More

'New Year's Eve' Earns $13 Million As Box Office Slumps

Hollywood Sign

DAVID GERMAIN   12/11/11 03:30 PM ET   AP

LOS ANGELES — Hollywood's holidays are off to a dreadful start: Fewer people went to the movies the last two weekends than during the box-office hush that followed the Sept. 11 attacks 10 years ago.

Domestic revenues tumbled to a 2011 low of about $77 million this weekend, when the star-filled, holiday-themed romance "New Year's Eve" debuted at No. 1 with a weak $13.7 million, according to studio estimates Sunday.

It's the worst weekend in more than three years, since the weekend after Labor Day in 2008, when revenues amounted to $67.6 million, according to box-office tracker Hollywood.com. And it comes after an $81 million total a week earlier that had been this year's previous low.

"It's unbelievable how bad it is," said Hollywood.com analyst Paul Dergarabedian.

Jonah Hill's comedy "The Sitter" opened at No. 2 with just $10 million.

Divided by this year's average ticket price of $7.96, the combined $158 million haul means only an estimated 19.8 million people went to the movies the last two weekends. Based on the average ticket price, this year's top-grossing film, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2," drew more people all by itself over opening weekend.

The two lowest-grossing back-to-back weekends of the last decade came amid the nation's shock after the 2001 terrorist attacks, when one of the last things on people's minds was catching a film. Revenues those two weekends totaled just $126 million; divided by 2001's average ticket price of $5.65, that means 22.3 million people went to the movies those weekends right after Sept. 11 – 2.5 million more than over the last two weekends.

A couple of bad weekends don't make a trend, yet domestic revenues have been lagging throughout 2011, a year in which many studio executives expected to do record business. Revenues this year are at $9.57 billion, about 4 percent below last year's, according to Hollywood.com.

Revenues this past weekend are down 17 percent compared to the same period last year, when business totaled $91.8 million, led by a $24 million debut for "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Voyage of the Dawn Treader."

The slowdown the last two weeks followed a quiet Thanksgiving weekend, when new movies failed to pack in the projected droves.

"The audience certainly is available. Unfortunately, they have not come out in the numbers they have in the past," said Dan Fellman, head of distribution at Warner Bros., which released "New Year's Eve," whose cast includes Sarah Jessica Parker, Halle Berry, Robert De Niro, Ashton Kutcher, Hilary Swank and Jessica Biel. "I'm hoping this is just a glitch, and starting next weekend, the box-office will expand."

Next weekend begins Hollywood's end-of-year blockbuster frenzy, with the debuts of Robert Downey Jr.'s "Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows" and the family sequel "Alvin and the Chipmunks: Chipwrecked."

Charlize Theron's comic drama "Young Adult" goes wide after starting in limited release this past weekend, while Tom Cruise's "Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol" launches in huge-screen IMAX theaters before expanding to general release the following week.

Studio bosses generally blame bad weekends on bad movies. Yet while critics trashed "New Year's Eve" and "The Sitter," a lineup of well-reviewed, seemingly must-see family films that include "The Muppets," "Arthur Christmas" and "Hugo" so far have done modest business at best.

Hollywood always has insisted it offers inexpensive entertainment compared to concerts, sports events and other costlier options. But many moviegoers complain about high ticket prices, particularly the extra few dollars it costs to see 3-D films, and they now have more entertainment alternatives than ever with their portable devices and big-screen home theaters.

"I still want to think that our business is product driven, but we're about to find out, because we've got some major films coming," said Chris Aronson, head of distribution at 20th Century Fox, the studio behind "The Sitter" and "Alvin and the Chipmunks." "There's a lot of good stuff coming, and I think audiences are going to be primed."

It might be a different story now if one of the upcoming action movies had opened around Thanksgiving, offering Hollywood's main audience – young males – something to see.

At No. 1 the last three weekends was "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1," whose audience is mainly women. "Breaking Dawn" fell to No. 3 this weekend with $7.9 million, raising its domestic total to $259.5 million.

Behind "Breaking Dawn" has been that rush of family flicks, with nothing fresh out there on the action front in more than a month.

