More

Obama Makes Decisions On Contraception, Other High-Profile Issues Ahead Of 2012

Barack Obama

By ERICA WERNER   12/10/11 09:07 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- On issues from air pollution to contraception, President Barack Obama has broken sharply with liberal activists and come down on the side of business interests and social conservatives as he moves more to the political middle for his re-election campaign.

Without a Democratic challenger who might tug him to the left, Obama is free to try to neutralize Republican efforts to tar him as a liberal ideologue by taking steps toward the political center.

At the same time, he is finding opportunities to boost his standing with his most committed backers. For example, he has appealed to environmentalists by delaying an oil pipeline that would run from Canada to Texas, and to gay rights activists by bolstering gay rights overseas and helping end a ban on gays in the military.

The sometimes seemingly contradictory moves come as Obama maneuvers toward next year's election. Critical to his success in 2012 is retaining support from independent voters who could be won over by his GOP opponents, given the country's high rate of unemployment and economic distress.

The White House denies that politics is at play. But as with any president, some of Obama's most potent campaign tools derive from the powers of his office, from the bully pulpit to decisions on issues that affect people's lives.

In the most recent example, Obama's health secretary overruled scientists at the Food and Drug Administration to block sales of the morning-after contraceptive bill Plan B to girls under age 17 without a prescription.

Social conservatives applauded and women's rights groups were livid, but Obama backed up Health and Human Services chief Kathleen Sebelius.

"As the father of two young daughters, I think it is important for us to make sure that, you know, we apply some common sense to various rules when it comes to over-the-counter medicine," the president said Thursday.

In September, Obama overruled scientific advisers at the Environmental Protection Agency and scrapped a clean-air regulation intended to reduce health-threatening smog. That angered environmentalists, but won praise from business leaders and even Republicans, who argued that the costs and potential job losses that could result from the proposal were too high.

Yet environmentalists cheered and Republicans and business groups groused last month when the administration delayed a decision on the oil pipeline from Canada to the Texas until the U.S. government can study routes that avoid environmentally sensitive areas of Nebraska. Final action on the pipeline is not expected now until after next November's election.

"There are politics in every issue, and there's an upside and a downside to every issue," White House press secretary Jay Carney said. "And usually, it's hard to know in advance how these things will play out politically. Which is just another reason why decisions like these ought to be made on the merits."

Melinda Pierce, a lobbyist for the Sierra Club, said that despite the disappointing decision on smog rules, environmentalists still believe they are coming out ahead with Obama as president. In addition to the pipeline delay, she cited rules from the administration on fuel efficiency for cars.

Pierce noted that one of Obama's most important roles in the eyes of environmental groups was to guard against bills being passed by majority House Republicans that would roll back environmental regulations.

"The kind of backstop the Obama presidency has provided against the barrage of anti-environmental attacks from the House is critical, and until the face of the House changes we need that backstop," Pierce said.

That underscores a calculation confronting Obama's liberal supporters: Even if Obama disappoints them, they would have to think twice before voting for his Republican opponent or staying home on Election Day, given how a Republican president might act on issues they are advocating.

So Obama has some latitude to make decisions that will anger interest groups that support him, especially if he mixes in other moves in their favor.

Such as the case this month when the White House announced plans to use foreign aid to promote gay rights abroad.

It was a relatively narrow step on gay rights, and one without great resonance domestically. What gay rights activists would really like Obama to do is endorse gay marriage, a step that seems unlikely before the election.

But Obama's done enough other things, such as repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military, that he's likely to maintain strong support from gay activists even without taking the final step on gay marriage that could hand ammunition to his GOP critics.

With the 2012 election approaching some analysts said it was hard to avoid viewing Obama's decisions through the lens of politics.

"He has no primary challenger and he's in full re-election mode, so he's triangulating, as Bill Clinton would say," said Paul Light, professor of public policy at New York University, using the term for Clinton's strategy of splitting Republican and Democratic differences.

