iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Government Spending Bill Passed By Congress As Democrats Declare Victory

Harry Reid

First Posted: 12/17/2011 10:46 am Updated: 12/19/2011 7:12 am

UPDATE - House Republicans are threatening to reject the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance extension deal approved by the Senate, according to GOP sources. The House GOP convened a conference call Saturday afternoon, where rank-and-file members expressed open hostility to the bargain. Neither House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) or Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) is interested in fighting for a deal cut by Senate Leaders Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) with little of their input. GOP sources said that passage of the Senate bill was highly unlikely, and that House Republicans are more likely either to amend it and return it next week, or appoint conferees to find a compromise.

WASHINGTON -- The Senate passed a last-minute bill Saturday to fund the federal government, and Democrats were privately patting themselves on the back for what they see as victories in cleansing partisan ideological add-ons from the measure.

Democrats believe the bill, which passed 67 to 32 and was the final major piece of legislation of the year, hands them a slew of points to use heading into the 2012 election season.

"There were a lot of ideological riders, and other nasty things in there that we got stripped from the bill," said one Democratic aide familiar with the negotiations.

The trillion-dollar "omnibus bill" passed the House overwhelmingly Friday, and President Obama is expected to sign it soon before going on vacation.

"The GOP came in with an aggressive agenda and both in April and now today, the president and Democratic negotiators held their ground," said another Democrat, referring to budget battles last spring. The senior aide added that they "made sure that extreme, ideological riders that had nothing to do with funding the government were removed."

"Priorities like health care reform, Wall Street reform and education were funded," said the aide, speaking anonymously Friday night because negotiations over tax cuts and other items were ongoing.

In fact, such items had all faced major cuts in the original bills passed by the House.

Perhaps the most-heavily targeted agency was the Environmental Protection Agency, which faced funding cuts of more than $1.5 billion. It still wound up with a substantial cut, but ended up with a budget above $8 billion, instead of the GOP's proposed $7.15 billion.

And removed from the bill were dozens of environmental riders that would have done things like allow mining around the Grand Canyon, controversial mountaintop mining practices blamed for harming streams and water quality, removal of protections for gray wolves, and prevention of the EPA from regulating certain greenhouse gas emissions.

On the Wall Street front, Republicans sought to weaken the new Consumer Financial Protection Board, which they contend has too much authority. They also would have cut back and weakened the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which plays a central role under last year's financial reforms in regulating risky derivatives trading. Both agencies were preserved by today's bill.

One source said the White House was especially pleased that money was preserved for the president's Race to the Top education initiative, which rewards schools for innovative reform plans. "Republicans were bragging about cutting Race to the Top in their bill, although how it's good to cut education, I don't know," a Democratic source said.

The bill also added money to the health reform law, instead of cutting it.

The Democrats provided an extensive list of what they see as bragging points, saying the bill:

  • Prevents policy riders that would have restricted funding for Planned Parenthood and eliminated funding for Title X family planning programs, severely limiting women’s access to health care.
  • Prevents restrictions that would have reversed President Obama’s policy allowing family travel and money remittances to Cuba.
  • Saves 60,000 New Head Start slots created by the stimulus act and spends more than $550 million for the Race to the Top program.
  • Boosts the Student Aid Administration with nearly $50 million in new funding for loan servicing and collections.
  • Preserves the AmeriCorps program by stopping a GOP provision that would have cut the program.

They also pointed to a string of riders that were cut from the bill, including items that would have:

  • Barred use of funds for the CPSC's public product safety database, SaferProducts.gov.
  • Cut federal funding of National Public Radio
  • Stopped a new military chaplain training curriculum written after the repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell
  • Ended the Home Affordable Modification Program, which aims to help homewoners avoid foreclosure
  • Prohibited use federal funds to develop and finalize EPA rules naming coal ash as a hazardous waste
  • Stopped the FCC from implementing new neutrality rules
  • Stopped federal spending to run and implement the heath reform law until 90 days after any legal challenges are complete.