"That has created a major vacuum in the marketplace, not serving that bread-and-butter audience of Hollywood," Dergarabedian said.

Released by Paramount, Theron's "Young Adult" opened in eight theaters and took in $320,000, averaging a strong $40,000 a cinema. That compares to a $3,910 average in 3,505 theaters for "New Year's Eve."

Theron plays a writer going to unnerving extremes to pry an old boyfriend away from his wife.

Focus Features' Cold War thriller "Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy," based on John le Carre's novel, also had a big opening in limited release with $300,737 in four theaters, for a $75,184 average.

The film stars Gary Oldman as le Carre's spymaster George Smiley as he hunts down a Russian mole at the top of British intelligence. The acclaimed film expands to more theaters as Hollywood moves into Academy Awards season.

Estimated ticket sales for Friday through Sunday at U.S. and Canadian theaters, according to Hollywood.com. Where available, latest international numbers are also included. Final domestic figures will be released Monday.

1. "New Year's Eve," $13.7 million ($12.9 million international).

2. "The Sitter," $10 million.

3. "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1," $7.9 million.

4. "The Muppets," $7.1 million ($1.2 million international).

5. "Arthur Christmas," $6.6 million ($14.3 million international).

6. "Hugo," $6.1 million.

7. "The Descendants," $4.4 million.

8. "Happy Feet Two," $3.8 million.

9. "Jack and Jill," $3.2 million.

10. "Immortals," $2.4 million.

___

Estimated weekend ticket sales at international theaters (excluding the U.S. and Canada) for films distributed overseas by Hollywood studios, according to Rentrak:

1. "Puss in Boots," $45.6 million.

2. "The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn – Part 1," $19.8 million.

3. "Arthur Christmas," $14.3 million.

4. "New Year's Eve," $12.9 million.

5. "Happy Feet Two," $10.1 million.

6. "The Adventures of Tintin," $8.1 million.

7 (tie). "Real Steel," $6.6 million.

7 (tie). "Vysotsky: Thank God I'm Alive," $6.6 million.

9. "In Time," $5.9 million.

10. "Tower Heist," $2.9 million.

___

Online:

http://www.hollywood.com

http://www.rentrak.com

___

Universal and Focus are owned by NBC Universal, a unit of Comcast Corp.; Sony, Columbia, Sony Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Classics are units of Sony Corp.; Paramount is owned by Viacom Inc.; Disney, Pixar and Marvel are owned by The Walt Disney Co.; Miramax is owned by Filmyard Holdings LLC; 20th Century Fox and Fox Searchlight are owned by News Corp.; Warner Bros. and New Line are units of Time Warner Inc.; MGM is owned by a group of former creditors including Highland Capital, Anchorage Advisors and Carl Icahn; Lionsgate is owned by Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.; IFC is owned by AMC Networks Inc.; Rogue is owned by Relativity Media LLC.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST ENTERTAINMENT

LOS ANGELES — Hollywood's holidays are off to a dreadful start: Fewer people went to the movies the last two weekends than during the box-office hush that followed the Sept. 11 attacks 10 years ...
LOS ANGELES — Hollywood's holidays are off to a dreadful start: Fewer people went to the movies the last two weekends than during the box-office hush that followed the Sept. 11 attacks 10 years ...
Filed by Jordan Zakarin  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (13 total)
04:21 PM on 12/29/2011
The economy plays a part, but to put it simply there have been so few quality films recently. I think many people are getting tired of overpaying to watch the remakes, sequels, and nothing-but-action 3D flicks that continue to disappoint.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kyle10
those who sharpen perception tend to be antisocial
02:20 PM on 12/12/2011
Wait a minute.

Moviegoers refrain from paying to see "New Year's Eve" is a bellwether of economic conditions?

I'd like to think that's more about taste, hopefully.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TaxpayingVoter
Wait....whut?
02:05 PM on 12/12/2011
In this economy, it's just easier to wait until a movie goes to rental and hit the Red Box or Blockbuster kiosk on the way out of the grocery store.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
01:23 PM on 12/12/2011
Bad model thinking that people can always pay more to see more and more movies, esp. when they are pretty much rehashing old ones.

