More

Microsoft-Novell Lawsuit: Jurors Deadlocked In $1 Billion Antitrust Lawsuit Against Microsoft

Microsoft Novell Lawsuit

PAUL FOY   12/16/11 11:43 PM ET   AP

SALT LAKE CITY — A federal jury on Friday failed to reach a verdict in a Utah company's $1 billion antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. in a case so important to the computer giant that it put Bill Gates on the stand for two days last month.

Novell Inc. sued the software giant in 2004, claiming Microsoft duped it into developing the once-popular WordPerfect writing program for Windows 95 only to pull the plug so Microsoft could gain market share with its own product.

Novell says it was later forced to sell WordPerfect for a $1.2 billion loss.

The trial began two months ago with jurors getting the case on Wednesday. After much confusion, and some perplexing questions from the panel, they told U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz they were deadlocked by early Friday evening.

He repeatedly asked them if they could keep trying.

"This has been a very long and expensive case," Motz told the panel.

Novell attorneys pleaded with Motz to give the panel just one more day. In the end, however, the 12 jurors told the judge they were "hopelessly" deadlocked, and they later told lawyers a single holdout refused to vote in Novell's favor.

"He had strongly held views about the technical evidence and refused to budge," Novell attorney Jeffrey Johnson said. Jurors offered no comment after the trial.

Novell was left with little to show for a decade of effort, but the company said it will seek to retry the case with a new jury.

"Although it's a technically complicated case, we're hoping to convince another jury that our claims have merit," Novell's corporate counsel Jim Lundberg said.

Microsoft said it would file a motion asking the judge to dismiss Novell's complaint for good and avoid a second trial.

"We remain confident that Novell's claims don't have any merit and look forward to the next steps in the process," said Steven Aeschbacher, Microsoft's associate general counsel.

Novell waited until 10 years after Microsoft left WordPerfect behind to file the lawsuit. The company said it was waiting for the U.S. government's antitrust enforcement against Microsoft to wrap up. At first Novell's case was dismissed, but it was later reinstated on appeal.

Microsoft lawyers have argued that Novell's loss of market share was its own doing because the company didn't develop a compatible WordPerfect program until long after the rollout of Windows 95. WordPerfect once had nearly 50 percent of the market for word processing, but its share quickly plummeted to less than 10 percent as Microsoft's own Office programs took hold.

Gates testified last month that he had no idea his decision to drop a tool for outside developers would sidetrack Novell. Gates said he was acting to protect Windows 95 and future versions from crashing.

He said that the company's preferred Word software was superior to WordPerfect, which was a "bulky, slow, buggy product" that did not integrate well with Windows 95.

Novell could have worked around the problem but failed to react quickly, he said.

Novell has argued that Gates ordered Microsoft engineers to reject WordPerfect as a Windows 95 word processing application because he feared it was too good.

Novell's lawsuit is the last major private antitrust case to follow the settlement of a federal antitrust enforcement action against Microsoft more than eight years ago.

Novell is now a wholly owned subsidiary of The Attachmate Group, the result of a merger that was completed earlier this year.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SALT LAKE CITY — A federal jury on Friday failed to reach a verdict in a Utah company's $1 billion antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. in a case so important to the computer giant that it ...
SALT LAKE CITY — A federal jury on Friday failed to reach a verdict in a Utah company's $1 billion antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft Corp. in a case so important to the computer giant that it ...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 311
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
12:14 PM on 12/20/2011
Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products had the same software (the program for processing languages, A.K.A. The Weidner Multi-lingual Word Processing Software, that also came from Provo) and when Microsoft switched over from Novell's WordPerfect to Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products the only difference was that they no longer had to deal with the Grumpy Grandpa of the Internet, Ray Noorda.
12:05 AM on 12/20/2011
I challenge the Micsosofties here to show a single instance where a major retailer is selling both a linux computer and Microsoft computer on the same hardware with a straight up comparison on price.

Microsoft's monopoly power does not allow it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Albright
03:45 PM on 12/24/2011
Server Beach. Do I get a cookie?
01:54 AM on 12/18/2011
BiIl Gate$ & M$ Micro$oft Window$ monopoIy are pure eviI. Use Linux.
photo
Skyhawk
When I write one it'll appear here.
12:58 AM on 12/18/2011
Wonder how many shares of MS stock did the holdout have?
photo
JohnHopwood2
Why do I feel like I'm in a hand basket?
12:42 AM on 12/18/2011
what sore losers ... I guess when you are a failure you can always sue the big guy ,,, I suppose no one every stole from Microsoft!?
05:20 PM on 12/18/2011
Weirdperfect is crappy software. I'm glad I don't have to use it any longer at work. I hope to see LOTUS NOTES go the same way and disappear.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Addison
07:49 AM on 12/19/2011
I take it you have not read how MS sent Novell the API's to Windows 9x and then changed them and never let Novell or others who were working on products that competed with MS know http://www.groklaw.net/articlebasic.php?story=20111112150717289 This is how MS won the office suite wars and crushed everyone else who tried to compete with them. If you do not have the proper API's you cannot write a program that will run and work effectively on an OS. Basically MS set Novell and others up to have programs that ran like crap, crashed, and locked up by never sending them the new and updated API's.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Albright
09:30 AM on 12/19/2011
The judge ruled in the case that namespace extensions had nothing to do with the underlying severe QA problems that Word Perfect suffered from. Even to the point of,, when the jury asked about namespace extensions he told them to disregard that part of the case.

