More

Eric Holder Vows To Use Justice Department To Enforce Voting Rights

Eric Holder Voting Rights 2012

PETE YOST and APRIL CASTRO   12/13/11 09:12 PM ET   AP

AUSTIN, Texas — Attorney General Eric Holder vowed Tuesday to fully enforce civil rights protections in next year's elections amid a flurry of activity by states to redraw political boundaries and impose requirements that could reduce voting by minorities who enthusiastically supported Barack Obama in the 2008 election.

Giving his most expansive speech on civil rights since taking office, the nation's chief law enforcement officer declared that "we need election systems that are free from fraud, discrimination and partisan influence – and that are more, not less, accessible to the citizens of this country."

He urged the country to "call on our political parties to resist the temptation to suppress certain votes in the hope of attaining electoral success."

"Instead, encourage and work with the parties to achieve this success by appealing to more voters," Holder said during an appearance in Austin, Texas.

Currently, the Justice Department is reviewing new requirements in Texas and South Carolina requiring voters to produce a photo ID before casting ballots. The department also is examining changes that Florida has made to its electoral process – imposing financial penalties on third-party voter registration organizations like the League of Women Voters when they miss deadlines and shortening the number of days in the early voting period before elections.

Most of the changes have been promoted and approved by Republicans, who argue they are needed to avert voter fraud. Democrats, citing studies suggesting there is little voter fraud, say the measures are actually aimed at reducing minority votes for their candidates.

Where a state can't meet its legal burden in showing an absence of discriminatory impact, "we will object," the attorney general said in his speech at the Lyndon Baines Johnson Presidential Library and Museum. As president in 1965, Johnson was instrumental in passing the landmark law the Justice Department now uses to ensure voting rights in Texas, South Carolina and all or parts of 14 other states. Most of the 16 states are in the South and all of them with a history of discrimination against blacks, American Indians, Asian-Americans, Alaska Natives or Hispanics.

Besides Texas and South Carolina, Alabama, Kansas, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Tennessee and Wisconsin have enacted more stringent voter ID laws this year.

"Over the years, we've seen all sorts of attempts to gain partisan advantage by keeping people away from the polls – from literacy tests and poll taxes, to misinformation campaigns telling people that Election Day has been moved, or that only one adult per household can cast a ballot," said Holder.

In light of that history, the attorney general announced he supports Democratic-sponsored legislation that would require stiff criminal penalties for distributing false communications such as the wrong date or time for elections, giving inaccurate information about voter eligibility or promoting false endorsements of candidates. The bill was to be introduced Wednesday by Sens. Ben Cardin of Maryland and Chuck Schumer of New York.

Among civil rights leaders on hand for Holder's speech was Wade Henderson, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Henderson said the poll taxes and literacy tests of an earlier era "are today embodied in state laws that require photo IDs to vote and that limit early voting, provisional voting and voter registration."

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, a former Texas attorney general, said voter identification laws are constitutional and necessary to prevent fraud at the ballot box.

"Facing an election challenge next year, this administration has chosen to target efforts by the states to protect the democratic process," said Cornyn, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

Johnson's two daughters, Lynda Johnson Robb and Luci Baines Johnson, listened to Holder's speech from the front row of a packed auditorium with other family members.

Holder was appearing in a Republican-controlled state which has taken a redistricting dispute with civil rights groups all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Texas added four congressional seats based on population gains in the 2010 census. Minority groups sued in federal court in San Antonio, arguing the Legislature's redistricting maps did not reflect growth in the state's Hispanic and black populations.

Currently, minorities are the majority in 10 of Texas' 32 congressional districts. A new map drawn by a three-judge federal court in San Antonio would raise that to 13 out of 36 districts, an outcome the judges said better reflected the growth in the state's Hispanic population.

The three-judge panel also drew redistricting maps that appeared to give Democrats a greater chance of winning seats in the Texas state House and state Senate than did the plans approved by those bodies and signed into law by Republican Gov. Rick Perry.

The state went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear the case and blocked the court-drawn maps pending the outcome of the lawsuit.

