More

Payroll Tax Cut Extension: Democrats' Demand For Millionaire Surtax Hangs In The Balance

Payroll Tax Cut Extension Senate House Keystone

DAVID ESPO   12/14/11 10:42 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Democrats backed away from their demand for higher taxes on millionaires as part of legislation to extend Social Security tax cuts for most Americans on Wednesday as Congress struggled to clear critical year-end bills without triggering a partial government shutdown.

But Republicans, frustrated that a bipartisan $1 trillion funding bill was being blocked by Senate Democrats, floated the possibility of repackaging the measure and passing it Friday in defiance of President Barack Obama and his allies in control of the Senate. Stopgap funding runs out Friday at midnight.

In a written statement late Wednesday, White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said the administration objected to several environmental, financial and other provisions in the mammoth spending bill and said Congress should approve a short-term spending measure to avoid a federal shutdown and give lawmakers time to iron out their final disputes.

With time beginning to run short, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., met with Obama at the White House, then returned to the Capitol and sat down with the two top Republicans in Congress, Speaker John Boehner and Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Taken together, the developments signaled the end game for a year of divided government – with a tea party-flavored majority in the House and Obama's allies in the Senate – that has veered from near-catastrophe to last-minute compromise repeatedly since last January.

The rhetoric was biting at times.

"We have fiddled all year long, all year," McConnell complained in a less-than-harmonious exchange on the Senate floor with Reid. He accused Democrats of "routinely setting up votes designed to divide us ... to give the president a talking point out on the campaign trail."

Reid shot back that McConnell had long ago declared Obama's defeat to be his top priority. And he warned that unless Republicans show a willingness to bend, the country faces a government shutdown "that will be just as unpopular" as the two that occurred when Newt Gingrich was House speaker more than a decade ago.

It was a reminder – as if McConnell and current Speaker John Boehner of Ohio needed one – of the political debacle that ensued for Republicans when Gingrich was outmaneuvered in a showdown with former President Bill Clinton.

At issue now are three year-end bills that Obama and leaders in both parties in Congress say they want. One would extend expiring Social Security payroll tax cuts and benefits for the long-term unemployed, provisions at the heart of Obama's jobs program. Another is the $1 trillion spending measure that would lock in cuts that Republicans won earlier in the year. The third measure is a $662 billion defense bill setting policy for military personnel, weapons systems and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, plus national security programs in the Energy Department.

After a two-day silence, the White House said Obama would sign the measure despite initial concern over a provision requiring military custody of certain terror suspects linked to al-Qaida or its affiliates. U.S. citizens would be exempt.

The measure cleared the House, 283-136, with a final vote expected Thursday in the Senate.

Officials said Democrats were drafting a new proposal to extend the payroll tax that likely would not include the millionaires' surtax that Republicans opposed almost unanimously.

Republicans minimized the significance of the move. "They're not giving up a whole lot. The tax they wanted to implement on business owners was something that couldn't pass the House and couldn't pass the Senate," McConnell said in a CNBC interview.

Jettisoning the tax could also require Democrats to agree to politically painful savings elsewhere in the budget to replace the estimated $140 billion the tax would have raised over a decade.

In its most recent form, the surtax would have slapped a 1.9 percent tax on income in excess of $1 million, with the proceeds helping pay for the extension of tax cuts for 160 million workers. Senate Democrats have twice forced votes on the proposal in what officials have described as a political maneuver designed to force GOP lawmakers to choose between protecting the wealthy on the one hand and extending tax cuts for millions on the other.

The spending bill was hung up – and there was no agreement why.

Republicans and at least one Democrat said agreement had been reached earlier in the week, but Reid disputed that and pointed to provisions relating to travel to Cuba and funding for the Commodities Future Trading Commission as examples.

"It's pretty clear to all of us that President Obama and Sen. Reid want to threaten a government shutdown so they can get leverage" on the payroll tax bill, said Boehner, noting that so far, the Senate has failed to pass legislation on the issue.

Wednesday's maneuvering occurred the day after the House passed a payroll tax extension that contained no higher taxes. That House measure drew a veto threat from Obama that cited spending cuts the White House said would harm the middle class without requiring a sacrifice from the wealthy.

The bill would extract nearly $43 billion from the year-old health care bill; extend a pay freeze on federal employees while also increasing their pension contributions and raise Medicare premiums on seniors with incomes over $80,000 beginning in 2017. It also would raise a fee that is charged to banks whose mortgages are guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Obama's veto message also alluded to a requirement for the construction of an oil pipeline from Canada to Texas that Republicans said would create 20,000 jobs. The provision is designed to force the administration's hand, since Obama announced recently that despite three years of review under two administrations, he was putting off a decision until after the election.

