iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Zynga IPO Disappoints, Could Negatively Affect Facebook IPO

Zynga Ipo

First Posted: 12/16/11 05:19 PM ET Updated: 12/16/11 07:03 PM ET


By Liana B. Baker and Alistair Barr
NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Online games developer Zynga Inc scored badly as it went public on Friday, dashing hopes for the year's hottest tech IPO, as investors frowned on its over-reliance on Facebook, dimming growth prospects, and outsized control by CEO Mark Pincus.

Zynga's stock fell 5 percent below its $10 initial public offering price to close at $9.50 on Nasdaq on Friday, dealing losses to IPO buyers used to racking up gains on a stock's first day of trading.

Investors had eagerly awaited the IPO as a way to get a slice of Facebook's growth before the leading social networking website goes public, possibly in 2012. Zynga makes money on Facebook by selling virtual items such as jewelry and poker chips in its games.

At least one analyst said on Friday that some investors may have been turned off my Chief Executive Mark Pincus' large voting stake and control over the company. He has a special class of shares that grants him 37 percent voting power even though his equity stake is much lower, and public shareholders will have less than 2 percent of votes.

"We believe that having a CEO/owner-controlled board is particularly dangerous for investors in young companies," said Cowen and Co analyst Doug Creutz.

Creutz, who has a neutral rating on the stock, added that history is full of examples of CEOs who have built young companies but cannot manage them when they mature.

Asked about his voting shares, Pincus told Reuters he decided to retain such huge control over Zynga because he believed from the start that he was the best person to lead the company.

"Investors who want to see the company deliver long-term value are going to be better served by the fact that I can continue to ensure the company keeps its focus on the long term and we don't let short-term swings and opportunities reduce that," he said in an interview.

Based on Friday's closing share price, the value of Pincus' holdings fell to $1.05 billion from $1.1 billion at the IPO price.

Friday's flop stunned investors who had expected a strong showing because the company is profitable, unlike other recent high profile Internet IPOs such as Groupon and Pandora.

"I was stunned when I saw this. This is a disaster for them. The way you're supposed to price deals is to give investors a 15 percent IPO discount to compensate them for the risk of backing a relatively new company," said Dan Niles, chief investment officer of AlphaOne Capital Partners, who did not buy shares.

"It makes me wonder about the underlying health of the market. IPOs like this can change the whole tenor of the market," he added.

Investors said Zynga's stock performance could hurt other private companies in the pipeline such as Yelp and even Facebook. Some investors regard Zynga's IPO as a proxy for Facebook, because 95 percent of its $828 million in revenue in the past nine months comes from Mark Zuckerberg's social network.

"Now we have an exciting IPO and people don't want it and that's a big concern for when Facebook comes out," said Jeff Sica, president and chief investment officer of SICA Wealth Management.

The cooling off in the IPO markets could hurt Facebook's estimated $100 billion valuation, BGC analyst Colin Gillis said.

Zynga's reliance on the platform was supposed to attract investors looking to bet on Facebook's growth. With Facebook's IPO expected to be at least several months away, Zynga is one of the few indirect ways to bet on the website's future.

Facebook takes a 30 percent cut of the revenue Zynga derives from the social network, which features more than 222 million monthly active Zynga users.

Zynga CEO Pincus said he was looking beyond the share price drop and said the company went public at the right time.

"We're going to focus on the products and business results we deliver in the next four to eight quarters and hope the stock market values and appreciates that as they see us deliver it," he said.

In San Francisco, hundreds of employees got to work early to watch Pincus ring the bell to open Nasdaq trading and wore T-sirts saying "I love play" featuring the ZNGA trading symbol printed on the sleeves. Cinnamon buns and hot cocoa were served before the ceremony.

CONCERNS WEIGH

The company, which competes with Electronic Arts, sold 100 million shares of Class A common stock at $10 per share in the IPO, roughly 11 percent of its shares on a diluted basis, at the top end of the $8.50 to $10 indicative range.

The IPO values Zynga at $8.9 billion. In November, the company had been valued at roughly $14 billion, according to an internal estimate in a regulatory filing.

But that lowered valuation may still have been too rich for some, said Sterne Agee analyst Arvind Bhatia.