Earlier, a federal court in Washington had refused to approve the Texas Legislature's redistricting plan without a trial, agreeing with the U.S. Justice Department that there was sufficient evidence to question whether the Legislature hurt minority representation.

"The most recent census data indicated that Texas has gained more than 4 million new residents – the vast majority of whom are Hispanic," said Holder. "However, this state has proposed adding zero additional seats in which Hispanics would have the electoral opportunity envisioned by the Voting Rights Act."

On the voter ID issue, Texas Democrats, voting-rights advocates and minority groups had harshly criticized the photo ID law, but were unable to block its passage in the Republican-controlled Legislature.

In September, the Justice Department's civil rights division said it needed the racial breakdown and counties of residence of the estimated 605,500 registered voters in Texas who do not have a state-issued license or ID. The division also asked how many of voters have Spanish surnames. Under the federal Voting Rights Act, the new Texas law needs Justice Department approval to take effect.

___

Yost reported from Washington, D.C.

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
AUSTIN, Texas — Attorney General Eric Holder vowed Tuesday to fully enforce civil rights protections in next year's elections amid a flurry of activity by states to redraw political boundaries a...
AUSTIN, Texas — Attorney General Eric Holder vowed Tuesday to fully enforce civil rights protections in next year's elections amid a flurry of activity by states to redraw political boundaries a...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,086
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
02:07 PM on 12/30/2011
Allowing Mr. Holder in his role as US Attorney General is the same as placing a career pedophile in charge of a day care.
11:56 AM on 12/19/2011
Just wondering when Holder will be extradited to Mexico for the Fast & Furious debacle that cost the lives of 100's of Mexican citizens and (if I am not mistaken) an American border guard.
11:14 AM on 12/19/2011
To require that an individual verifies that they are a lawful citizen and resident in order to exercise their right to vote constitutes the most minimum civic responsibility. To open a bank account, rent a car or even pay for a pizza with a credit card, I had to show an ID, so is it too much to ask for prospective voters to do the same? Frankly, I believe that the declining quality of political life would improve if we were to introduce more voting requirements such a test that demonstrated basic literacy, knowledge of current events, the constitution and economics. Would that discriminate? Of course it would, but not against any race, color or creed, but against the ignorant, which do not yet constitute a protected class. I suspect that with such a policy we would have less meat head candidates on the right and the the left.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
12:43 PM on 12/16/2011
This blivet states that the State laws interfer with voting rights.Since the States don't interfer with the voting right of US citizens,where does he get this notion from.Every US citizen can vote provided they can prove they are a citizen of the US.How does that interfer with voting?
Since he is interested in protecting voters rights then I am sure he is interested in assuring they have the right to vote.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:18 AM on 01/27/2012
I think if Eric Holder put some of these people and their backers in jail, maybe, you and others like you will understand.

The idea of these congress people can go after him without retaliation is beyond me.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
12:14 PM on 12/16/2011
Where everyone is treated the same there is no racial profiling or dicrimination.
Holder used the term "eligible citizens"instead of "citizens of the U.S."
States are not prohibited from requiring identification. As a matter of fact the States can require more strict qualifications applied to all voters.Such is the case with identification,
This is another corrupt tactic of the Obama administration to get illegal minority votes which is a very large number.We expect candidates to be US citizens elected by U.S. citizens.
There is nothing in the Constitution granting anyone this authority.They have no such responsibility to the citizens of the U.S.
The Voting Rights Act does not prohibit identification requirements.No U.S.citizen is being denied the right to vote.EVERYONE must show an ID.
The notion of racial profiling is a politically correct term. Racism is a social phenomenon, discrimination a legally prohibited act.Every act of racism is attempted to be turned into a crime or hate crime.
To be "discrimate" is an act of prudence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
11:32 AM on 12/16/2011
Where is this in the Constitution. Perhaps the 15th Amendment covers it.However the government does not have the above power nor is it Constitutional.What will they register as?
In another article he referred to "all eligible"citizens and not"all citizens of the U.S.
The ineligible voters will be illegals and minorities who will vote for Obama.
The Voting Rights Act does not prohibit asking for Identification.Furthermore if civil rights are to be protected this mean for all citizens of the U.S.Also the States can make more strict
requirements than the Federal Law.If the majority must produce identification then so must everyone.Nor is anyone denying persons of race or color the right to vote.
This has become necessary for prevention of fraud and the prohibition of voting corrupting.
The majority of people have every right to insist on this if one wants to talk about civil rights
No one is acting to reduce minority votes only the minority who have no right to vote because they are not citizens.There is no racial profiling here.There is no discrimination where all are treated the same
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nicko68
07:25 AM on 12/16/2011
Perhaps we should check your papers, Mr Holder.
01:50 PM on 12/15/2011
Election Fraud is the problem and has been since at least 1988 and is going in one direction and one direction only...to the Republicans...http://bit.ly/uHsOw6
11:40 AM on 12/15/2011
Why didn't Holder do something about the men walking around with Billy Clubs watching people enter the polling centers? Let's hope he Resigns before the next election. While in Texas, he should have taken a ride over to the Borders, he may have seen some illegals entering th United States.
03:21 PM on 12/15/2011
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh the fake Black Panthers, you're one of those low information voters who watch Fox News that I read about aren't you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sarah Cuse
Truth is the recognition of reality
01:19 PM on 12/19/2011
Perhaps it is a good time to debunk a few of the myths surrounding the dismissal of the Panther case - especially because we now have facts from internal Department of Justice reports and sworn testimony.

