More

HuffPost Social Reading

Obama's Health Care Overhaul: 2.5M Young Adults Gain Coverage, Report

Obama

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   12/14/11 01:14 PM ET  AP

WASHINGTON — Young adults trying to get traction in a tough economy are getting a welcome assist: the new federal health care law has markedly improved their access to health insurance.

The number of young Americans ages 19-25 lacking health insurance has shrunk by 2.5 million since President Barack Obama's health care overhaul took effect, the administration announced in an analysis released Wednesday.

That drop is 2 1/2 times as large as the decline indicated by previous government and private estimates from earlier this year, which showed about 1 million had gained coverage.

The improvement comes even as the uninsured rate stayed basically stuck for those a little older, ages 26-35.

Under the health care overhaul, adult children can stay on a parent's plan until they turn 26, a provision that has proven popular in an otherwise divisive law.

Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said the numbers show the law is making a big difference for families with adult children.

"Many of them gained coverage earlier this spring, meaning the law was there for young people as they graduated from college or high school and began their careers," she said.

Administration officials said there are a couple of reasons for the better-than-expected result.

First, there is more data available now than earlier this year. Secondly, analysts are slicing the numbers more precisely than the government usually does.

The health care law's main push to cover the uninsured doesn't come until 2014. But the young adults' provision took effect last fall, and most workplace health plans started carrying it out Jan. 1. Since then, families have flocked to sign up adult children making the transition to work in a challenging environment.

The overall fate of Obama's law remains uncertain, with the Supreme Court scheduled to hear a constitutional challenge next year, and Republican presidential candidates vowing to repeal it. But this provision seems to have gotten a seal of approval from consumers.

"The increase in coverage among 19- to 25-year-olds can be directly attributed to the Affordable Care Act's new dependent coverage provision," said the HHS analysis.

Using unpublished quarterly statistics from the government's ongoing National Health Interview Survey, analysts in Sebelius' policy office determined that nearly 36 percent of those age 19-25 were uninsured in the third calendar quarter of 2010, before the law's provision took effect.

That translates to more than 10.5 million people.

By the second calendar quarter of 2011, the proportion of uninsured young adults had dropped to a little over 27 percent, or about 8 million people.

The difference – nearly 2.5 million getting coverage – can only be the result of the health care law, administration officials said, because the number covered by public programs like Medicaid went down slightly.

Overall, nearly 30 million Americans are ages 19 to 25.

"From September 2010 to June 2011, coverage rose only among those adults affect by the policy," said the HHS report.

The National Center for Health Statistics has documented a broadly similar trend in its official publications, only it's not nearly as dramatic.

Administration officials said those statistics did not focus on the change from calendar quarter to calendar quarter, as does the new HHS report. Instead, they pool data over longer time periods, and that has the effect of diluting the perceived impact of the law, officials said.

Traditionally, young adults have been more likely to be uninsured than any other age group.

Some are making the switch from school to work. Others are holding down low-wage jobs that don't usually come with health care. And some – termed the "invincibles" – pass up job-based health insurance because they don't think they'll use it and would rather get extra money in their paychecks.

Other early coverage expansions in the health care law have not worked as well, including a special program for people with health problems turned away by private insurers. Many applicants found the premiums unaffordable.

Young adults are less expensive to cover than people who are middle-aged, and many companies have spread the extra premiums among their workers. Benefits consultant Delloite LLP has projected additional health plan costs in the range of 1 percent to 2 percent for covering young adults.

Before the health care overhaul, families with adult children faced a hodgepodge of policies. Some health plans only covered older children while they were full-time students. Others applied an age cutoff.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

WASHINGTON — Young adults trying to get traction in a tough economy are getting a welcome assist: the new federal health care law has markedly improved their access to health insurance. The num...
WASHINGTON — Young adults trying to get traction in a tough economy are getting a welcome assist: the new federal health care law has markedly improved their access to health insurance. The num...
Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,183
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtheryoung
12:22 PM on 12/15/2011
Lets look at this, you're considered an adult at age 18, you can vote, get married, drink in some states and be eligible for a lot of different benefits, but the American taxpayer is responsible for your healthcare until you turn 26? In most family's, a 21 year old is shoved out the door and wished good luck. Not the taxpayers we're stuck paying for them. I guess it's another entitlement some people believe you're born with in this country.
02:15 PM on 12/15/2011
Oh, well done. You actually can't read, and yet you post here.

Try again, dopey: the story says the kids can be carried on their PARENTS' insurance, not the taxpayers'.
09:19 AM on 12/15/2011
Something else I'm sure the far right will deny.
02:15 PM on 12/15/2011
It's like they can't read, or something. They just don't grasp the story at all.
02:57 PM on 12/15/2011
Amen!
10:17 PM on 12/14/2011
Its always nice to get something for nothing...um I mean its almost too good to be true...um I guess I just like things that seem nice. Isn't it nice to get something for free every now and then. This health care deal is so swell that I might just have another baby.
07:47 AM on 12/15/2011
ask for a brain, instead. You are in desperate need of one, trollbagger.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
07:30 PM on 12/14/2011
The ignorance of the conclowns on this thread is right on par, astounding!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:27 PM on 12/14/2011
Yes, and insurance rates have zoomed 18-25%. The insurance industry is making a mint off this law. Patients, doctors, and hospitals are being squeezed going bankrupt.
07:14 PM on 12/14/2011
Rates climb 15-17% year over year anyway. Makes no which never mind.
photo
mtnlife96
No apology
07:25 PM on 12/14/2011
And those insurance rates should be very, very closely examined by regulators - if there were any left. The population of young adults into the risk pool dilutes the risk, historically incurs lower and fewer claims than an older, unhealthier population so, of course and as has been the case for years now, the every escalating rates are nothing but profit boosters.
05:34 PM on 12/14/2011
Healthcare will soon by one of those things that Republicans use as proof that people are not poor if they have it. Just like they do today with TV's, Cars, Phones, Refrigerators and Xbox's.