How bout corporate media get off their butts and make new movies and theater owner it wouldn't hurt to lower prices on tickets and food.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
makebofapay
01:20 PM on 12/12/2011
Hello--We're in a depression. Unlike the last depression where people could go see coming attractions, two movies, a newsreel and a short for 10 cents, these days, we have to pay upwards of $10 to go to the movies and see bunches of commercials, coming attractions and one movie. Now that we all have to pay for TV which should be free, we'll stay home and watch the commercials and a recorded movie. As a result of audience frugality, movie stars may no longer make $20 million per picture. Good.
12:56 PM on 12/12/2011
Everybody complains about the amount of money that is spent of defense spending. The 99%ers want corporations and the wealthy to pay more taxes. Why is Hollwood never attacked in the same way as the corporations in this country? Why are they immune? Yes, you do have a lot of monatary contributions that come form the industry but let's be honest, it's a tax deduction. Too bad they won't donate 50% of studio's profits to health care and education for the next ten years. Do you think that would make a difference? Oh, my bad, they'd just raise ticket prices to cover the shortfall.
11:43 AM on 12/12/2011
All the new technology intruduced on flat screen TV's, and piracy are major contributions for many people opt out of movie theaters. Movie theaters are not so convenient for adult single people anymore. And for families, it is very expensive and especially in this time of the year. But I do not see how movies would get any cheaper with the obsessive compensation packages for actors.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dbrockskk
11:07 AM on 12/12/2011
going to the movies is WAY too expensive
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nycbunny
My micro-bio did not meet their guidelines.
11:05 AM on 12/12/2011
I see alot of movies at the theater (once a week at least, sometimes twice), love the big screen and I'm willing to pay for it but approx 85% of those I see are at Independant Theaters. Most of the big studio stuff is crapola nowadays.
10:59 AM on 12/12/2011
The reason nobody's going to the movies anymore is because the movies are terrible and because people are tired of these privileged actors taking political stances that don't jive with the American experience. Actors need to stick to acting not activism - people resent paying money for bad acting and bad movies and then being told they are bad people because we are living in America. Stop with the political messaging and maybe people will go back to the theatres.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blkbrdsr71
Proud American Citizen
09:45 AM on 12/12/2011
Deadwood!
09:44 AM on 12/12/2011
Hollywood just doesn't get it. The ticket price, snack price, gas used, quality of movie, and time required all need to be considered. The people in Hollywood spend tens or hundreds of millions of dollars on making one movie, so their idea of what the consumer is willing to spend is skewed. I am rarely motivated to go out to a movie because there are too few movies I am interested in seeing and it is cheaper to buy them later on DVD. Seeing a movie in a theater was a big deal when there was a lack of easily accessible entertainment. Yes, some movies are better on the big screen, but the experience is marred by rude people in the theater and the total expediture of money and time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JOHNMEDLIN
sharp left ahead
09:42 AM on 12/12/2011
When more people are out of work than ever before, when the American familys' revenues are down; who can be surprised fewer people are willing to spend their money on anything except a really good movie. It costs nearly 50 bucks for my wife and I to go to a movie and eat treats and soda. It's ridiculous. Especially with on demand. 4 bucks ...the privacy of your own home where you can eat cheap snacks, inbibe, and talk all you want thru the movie. Back it up and watch some scenes again. It's hard to compete with that. Not to mention much safer. 9-12 bucks for a ticket that used to cost a quarter. Wonder why the industry is down.
09:38 AM on 12/12/2011
This year's movies were all saturated with animation movies targeting young audiences with 3D effects with sloppy plots and stories. Got nothing with animation but I guess parents have no interest in taking their kids to see a movie would rather spend on gifts and so forth. And some movies nowadays are less than 2hrs, wanted to see The Sitter but at only 1hr. and 20mins. not counting the previews which make it at least 2hrs. come on Hollywood.
09:37 AM on 12/12/2011
Yeah, these Hollywood execs can offer all the excuses they want. There is no talent and too much entitlement in the movie industry. If we don't give our money to the no-talent "actors," they'll have to find something else to do. Imagine that.