Zynga's near $9 billion valuation is less than videogame maker Activision Blizzard Inc's $13.6 billion and higher than Electronic Arts Inc's $6.7 billion. In the last four quarters, Activision and Electronic Arts generated more revenue than Zynga.

Analysts and investors have also expressed concern over how it profits from less than 3 percent of its players who buy items in its free games.

Plus, its reliance on Facebook appears unhealthy to investors who want to see Zynga diversify its revenue sources. Pincus on Friday said the company's 13 million daily users of its mobile games is a good start, and doesn't trail its daily users on Facebook, which are at 40 million, as much as people assume.

Yet Zynga's growth rate of bookings - the money it makes up front when users buy items, is slowing - which most analysts said is a red flag and could hurt Zynga's future revenue.

Zynga is the second online games company selling virtual items to slip in its trading debut this week. On Wednesday, Nexon Co shares fell following its $1.2 billion IPO, which was Japan's biggest offering this year.

At $1 billion in proceeds, Zynga's IPO is still the largest from a U.S. Internet company since Google Inc raised $1.9 billion in 2004.

(Reporting By Liana B. Baker in New York and Alistair Barr in San Francisco)
Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

By Liana B. Baker and Alistair Barr NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Online games developer Zynga Inc scored badly as it went public on Friday, dashing hopes for the year's hottest tech IPO, as i...
By Liana B. Baker and Alistair Barr NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Online games developer Zynga Inc scored badly as it went public on Friday, dashing hopes for the year's hottest tech IPO, as i...
Filed by Ramona Emerson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 32
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
08:30 PM on 01/18/2012
THESE ARE THE REAL REASONS ZYNGAS STOCKS ARE FAILING-THE VOICE OF GAMERS VIA A PETITION FOR SOLUTIONS!
http://www.facebook.com/events/269540276438607/
10:55 AM on 12/18/2011
Wow..so this is what folks get excited about today... A crappy online game maker?.......
03:58 AM on 12/18/2011
Both Zynga and Facebook's real value is under a million dollars, about 0.1% of their valuation. That is how much it costs to develop this software. On the other hand, why not exchange fake monopoly money between friends?
03:33 PM on 12/17/2011
Know one will come out and say it, but wall street loves selling virtual things for money, but they just don't seem to trust that pincus character.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JFetch
Don't make up facts to support your ideals.
01:33 PM on 12/17/2011
Almost all of it's revenue comes off the back of Facebook. If that connection is severed, where would that leave investors? That's the main reason why I wouldn't invest in it.
11:12 AM on 12/17/2011
What moron investors advise a company to IPO prior to the 2012 election? What moron company would listen? It's a "teenage" understanding of the financial market currently to HOLD OFF until after the election. Go Facebook go, because I'd really like to see you sink into oblivion!
09:43 AM on 12/17/2011
This company is a fad. Where will it be in 10 years? Nowhere. It's near impossible for companies with legitimate products and services to survive ten years but "Farmville" and other like games where the main source of revenue is people buying "virtual" upgrades is a fad.

One can argue that if Facebook makes a few wrong moves they'll be toast within 10 years too. We sometimes find it hard to imagine current "giants" going down, but look at Yahoo, AOL, MySpace and Blackberry and it'll tell you that just a few corporate mistakes can make giants fall rather quickly.
10:39 AM on 12/17/2011
Yes, but on the other hand, no, as a T-shirt friends had printed up for me said.
Overpricing on IPOs is notorious; sorry the insiders did not get their free profits, but most of us individual investors know that there will be a drop right after most IPOs.
Farmville may not last 10 years—on the other hand, look at Monopoly for a long-legged board-game success—but the question is, do Mr. Pincus and his employees have the talent and ability to create new games, new variations for older games, etc., to keep a gaming public interested? AOL was the first in its field, now one of many, and I argue that their time with Time-Warner was not in their best interest (I may be biased in that, as I bought the stock unknowingly THE DAY BEFORE the buyout was announced, and my stock instantly lost ~73% of its value). Tech companies are different than brick-and-mortar types, I guess, though, as there are not so many physical assets to value.
Interesting to watch from outside, if you do not think about the many employees involved.
photo
PathofTotality
Regret serves no purpose
09:27 AM on 12/17/2011
For Sale:

A lovely 10 acre farm with all the corn and beets you can fathom. The barn and house are brand new as other FB friends have moved in beside me along with the tractor. The farm hands never get tired as long as your fingers don't get tired and the farm can be tended from anywhere....like magic!!

