iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

With Stratolaunch, Paul Allen Attempts To Realize Childhood Dreams

Paul Allen Stratolaunch Spaceship

DONNA BLANKINSHIP and SETH BORENSTEIN   12/13/11 09:25 PM ET   AP

SEATTLE — The tycoons of cyberspace are looking to bankroll America's resurgence in outer space, reviving "Star Trek" dreams that first interested them in science.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen made the latest step Tuesday, unveiling plans for a new commercial spaceship that, instead of blasting off a launch pad, would be carried high into the atmosphere by the widest plane ever built before it fires its rockets.

He joins Silicon Valley powerhouses Elon Musk of PayPal and Jeff Bezos of Amazon.com Inc. in a new private space race that attempts to fill the gap left when the U.S. government ended the space shuttle program.

Musk, whose Space Exploration Technologies will send its Dragon capsule to dock with the International Space Station in February, will provide the capsule and booster rocket for Allen's venture, which is called Stratolaunch. Bezos is building a rival private spaceship.

Allen is working with aerospace pioneer Burt Rutan, who collaborated with the tycoon in 2004 to win a $10 million prize for the first flight of a private spaceship that went into space but not orbit.

Allen says his enormous airplane and spaceship system will go to "the next big step: a private orbital space platform business."

The new system is "a radical change" in how people can get to space, and it will "keep America at the forefront of space exploration," Allen said.

Their plane will have a 380-foot wingspan – longer than a football field and wider than the biggest aircraft ever, Howard Hughes' Spruce Goose.

It will launch a space capsule equipped with a booster rocket, which will send the spacecraft into orbit. This method saves money by not using rocket fuel to get off the ground. The spaceship may hold as many as six people.

"When I was growing up, America's space program was the symbol of aspiration," said Allen, who mentioned his love of science fiction and early human spaceflights. "For me, the fascination with space never ended. I never stopped dreaming what might be possible."

For those attracted to difficult technical challenges, space is the ultimate challenge, Allen said.

"It's also the ultimate adventure. We all grew up devouring science fiction and watching Mercury and Gemini, Apollo and the space shuttle. And now we are able to be involved in moving things to the next level," he said, adding that he admires people like Simonyi who have gone into space to experience it.

Allen is not alone in having such dreams, and the money to gamble on making them come true.

Bezos set up the secretive private space company Blue Origin, which has received $3.7 million in NASA start-up funds to develop a rocket to carry astronauts. Its August flight test ended in failure.

"Space was the inspiration that got people into high-tech ... at least individuals in their 40s and 50s," said Peter Diamandis, who created the space prize Allen won earlier and is a high-tech mogul-turned space business leader himself. "Now they're coming full circle."

Diamandis helped found a company that sends tourists to space for at least $25 million a ride, and seven of the eight rides involved high-tech executives living out their space dreams. One is a former Microsoft colleague of Allen's, Charles Simonyi, who paid at least $20 million apiece for two rides into orbit and attended Allen's Tuesday news conference, saying he wouldn't mind a third flight.

"Space has a draw for humanity," not just high-tech billionaires, Simonyi said, but he acknowledged that most people don't have the cash to take that trip.

Space experts welcome the burst of high-tech interest in a technology that 50 years ago spurred the development of computers.

"Space travel the way we used to do it has a `50s and `60s ring to it," said retired George Washington University space policy professor John Logsdon. "These guys have a vision of revitalizing a sector that makes it 21st century."

But Logsdon said the size of the capsule and rocket going to space seemed kind of small to him, only carrying 13,000 pounds. It didn't seem like a game-changer, he said.

Stratolaunch's air-launch method is already used by an older rocket company, Orbital Sciences Corp., to launch satellites. It's also the same method used by the first plane to break the sound barrier more than 50 years ago.

Stratolaunch, to be based in Huntsville, Ala., bills its method of getting to space as "any orbit, any time." Rutan will build the carrier aircraft, which will use six 747 engines. The first unmanned test flight is tentatively scheduled for 2016.

NASA, in a statement, welcomed Allen to the space business, saying his plan "has the potential to make future access to low-Earth orbit more competitive, timely, and less expensive."

