iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Income, Parental Education Linked To Pre-School Learning Gaps

Income Inequality Education

Posted: 12/20/2011 4:35 pm

As states revamp their early childhood education to grab a slice of federal education dollars, some education experts are urging policymakers to look outside the classroom to improve educational opportunites for the country's youngsters.

Just as Obama awarded over $500 million in state grants to improve pre-K, the Brookings Institution released a report arguing more attention paid to family background factors such as poverty and maternal education would help improve educational outcomes for our littlest learners.

The report argued that gaps in children's ability to learn begin long before they enter the classroom -- and that those gaps can have lasting effects on class mobility.

"If you look at kids with parents in the bottom 20 percent, their chances of remaining in the bottom 20 percent are very high," said Julia Isaacs, a Brookings fellow and one of the paper's authors. "How is it that children of low-income parents don’t succeed as well as other children?"

The paper found that parental income is strongly linked to academic performance, even when accounting for other background factors, such as gender and race. The paper found each additional $10,000 in annual parental income throughout early childhood gave kids the equivalent of slightly over one more month of learning.

The paper also found ties between maternal learning and student achievement: An additional year of a mother's schooling was equivalent to about half month of additional learning, as gauged by test scores. The report is the first to have linked maternal learning and income to school readiness on a national scale while controlling for other factors.

"Disparities in academic skills and other areas of development are apparent well before children enter school, suggesting that efforts targeted early in the life course may be effective in preventing the disparities that schools seek to remediate," the authors wrote.

"If we could identify strategies for improving the school readiness of disadvantaged children before they enter kindergarten, we might be able to improve their opportunities for achieving the American Dream."

But not all academics have heralded the new research. Jens Ludwig, a University of Chicago professor who has published on pre-kindergarten programs, said he is skeptical of reports that focus on income.

"What really matters are the parent characteristics that are correlated with family income," he said, mentioning factors such as mental health and verbal ability.

Katherine Magnuson, an author of the paper and University of Wisconsin, Madison professor who focuses on early childhood development, made the case for early childhood interventions that focus on parental support.

"Academics have known this for a very long time," she said. But "there's been this persistent inability to really strongly take up its implications on the policy side." The report suggests giving conditional cash supplements to families in need and enhanced tax credits like the Earned Income Tax Credit as ways to help parents prepare their kids for learning.

So far the Obama administration hasn't pushed those comprehensive ideas, instead targeting pre-K learning gaps primarily through in-classroom programs.

Last week the Obama administration announced the first nine winners of the Race to the Top -- Early Learning Challenge contest, a competition that awards states that overhaul their pre-K programs, and on Monday the Department of Health and Human Services, which runs the public pre-K initiative known as Head Start, announced its first tangible step toward improving public pre-school Head Start centers.

While most of Obama's programs focus on the classroom, a smaller initiative, known as Promise Neighborhoods, takes a more comprehensive approach.

"There's reason to believe that if you affect a whole community, kids should be better," Magnuson said.

"The differences we observe are not a necessary condition of the world that we live in," Magnuson sad. "They're constructed by a whole series of decisions that policymakers in conjunction with the public make."

William Gormley, a Georgetown University public policy professor, agreed. He said, "We need a viable plan to turn their lives around. Higher taxes and entitlement reform have to be part of that plan."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

As states revamp their early childhood education to grab a slice of federal education dollars, some education experts are urging policymakers to look outside the classroom to improve educational oppor...
As states revamp their early childhood education to grab a slice of federal education dollars, some education experts are urging policymakers to look outside the classroom to improve educational oppor...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 154
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madcityy
01:29 PM on 01/07/2012
I WISH I FELT HE REALLLLLLLLLYYYYYY CAred................his action dont show he does,,,,,,he could have been the best pres ever............................now he looks like a union stooge................
it makes me cry...i cant vote for him again./....................
04:28 PM on 12/26/2011
Another excuse for more welfare. Great. The sick part for me is that all this chatter hides the main factor: public schools do a lousy job of teaching kids to read. The previous two generations, the current generation--millions of these people never become fluent readers. Whole Word is a proven blueprint for illiteracy. The Brookings Institute provides sophistical cover for more of the same failure. Children should be reading by second grade.

