More

Defense Cuts Could Result In 1.5M Lost Jobs Over Next Decade

Defense Cuts

First Posted: 12/14/11 08:36 AM ET Updated: 12/14/11 08:53 AM ET

(David Alexander) - Defense cuts that begin in the 2012 budget will ultimately cost up to 800,000 jobs, and additional spending reductions could push that figure to 1.5 million over the next decade, a top Republican lawmaker testified on Tuesday.

Representative Buck McKeon, chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said his panel estimated the initial $489 billion in defense cuts approved by Congress would cost 100,000 military jobs, mostly Army and Marines, as well as 200,000 civilian defense jobs and 500,000 defense industry positions.

"We're looking at ... between 700,000 and 800,000 jobs," McKeon told the House of Representatives Rules Committee during testimony about the compromise National Defense Authorization Act approved on Monday by House and Senate negotiators.

If a second tranche of about $600 billion in defense cuts takes place under legislation passed in August, he added, "that would take those jobs up to about 1.5 million."

McKeon's comments came during a procedural session to establish rules of debate on the defense policy bill, which authorizes $662.4 billion for national defense programs, including $530 billion for the Pentagon's base budget and $115.5 billion for the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The bill, which authorizes spending limits but does not appropriate funds, is expected to go to the House and Senate floors for a final vote this week before being sent to President Barack Obama for his signature.

The authorization measure is the first defense bill to reflect spending cuts approved by Congress in August in an effort to get control over the government's soaring $14 trillion debt.

The final spending levels authorized in the bill are $26.6 billion less than Obama's initial request, with $23.1 billion taken from the Pentagon's base budget and $2.4 billion being cut from the war budget. Actual funding will be appropriated in a separate measure and could differ the amounts authorized.

McKeon offered the estimate on job losses after being questioned about the issue by Representative Rob Bishop, who expressed concern spending cuts and job losses in the defense sector at a time when Obama is pressing Congress for a jobs bill to help put people back to work.

"We're talking about people who already have jobs that we're going to put out on the street in the near future," Bishop said. "Not only are these people who currently have jobs (and are) going to lose them, they do a vital function."

Lawmakers also expressed concern about provisions in the bill that strengthen the military's powers in dealing with detainees in the U.S. war against al Qaeda and affiliated extremist groups.

Obama has threatened to veto the bill over concerns that the new provisions reduced the president's flexibility in dealing with enemy combatants, possibly creating a presumption that they would be dealt with by military tribunals rather than civilian courts.

Top House and Senate negotiators on the bill said they had added changes sought by the White House and hoped the final measure would be approved by the president. But they said they had not received any assurances from the White House that the new language would avoid a presidential veto.

White House spokesman Jay Carney told reporters on Tuesday, "We're in the process of reviewing the changes that were made to the legislation and to see if those changes address the concerns that we have."

McKeon and Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said the changes were needed to update laws dealing with detainees that were passed shortly after the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

"Nobody, frankly, U.S. citizen or non-U.S. citizen, can be held in military detention without getting their day in court," Smith said. "Even those people who don't win their habeas case (seeking release from detention) will have periodic efforts to have that reviewed."

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(David Alexander) - Defense cuts that begin in the 2012 budget will ultimately cost up to 800,000 jobs, and additional spending reductions could push that figure to 1.5 million over the next decad...
(David Alexander) - Defense cuts that begin in the 2012 budget will ultimately cost up to 800,000 jobs, and additional spending reductions could push that figure to 1.5 million over the next decad...
Filed by Harry Bradford  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 274
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (9 total)
11:48 AM on 12/15/2011
LET'S HOPE SO
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
11:30 AM on 12/15/2011
So what, we keep our war machine going to employ people?
10:53 AM on 12/15/2011
I got a good idea. Lets borrow money from China to build defense systems we do not need just so we can keep the repuckaigns happy. Now that is a good use of our money!

When will this insanity stop?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildog21
"War is a Racket" -Smedley D. Butler MajGen USMC
05:30 PM on 12/15/2011
When more than 50% of eligible voters start paying attention and electing progressives to office. Personally, I'm not holding my breath on that...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Carl Caroli
Give peace a chance
10:12 AM on 12/15/2011
Use the savings to create alternative energy jobs. Don't succumb to the fear of losing jobs making weapons of mass destruction. We don't need them. Only the MIC and profiteers want them.
10:12 AM on 12/15/2011
Wait, the gop cares about these government jobs?? But if you work for state or federal they want you to be laid off.