Unlike its competitors, Allen's company isn't relying on start-up money from NASA, which is encouraging private companies to take the load of hauling cargo and astronauts to low Earth orbit and the International Space Station. The space agency, which retired the space shuttle fleet earlier this year, plans to leave that more routine work to private companies and concentrate on deep space human exploration of an asteroid, the moon and even Mars.

Allen said his interest comes not just because of the end of the shuttle program or changes in government funding for space, but he does see an incredible opportunity right now for the private sector to move the needle on space travel.

Allen's company is looking at making money from tourists and launching small communications satellites, as well as from NASA and the Defense Department, said former NASA Administrator Michael Griffin, a Stratolaunch board member who spoke at a Tuesday news conference.

Just three months ago, Griffin was testifying before Congress that he thought the Obama administration's reliance on private companies for space travel "does not withstand a conventional business case analysis."

This is different because it's private money, with no help or dependence on government dollars, said Griffin, who served under President George W. Bush.

Allen and Rutan collaborated on 2004's SpaceShipOne, which was also launched in the air from a special aircraft in back-to-back flights. Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic licensed the technology and is developing SpaceShipTwo to carry tourists to space. But Allen's first efforts were more a hobby, while this would be more a business, Logsdon said.

SpaceShipOne cost $28 million, but this will cost much more, officials said.

Allen left Microsoft Corp. in 1983, and has pursued many varied interests since then. He's the owner of the Seattle Seahawks football team as well as the NBA's Portland Trailblazers. He also founded a Seattle museum that emphasizes science fiction.

Allen said this venture fits with his technology bent.

"I'm a huge fan of anything to push the boundaries of science," Allen said.

___

Borenstein contributed to this report from Washington.

___

Online:

Stratolaunch Systems: http://www.stratolaunch.com

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SEATTLE — The tycoons of cyberspace are looking to bankroll America's resurgence in outer space, reviving "Star Trek" dreams that first interested them in science. Microsoft co-founder Paul All...
SEATTLE — The tycoons of cyberspace are looking to bankroll America's resurgence in outer space, reviving "Star Trek" dreams that first interested them in science. Microsoft co-founder Paul All...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 24
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
08:24 PM on 12/14/2011
Funny, how a guy who made his billions with a company called Microsoft, likes everything Supersized.
http://www.billionairechronicles.net/paul-allen-parking-spot-for-his-yacht-at-olympics
04:39 PM on 12/14/2011
This is not a "radical" change. It's an "incremental" change. It lets Space-X's (wonderful - GO SPACE X!!!) rocket go a little higher or carry a little more weight or save a little on fuel.

The bottom line: You don't save much fuel or rocket size by launching from a sub-sonic jet at 10 or 15 miles altitude when you need to get to 17,000 mph at 200 miles altitude! (You might save a bit from having less air friction, but I'm guessing less than 10%.)

Rocket fuel is cheap. The big costs of space flight are staffing and hardware, in the air and on the ground (launch pad). This isn't going to make the rocket much smaller and it won't make it reusable. Maybe it saves the cost of a launch pad, but you still have to build the plane. Is it going to cut the staff way down??? Like I said - "incremental".

Plus side - this DOES let you launch from anywhere in the world ... that has a big enough runway and a way to fuel your rocket.

What WOULD be radical?
- Fully reusable rocket that is cheap and fast to turn around
- Hypersonic air-breathing reusable mother ship that launches the rocket from Mach 10 or 15
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:17 PM on 12/14/2011
It takes about half of the launch mass of a conventional rocket to reach ten miles altitude and mach 2. You save a lot in not having to beating air resistance through max Q. Every pound of fuel you don't need can then goes straight to payload.

Letting the booster go at mach 10 might be - but isn't necessarily - much better. You still need about ten times more energy to reach orbit, and the mothership would be much more expensive - which is not saying that Rutan's 1.2m lb U2 is going to be cheap.

The only existing air-launch example: OSC's Pegasus has completely failed to save any cash over a Rockot.

