iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Aides: Keystone Pipeline Inclusion 'Is Absolutely Not A Blink'

Obama Keystone

First Posted: 12/17/11 03:39 PM ET Updated: 12/19/11 08:14 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- At a press conference on Dec. 7, President Obama warned congressional Republicans not to attach a controversial crude oil pipeline from Canada through the U.S. to a bill extending a year-old break on people's payroll tax.

"Any effort to try to tie Keystone to the payroll tax cut, I will reject," the president said, standing next to his Canadian counterpart, Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

Ten days later, Republicans, with the help of sympathetic Democrats and lawmakers who just wanted to get a deal done, did just that. By a vote of 89 to 10, the Senate voted on Saturday morning to extend the payroll tax cut for two months. Included in the bill was language requiring the State Department to issue a permit within 60 days to proceed with the 1,700-mile oil pipeline.

The inclusion, on its surface, goes directly against the president's veto threat. But the White House has no plans to torpedo the measure. At a briefing with reporters following a short statement by the president, senior administration officials made the case that their position on the pipeline had not been affected.

"It is absolutely not a blink," said one official. "It does not make him do a single thing... All they did was shorten the review process. ... They shortened the review process to 60 days; they are not making the president do anything."

Depending on whom you ask, the bill passed on Saturday does different things with respect to the Keystone XL pipeline. House Republican leadership says that it will mandate that the State Department approve the permit in 60 days time. After that, it would be up to the president to override the approval if, in fact, he wants the pipeline killed.

"It is not as simple as they put it," countered a senior administration official. "I know that will come as a huge shock."

The White House has been slightly cagey with its interpretation of the law, but one official raised questions as to whether it was legal or constitutional for Congress to force the executive branch's hand on this matter. Asked if the president would issue a signing statement nullifying the Keystone language, a senior administration official declined to show the administration's hand, saying, "We are not going to get into that."

As it stands now, Republican lawmakers may have effectively killed the Keystone pipeline by putting it in the payroll tax cut bill. On Dec. 12, the State Department issued a statement that warned Congress it would be "unable to make a determination to issue a permit" for the project if Congress were to "impose an arbitrary deadline." The bill passed Saturday may no longer give officials at State that choice. But the senior administration officials insisted that, should the decision come to the president, he would operate with those same considerations and concerns.

"I don't think the State Department could have been any clearer but Republicans in Congress insisted on pushing forward even though it may result in an outcome that obviously goes against their desires," said one senior administration official.

Another added, "The Republicans are driving toward an outcome that they disagree with. I mean it is pretty remarkable. Sometimes folks play chess and sometimes people play checkers."

The politics of the deal reached Saturday are certainly less than clear. Republicans will have to go through a payroll tax fight once again in two months, something leadership desperately wanted to avoid considering the damage it has done to the GOP's image. At the same time, the president is now forced into a corner: forced to choose between signing off on the pipeline and angering environmentalists or taking a heap of heat from putting off the issue.

"They're making the president kill the pipeline before the election, as opposed to after -- and that's not nothing," tweeted Michael Goldfarb, a Republican operative who served as Sen. John McCain's online communications director during the 2008 campaign.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- At a press conference on Dec. 7, President Obama warned congressional Republicans not to attach a controversial crude oil pipeline from Canada through the U.S. to a bill extending a year...
WASHINGTON -- At a press conference on Dec. 7, President Obama warned congressional Republicans not to attach a controversial crude oil pipeline from Canada through the U.S. to a bill extending a year...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 8,032
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (110 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
johndpieper 08:25 PM on 12/17/2011
Obama only has to rush his decision. He can and will say "no" and deny the pipeline. All the republicans asked him to do is make his decision in 60 days. He doesn't have to approve it, he has to decide. He's already decided. He's going to deny it. A very good family friend works for the company that will build it. He has told us, the bulk of the jobs will be in Canada for Canadian citizens. The jobs in the  Read More...
-me-
D to go forward, R to go backwards
10:38 PM on 12/20/2011
Every other Canadain pipe line coming into the U.S. goes to the mid west, Canada can't keep those full. Now we "need" another Canadain pipe line but this one, doesn't go to to mid west. The plan is to pipe the tar sludge to the Gulf Coast, where it it will be refined. Why will the refining be done in the gulf instead of the mid west? so the oil companies can export the gasoline to other countries ofcourse. This pipeline has nothing to do with helping us cover our fuel usage, it's about maximum profits with socialized costs.
nam medic
Service above Self ...Always
07:21 AM on 12/20/2011
We have purchased trillions of dollars of OPEC oil in the last thirty years. While our petrodollars have built mansions in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar, our cities like Detroit, Philadelphia, and St. Louis are burned out wrecks.
How many jobs have been lost to buying foreign oil from enemies and rejecting energy from our friends in Canada? The young people need good jobs and our government needs revenue to prevent the US from defaulting on our debt.
Stop this war on work in the United States.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Al Nava
Working-Class & Progressive Revolutionary Leader
04:20 AM on 12/20/2011
Barack Obama will "cave" on this like every other Right-wing/ Conservative legislation before. Or perhaps Obama is not "caving"? Perhaps this has been Obama's agenda from the beginning? Perhaps Obama has been a Wall Street puppet all along?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Lee Harrington
I'd Love To Change The World..
03:57 AM on 12/20/2011
THIS IS IT!

