iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station: Nebraska Facility Has More Issues

Fort Calhoun Nuclear Station Nebraska

JOSH FUNK   12/13/11 08:08 PM ET   AP

OMAHA, Neb. — Several new problems have been found at a Nebraska power plant that suffered flood damage earlier this year, federal regulators said Tuesday, so inspectors will be watching the plant north of Omaha even more closely as repairs from flooding are made.

The tougher oversight for the Omaha Public Power District plant in Fort Calhoun will likely further delay its restart from early next year until sometime in the spring as it makes repairs from the summer flooding. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said none of the new issues represents a public safety threat, but the growing number of problems, combined with the prolonged shutdown, requires more scrutiny.

Fort Calhoun has been shut down since April, when it was being refueled. Flooding along the Missouri River then forced it to remain closed as floodwaters surrounded the plant.

NRC spokesman Victor Dricks told The Associated Press that the new problems at the plant include deficiencies in the Omaha Public Power District's emergency response and either a design or installation flaw that contributed to a fire in June. Inspectors also found flaws in the way the utility's analysis of how the plant would withstand different accident conditions such as earthquakes, tornadoes or loss of coolant.

The plant was already facing extra oversight because of the failure of a key electrical part during a test in 2010 and deficiencies in flood planning that were also found last year. Fort Calhoun might not be receiving so much attention if it hadn't had the other recent regulatory problems.

"In light of all that, the senior managers of the NRC are going to increase oversight at Fort Calhoun even further," Dricks said.

Utility officials began looking for ways to improve Fort Calhoun's operations earlier this year after the first couple of regulatory concerns were identified. The utility has submitted a detailed improvement plan to the NRC that regulators approved. The utility's chief nuclear officer, Dave Bannister, has acknowledged the performance problems at Fort Calhoun and promised to improve.

Utility officials say they are committed to doing whatever it takes to repair Fort Calhoun.

"OPPD has and will continue to aggressively and thoroughly address these issues until they are resolved," said utility President and CEO W. Gary Gates. "We are committed to returning Fort Calhoun Station to its normal high-performing plant status as soon as possible."

David Lochbaum, nuclear safety director at the advocacy group Union of Concerned Scientists, said he could think of only a handful of times when the NRC has used this inspection approach, but that's partly because the nation's 65 nuclear power plants are rarely shut down as long as Fort Calhoun has been. He said many of the regulations the NRC uses to measure how well a nuclear plant is operating are based on things that happen while it is running.

Lochbaum praised the way the NRC is handling the situation.

"The good news is the NRC is doing its job," said Lochbaum, a former nuclear plant engineer.

At the height of the summer flooding, the Missouri River rose about 2 feet above the elevation of the base of the plant. The utility erected a network of barriers and set up an assortment of pumps to help protect its buildings. The plant remained dry inside, and officials said Fort Calhoun could withstand flooding up to 7 or 8 feet higher.

Two of the new violations are related to a small fire at Fort Calhoun that briefly knocked out the cooling system for used fuel in June. Temperatures at the plant never exceeded safe levels and power was quickly restored.

The utility declared an alert when the fire happened, but Dricks said it failed to notify state emergency response officials within 15 minutes, as required. NRC inspectors also determined that the part that caused the fire was either designed incorrectly or installed wrong.

Utility officials said last month that Fort Calhoun might resume generating electricity as early as January, but the additional inspections announced Tuesday will likely delay that a couple of months.

Before Tuesday's announcement, Fort Calhoun was one of only two nuclear power plants in the nation at level four of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's oversight system. This new move will put Fort Calhoun in a special category for plants that are shut down where regulators will have broad authority to conduct inspections.

___

Online:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: http://www.nrc.gov

OPPD Fort Calhoun plan: http://www.oppd.com/AboutUs/22_007203

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

OMAHA, Neb. — Several new problems have been found at a Nebraska power plant that suffered flood damage earlier this year, federal regulators said Tuesday, so inspectors will be watching the pla...
OMAHA, Neb. — Several new problems have been found at a Nebraska power plant that suffered flood damage earlier this year, federal regulators said Tuesday, so inspectors will be watching the pla...
Filed by Chris Gentilviso  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 100
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
06:04 PM on 12/19/2011
This is good news and shows that Jackzo is turning things around for the better at the NRC. It is rare to get a good report from the UCS concerning NRC oversight. We need strong safety priorities for nuclear reactors.
09:45 PM on 12/14/2011
CONT'D
3) Separated fecal (carbon) and Urine (nitrogen) treated separately fertilize the earth abundantly in proportion to human numbers without limit. Fecal = 20% of fuel needs through anaerobic conversion to methane already dangerously abundant in our sewer systems. Flushing and burning these primary materials pollute rivers and air.