If SpaceX can get the stages reusable, then this proposal is a complete waste of time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Conservative666
04:21 PM on 12/14/2011
Ever since watching a short lived television show that went to the moon slowly, I wondered why they couldn't use helium airships to lift the capsule off the ground. It seems that a lot of fuel is used just to get the ship into the upper atmosphere.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dinosaur David B
03:28 PM on 12/14/2011
They should call it Spruce Goose 2. The resemblance to Hughes' plane and folly is unmistakable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Evan Joseph Ringle
The Doctor 2012
01:57 PM on 12/14/2011
Maybe I should've read the article first....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
authorized-user
macho macho man
12:33 PM on 12/14/2011
"Space travel the way we used to do it has a `50s and `60s ring to it," said retired George Washington University space policy professor John Logsdon. "These guys have a vision of revitalizing a sector that makes it 21st century."

This program shows how wasteful NASA is

The bone yards are full of unwanted 747's and other big freighters that can be purchased cheaply for this program.

There is a lot less waste and pollution with this program than with a shuttle.

Lots of companies will line up for a cheap way to put satellites into orbit.

Talk about "cloud" storage!
photo
MrGovtCheese
We don need no stink'n badges ...
02:10 PM on 12/14/2011
To me it's all part of a necessary evolution. It took a national effort to get where we are today and I think NASA is one of the best parts of the U.S. govt. They spent the money and took the big risks-- lost lives. It's smart to pass on the low orbit stuff to private enterprise and concentrate on the big stuff.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:36 AM on 12/15/2011
Gravity and air resistance have a 17th and 19th century feel to them, but they're still there.

No existing aircraft is suitable to do this - Orbital science's Pegasus on a modified Tristar is
about the limit. Ukranian proposals to use an An-225 to do this kind of thing had been made, and would probably be much more realistic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donns
12:22 PM on 12/14/2011
NASA (Never A Straight Answer)could have done this but it would have taken several years and several boatloads of money.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
07:38 AM on 12/15/2011
NASA would have spotted at the proposal stage that is likely to be silly.

In several years and after several boatloads of money, the loss of a Rutan bananaplane with a 100-ton fueled booster will make interesting youtube viewing.
12:20 PM on 12/14/2011
Yet another misleading HuffPo headline. I thought this was an article about jetpacks.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:04 PM on 12/14/2011
me too!
11:58 AM on 12/14/2011
Congrats on ripping off Branson's and Rutan's Design.

I guess when you have always been riding someone else's coat tails in second place, you always will
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
12:19 PM on 12/14/2011
The attribution to Bernard is due to John of Salisbury. In 1159, John wrote in his Metalogicon[2]:
"Bernard of Chartres used to say that we are like dwarfs on the shoulders of giants, so that we can see more than they, and things at a greater distance, not by virtue of any sharpness of sight on our part, or any physical distinction, but because we are carried high and raised up by their giant size."
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
05:18 PM on 12/14/2011
You'll find Rutan is the designer of the whale thing.
He will have trouble scaling up white knight two by a factor of at least ten.
11:12 AM on 12/14/2011
Replay of spruce goose/ the Howard hughes
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
12:20 PM on 12/14/2011
Hardly!
11:06 AM on 12/14/2011
Invest back into R&D, NASA and education and we will really begin to open the cosmos. Until that happens private companies are going to just bring us into low-orbit and keep us trapped within the grasp of the earth...
photo
hplhenry
Think lucky and be lucky
01:09 PM on 12/14/2011
Low-Earth-orbit is exactly where NASA has been stuck since the '60's. Privitization is the only way we'll see advancement in space travel.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
10:50 AM on 12/14/2011
Why has Paul Allen always wanted to see the world's biggest plastic airplane crash?
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JScott
John Galt's last name is McGuffin-Smithee
10:40 AM on 12/14/2011
Yup and how many airports are big enough for that aircraft, probably not many, they'd all still have to take off from Canaveral or Edwards.
ThinkCreeps
Seriously, it's time.
10:49 AM on 12/14/2011
Which is fine, because pretty much every spot over the tropical ocean is as good as any other fo launching a rocket.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:05 PM on 12/14/2011
Area 51 is pretty big.