Because they actually think all those things are "perks" that only the truly not poor should be allowed to have.
05:36 PM on 12/14/2011
I hope your right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TVs Scotty J
05:14 PM on 12/14/2011
I love how people are complaining that covering more people will drive up the cost of health care, but have no problem at the even more expensive prospect of less people being covered, using an ER for guaranteed treatment, and then leaving the bill for the taxpayers to take care of...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TVs Scotty J
05:09 PM on 12/14/2011
Uh oh. 2.5 more Americans have health care? Republicans aren't going to stand for this!
04:43 PM on 12/14/2011
Instead of complaining about the rising cost of healthcare, why not take a stand against the insurance companies...oh yeah, the Repubs are each their own corporation, no wonder they don't want ObamaCares, they can't keep lining their pockets...idiots!!
04:36 PM on 12/14/2011
This is the kind of headline I like seeing. Thanks for putting it on the home page HuffPost. Obama needs to have more publicity for his successes. Cancel Obama's health care plan? Heck, NO! (unless we can get single-payer which would be even better!)
04:33 PM on 12/14/2011
More cheerleading for this garbage legislation.
They are on their parent's policies and the policies are killing all of us.

The cost is the issue. United Health wants 1920 per month!! in CA on my employer plan for myself my wife and one daughter. Are you kidding??

Now, put yourself out on the private "market" and really get screwed the backside!!!

Every effort has been made to keep feeding the beast. It's pathetic.
04:55 PM on 12/14/2011
1. People who are under 26 barely use health insurance, so they aren't driving prices up.

2. If you want cheaper health care, you should support a public option.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
iamwomanofcolor
All in Love Is Fair...
07:02 PM on 12/14/2011
yes indeed this comment is just that: pathetic... Yeah Go Obama/Biden 2012!!!!!!!!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rtheryoung
12:24 PM on 12/15/2011
Please go!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:30 PM on 12/14/2011
These young adults are being treated like children so that their parents can pay for their health care well after they are no longer dependents. Way to go!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gernger
04:44 PM on 12/14/2011
Way to judge millions of young people who can't get jobs due to the economy. This law helps people from all segments of our society. I don't undrestand your complaint.
photo
Exfl
A centrist until the center moved.
04:51 PM on 12/14/2011
The complaint is simply that the article said something positive about the ACA, and Obama h8rs can't stand that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
drumz
Those little red panties they pass the test
07:27 PM on 12/14/2011
Wrong!
04:27 PM on 12/14/2011
Well, that is great news that Kagan will be recusing herself when the Supreme Court hears this lawsuit in March or April due to her many conflicts in the "passage" of Obamacare....it is nice to see a Barack proxy/clone do the right things. Accolades to Ms. Kagan...
04:33 PM on 12/14/2011
I think you are confused. She recused herself from the immigration law case, which she was part of, not the ACA case. Unless you have a link I couldn't find?
07:38 PM on 12/14/2011
not confused. Merely thoroughly dishonest and not very bright. In other words, "senator11" is a typical member of the RW. Oh, he's loud, too, and he doesn't know what he talks about.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cole 33
If someone asks if you're a God, you, say, YES!
04:18 PM on 12/14/2011
Gotta love the right wingers. They want everyone to fend for themselves, with no government help, and their answer is, look to your family for help and charity. When a law passes that allows families to help their families, its' what happened to self reliance!?

It's a problem if the government helps.
it's a problem if your family helps.
04:23 PM on 12/14/2011
Exactly. I hate how people pretend relying on your family and relying on the govt are two completely different things. Or that collective action is somehow a bad thing.
04:17 PM on 12/14/2011
Sure, mine can stay on if I have an extra $900!!!!!!
04:32 PM on 12/14/2011
If the $900 is your annual cost to add on your child, that is actually an incredible DEAL if you really think about it. Do you have any idea how much it would cost your child to buy coverage out on the market without your help? If you don't have the extra $75 per month to cover them, maybe ask them to help pay for it. It would be a lot less than what it would cost them individually.
04:34 PM on 12/14/2011
Stop using math, you'll confuse him.
07:33 PM on 12/14/2011
sorry, should have been more clear...... it's like any other insurance policy.... MONTHLY....$900 more PER MONTH! And, as a teacher that would make eating optional.
photo
Exfl
A centrist until the center moved.
04:53 PM on 12/14/2011
I guess the alternative is that your child could be yet another "free rider"sticking all the rest of us with the cost of their medical bills.