More

Agricultural Profits Pass $100 Billion As Farmers Have One Of Their Best Years Ever

Agricultural Profits

By JIM SUHR   12/12/11 10:30 AM ET   AP

ST. LOUIS -- An Illinois farmer made so much money this year he made loan payments on one tractor a year in advance and exchanged some older ones for newer models. An Iowa farmer upgraded his combine and also paid off debt, while an elderly Oregon farmer poured into retirement funds a bundle of his $2 million take from a well-timed sale of much of his turf and equipment.

While much of America worries about the possibility of a double-dip recession, such stories of prosperity are cropping up as U.S. farmers enjoy their best run in decades, thanks to high prices for many crops, livestock and farmland and strong global demand for corn used in making ethanol.

Farm profits are expected to spike by 28 percent this year to $100.9 billion, and the amount of cash farms have available to pay bills also is expected to top $100 billion – the first time both measures have done so, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. All the while, crop sales are expected to pass the $200 billion mark for the first time in U.S. history, and double-digit increases are expected in livestock sales.

"We're just experiencing the best of times," said Bruce Johnson, an agricultural economist at the University of Nebraska in Lincoln. "It's a story to tell."

That's not to say that everyone is sharing in the good fortune. Near Gardner, Kan., a short drive south of Kansas City, a lack of rain and nagging winds conspired to leave Bill Voigts with about half of the soybeans he expected. His harvest of corn was worse, coming in at about one-third of his normal production. Even with insurance, he didn't quite break even on the 2,400 acres he farms – most of them rented.

"Had it not been for insurance in his area, it'd be a disaster. That's the only thing that saves us," said Voigts, 66.

But he noted that the drought plaguing farmers like him helped drive up prices for commodities like corn, soybeans and wheat, benefitting those fortunate enough to get a good crop.

"At the expense of some farmers, other farmers become wealthy," he said. "That's really the whole story. That's not the government's fault, it's nobody's fault. That's just the way things happen.

"Some people got left behind."

Yet most of the talk about U.S. farming remains bullish, with analysts widely trumpeting "the new normal" in U.S. agriculture: Demand in China, India and other developing countries for U.S. agricultural exports – and hunger for corn for ethanol – has been keeping prices high and farming profitable.

In central Illinois' Morgan County near Jacksonville, Dale Hadden says he was "pleasantly surprised" by the corn and soybeans he got from the some 4,000 acres he works with his brother and their parents, considering they lost about 400 acres of corn to 21 inches of rain in June.

All told, Hadden estimated his crops were worth 10 percent to 15 percent more than in previous years, amounting to tens of thousands of dollars. He spent a chunk of that on an advance full-year payment on a seven-year loan on one of his tractors and to pay down debt on land.

Much of the rest he cautiously set aside.

"It was a successful year," said Hadden, a 38-year-old with two children, ages 11 and 9. "But most farmers would tell you that just because you're flush with cash, you don't spend it all."

In Oregon, 79-year-old Warren Haught sure didn't. With four decades of farming under his belt, Haught – socked by the high cost of electricity to irrigate crops in high desert country – unloaded his 1,500-acre operation a couple of years ago. He pocketed $1.7 million on the land sale and $300,000 from liquidating everything from haying equipment to plows and tractors, using some of proceeds on two new homes – one of him, the other for his son and his family – while saving much of the rest.

"It was a pretty good deal at the time," said Haught, who now has just 72 acres near mountainous Klamath Falls on which he grows alfalfa and grass crops. He'd like to get at least 100 more acres, saying demand for hay in China and other Pacific Rim countries is boosting prices.

"It was kind of the perfect storm – what you had this year brought a good price," he said. "Everything seemed to be a good price."

In western Iowa near Kingsley, Jeff Reinking and his brother – partners in a 2,500-acre operation evenly split between corn and beans – recently traded in a 2006 combine for one three years newer – spoils from what Reinking called "the best year for me." He also paid off some debt and put some money aside in case things aren't always so rosy.

"I guess we're getting the better end of things right now," Reinking said. "That has not always been the case."