"And that means quashing some major regulations and maneuvering toward the center on a host of issues, and he's perfectly willing to alienate core constituencies like the environmental movement," Light said.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- On issues from air pollution to contraception, President Barack Obama has broken sharply with liberal activists and come down on the side of business interests and social conservatives a...
WASHINGTON -- On issues from air pollution to contraception, President Barack Obama has broken sharply with liberal activists and come down on the side of business interests and social conservatives a...
Filed by Paige Lavender  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,519
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (20 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
goodog 05:33 PM on 12/11/2011
"On issues from air pollution to contraception, President Barack Obama has broken sharply with liberal activists and come down on the side of business interests and social conservatives as he moves more to the political middle for his re-election campaign."
...oooor, he's doubled the emissions standard for autos and funded stem cell research; Removed the gag order on family  Read More...
04:26 PM on 12/16/2011
Liberals have every right to be disillusioned with Obama, because the liberal priorities he eventually ignored or voted against as President are the same ones he campaigned for in 2008. Obama and other Democrats dismissing liberals' disappointment as selfish bellyaching are missing the point by a mile. We liberals supported the public option in healthcare because it would save money. We supported closing Guantanamo and ending the wars because it's the right thing to do, adheres to the rule of law and would save money. We supported ending the Bush tax cuts because it would help the economy and start balancing the budget. We oppose indefinite detention because it flies directly in the face of the Bill of Rights. We support the millionaires tax not because we want to stick it to the wealthy, but because it will help balance the budget. We support the social safety net intact not because we want free stuff, but because we've paid for it our entire working lives and don't think they should be gutted to provide tax cuts for people that don't need them. Liberal values are American values. Obama's mere lip service to liberal and Democratic priorities got the Dems clobbered in 2010 and now put him neck-and-neck with whatever clown emerges from the GOP circus. Obama, you should have listened to us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ekat
09:08 PM on 12/13/2011
Obama cops positions from all over the spectrum to appeal to everybody. There is no coherent vision there. How can you talk economic populism while hobbling financial regulation and pitching in with industry on key environmental issues? This is maneuvering in place of a world view that includes clear, moral, ethical, holistic values informing solid judgement on issues. Totally undermines confidence in the man.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
02:48 PM on 12/12/2011
Obama may be countering GOP efforts, but he is disenfranchising liberal voters who may choose to stay home rather than support a Democrat President who behaves more like a Republican on all the issues that matter.
02:01 PM on 12/12/2011
Sure Obama signed the Congressional removal of Don't ask don't tell - only after he previously had blocked it. Obama is not a friend of gays, of pro-choice groups, unions, students or anyone else on the left. As a liberal, why should I vote FOR him and not AGAINST someone else?
08:05 PM on 12/12/2011
Are you kidding? You might want to go do a little fact checking. Actually I suggest factchec.org.
12:01 AM on 12/13/2011
Does it really make a difference? That is what got him into office last time, and it will work for him again. At this point it is pretty much why should I send a vote his way at all?
01:32 PM on 12/12/2011
Now if we could only talk him into making a decision on something that really mattered- like the Keystone pipeline...

This is all part of parcel of "redefining" himself as a centrist in advance of the coming election. Then, if he wins reelection, he will revert to his normal socialist self. By election day he will be blaming congress for health care reform and promising to repeal it if elected.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:33 PM on 12/12/2011
The Keystone pipeline was slammed through without proper research on the potential effects to sensitive areas of land. All he said was that he wanted further time to study the pros and cons.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
12:54 PM on 12/12/2011
As the GOP has no viable candidate, Obama steps in to help them out in winning.
01:33 PM on 12/12/2011
Obviously he knows a winning philosophy when he sees it. That socialist stuff won't get him elected.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
02:50 PM on 12/12/2011
Really? The vast majority of the country wanted the government insurance option that Obama and the Republicans got rid of. If he behaves too much like a republican, democrats will choose to stay home rather than support a wolf in sheep's clothing.
11:59 AM on 12/12/2011
Where is the Green Party?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
11:44 AM on 12/12/2011
“I’m disillusioned by the people who are disillusioned by Obama, quite honestly, I am,†he said on ABC News Now’s “Popcorn with Peter Travers†before today’s release of “The Ides of March.â€Democrats eat their own. Democrats find singular issues and go, ‘Well, I didn’t get everything I wanted.’ I’m a firm believer in sticking by and sticking up for the people whom you’ve elected.