4) Home & building energy efficiencies through insulation and design provide another 20% of energy needs. When we don't channel this energy our homes remain unpleasant sieves to the elements.
5) The river bridges around most cities concentrate kinetic water and wind force around the pylons. Pylon mounted Linear axis helical water and wind turbines below and above the water line without dams = 20%.

We are already at 100% but there are thousands of material (compost, waves, recycling etc) energy sources which untapped damage our infrastructure still crying out for our attention. The central electrical generator sites such as nuclear, coal hydro dams, ambient wind farms, etc lose 5% of energy produced per 100 miles of transmission line (maintenance and transmission loss) so that most systems lose 50% of energy produced. The transmission lines are clear-cut simplified non-productive environments with Electro-Magnetic-Field EMF damaging to human and wild-life for tens of thousands of miles. The ease of harnessing complementary abundant energy already from building infrastructure and human physiology around us, damages us while we 'fixate' upon the military imposed manic submissive mindset of artificial sources.
https://sites.google.com/site/indigenecommunity/design/9-complementary-energy
01:42 PM on 12/15/2011
Passive solar is great.

Solar PV and wind can produce no net energy without adding massive storage at a buck a kwh.

Their is no such thing as distributed energy as massive transmission lines are required for the many times that wind and solar are not producing locally.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:48 PM on 12/15/2011
FF. human poo alone can supply 15% of our total energy needs. add animal poo, and all the stuff we dump, and efficiency, plug in hybrids and waste bio char can supply all the backup energy offshore wind and rooftop solar need.
09:41 PM on 12/14/2011
Pro-nuke represents a mind very submissive to centralized authority. Central authority has its design problems based upon submission to insecurity rather than truth. Insecurity is fed by false perceptions of scarcity even though the open mind realizes we are so awash in untapped energy. When we don't capture the following energy of which each can contribute 20% of our energy and material needs, then we destroy our environment. By spending massive amounts of money to unsuccessfully 'invent' such complex energy such as nuclear power, we aren't taking responsibility for the abundant gifts the planet freely offers:
1) Passive South Side Solar windows with overhangs or porches (keep our summer sun) allow for the greatest depth penetration and on site storage by heating the common articles found in our rooms). Uncaptured sun destroys building skins, is harmful to Climate Change and our felt environment. Passive & Active (photovoltaic & water heating) solar when fed into the grid easily provide 20% of energy needs.
2) building mounted wind with linear axis helical turbines capture the excessive wind shear (12 times ambient wind force) on our building (windward roof line and walls) and street corners. Uncaptured wind destroys building skins & windows as well as making our homes and communities less pleasant for humans and wildlife. Wind easily provides 20% of energy needs when fed into the grid.
CONTINUED to 100% +++
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism every day
08:05 PM on 12/16/2011
Have you ever worked or even been in a nuclear power plant to know what's even going on at the plant.
Like even knowing anything about nuclear power or radiation?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
10:55 PM on 12/31/2011
The founders were Locke liberals against the Burke conservative 1000 richest families and their empire and multinationals. Is that who you are for? The Tories?

But you think you know something about nukes? wow.

Nukes more expensive the rooftop solar, twice wind and waste, 4 times efficiency trillion dollar disasters every year if all nukes, million year waste, and civilization ending proliferation.

What part did you like?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Williams
Don't worry ! Nothing is going to be OK !!!
12:56 PM on 12/14/2011
Same old story ~ Nuke VS. Anti Nuke ... We need power and it seems it will cost us our existance !
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:50 PM on 12/15/2011
True, take a stand. I already fanned you, I know you know the right choice. ;)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:01 PM on 01/17/2012
"Feels strongly both ways" is not taking a stand. It's called waffling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
12:52 PM on 12/14/2011
"The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said none of the new issues represents a public safety threat"

A shame you have to dig for that in here.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:50 PM on 12/15/2011
A shame you believe it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:17 AM on 01/09/2012
A shame you disparage a government agency that has provided a perfect safety record, with no deaths or injuries from radiation in the entire history of the U. S. nuclear power industry, with no facts and no proof. You sir are a liar.
09:12 AM on 12/14/2011
From what I understand is that there are newer and safer designs/technology for using/building nuclear plants. Why haven't we allowed the companies that want to put in the new safer types of reactors to do it? I understand the issue of the waste from the older plants but the new plants offer better containment/reuse technologies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
09:59 AM on 12/14/2011
It is very simple: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
12:22 PM on 12/14/2011
Ah, if only hard questions really could be answered by holding down the '$' key! But no. Of course it is not as simple as that. The new designs are not only safer, but cheaper. So '$$$' does not explain why they are not being used.