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

ST. LOUIS -- An Illinois farmer made so much money this year he made loan payments on one tractor a year in advance and exchanged some older ones for newer models. An Iowa farmer upgraded his combine ...
ST. LOUIS -- An Illinois farmer made so much money this year he made loan payments on one tractor a year in advance and exchanged some older ones for newer models. An Iowa farmer upgraded his combine ...
Filed by Joe Satran  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 169
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
02:58 PM on 12/14/2011
Hard to feel sorry for a 66 year-old farmer who could have retired four years ago. Farming 2,400 acres means he had roughly $2.4 million gross... Did he get a new pickup again this year? My father was a farmer and my brother farms now. I know the scam... and yes he has had a few "good" years!
photo
HazelPethigFan
I don't know until I know
08:39 PM on 12/14/2011
Yeah right....your brother got the farm and you went to college and probably got the job in the big city.

Yes..urban jobs...paid vacations, 401ks, guaranteed, subsidized health insurance, 40-45 hours per week, paid holidays, paid sick days, unemployment compensation, tuition reimbursement, fancy steak meals on the business credit card, pensions, drunken sales meetings. Farmers get NONE of these and YOU know it.

Yeah right...the farmer get's a pickup and you whine. Yeah right...urbanites never buy new cars and useless shiny SUV's do they? LOL!
11:38 AM on 12/14/2011
How much did these profiting farms get in farm subsidies?
02:54 PM on 12/14/2011
Look it up on Ewg.org. You will even find Robert Edward "Ted" Turner the Third on the list of folks who receive farm subsidies.
03:39 PM on 12/14/2011
The one example I looked up (Hadden) only pulled in a little more than 6k personally in 2010 (most recent data), although the farms he's registered to (Hadden Farms and Hadden Farms Inc of which is is a 50% shareholder and 33% shareholder, respectively) pulled in a collective 75k, also in 2010. Make of it what you will.
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
11:23 PM on 12/13/2011
LOL, that's not surprising since my food bill has quadrupled...duh!
09:41 AM on 12/13/2011
The family farm has been the backbone of this country. It is about time things turned around for them after years of being subject to below cost prices for their crops and ignorant perceptions of them being created by the urban socialist media.
11:47 AM on 12/14/2011
Below cost prices for their crops? Have you heard of farm subsidies? They have a tendency (in fact, are designed) to allow the farmer to do this and still make some margin of money. I'm not saying that they aren't due to get a paycheck, but perhaps we can reevaluate our system so there aren't billions of dollars in profits. After all, their profit is often our expenditure.

With that said, these are not "family farms" in the traditional sense. Dale Hadden farms 4,000 acres. 4,000! That's 6.25 square miles! Another subject of this article is 2,500. You think these are "family farms"? These are manufacturing plants run by perhaps a single family, yes, but these are not a good example of the "family farm [that] has been the backbone of this country."
03:01 PM on 12/14/2011
I doubt you would know what a "family farm" is to begin with. Many years my father farmed only to get the same price for grain as the year before. Somehow we made it and I am glad to have learned how to work at a young age. BTW, there is no way a single person can farm 4,000 acres, more likely four to six.
04:12 AM on 12/13/2011
They will still beg for more farm subsudies,,,time to cut the cord on the program to feed the greed !
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keedyk87
03:16 AM on 12/13/2011
Hurrah for me and to hell with my fellow Americans these Christian farmers say! Capitalism tells me my releigeous values are fine as long as Capitalism says they are. So to these Christians money and profits come before relegion and thing worship before their fellow man. These folks will fit right in with the Teapublicans. They are both made of the same cloth!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keedyk87
03:06 AM on 12/13/2011
Yes, the farmers are happy with their profits during a recession. What is good for the goose isn't always good for the gander. One would think that in a supposedly Christian nation people would be a little empethetic with their fellow Americans who are struggling to keep their homes and pay their bills. But in America where Protestan Christianity mainly reigns it's ok to raise food prices on those having a hard time making ends meet because their religeon says it's ok to worship the dollar bill equally along with Jesus. These farmers and grocers really are good Christians aren't they? God bless America, land of legalized greed and home of the self ignorant.
02:33 PM on 12/13/2011
grocery stores have razor thin margins (the real money is in being a processed food maker), and farmers have been losing their farms right and left for decades.