“If he was a Republican running, because Republicans are better at this,†Clooney continued, “they’d be selling him as the guy who stopped 400,000 jobs a month from leaving the country. They’d be selling him as the guy who saved the auto-industry. If they had the beliefs, they’d be selling him as the guy who got rid of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,’ who got Osama bin Laden. You could be selling this as a very successful three years.†I’m more than disillusioned by these people. I’m sick and tired of them. When you have so-called progressives arguing that Bill Clinton has a better record on LGBT issues than President Obama does, there’s a serious problem. When you have progressives calling for President Obama’s impeachment based on nothing but the opinions of Glenn Greenwald, there’s a serious problem."

"At this point, the Professional Left and their sycophantic gripers inspire more loathing in me than right-wingers." ~ George Clooney
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:36 PM on 12/12/2011
I wouldn't go quite that far (it's really hard to loath anything more than the TP) but yeah, I'm tired of progressives that will never be happy until they get everything they want. Life doesn't work that way.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
02:52 PM on 12/12/2011
And "progressive" candidates that campaign on ending the PATRIOT act and closing Guantanamo, then embrace those abuses of individual rights? I guess your life is all about supporting the lies of politicians and taking what you get instead of demanding what people promised to do. Obama has real integrity issues and has failed to follow through on the majority of his campaign promises.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
11:19 AM on 12/12/2011
There's quite a few right-wingers on here trying to make this headline matter in the real world,. If they spent only half the energy being informed about the Republican field, they would realize they have a true Conservative among them...his name is Jon Huntsman, and he will pull an upset in New Hampshire...the ultra extremist, Ron Paul will take Iowa...and then what are you gonna do?!? Only in the Republican party could a known corrupt politician, who was run out of Washington in shame, by his own Party...be the front runner for the top of the ticket. Now I understand why Republicans don't do anything in Washington but obstruct the policies of the Democratic Party, because that's what their constituents accept and deserve.
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
02:52 PM on 12/12/2011
It's always nice to hear about the weather in fantasy land. Thanks for the update.
08:08 PM on 12/12/2011
You pretty much just proved the posters point. Well done.
11:08 AM on 12/12/2011
We live in a world that is so cynical, it can't even allow the thought that a government official is actually trying to make a decision that will help people. It is automatically assumed that every move is calculated into number of votes. And every issue is turned into some life and death commentary on the entire future of the politician's career.

Another disservice that gets done in these types of works is to inflate the power of the President. He was allegedly super liberal and leaning way left when he got elected. Then suddenly two years later he's a centrist. Did the President change, or was it something else perhaps? Notice that this alleged shift to the right came when Democrats lost control of both chambers of Congress.

It isn't that the President has shifted to the right. It's that only right-shifted laws can have any prayer of passing. Most of the policies in the country are created by Congress. If Democrats were able to win a real 60 seats in the Senate and majority in the House again, you'd suddenly be seeing all sorts of progressive legislation being passed. And it wouldn't be because the President changed.
01:38 PM on 12/12/2011
As the article states, he is trying to "reposition himself" to the center because of the upcoming election. Clinton did the same thing, after getting pounded in the midterms. This is much more prevalent among liberals than conservatives, since most politicians who admit being a liberal and promise liberal policies don't get elected.