Republicans also declared wins in adding many other restrictions, including blocking a phaseout of 100-watt incandescent lightbulbs, stopping express funding for a number of President Obama's "czars," cutting the budget overall, and placing restrictions on funding for the United Nations.

Yet it was some of the things that made it into the bill that attracted scathing denunciations from Republicans concerned about waste, especially in the defense budget.

"We have 15 minutes to consider a document 1,221 pages long, representing $915 billion of the taxpayers' money, filled with unauthorized, unrequested money," said Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.)

"There's $3.5 billion of unrequested, unauthorized [spending] ... projects like for Guam. You thought the Bridge to Nowhere was bad?" McCain said. "This is 53 civilian school buses and 53 repair kits for $10.7 million; $12.7 million for a cultural artifacts repository. That's in the name of defense.

"I have amendments to save the taxpayers billions of dollars as associated with this bill," McCain said. "But never mind because we're going to go home for Christmas."

President Obama was expected to address the bill Saturday afternoon.

Michael McAuliff covers politics and Congress for the Huffington Post. Talk to him on Facebook.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
UPDATE - House Republicans are threatening to reject the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance extension deal approved by the Senate, according to GOP sources. The House GOP convened a conference...
UPDATE - House Republicans are threatening to reject the payroll tax cut and unemployment insurance extension deal approved by the Senate, according to GOP sources. The House GOP convened a conference...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,278
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (119 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
PenGoddess 11:50 PM on 12/17/2011
"I'll be home for Christmas, but only in your dreams."
 Read More...
Once again the immaturity of the house leadership bubbles to the surface...if Mitch and Harry want it then we will stomp our feet and hold our breath until we turn blue. So, I guess they're hoping that the closer it gets to the holiday, the more pressure there will be on members of congress and they will be so desperate to get out they will do anything.

Whatever they present, VETO it, Mr. President! All their talk about bipartisanship is just that.  Their definition of bipartisanship is give us what we want and we won't hold the country hostage. ARRGGHHH!!
01:28 PM on 12/24/2011
Democrats declare a victory for a two month extension? HOw is that a victory? And for whom? A year minimum would have been a small accomplishment. Besides, my wife saw a $9 increase in her paycheck from this tax benefit that's supposed to save the economy. Maybe I can put a happy meal on layaway with it?
05:58 PM on 12/19/2011
Wow. What a load. When, exactly, do we, I mean I, pay for all this extra-governmental spending going not for my benefit or not into my pocket fast?