The measure would permit Obama to block the Keystone XL project if he deemed its construction to be not in the national interest.

The House-passed bill also includes an extension of unemployment benefits that would scale back what is currently in place. The White House said 3.3 million people would be cut off under its terms. Another part of the bill, to block proposed regulations limiting toxic emissions from industrial incinerators, drew objections from the White House.

The legislation would avert a threatened 27 percent cut in payments to doctors who treat Medicare patients, and Obama and Democrats are willing to accept that.

___

Associated Press writers Donna Cassata, Alan Fram and Andrew Taylor contributed to this story

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Democrats backed away from their demand for higher taxes on millionaires as part of legislation to extend Social Security tax cuts for most Americans on Wednesday as Congress strugg...
WASHINGTON — Democrats backed away from their demand for higher taxes on millionaires as part of legislation to extend Social Security tax cuts for most Americans on Wednesday as Congress strugg...
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 392
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
DrObvious 04:31 PM on 12/20/2011
I can't tell you how angry I will be if the Democrats cave on "paying" for the payroll tax cut by increasing taxes on our wealthiest citizens. When more than 70% of the electorate supports a policy - as this one - it's time for politicians on both sides of the fence to do the people's bidding. If Democrats can't show any spine when more than 70% of voters are behind them, they don't have a spine to  Read More...
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DrObvious
dissatisfied 99%er
04:31 PM on 12/20/2011
I can't tell you how angry I will be if the Democrats cave on "paying" for the payroll tax cut by increasing taxes on our wealthiest citizens. When more than 70% of the electorate supports a policy - as this one - it's time for politicians on both sides of the fence to do the people's bidding. If Democrats can't show any spine when more than 70% of voters are behind them, they don't have a spine to reinforce, and should fold their political tent. Not a dime, not a vote to Democrats if they cave into Republicans on this bill. Of course, I have long sworn off voting for any Republican, when they promised that the failure of the US President was their highest priority. So it'll be picking and choosing among 3d party candidates. Thought i was past abandoning Democrats ..... but here they are, ready to screw the people who vote for them ....... to cave into Republican demands that even Republicans find ridiculous. Beyond pathetic.
03:46 PM on 12/21/2011
You will pay for this tax cut that comes out of your Social Security Fund when ? YOU ' need this OLD'age fund at retirement . What Obama calls a tax holiday will be your OLD'age nightmare for sure .
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
DrObvious
dissatisfied 99%er
01:35 PM on 02/12/2012
You're absolutely right that - sooner or later - we have to pay for our habits of spending more than we tax ourselves.   I just want it to be the focus when the economy is humming again, creating jobs, keeping nearly everybody employed.  We'll be able to start paying down the mountain of debt we've created in the last 20 years of federal fiscal mismanagement.

I don't much care about sustaining the payroll tax cut.   I do care that our wealthiest citizens should pay at least the same tax rate as I do as a middle class wage earner.     And I care deeply about creation of jobs that pay well in the USA.    If we don't get more people back to work, if we don't start seeing our incomes rise,   the federal deficit will be the least of our problems,  as our economy slides back into  a contraction spiral that will be truly terrible in scope and effect.    So ... i'm not anxious to hike taxes on  middle class Americans in the short run,  just so we don't slide in to recession.   At some point, we all have to pony up more, and maybe even spend less.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
shaitan
The Devil's Advocate
03:29 PM on 12/15/2011
Once again we find Obama and the Democrats caving in to Republican obstructionism.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleblackcat
11:59 AM on 12/15/2011
Shut the damned government down! Our elected "leaders" aren't, and haven't been, listening to the American people at all much LESS acting on what we want!

The people want the wealthiest to pay more in taxes. The rich are paying the LOWEST amount in taxes ever, haven't created a single job, have no idea what it is like to try to earn a living in a time and nation that has NO JOBS to offer or if there are some, they pay half of what they should at best or minimum wage at worst.

Since everyone in Congress and the Senate is a multi-millionaire, why do they not voluntarily give up their paychecks and their pensions for a minimum of five years? They don't need the money.

The stimulus should have been twice the size it was and GENUINE effort put into a public works program, a la FDR. Obama should veto anything that does not contain revenue increases from corporations and the wealthy. Just shut the thing down. We'll make a happy holiday season in spite of it.
07:25 AM on 12/15/2011
Did anyone actually believe they ( politicians) would impose a TAX INCREASE on themsleves. ? So Occupy Wall Streeters, you have been had.! Fold your tents and get on the truth trail.
photo
With Your Consent
Speak Truth to Power
09:59 PM on 12/14/2011
The people who pretend Obama is a "class warrior" have created a sophisticated rouse which allows Obama to maintain his base-voter support while picking their pockets for Wall Street.