Methinks you are attacking the wrong folks.
01:57 AM on 12/13/2011
Ethanol is such a waste of money, it uses almost as much energy to product and it creates. Stop farm subsidies for not growing crops. While I admit that farming is not the easyiest job we should pay the farmer what the crop is worth vs. subsidies. If that means we pay more at the store but less in taxes, get the government out of farming.
03:03 PM on 12/14/2011
Maybe everyone should just grow their own food?
11:14 AM on 12/15/2011
If you have the room them go for it.
12:56 AM on 12/13/2011
its about time, the farmers have taken the brunt of the recession since long before there was a recession, unfortunatly it is too late for many of the family farms, wtg folks, I hope it stays this way or gets better, I know it has been a very long wait
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lane Campbell
Say what?
12:14 AM on 12/13/2011
Well, thank God. After decades of watching farmers mortgage themselves to the hilt just to make ends meet, and be forced to sell out to Arab speculators to retire their debts, it's nice to see solvency and prosperity returning to the farm belt. I hope that means we can start paring back some of the decades-old farm subsidies; assuming there should be less need for them.
01:12 AM on 12/13/2011
LOL, haven't you noticed that any government subsidy plans don't end?
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
11:25 PM on 12/13/2011
Maybe the real profit was a result of subsidies? Can we fact check that?
09:52 AM on 12/13/2011
In the long term the subsidies were created to keep all of the giant conglomerat farm vendors and suppliers rolling in cash not the farmer
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keith63ply
11:14 PM on 12/12/2011
I wonder how long it will be till U.S. farmers only grow corn? That's where we're headed. Look for another dustbowl era in the next 20 years. Helluva thing to have when global population is growing as it is. Time for our government to stop with the subsidies. Get rid of them all together. Or, are the farmers too big to fail too? This country disgusts me. MONEY-MONEY-MONEY. Greedy bunch of F**KS
11:13 PM on 12/12/2011
Many farmers along the Missouri river lost all of their crops to the flood. Also, did anyone mention that farmers have to pay $200,000 for a combine in order to bring in the crops to feed the people. Their equipment expense costs more than some people pay for a house!!!!! Then there are fuel costs, transportaton, and maintenance costs. Farmers are not rich, some just finally had a good year!
12:37 AM on 12/13/2011
You can't expect to run a multi million dollar business without an investment or operating costs.
01:01 AM on 12/13/2011
In the late 60's, I helped to develope the new wave John Deere Combine, it was supposed to be sold for under 40K for the 7700 series, it was discusting to see it quickly ballon to over 100K, John Deere and all of the equipment manufacturers got greedy and nearly killed the market, the price of grain remained more or less unchanged to the farmer for over 30 years while the cost increased 20 fold. Thye farmer still sells for about 20% of wha the consumer pays, too many middle men screw the farmers at every turn.
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
11:26 PM on 12/13/2011
Straveler - design another one and put em out of business - go American baby!
rockymtnal
The spaces between your words make the most sense.
10:56 PM on 12/12/2011
Tell it to the melon farmers in Rocky Ford, whose businesses got trashed by a guy on a farm 100 miles away who was calling his melons "Rocky Ford."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gabe Brummett
left wing/right wing - same bird.
10:50 PM on 12/12/2011
so are these farmers who are making millions actually growing food for people? or feed for animals in CAFOs, or corn for ethanol, or soy for biodiesel, or just plain food additives? what about the small farmers who make their living at farmers markets and.or selling to local cooperatives? are they making millions too?
photo
special38x2
Live, Love, & Laugh
11:28 PM on 12/13/2011
Good point, this isn't a fair and balanced view - something tells me somebody wants us to believe the little farmer is doing well as a whole...propaganda
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zanytothemaxx
10:44 PM on 12/12/2011
Hey....what about Riceland Foods, they have raked in $555 million in farm subsidies over the last 15 years. Farm subsidies were designed to help struggling farmers but they have turned into a wefare program for big and rich farmers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:49 AM on 12/13/2011
Hey...Riceland is a cooperative with "9,000 farmer-members in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri and Texas".
That comes out to an average of little over 4 grand per farmer per year.