No wonder tea partiers and OWS's sprang-up.
11:10 AM on 12/19/2011
i wish my budget had a little pork in it, i say its time to reverse the poles. what would they do if we only paid what we could afford? only what fit into OUR budgets. do you think they would ask and spend the money more wiseley? i mean each paycheck only what we could afford. because they like donations so so much,,,, then thats what we could call it..( political welfare). whats your thought on that?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
10:44 AM on 12/19/2011
A Republican win: You can still use incandescent light bulbs!!!! A Democratic win: Save 60,000 new head start slots (among a slew of others that help American citizens that need it the most). Boy you got to love those GOPBAGGER priorities, eh?
01:07 PM on 12/19/2011
If chronic poverty in the U.S. persists, we may be looking at
a major popular revolt.
05:15 AM on 12/21/2011
Now using real statistics show me where those that participate in head start actually benefit. They dont. It a welfare based baby sitting program. And it was not to cut anything but the additional monies that were provided in that so called stimulus bill. You liberals just dont get it. This happens ALL the time. There is no money for your program so they come up with a one time deal for funding. And then the one time gimmick becomes a lifetime spending program. And this particular one has NOT shown to have any benefits to young children. So what is all this money being spent for?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
08:37 AM on 12/21/2011
I love educating mushrooms: http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/tta-system/family/For%20Parents/Everyday%20Parenting/Parents%20as%20Teachers/PlayingGamesin.htm
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie Martinez
10:04 AM on 12/19/2011
Democrats Declare Victory - Wall Street Rules - 99% Suffer!
10:30 AM on 12/19/2011
good to see people are figuring out the democrats are the group in the pockets of the super wealthy.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
10:45 AM on 12/19/2011
Most people have known that but we're all stuck in a position where they, as contemptable as they are, continue to be better (if only barely) than the brownshirtparty on the right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eddie Martinez
02:29 PM on 12/19/2011
Sorry, but the D & R's are booth in the pockets of the wealthy.
08:10 AM on 12/19/2011
The government kill what our fore fathers created. Forcing banks and insititutions to lend money for houses people could not afford. To big to fail for friend of the party in charge. Gocernment lending money to create winners and loser by your politicials donations. Regulations were in place and were not enforced so government create more bureaus and committees to do what the one that are already there did not do. Government had to take control and as all things that government controls it goes belly up. The more the government controls the worst things get.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
10:46 AM on 12/19/2011
You're talking points of the day brought to you by yet anothermouth breather straight from foxnationdotcom. Give the little fellow a pat on the head and send him on his way.
06:11 PM on 12/19/2011
You are on the right track and "SATAN-lite's" condescending attempt at discrediting you speaks volumes about their lack of "enLITEned" counterpoint.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rob burton
"I will write peace on your wings and you will fly
08:09 AM on 12/19/2011
..let's get it straight, there are only three things that republicans care about, ethnic disparity, constant war somewhere in the world, and legislation that funnels money to their sponsers..that's it,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zcapitalism
AN OUNCE OF PERCEPTION A POUND OF OBSCURE
08:40 AM on 12/19/2011
BULLSHlT
09:23 AM on 12/19/2011
Yes I thought something was missing from that list. They like like to talk 'BULLSHIT'
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
10:46 AM on 12/19/2011
Pretty much.
diomedes23
Conservatives are the problem
07:09 AM on 12/19/2011
The Founding Fathers, in their wisdom, set the House terms at two years for a very good reason. If they screw things up, we can vote them out before they do too much damage. Although, to be fair, this current House did a lot of damage in a mere two years.
10:31 AM on 12/19/2011
the houses of the 4 years previous did WAY more damage then this any before it. all dem controlled
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
graceaustin
10:56 AM on 12/19/2011
Like what?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MUDPUPPY
02:54 AM on 12/19/2011
If Washington had ran our government more business like instead of like a bunch of manipulative politicians, we would be in much better shape now. Who would have thought that George Washington would have the foresight to consider that politicks would seriously divide and weaken our nation?
01:51 AM on 12/19/2011
Yep, yep, republicans are bought and paid for. I wonder how much they got for their souls.
diomedes23
Conservatives are the problem
07:09 AM on 12/19/2011
Whatever they got, it was something for nothing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zcapitalism
AN OUNCE OF PERCEPTION A POUND OF OBSCURE
08:41 AM on 12/19/2011
Im a republican and please tell me who owns me.
08:59 AM on 12/19/2011
Your political representatives and those who own them. Too bad that you can't tell that they've sold you out. Or is it that you have hated all that America has been since civil rights were passed and prefer fascism with corporations ruling our country?