It mostly works. But, I think the average voter is also growing more sophisticated
through the use of the internet. I feel it and see it showing up in polling data.
photo
With Your Consent
Speak Truth to Power
09:54 PM on 12/14/2011
Anyone who thought this tax cut would be paid for isn't paying attention.

The two parties ALWAYS agree on bailouts and debt. Obama could have roped the GOP
just as he COULD have before he extended Bush's tax cuts. The GOP is never put on the ropes and beat_on anything, at any time. Obama didn't get all the Wall Street money to foil Republicans.
He got the money to foil Democrats. He just did it again.
03:49 PM on 12/21/2011
The only ones who will be on the ropes will be you when you retire an there is a Hugh hole in your Social Security Fund . This tax holiday comes out of Social Security ? Never never touch your OLD' age fund Social Security .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SeaMikeC
Retired Retailer/Former Mortgage Loan Officer
09:45 PM on 12/14/2011
What the hell is wrong with these greedy alleged Americans?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Ismoe
08:45 PM on 12/14/2011
The Democrats caved????? Who would believe that? Looks like we all can stay home next November
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
07:50 PM on 12/14/2011
Trade you the Millionaires tax for the pipeline.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deebastet
11:12 AM on 12/15/2011
Makes sense is some way. Just don't like the idea that the 1% win!
photo
MacTheCat
They only pass laws they intend to use
06:19 PM on 12/14/2011
""which they had hoped to use to cover the cost of a Social Security payroll tax cut extension for millions of wage-earners, officials said Wednesday.""

Ah vindication. For all of you who said that this tax 'holiday' would not impact SS and that our side (gosh how that hurts to write now that they are prepared to repeal the Constitution with the military indefinite detention act) once again had the plan, pfffftttt.

Let's get Harry and O one of those cute little spelunker headlamps all the cavers use, for xmas. Maybe they can use the light to see their way to doing their job properly.
06:08 PM on 12/14/2011
Does any historian or anyone else know of any time in the history of this country when a rich person was so hated or resented or made the scapegoat for the country's lack of funding? I know that such history does exist in places like Cuba or Venezuela but I am not aware of such a thing in this country until now when president Obama has declared war on the so called 1% . I find it amusing when Mitt Romney gets broadsided for trying to make a $10,000 bet but Obama gets a pass for boasting of his billion dollar campaign fund The hypocrisy is so obvious.
06:02 PM on 12/14/2011
This is a good point for the Democrats to propose to pay for this by taxing the salaries/compensation of money/hedge-fund managers at the same tax rate as the salaries/compensation of regular folk. Unfortunately Obama and the Democrats are bought and paid for by said managers and would never do such a thing!
06:08 PM on 12/14/2011
I can tell you who will pay for this Obscene attack on Social Security YOU an I an everyone that paid into Social Security that's who will pay in the from of a Hugh cut when you need it most. In your OLD 'age .
06:13 PM on 12/14/2011
The problem in this country is that the very rich avoid paying taxes via tax shelters and loopholes, and even if they don't hide all of their income, they pay only 15% in taxes (capital gains and dividents). Any tax relief on the middle class and the upper middle class is god no matter how it is done because the upper middle class pays the bulk of the taxes and the highest tax rate. Any tax on the super rich is good because they now pay only 16% average tax on the income they have not hidden, while 10 years ago they paid 30% and 25 years ago - 50%.
06:14 PM on 12/14/2011
it is to be repaid to SS from the general fund. not the greatest, but not at all the worst of plans for these times.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
debqd
Forward, not backward
06:01 PM on 12/14/2011
"We have fiddled all year long, all year," the Republican leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, complained in a less-than-harmonious exchange on the Senate floor with Majority Leader Harry Reid."

No, Sir. You have OBSTRUCTED all year, and you are still doing it. In your effort to destroy a President, you have destroyed us, the 99%. You have obstructed a national economic recovery. You are sick with a lust for power -- insatiable lust. It is your publicly stated goal, and you have won our utter contempt.
06:00 PM on 12/14/2011
A pox on both their houses. Throw the bums out like they do in England. Move for a constitutional convention and slug out an answer that works. Our best minds are no different than those that agreed to the original. The existing constitution has been amended too many times. The original intent was to create a brand new country and way of governing. We need a new one to lead us into the new reality and a new future.
05:50 PM on 12/14/2011
Dems should not consider dropping anything. Call the Republicans Bluff. All the Republicans keep doing is holding Working People and the whole Country HOSTAGE to protect the Rich and Corporations and the Dems and the President Cave everytime.

They should be tired of the BLACKMAIL by Republicans.
06:08 PM on 12/14/2011
Isn't BLACKMAIL a racist comment?
07:04 PM on 12/14/2011
Is it? Should I call it Republican Mail?