The President of the United States of America has to make a decision on XL
His legacy, and the future of our country, are on the line with this one decision.

NO KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE IN MY COUNTRY
08:03 PM on 12/19/2011
Will this President ever get the guts to veto anything? I keep hoping for a better performance but it just does not happen with this man. He has always played a shady game. You cannot trust one thing he says.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Rayburn
GET YOUR GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY LIVINGROOM
03:27 AM on 12/20/2011
you speak the truth, however obama is just as all those other clowns in DC, out for himself. i dont hold his lies aginst him as much as i hold his incompetence against him.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gsmp
What the ????
11:26 AM on 12/19/2011
Nice job alec,koch, armey,rove,luntz. You've got dems/libs/progs dancing to your soundbites once again.

I thought we were better than that bumpersticker reactionary pavlov cr ap.

Anyone got any idea how long it will take to build this pipeline, who's financing it and who will profit?

I know there are pipelines all through the Ogalala and everywhere else, but when do we stop? Wasn't exxonvaldez or the gulf enough?

We all are so fortunate to have had ancesters (that includes firstnations) willing to take the chance, sink or swin, of a lifetime. When do we give back?
12:28 PM on 12/19/2011
They're already looking at more tar sands
In Utah...
And it would all get refined here, and sent to China... while our nation becomes a third world.
It will create a few thousand temporary jobs. Wow.
It will make a handful of people billions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gsmp
What the ????
12:33 PM on 12/19/2011
Glad to see so many people realize the down side, Laurelea.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gsmp
What the ????
01:01 PM on 12/19/2011
Let's stand with our President and change 30 years of bragging about 'areyou dumberthan a fifthgrader'.
nothingchanges
too soon old, too late smart
10:37 AM on 12/19/2011
IMPO................not since the Great Depression have we needed a President like FDR more than we do today.

Presidential Veto's through 2010 of the Obama Administration?.......................................0

Presidential Veto's during the FDR Administration?.....................................................635

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0801767.html

It begs a Question........................What does President Obama Stand For?

Apparently ..................almost anything Congress is willing to throw at him.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlmn08
Lord, please protect me from your followers.
10:34 AM on 12/19/2011
Cutting the payroll tax gives people more money to spend, hench, good for the economy. The pipeline provides temporary jobs at the cost of the environment for the oil needs of China, hench, good for China, not us.....very short sighted. If Canada wants to sell oil to China, they can go through British Columbia, which wants no part of it. I wonder why?
10:28 AM on 12/19/2011
from"ruleoflaw":

http://www­.thestar.c­om/news/wo­rld/articl­e/1075261-obama-hir­es-former-­keystone-p­ipeline-lo­bbyist-as-­new-campai­gn-adviser
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jasaplay
Yeah - Jersey - you got a problem wid dat?
09:17 AM on 12/19/2011
why not put the oil pipeline on the ballot and let voters decide? We need jobs out here - helll-ooh!
Besides, it won't cost the government a single dime. Why not let Business do business?!?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cambridge9
10:34 AM on 12/19/2011
Don't you mean let OIL COMPANIES dictate this country's policy?? This oil WILL NOT be for USA consumption unless we pay FULL world OPEC prices at the pump. As for jobs? The numbers are greatly exagerated and those jobs which are available will be split two ways. Imported (H1B Visa) jobs for scientists, hi-tech and refinery management - and the grunt work for the actual building will be VERY short term (per State) for construction workers. And why should residents of Nebraska, South Dakota and Wyoming be thrown under the bus by threatening the Nebraska aquifer (the biggest aquifer on this continent) with the water being fouled by oil spills and pipe leakage. Have you wondered why Canada doesn't want that pipeline to cross their own pristene landscape to get it to market? I'm sure that IF the oil company confirmed - by allowing refineries in the middle of the country to accept the oil instead at a major port city, and that the oil would ALL be available to the USA at reasonable prices we might reconsider rerouting the pipeline. But at a Congressional hearing last week the oil company executives REFUSED to consider that idea. Why? Because once at the refinery in Texas., most of it will be loaded onto tankers - and shipped overseas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mlmn08
Lord, please protect me from your followers.
10:37 AM on 12/19/2011
I wonder why the Republicans won't pass a jobs bill??? Do they care about American jobs or just scr ewing Obama?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cambridge9
12:10 PM on 12/19/2011
Easy answer! The last three (3) words of your post is the CORRECT answer!! : - )
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
last man standing
and that's just the way it is!
09:10 AM on 12/19/2011
Of course Obama would like to put everything off until after 2013.

