More

Newt Gingrich's Past Immigration Statements Shed Light On His Current Positions

Newt Gingrich Immigration

First Posted: 12/13/11 07:06 PM ET Updated: 12/14/11 08:32 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Long before he was a GOP presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich knocked the Bush administration for its effort to ensure all workers -- regardless of immigration status -- were paid for their work in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

"The government of the United States is currently insisting that everybody in the Katrina recovery make sure they pay all of their illegal workers," he said in an April 2006 speech at the American Enterprise Institute. "Now again, I am not for cheating anybody who came here, but I just want to suggest to you, this is so out of touch with reality, that it's baroque. It makes no sense at all. In a country which wants to crack down on illegality, the United States government is helping it."

Gingrich's position in 2006 doesn't necessarily jibe with the statements he has made during the Republican presidential debates, many of which have prompted his opponents to brand him as a supporter of some type of amnesty. But the truth of the matter is that those debates have left many questions unanswered about the immigration reform policies he would pursue as president. A review of his past speeches and policy pronouncements offers more specifics, filling in details about how he would deal with the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States.

On border enforcement, Gingrich has joined with other candidates who insist a fence along the U.S.-Mexico border is the first step toward solving the problem of unauthorized immigration. He signed a pledge earlier this month to build a double fence along the border within his first year as president. The pledge has only been signed by one other candidate, immigration hardliner Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), and allows the two to tout themselves as the toughest on border security.

That pledge has a little-mentioned caveat: the fence only needs to be built on areas requested by the Department of Homeland Security, which is currently asking for very few additional miles of border fence.

In fact, Gingrich's 2006 policy position on the border specifically says that a full fence along the border is unnecessary. Instead, he said the government should "pick some easy wins" in high-traffic areas and build fences there, using technology to detect illegal border-crossers elsewhere.

"I think where there are large concentrations of people, you have fences," he said in his 2006 American Enterprise Institute speech. "Where there are not large concentrations of people, you have electronic devices. I think you apply the amount of manpower you need to do the job."

For those undocumented immigrants already living in the country, Gingrich's tone has remained consistent over the past five years. In 2006, he said, "running around trying to deport people ... is not a sustainable policy. I think it is an anti-human policy." In 2011, he has said undocumented immigrants should be treated in a "humane" way, advocating legalization -- though not citizenship -- for some long-time immigrants.

"If you've been here 25 years and you got three kids and two grandkids, you've been paying taxes and obeying the law, you belong to a local church, I don't think we're going to separate you from your family, uproot you forcefully, and kick you out," he said on a recent CNN debate.

In a June 2007 document entitled "Ten Simple, Direct Steps to a Legal American Immigration System," Gingrich wrote that he wanted to send all undocumented immigrants home before allowing some to return with legal status, rather than allowing some to remain in the United States at the discretion of citizen review boards as he advocates now.

"[T]hey should be required to go home and get the visa at home," he wrote. "This way they are beginning their new career in America by obeying the law."

Gingrich is a long-time supporter of some type of immigration reform, but he insists the 2006 bill put forward by Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.), and supported by then-President George W. Bush would legalize too many undocumented immigrants.

He offered up support in 2010 for an immigration reform plan by the president's brother, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, who is considered a moderate on immigration among Republicans. The Bush plan calls for comprehensive immigration reform including legalization for some undocumented immigrants already in the United States. That plan is largely similar to the one Gingrich is touting during his campaign, recommending a major reform of the employer-based visa system, increased border enforcement and crackdowns on employers who hire undocumented workers.

Gingrich's 2010 statements point to a consistent view that some of the country's undocumented immigrants should be given a chance to stay, a position that has put him at odds with a current GOP field that largely stresses deportation over fixing the immigration system.