Also, it is notable, that Novel themselves failed to document any case of the API causing them problems.

But none the less, it is kind of funny, that this court case reveals that Novel was taking the same tact as RMS did with emacs... Turn a text editor into a full blown operating system.
10:44 PM on 12/17/2011
I bought the first MS Office package because I needed to know it professionally. It was pretty basic and worked well. Word Perfect ignored Windows 3.0 and laughed at Microsoft's effort for over a year! They thought it would never catch on. A year later they realized they were losing a lot of business and they got busy writing a Windows version. Their first Word Perfect for Windows was lampooned by all the magazines as bloatware. Impossibly huge, slow and often froze the users computer. So MS had an Office Package where WP only had a very bad word processor to compete. WP floundered along for 2 years redesigning over again and by the time they had a good word processor, everyone was buying office suites. Lotus and dBase didn't do too well, either. You either came up with a good office suite or you went away. Many went away. This lawsuit is sour grapes over bad decisions made by Word Perfect Corp. I don't love MS and I don't believe they ever invented anything new, but they made it work and they sold applications to you for less money. Free browser anyone? If you want to swim in shark infested waters, keep a good lookout and swim fast. I don;t currently own or use any MS products other than Windows. Bloatware!
02:23 PM on 12/18/2011
WRONG WRONG WRONG

Microsoft had a monopoly on the OS. THis made it easier to command the market for office type software.

Microsoft has a monopoly and they use their clout to prevent Linux from becoming a real alternative.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greg Albright
09:35 AM on 12/19/2011
Linux did that to its self. Microsoft had nothing to do with Linux's failure to become relevant.

The main detriment to Linux has been the GPL. The only thing that Linux has accomplished is killing off the remnants of the Unix business...
photo
flashfyre
Honore de Balzac
09:28 PM on 12/17/2011
Too bad. MS is continuing their old tactics now that the consent decree has expired. The DOJ and EU should jointly crush MS, once and for all.
01:37 PM on 12/18/2011
What "old tactics" are they continuing, and how do they relate to a lawsuit over something that happened 17 years ago?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Vapula
Failure is not an option
09:10 PM on 12/17/2011
Shame, Microsoft has it coming.
01:37 PM on 12/18/2011
Has what coming? They were already hobbled for 10 years over a ridiculous and fallacious legal ruling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Addison
08:06 AM on 12/19/2011
StinkeyPete0279 let's see they locked OEM manufacturers into only being able to use MS products, stole the whole UPnP from IBM and OS2 while working with IBM on it, stole the GUI from Apple, and have tried to have proprietary standards for word documents, media files and the internet passed for patents they own. Also here is a new lawsuit from last year where they admitted to stealing code http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/15/microsoft-stole-plurk-cod_n_393185.html . MS has had a history of this, they are known for taking small start ups to court that refuse to let them buy them or finding some frivolous patent to crush them with. You can see some of the MS lawsuits here http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653
08:12 PM on 12/17/2011
should have built an 11 car garage instead of 32 on your estate billy!!!
08:00 PM on 12/17/2011
There is competition and the name is Linux. The problem is that Linux cannot gain the market share that would force the players to write drivers for Linux.

And Linux cannot gain this market share becase Linux is open source and open software without a marketing department. And Microsoft has a huge marketing department and it is all about keeping Linux from gaining market share.

Else why do we never see Linux and Microsoft on the same hardware at the same store?

The Linux computer would be priced cheaper on the same hardware as Microsoft. And people like to save money.
01:41 PM on 12/18/2011
"Else why do we never see Linux and Microsoft on the same hardware at the same store?"

Because nobody wants Linux, retailers realized nobody was buying Linux, and so they no longer sell it at big box retailers because big box retailers aren't in the habit of stocking things that won't sell. Ask someone at your local Best Buy how well Chromebooks are selling against Windows PCs and Macs.

This has been pointed out every time yohttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/16/microsoft-novell-lawsuit-jurors-deadlocked_n_1155006.html?ref=technology#u post this, but you still don't get it.
02:20 PM on 12/18/2011
People want computers and they want them as cheap as possible.

And the public in general never even sees Linux, so your point that the public does not want LInux is FALSE.
07:48 PM on 12/17/2011
Google will eat both of you, you idiots. Forget the lawsuits...spend money on better engineering instead.
07:32 PM on 12/17/2011
I used Word Perfect in the beginning and it was vastly inferior to MS Word in my opinion. I hated it. Seems to me Novell would have been better off developing a better word processing program and/or different products than they are having spent the money in a law suit.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stephen Davies
07:16 PM on 12/17/2011
Buy an Apple (granny smiths )
06:37 PM on 12/17/2011
Microsoft should have and still should be busted into a billion little pieces.
01:42 PM on 12/18/2011
I'm sure you have a valid legal basis for why that should be done. Not holding my breath waiting for it though.
photo
SonOfUgh
Your micro-bio is empty
04:59 PM on 12/17/2011
"He had strongly held views about the technical evidence and refused to budge," Novell attorney Jeffrey Johnson said.

Strongly held views. Hmmm, I wonder if those views were purchased by Microsoft. I have no evidence one way or the other - I'm just hypothesising.