Asking price - 21 bagillion dollars
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sensimilla
Lead with your heart, and your mind will follow...
02:44 AM on 12/17/2011
haha, this actually makes me laugh. Not sure why, but it does. Maybe someday soon, individual investors will stop getting sucked into these nanotrading ponzi schemes by g$acs-types and ventural capitalist vultures who pump and dumping these firms to death, and go back to VALUE, long term investing, and dollar cost averaging. Face it, we have no place in the day trade market.
10:43 AM on 12/17/2011
I think this is the beginning of individual investors not getting sucked in—I suspect that it is fallout from 2008, Citizens United, and the general distrust of Wall Street; about time! Bring back a REAL SEC; the one with teeth that investment bankers feared during the 1960s and 1970s!
garystartswithg
el sueno de la razon produce republicans
11:43 PM on 12/16/2011
Buy stock in Farmville with real money? Um, no thanks.
11:14 PM on 12/16/2011
"Friday's flop stunned investors who had expected a strong showing because the company is profitable, unlike other recent high profile Internet IPOs such as Groupon and Pandora."

See the problem is those investors were TRYING to be rational. A tech IPO that isn't making money has the swing from negatives to positive to hyperinflate growth statements of profits generating amatuer buys and overpriced value.
10:52 PM on 12/16/2011
The stock market is just a betting game. The only real value of a stock is its dividend, which most stocks do not pay these days. Everything else is just exchange value predicated on herd mentality.

Zynga's games are stupid, but I see no reason to doubt their ability to remain profitable. Their product is cheap to deliver, they have a huge user account base, and their users spend inordinate amounts of time with their eyeballs glued to their content. They can be a virtual goods market, an advertising medium, and a product placement venue. With the kind of userbase they have, it's not so difficult to find ways to make money.

As for reliance on Facebook, once again, I think Facebook is stupid, but I see no reason why building applications on Facebook's platform is bad for business. It's not like it would be a better idea to build on Microsoft's "LIVE" platform, which seems to be more of a nebulous brand than a cohesive platform, especially on clients other than Xbox. Google didn't think to develop its social network product as a platform capable of supporting third-party applications.

It would have been prohibitively difficult for Zynga as a startup to develop their own social network platform with their own user account base as a means of delivering their social gaming products. Facebook was the only sensible way to get their business off the ground. But now as a $9B corporation, they have more than enough resources to develop and deploy their own network services framework and migrate their existing userbase. 

At this point, Zynga has as a better shot at taking the fight to Facebook than Google does, because Google's product managers clearly do not understand platforms at all, whereas Zynga has been by far the most demanding client of any social networking platform from their inception. I doubt that anyone understands how to improve upon existing social networking platforms better than Zynga. 

Everything that Zynga needed from Facebook, they already took. They can strike off on their own at any time, I wouldn't be surprised if it happens within the next 12 months. They're really competing against Apple, which is aggressively building out its messaging, notifications, and synchronization frameworks in the shape of a future social network including casual gaming.
11:26 PM on 12/16/2011
The value of a stock is owning a portion of the company.
10:51 AM on 12/17/2011
Bravo, I think that way too, as does Warren Buffett! One’s belief in a company’s future is the determining factor in buying shares, as well as the market price—sometimes the market offers bargains, other times prices are absurdly high (often the case with IPOs; the comment about deals being priced to investors at a 15% discount is an important little nugget of information buried in this article; no wonder IPOs are not for the average individual; the cards are stacked against you by at least that much). But there is a point about a dividend being an important part of an investment decision; it buffers the mistakes a company might make and the fickleness of the stock market, perhaps especially if one reinvests those dividends.
10:33 PM on 12/16/2011
Disappoints?...who would have guessed?.....everyone except the founder.
09:49 PM on 12/16/2011
it is no wonder. There games are so bug riddled that the only place they can sell them is on Facebook. They would never make it on the open market
09:40 PM on 12/16/2011
Ha ha.