"I am for immigration reform and the person who I think has had the most courageous position in this is Jeb Bush," he told Univision's Jorge Ramos in October 2010. "Jeb Bush is co-author of a report on immigration reform, which is much bolder than the Republicans will be ready to be in Washington, but he moves us in the right direction."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Long before he was a GOP presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich knocked the Bush administration for its effort to ensure all workers -- regardless of immigration status -- were paid for t...
WASHINGTON -- Long before he was a GOP presidential candidate, Newt Gingrich knocked the Bush administration for its effort to ensure all workers -- regardless of immigration status -- were paid for t...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
02:43 AM on 12/15/2011
lets take a stand against illegal aliens abcalliance.bbnow.org
photo
hawaiianstile
all hail the balance of nature.
08:33 PM on 12/14/2011
racism and thievery, the true american way ;)
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
07:51 PM on 12/14/2011
Spending time, money or effort on making sure that illegals are paid correctly is very strange ... it's like a thief robs a bank, and the police give them an escort so they can keep the loot.
05:11 PM on 12/14/2011
COMPLETE SOLUTIONS AND DETERRENCE TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION:
YES TO A FULLY FUNDED, FEDERAL LAW, that after paying fines, taxes, passing criminal check, to GIVE renewable, 5 YR. TEMPORARY GUEST WORKER’S/STUDENT’S VISAS to make illegal aliens legal (NOT PERMANENT RESIDENTS); allow such aliens to: work and be productive; have drivers license/state id/visa-legal residency id, ssn (no more identity thieves); pay taxes, social security, qualify for ss retirement; GO TO SCHOOL/COLLEGE; and join our military.
YES TO EQUAL PROTECTION AND EQUAL WAIT--that all applicants for permanent residency or citizenship must apply, qualify, and WAIT IN LINE BASED ON EXISTING LAWS.
NO TO EQUAL PROTECTION-VIOLATIVE “AMNESTY”—NO to “any path to permanent residency or citizenship BASED ON NEW LAW”. AMNESTY IS A SURE AND PROVEN ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAGNET.
YES to secure our borders with zero illegal entry goal, with more border patrol agents, with using our military, civilian volunteers, DRONES, aircrafts, satellites, gadgets, fences, etc., whatever it takes or cost.
YES to fully funded, federal law requiring MANDATORY AND NATIONAL “secure communities” and “e-verify” programs; and add jail time to "e-verify" employers-violators.
YES to a fully funded, federal law constitutionally empowering state’s, county’s, cities’, and local police or law enforcement officers, with adequate non-discrimination training, to check for id/legal residency during their normal police duties, such as traffic stops (such as what police in foreign countries you visit do when you are stopped, such as in mexico or europe).
photo
freedom1947
sarcasm, cynicism
04:55 PM on 12/14/2011
Sure, don't protect their wages. Make them work cheaper, so the Repubs can take advantage of making more money. It's the American way to thieve someone for your own gain.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nypapajoe
01:13 PM on 12/14/2011
Newt should know about wages! He got paid Lobbyist wages to do "Historian" work!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:39 AM on 12/14/2011
Let me tell you about wage theft laws. They are meant to protect American citizens. My state has such a law and employers are told it is a crime not to pay wages owed "even if the worker is undocumented". If contractors know they have to pay their undocumented workers there is less incentive to hire an undocumented worker. But Americans are getting stiffed too. These companies hire and then promise wages and then have one excuse after another for not paying or not paying on time. It has become a real problem. If we make it ok to not pay undocumented workers there is more incentive to hire them not less and Newt knows this.
wordsalad12
Control over Congress is essential, not just WH
04:45 PM on 12/14/2011
excellent point, and not many would have known this, including myself! i learnt something more today!
11:22 AM on 12/14/2011
Why on earth would anyone worry how illegal aliens or their dependents will fare if returned to their native lands? When did this become a requisite burden for American workers, taxpayers, students and voters? Virtually all of the problematic illegal immigration is from south of our border and most of those nations are democratically (albeit corrupt) governments with vast national resources. If we're so compassionate about breaking up families, why then do we still separate parents and children for other crimes? Realistically, illegal aliens at least have a country to return to. When the population of illegals aliens finally capsizes the U.S. ship of state, where do America's citizens, the native born have an opportunity to "flee" and take advantage of other taxpayers largess? Like it or not, too many people competing for the same limited resources is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, sane, sustainable social, economic or environmental policy. Virtually every industrialized nation, China, Mexico, Great Britain, the European Union, Asia, the Middle East, have all adopted zero tolerance policies for illegal aliens, as well as strict identification, incarceration and deportation practices for illegal aliens and their employers as well. It's dangerously misguided to suggest that the U.S. not do likewise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ncconcernedcitizen
only a fool would take me seriously
01:07 PM on 12/14/2011
Why on earth would anyone worry how illegal aliens or their dependents will fare if returned to their native lands?
>> Because they have a heart, not a lump of coal in their chest.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brokenleoheart
11:09 AM on 12/14/2011
i know it's his political stance, but this guy is kinda racist and has prejudical undertones throughout his views. do we want that for our country?
11:03 AM on 12/14/2011
According to the latest CIA World Factbook, unemployment in Mexico (with a population one third the size of the U.S.) is less than half that of the United States, Mexico has the 12th. Largest GDP on the planet, and the cost of living in Mexico is substantially less (perhaps a third that of the closest U.S. states). To all but the most self serving cheap labor/mass immigration lobbyists, it's apparent that Mexican nationals prefer to leach off others. They oppress our wages by taking U.S. jobs, often on a cash basis (no taxes), and their remittances (likewise never taxed by either government) are also worth substantially more in their native countries owing to the peso/dollar exchange rate. Folks, even if SS is withheld from the use of false or stolen identification, illegal aliens benefit massively by beating the tax man both here and back home, with the added bonus of U.S. taxpayer funded education, health and social services and benefits thrown in!
photo
Liberals Are Intolerant
fiscal conservative, social libertarian
09:24 AM on 12/14/2011
Why is no one asking the real question, which is, how are these illegals obtaining employment in rebuilding the gulf region?