First, there was sworn testimony from eyewitnesses that voters indeed turned away at the sight of the club-wielding Black Panthers. A favorite canard of Holder's defenders has been that no voters were affected. Multiple eyewitnesses, including Chris Hill and Bartle Bull, testified under oath to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that they saw voters intimidated by the Panthers.

Those who support the dismissal of the case mock those who believe intimidation occurred, accusing them of being afraid "of scary black men." Yet those hurling such racialist taunts overlook an important fact - even Holder's Justice Department disagrees with them. After all, it pursued an injunction, albeit a paltry one, against Shabazz. If he committed voter intimidation, then certainly so did codefendant Jerry Jackson. Sworn and uncontroverted testimony revealed that Jackson acted in unison with the armed Shabazz to block the entrance to the polls.

Second, the internal ethics investigation of the dismissal revealed hostility toward using civil rights laws against minority wrongdoers. This testimony was given under penalty of perjury. Multiple lawyers stated that it is a common view inside this Justice Department that black wrongdoers should not be defendants in civil rights cases. The attorneys providing this testimony were longtime department employees, and liberals.
12:42 AM on 12/15/2011
Attorney General Holder is a bit late to speak up about this violation of every eligible American to vote. If they go to court in each state where these discriminatory practices are occurring, the likelihood is that Republican appointed Judges will just hold up on hearing these cases until after the 2012 election thus affecting the outcome of the election. It is time for the Occupy Democracy Movement to take direct action; go into each precinct where these illegal voter registration measures are, find out how to get people registered legally and just have massive voter registration drives. Each time the Occupy Movement supports members of the 99% with direct action, the more relevant the Occupy Movement becomes. Occupy Democracy Now!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Dick Stone
My Andalusian works hard and loves his job
11:24 PM on 12/14/2011
Eric Holder is as anti American as it gets, of course that is what one would expect from an anchor baby of parents from Barbados. Eric is also another thing that we can hold against the Clinton's since it was Bill that launched this Anti American's career.
11:16 PM on 12/14/2011
Amazing what a liar will do for his fellow liars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:17 PM on 12/14/2011
The left call it '"disingenuous" instead of lying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ameri Bunker
12:00 AM on 12/15/2011
You still buying into the 'left versus right' thing?
11:14 PM on 12/14/2011
That's nice. The avowed racist is making sure that the usual Democrat cheating can continue. How does this man even have the nerve to make any declarations when he should be on a train out of town? Lying ^&**&
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
scat
There, it is no longer empty
11:07 PM on 12/14/2011
why does this clown still have a job.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bruce Barron
11:35 AM on 12/16/2011
Because it is a circus.
09:32 PM on 12/14/2011
Since Holder is trying to ensure the integrity of the voting system - has he figured out the easiest way to get dimpled ballots and hanging chads is to try to punch multiple ballots at the same time.