Obama doesn't govern because he doesn't know how to govern. All he knows is how to campaign. He has no real position on anything. The positions that he takes he considers are the ones that are popular to his base at the moment.

He has a tendency not to tell the whole truth at times and stretched the truth at other times. The sooner he is gone the better it will be for everybody.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cambridge9
08:43 AM on 12/19/2011
Want people back to work????? Back in 1986 (25 years ago) I was motorcycling cross country and - just outside the ghost town of Calico, CA) I turned a corner and was greeted with an amazing sight. There, standing on a hillside and stretching as far as I could see, were windmills - HUNDREDS OF THEM! I took pictures so that no one would be able to dispute me. Later at a little gas station I asked the attendant what the windmills were for - and the answer astounded me even more than the sight of them. "They are supplying Edwards Air Force Base with electricity", he said. I was rememinded of back in 1941 when (while living on the German occupied Island of Jersey) my dad hauled an old generator onto our roof, planed his own blades, ran wires to old wet storage batteries and pointed it out towards the Atlantic! Voila, while the island had no electricity my family did - and later so did our neighbors. Even the German billets were dark, but we made sure the curtains blocked the light from our windows and burned our light bulbs. Don't you naysayers think that if wind worked 70 years ago - or even 25 years ago, that we could take lessons from that. There are places in this country which actually are 'natural wind tunnels' which could supply 'mega-watts' which would create more 'permanent' jobs than this pipeline with its 'temporary' jobs !!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deltalady
12:00 PM on 12/19/2011
But that wouldn't put enough money into the coffers of worthless politicians like Barack Obama and all his Republican and Dem friends in the Congress. We all know how to fix the country...bring back jobs, make Wall Street pay, cut off the salaries and benefits of our great "leaders" til they have to be as miserable and sad as we are this week. But it will never happen. All out anarchy is the only way to redemption for this country...but we'll get around to it...after Dancing with the Stars, the next Kardashian wedding, the next surfing squirrel, etc.
photo
fla kracker
Fame is a weed, reputation an oak tree
09:14 AM on 12/21/2011
And your answer is?
07:12 AM on 12/19/2011
what an ego!! obama is calling himself the 4th best president in US history..hey, he just one step closer to being a megalomanic..talk about believing your own propaganda!! one would believe the 4th worst president but not obamas claim of 4th best.. so funny!! thank you 60 mins for bring it to light..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
advchaser
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery.
07:07 AM on 12/19/2011
Like a children's baseball game that gets called after 10 or more unanswered runs are scored, Obama's should retire in favor of someone with some smarts.

Only problem is ... I wonder how we bypass Joe Biden??
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gurinder Dhillon
Federal Reserve is as Federal as Federal Express
11:24 AM on 12/19/2011
Smarts has nothing to do with it, he's intelligent he just has no backbone 3 years I thought he stood for all things progressive but his spineless tenor thus far shows that he like any other elected official only stands for anything when he's told to by his campaign financiers.
photo
Lucile S
Lib and a truth lover.
06:12 AM on 12/19/2011
That's exactly what Michael Goldfarb said: GOP wants Obama to put off this pipeline issue and then asking him why he has deprived so many people from jobs. It's a master stroke made by Republicans.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
julescator
Just the FACTS, Por Favor!
09:00 AM on 12/19/2011
And the Brilliant President with retort that why would they opt for jobs on the pipeline which by intelligent estimates is 6,500 jobs and Not pass the American Jobs Act that they President propsed in September which creates 2 million jobs. The Republicans have Never outsmarted this President. They don't have it in them. They are all talking points and no substance.

As is common said, they GOP playes checkers while the Brilliant President plays 3 deminional chess! HA!
photo
Lucile S
Lib and a truth lover.
09:47 AM on 12/19/2011
You know, nowadays GOP has one aim only: block Obama's road. And nothing else.
He must show he's the smartest.