As far as the premise that politicians are self serving- certainly not 100%, or 100% of the time...but when was the last time you saw a politican retire poor?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Fraley
10:35 AM on 12/12/2011
Here's our choices:

1. a disingenuous corporate Democrat; that will back-stab us and sell out our interests if it meant appeasement for big business.

2. an extremist Republican lacking in sympathy or humanity.

At this point I'd vote for a Gorilla with a cowboy hat if a third party ran him.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
10:56 AM on 12/12/2011
Well, you'll get your wish, the "Justice Party" is announcing it's candidate at 2pm today. Good luck and God bless.

BTW, the "appeasement" thingy is going nowhere fast.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Fraley
11:22 AM on 12/12/2011
I'm hoping for a hat wearing primate!
MtnGeek
Partisan thinking is an oxymoron
02:53 PM on 12/12/2011
The "appeasement" thingy sure extended the Bush tax cuts though, now didn't it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Fraley
10:29 AM on 12/12/2011
When will Obama learn that regardless how far right he moves, the Conservatives will never accept him. He has yet to play for his base on any issue barring the "dont ask dont tell" slow pitch he bunted.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
11:03 AM on 12/12/2011
I don't think President Obama is looking for acceptance from the extreme Right...he does fine with Conservatives, which btw, are a dying breed. The Republicans running for office, with the exception of Jon Huntsman, are not Conservatives...I'm not sure what the hell they represent.
10:25 AM on 12/12/2011
obama has lost the base. Liberalism has failed.
10:55 AM on 12/12/2011
His support among the base is stronger than ever. If all you read is reporters and bloggers trying to take a piece out of the President, it might look that way.

And your idea of failure is interesting. The right wing causes the near collapse of the world economy, and somehow "liberalism" is a failure for not putting the pieces back together in three years. You probably are one of those people who runs around saying the country is still in a recession and things are worse now than after the collapse, too? Right? Of course those are lies too. But it won't stop people from repeating them.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
PAposter
Radical Progressive
11:07 AM on 12/12/2011
Seems to me you would spend your time finding a Conservative to run for office...you know, like Jon Huntsman, who happens to be a Mormon...so, he doesn't get a second look from you extremists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
10:17 AM on 12/12/2011
Obama got slamed for not negotiating, not compromising and excluding the right (Boehner's excuse for walking out of meetings.) Now he's getting slammed for not having any principles and agreeing with with anyone on anything for votes.

Which is it? You can't have it both ways.

Compromise, concensus and negotiation have never been viewed as good things by the right. Why do they fear those things so much? It's almost as if they agree to those things they may cease to exist.

The only time you don't have to agree on them is under authoritarian rule or in a dictatorship.

Is that what the right is really after?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:40 PM on 12/12/2011
Obama has compromised quite a bit. It's just that the Republicans keep moving the goal posts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
l78lancer
Wisdom is the principal thing
08:53 PM on 12/12/2011
For sure, he did. Thanks for mentioning that. He compromise­d on numerous things from the Health Care Bill to the budget negotiatio­ns last summer. He negotiated on the Stimulus Package. So you're right, every time he got to the 1 yard line the goal post was 99 yards away.

He has always demonstrat­ed a willingnes­s to cooperate - sometimes to a fault I think. So it's a little disturbing to hear folks say that he will say anything just to get votes.
photo
shelagh63
Whatev's
10:02 AM on 12/12/2011
The paradigm is shifting, OWS is a harbinger of such a shift on the Left, and the Tea party--however astro-turf it may be--is prompting the GOP schism. These shifts do not bring complete change over night. The economic crash is the catalyst and fear is the control mechanism of the elites (from both parties) to keep the electorate in line. The system may not disintegrate in our lifetime but nothing lasts forever. Look at the timeline of civilizations starting from the Neolithic era, our system in the the U.S. is about same age as the Golden Age of Greece. Again, nothing lasts forever, yet real societal change does not happen overnight. And that's the rub, what the heck did the potus' base think they were getting when they elected this man that they deified before he took office? A rose garden?