They are not being used because the nuclear industry has a really bad reputation right now. Even before Fukushima, it was impossible for power companies to get financing for starting new nuclear plant construction in the US and much of the rest of the world. Why? Because the banks and the banks insurance companies do not believe the industry's estimates, they believe the cost to insure against accidents is still way too high.

Of course, this is not a problem in Russia and China, which are still very much command economies. India is still going ahead only with massive government support, too.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
07:04 PM on 12/14/2011
Correct. Mark down a rare point of agreement.

Big Fossil does not want to see its near-monopoly on US electrical generation shattered, and as the most largest and most profitable group of companies on the planet, it has the necessary lobbying muscle to protect its interests by buying Congress and misinforming the public.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
07:02 PM on 12/14/2011
There are.

We have not built them because of an unholy alliance of misinformed 'green' voters and Big Fossil has formed to prevent us from replacing fossil fuels in the name of 'safety'. Their actions have delivered us anything but safety.

I suggest you write to your Congresspeople and ask that question.
08:17 AM on 12/14/2011
Clean renewable energy has none of these dangers, it is cheaper, it is safer, and it is far more abundant than any other energy source.
photo
4everright
My heart went boom
11:08 AM on 12/14/2011
great as long as the sun is shining or the wind is blowing.
01:55 PM on 12/14/2011
Storage technology and transmission lines fix that problem.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:18 AM on 01/29/2012
Waste bio char bio fuels. get it?
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism every day
08:11 PM on 12/16/2011
Like all the toxic lithium batteries?

Wind and solar are 5 to 8 times more expensive than nuclear per megawatt/hr produced.
Nuclear $38/hr
Wind $125/hr
solar $250/hr
08:13 PM on 12/16/2011
Dear VMF,

Nuke power is not economical if you look at the hole picture, but coal, and natural gas are.

What we need to do is get pass the stupid it is cool to be green, and ask ourselves what is the best way to produce energy, and it is simple, coal, and natural gas are.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
02:19 AM on 01/29/2012
No, solar is and nukes are about the same 16 cents per KWH bussbar, before the 500M$ per reactor per year nukes get.

Wind and waste about 6 cent, and efficiency less than 3 cents.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
10:54 PM on 12/13/2011
Good grief! No more Nuclear! Look at Fukushima damn it!!
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
01:56 AM on 12/14/2011
So what? Russia, China and India are not listening to you. They saw what happened at Fukushima and are proceeding with their own plans to build lots and LOTS of nuclear power plants. Most will be safer than any US plant, since they use newer, safer designs.
08:15 AM on 12/14/2011
Russia, China and India are being irresponsible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
12:53 PM on 12/14/2011
well no every country depends on nuclear - even Germany is using large amounts of nuclear power. They just import it.
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism every day
08:12 PM on 12/16/2011
We need to build even more plants.
Syllogizer
Barely Left of Pobedonostsev
09:18 PM on 12/16/2011
But we need to be more careful than TEPCO was with Fukushima. Otherwise, as Russia, India and China build so many more plants, radiation will affect a LOT more people than in Japan. And that would be bad.
09:18 PM on 12/13/2011
As Fukushima continues to prove, whatever way you look at it, nuclear is DEAD.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
10:55 PM on 12/13/2011
I agree with you! FF
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jtt
-
12:50 PM on 12/14/2011
As there have been no casualties? what are the comparable numbers for other technologies?
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
09:04 PM on 12/14/2011
cancer
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:38 PM on 12/13/2011
US nukes are all just a cooling system failure away from meltdown and world radiation cancer causing disaster.

Shut down the worst 10% NOW.

Rooftop solar is cheaper than nukes.

Wind and waste bio char are half that or less.

There is no excuse for more nuclear.

BTW, year long outages are common for US nukes. not rare. Half of all US nukes have had year long outages.
10:47 PM on 12/13/2011
Every solar panel will be out at least six months out of the year. Those six months just happens to be when you want your lights on.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
10:55 PM on 12/13/2011
Baloney PLUTONIUM MAN.
08:16 AM on 12/14/2011
That is a BIG LIE.  The sun still shines in the winter.  The wind blows very strongly in the winter, which could give us lots of wind power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeMustDoBetter09
10:57 PM on 12/13/2011
No more Excuses and No more possibilities of Japan here!!
FAVED
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
11:17 PM on 12/13/2011
I have stopped responding to the pro nuke fanatics. From what I have read, paid commenters don't get as much if we ignore them. I add comments next to theirs if needed, so they they can't profit. Perhaps that ends up with us talking next to each other, and that seems fine.