ms. Diana Black of TN did get back to me, but still nothing from no one else)
So I'll ask to copy it and pass it on too:
Did the "smart" people that run our postal system every think of selling advertising space on the stamps?
I don't have all the numbers, but some of the numbers I found were for food, beverage, and restaurants.
In 2008 McDonald's spent about $1.2 Billion, and what I found was that the food, beverage, and restaurants advertising hit around $11. Billion in 2004.
Just think how much the post office could pull in selling add space, stamps with Golden Archers, The Pink Bunny with the Drum, the Big Red Hot Pepper, and the list goes on.
I would go into more, but this letter would be so long, no one would read it, so I keep it short.
photo
des946
Consultant
02:01 AM on 12/10/2011
I have to disagree with the idea of "selling "advertising space" on stamps . . . . that is just too impractical. How would anyone (the postal service) be able to keep track of what was legitimate or not. Under your concept, how would the system work? What would be the minimum "purchase" of "advertising"; and how does it become legitimized / recognized by all of the postal offices's machines throughout the USA? Even if it were to be computerized, wouldn't it be aprograming and handling "nightmare"? Your intent is good; but the idea is TOTALLY IMPRACTICAL and unworkable.+ (I've seen your comment a couple of times previously.)
07:05 AM on 12/10/2011
Totally Impractical? How did they keep tract of the Young Elvis or the Old Elvis stamps, or the different stamps they're sell now for Christmas? Don't they sell deferent stamps thru out the year for the deferent holidays? Set a minimum, say $10K, it would get them 200K stamps (that's 5 cents per stamps), with increments of $1K, all the time selling the stamps to the public for the 44 cents, they're charging now. The companies PR department could come up with the background art work with limits set by the post office. And as far as counterfeit stamps, if someone could make money doing it, they would be doing it now, they don't because no money in it. I know the next question that will be asked, how to sell the idea, I'm even willing to sell it on a commission bases, say .001 cent for any advertise stamp I get a company to purchase. Maybe if some people use their head for something other then to keep their ears a part, we wouldn't be in the mess we're n know.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
11:01 AM on 12/10/2011
Let Milo Minderbender, (M&M Enterprises) run the USPS.

You'd be crazy not to!
10:58 PM on 12/09/2011
So a govt agency unable to change with the times bleeds red ink for years will not create more problems for other businesses due their inefficiency. That's our good ol' USA!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grover5995
Proud American, former Republican
12:50 AM on 12/10/2011
Actually the US Postal Service has not been allowed to change with the times due to government mandates. USPS is required to serve all outlying areas but they are not permitted to charge enough to cover costs. Meanwhile, FedEx and UPS get to cherry-pick all the profitable traffic.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:48 PM on 12/10/2011
It should be profitable for fed ex. ups, an next day letter cost $23.00 the post office 0.42 cents
dididangerlove
subverting political perversion
01:07 AM on 12/10/2011
USPS isn't bleeding red ink. What are you talking about?