Transactions between drug dealers are not protected (which is why we have so much violence associated with that). Neither is under-the-counter payments for labor. We should not be encouraging illegal behavior.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arecibo48
We just need to reinvent ourselves
10:50 AM on 12/14/2011
I agree, we should not be tolerationg illegal behavior. However, the answer to your question is well know; employers are making this possible. Why is it that we hear republican presidential candidates complaining about ilegal immigration, but say nothing about holding employers responsible for hiring the ilegals?
11:48 AM on 12/14/2011
It is being said, very clearly, But people are complaining saying that holding employers responsible will backfire. They hire cheap labor to make a profit - if they start turning each other in, then the smaller businesses will fail and then we will lose more jobs in America.
I think its a preposterous thought or forecast! Anyone enabling the illegal immigration stats to rise should DEFINITELY be held accountable! I also think that those very employers do NOTHING positive to contribute to our country getting back its footing. And they should be dealt with in a very stern manner - and possibly never be allowed to own another business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Emma2011
06:47 AM on 12/14/2011
In continuation of my previous post, Gingrich and Romney are DUMB AND DUMBER on immigratio­n.
Romney's immigration plan is that the illegals go back to their home countries to apply and wait for legal status.
Questions: Do you really think that the illegals will leave without having any guarantee that they can return? Should the illegals uproot their children from school in the US or should their kids be put in foster care while the parents leave the country? Who should pay rent or mortgage in the US while the illegals are in their home countries and hence will not be able to work or make as much as in the US? Where should they stay in their home countries? Do you assume that their relatives have guest rooms waiting for them or should they stay at the St Regis?
DOES ROMNEY'S UNINTELLIGENT IMMIGRATION "PLAN" REFLECT HOW HE WILL LEAD ON OTHER ISSUES?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tin soldier
No more Mr. nice guy
10:06 AM on 12/14/2011
Why are all of these issues the problem of the American people.
If you came home and found 2 people you didn't know sitting on you couch eating you food and using your supplies and services, you be on the phone calling the cops to remove them. Well the country is your home ,,SO REMOVE THEM
01:11 PM on 12/14/2011
Not even close..its more like this...What would you do if you came home and found the two peo
01:14 PM on 12/14/2011
Not even close... its more like this...What would you do if you came home and found the 2 people you had hired to do the work you dont want to do had completed assingned
10:54 AM on 12/14/2011
Isn't part of the major complication of unconstrained immigration and lax enforcement the oppressive competition of illegal alien workers for American resources? Arguably, those who entered our nation illegally and have perpetuated the fraud necessary to operate undetected in our economy, should not be allowed to "keep their ill-gotten gains" of mortgages, automobiles, etc.. As is common practice in virtually all states, these "assets" would be considered forfeit, and the proceeds from these forfeitures would be utilized to fund enhanced identification, incarceration and deportation, as part of prudent attrition policy that will eventually put an end to unsustainable inflows of illegal aliens. Overpopulation, congestion, urban sprawl, crumbling infrastructure, diminishing resources and opportunities, vanishing farm land, green space, overcrowded schools, hospitals, jails, lack of affordable housing, water and energy shortages, crime, pollution, depressed wages, increased tax burdens, the balkanization of our communities, are the result of unconstrained, immigration and lax enforcement! The media and self serving interests try as they might to spin the narrative as a racist issue, the cold fact remains that too many people competing for the same limited resources is NOT, and NEVER WILL BE, sane, sustainable social, economic or environmental policy!

The lives and treasure our nation expends on spreading democracy to other nations will have been wasted so long as we accept the premise that all those foreign nationals unwilling to work for necessary social and economic reforms in their native lands must be accommodated at any cost to American citizens .
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:42 AM on 12/14/2011
Yeah but we need the wage theft laws, otherwise the contractors will keep hiring the undocumented because they think they don't have to pay them when payday comes. It's bad enough that alot of these contractors don't think they have to pay American citizens who work for them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
03:35 AM on 12/14/2011
Looks like his tail is beginning to wag him.
stephan67
Eternity and a day
02:38 AM on 12/14/2011
Gingrich has a favourite slogan: I go where money goes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
01:46 AM on 12/14/2011
Newt is the conservative perfected. He really is all those things all of you denouncing him elsewhere on this thread said he was, including but not limited to, odious, morally putrid, and fatally flawed, and what's more, he is not only unashamed of it, but, given half a chance, he will try to tell you that there's nothing wrong with any of it. And he will use conservative dogma to do it. Fortunately for him, conservative dogma is extremely flexible due to years of use of it by people just like Newt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kbeth
Dear Jesus, Save us from the Christians. Amen
06:29 AM on 12/14/2011
F/F I'm always looking for new adjectives to describe Newt and you came up with some good ones- thanks
07:34 AM on 12/14/2011
That's what sociopaths do! It's never their fault.

http://www.sociopathicstyle.com/traits/classic.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Querent
I just had to say that.
04:14 PM on 12/14/2011
They like to call themselves "conservatives".