I tend to think that you're a conservative who wears blinders where your party is concerned. Or is it really that you just hate Obama to the point of sacrificing the well being of America just to get him?
09:07 AM on 12/19/2011
By the way, capitalism, as we have known it, is dead. Corporate communism has taken hold and all our wealth is being extracted. That is not something that American conservatives support. Why are you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shelby596
Political junkie, animal lover, activist
12:32 AM on 12/19/2011
There's so much to say about Republicans, but I'll start with this: After what we've all been through in this financial crisis, ANYONE who is against consumer protection is just plain wrong, stup*d and evil.
06:30 PM on 12/19/2011
Define your idea of "consumer protection." Does it include the new "farm bill" that increases to roughly 15 a list of duplicate-purposed regulatory agencies charging yet another fee to protect the consumer and drive out small farms?
01:19 PM on 12/24/2011
Nice one!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyrosedeky
11:51 PM on 12/18/2011
So what's news about the congress not wanting to pass something? What is good in that bill is the fact they didn't eliminate the funding for the training program for military chaplains. Especially since the congress and senate spends almost $1 million on their own chaplains. I still can't figure out how they do that. Seriously folks, think about it. To spend that much money on chaplains what do they do, have every cleric, minister, priest, and rabbi in the greater D.C. area on retainer? One thing for sure, the American people aren't getting their money's worth in ministerial teaching to the congress. At least no compassionate teachings of Christ if the Republican congress are really Christians.
05:24 AM on 12/21/2011
This funding, I mean indoctrination, of the chaplains was totally not needed. It is an effort for the left to force feed every chaplain in the military and brainwash them into believing like they do. In other words if the chaplain does not believe the liberal homosexual agenda then they will be brainwashed into adopting it. I can just see if the repubs would have added a bill to brainwash the chaplains into how bad abortion is. And dont go to the name calling because you dont know what i believe or not. This was just to compare what was just done in spending that the dems think was great.
08:28 PM on 12/18/2011
Question for you all, libs like to say that trickle down economics don't work - right? But then the dems and Obama say that the SS tax cut puts money in the hands of the middle class and that they will spend it. This is the same as trickle down the money is just coming a different way. Say you are a waiter and work in a nice resturant. A person that is getting a little more in the pay check takes the family out for a nice dinner. You get your tip, the bus boy and bartender also gets tipped out, the resturant owner sells some meals so bottom line trickle down works, Ronnie was right all along. And it took Obama to prove it, gotta love it. OK libs your own is behind trickle down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeInFla
08:39 PM on 12/18/2011
Just how is the 1% putting money in the hands of the middle class? They are costing us money. We pay for the subsidies and loophole tax breaks. The best and only way to get money from the 1% into the hands of the middleclass is for the 1% to pay their fair share of taxes.
08:53 PM on 12/18/2011
Lets see, I looked back at my post and didn't mention the 1% as you called them at all. I am talking about Obama and the SS tax cut extension. So re-read it and come back to comment on the topic I brought up or post your own, independent of mine please.
11:35 PM on 12/18/2011
You "pay" for their subsidies? LOL! Only a lib could believe that not TAKING money from someone is GIVING them money.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ladyrosedeky
11:58 PM on 12/18/2011
No dear, what you just described was trickle up economics because you were explaining how when middle-class and poor people have more money, more money goes into the economy so it gets stimulated and the wealthy do better because the poor and middle-class are doing better. And there are no threats to the wealthy because the poor are feeling empowered to make a better life and work their way out of poverty. So is the middle-class feeling more empowered to work their way out of the middle-class into the upper 10% because their businesses such as this fictional restaurant is doing business and growing, maybe becoming the next Chili's or Crock Pot.
01:46 AM on 12/19/2011
Don't see how you would call that trickle up since it is going down to lower level workers. When I had money I would travel and stimulate economies of other cities in the U. S. and a cople of other countries also. If have more money than the person recieving it than I would think it is trickle down. Hmm.
I don't view the wealthy as a threat, I view them as my customers. So when they buy one of my products that is trickle down. When a poor person calls they don't buy anything. Anyway, thanks for your reply
08:18 PM on 12/18/2011
Step right up folks , talking points right here folks, get your talking points dirt cheap right here.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howzat
Eliminate Poverty
07:47 PM on 12/18/2011
Bet Boehner will blink. All talk. He does not want to be written into history as the second guy to shut the Gov't down. Newt did it and look what happened.

Chicken sh1tes one and all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
boogie albert 56
But I wa promised a Water Buffalo
08:13 PM on 12/18/2011
If Harry does not pass Boehners bi-partisan bill he will be the one shutting the governemnt down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Howzat
Eliminate Poverty
09:25 PM on 12/18/2011
Is that you Gingrich? How is Calista
05:47 AM on 12/19/2011
bi-partisan? not in the real world