Got to love the hypocrisy !!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildog21
"War is a Racket" -Smedley D. Butler MajGen USMC
05:31 PM on 12/15/2011
Keep your government hands out of my military!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rules Too
09:17 AM on 12/15/2011
Well, they will just have to get use to the GOP service economy like everyone else. Defense is way way to expensive and massive. Besides I am sure the job creators will have no problem taking care of this little bleep on the unemployment scale.... I mean look how successful they have been so far with the Bush Tax Cuts passed by the GOTP.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:03 AM on 12/15/2011
"Defense cuts that begin in the 2012 budget will ultimately cost up to 800,000 jobs" Wait,wait,wait what happen to the job creators ? can't private enterprise pick up the slack ? what about the small business community, what's going on here ?
photo
DanoX
I'll be your snack-pack baby!
06:35 AM on 12/15/2011
Well, that'll happen when you allow your military industrial complex to comprise three quarters of your economy.
03:45 AM on 12/15/2011
Let this be the first step in repopulating the goods on our retailer's shelves with "Made In America" labels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Harpe
Was young, now old.
02:36 AM on 12/15/2011
Not so. If that money is reallocated to peaceful programs such as renewable energy and rebuilding our infrastructure, it would create more jobs than were lost in the military industrial complex. The biggest threat to our national security is our weak economy. It does not matter how strong our military is if we don't also have a strong economy. The fall of the Soviet Union was a good example of what happens if you put too much of your resources into guns and not enough into butter. Let's learn from their mistake and not repeat it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eugene Skidmore
the real deal
07:02 AM on 12/15/2011
the problem there is they won`t be any funds to reallocate. this is a "cut" in spending, so those jobs (you know, the ones government can`t create) will be the first to go as defense contractors "downsize" while maintaining their own inflated worth.
photo
Lahonda
Bynocent Instander
01:56 AM on 12/15/2011
Nope.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jflorish
01:21 AM on 12/15/2011
The Obama plan is really in effect now, more jobs being lost.
12:51 AM on 12/15/2011
Wait a minute, every defense contractor whose financial statements that I have seen typically makes a profit margin of over 70%, why can the DOD not figure out a way to negotiate better pricing? Too lazy? Too connected?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildog21
"War is a Racket" -Smedley D. Butler MajGen USMC
05:33 PM on 12/15/2011
Too many retired miltary officers working in the industry.
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
12:48 AM on 12/15/2011
Well, DUH!

We don't feed the DOD just to keep people working. The purpose is "defense". We don't need a million soldiers, hundreds of tanks, amphibious equipment, outdated weaponry, unneeded planes.... We have the biggest military in the world and more than the next 10 countries.

Get rid of the sub-contractors and "peace keepers", stop building unwanted equipment, remove unneeded programs. We don't need a huge invanding military.

The budget is bloated and growing every year. Waste, overruns, fraud is everywhere....tighten the ship.

As for those "million" job losses....baloney. Republicans just like all those big old military thingies....makes them feel all manly and such.

Heck, we got bin Laden with half a dozen or so Navy Seals, coupla helicopters in 40 minutes with no loss of American lives. "Pilots" sit thousand of miles away from their "planes" and operate over computers. Drones are replacing "fighters".

Get real.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
devildog21
"War is a Racket" -Smedley D. Butler MajGen USMC
05:34 PM on 12/15/2011
"The purpose is "defense"."

Not really. The purpose is to maintain empire and it's failing.
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
12:21 AM on 12/16/2011
No, the purpose is the defense of our nation from within and without.

What the politcians and the MIC has done with it is the crime.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:27 AM on 12/15/2011
If we were not such a violent, war-mongering nation, so willing to enforce our empire with "the worlds greatest fighting machine", most of those jobs would never have existed. Never fear, however, war-mongers. With impending resource constraints, the powers-that-be will no doubt find other opportunities to feed the machine.

www.offthegridmpls.blogspot.com