Bruce Deitrick Price
11:46 AM on 12/22/2011
Welfare should not be an acceptable lifestyle.
photo
captainindustry
then that will be my story.
10:36 AM on 12/22/2011
America isn't obligated to give you the best education. It is obligated to give you as good an education as it can afford.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kimpeach
Progressive Independent and proud of it!
09:41 AM on 12/22/2011
Who is this program really benefiting? Not the students---its benefiting Bill Gates, Pearson Company and other book companies, ALEC, Murdoch, and the Walton Family. Don't believe me--look it up! I just hope people wake up before its too late!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Timothy D. Slekar
Associate Professor of Teacher Education
08:31 AM on 12/22/2011
"The report argued that gaps in children's ability to learn begin long before they enter the classroom..."
This is an absolutely ridiculous statement. There is no "argument." Research is unambiguous! Birth to 3 years of age is the most critical time period in a child's life. If there are gaps there is no "argument." It absolutely happened "long before they enter[ed] the classroom."
07:44 AM on 12/22/2011
ONLY In America, where being PC is required, will we waste money to make incapable people expensive incapable people.
03:15 AM on 12/22/2011
It is genetic. IQ. Yes a child's ability to learn in the classroom begins and is greatly determined before school age. It is determined pretty much at conception.
04:40 PM on 12/21/2011
we need to be careful. while it is heartening to see that policy is starting to recognize that we need to do something about society in order to do something about education, many of the pre-k RTTT conditions are not that much different from the normal RTTT conditions, ie 'teacher' evaluations based on test scores, which obviously implies testing (and K and pre-K level mind you). Pedro Noguera said it best in an article linked from this one:

"Collecting data is good. What's more important is to get kids the help they need," he said. "Some means of tracking is certainly important. These days, we spend more time tracking and monitoring than we do actually helping. I hope we find the balance we need."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScaningTheWaves
03:54 PM on 12/21/2011
As states revamp their early childhood education to grab a slice of federal education dollars, some education experts are urging policymakers to look outside the classroom

whats wrong, don't want to put the blame on yourself states? Home schooled kids come out better than government schooled, it's your fault, only fault of the parents is letting the government get away with this 100year old curriculum
photo
weebils
I like jalapenos and hot sauce
03:45 PM on 12/21/2011
This has become a nation of non stop whiners. We have more programs and help than ever before. No it isn't perfect and we can always do more. In an ironic twist the people who beg and whine the most are the ones who never do anything to better themselves or this country. It is getting to the point where some people just want to pop their kids out and think everything is suppose to be provided by society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tultican
Thomas Ultican, MEd. BS Mecahnical Engineering
03:03 PM on 12/21/2011
The primary driver that can be mitigated is failed communities and poverty. Blame schools, blame parents and blame children is not going to solve the damage to communities and their citizens that pervasive wide-spread poverty is causing.

The Obama administration’s RTTT policy is even worse than NCLB. A contest to see who can create policies that big brother and his owners in the billionaire boys club like is waged. If you lose the contest, your tax dollars go out of your community. It is an unfair and morally repugnant game of bribery and it has states implementing terrible education policy that bows to high stakes testing and teacher evaluation schemes based on junk science. Most frustrating of all, this policy seems absolutely enlightened compared to what is being offered by the other corporate owned party.
02:56 PM on 12/21/2011
The congressional gops have a different philosophy...ignore the 'situations' of the 'little people' and address the needs of the 'job creators'.
photo
nypoet22
Psychology Ph.D., Civics Teacher, Songwriter
02:29 PM on 12/21/2011
it's heartening that the administration has noticed the fifty years of research that establishes early childhood education as a factor in school success. however, they seem to want to take the same "data-driven" model that is at-best unproven in k-12, and apply it to pre-k education as well. i can't help wondering if this push will follow its precursor and do our nation's children more harm than good.
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
03:03 PM on 12/21/2011
Data driven is much easier to understand for those who do not care to educate themselves on child development, instruction strategies, behavior management, or learning needs. Numbers on a spreadsheet are very black and white. Students either reach the benchmark number or they don't. The decision makers do not want to be burdened with factoring in all of the other influences on a child's development. This model is already doing more harm than good, and allowing people with little, if any, knowledge of real education, to make decisions that govern the path of teaching and learning. It is easy to "analyze" numbers on a spreadsheet when you have a one size fits all model. In contemporary views, it seems, that students either hit that magic number or their teachers are believed to be failures.
11:48 AM on 12/22/2011
And, recall, if students do not reach the benchmark number, the fault lies entirely with the teacher.

Our administration assigned us an almost pointless task recently: scrutinize benchmark scores, and where the percentages were high for selecting the correct answer, jot notes on what we did to (successfully) teach this concept, where percentages were low, tell what we would do differently.

Several factors are conveniently ignored in this procedure, at least three of which include:
1. Evaluating whether or not the question was "good." In my opinion, at least one was badly worded and most students failed it (including myself, as a colleague wrote the questions).
2. Accounting for the fact that the 15 questions included about 5 that were easy, 5 that were of an intermediate difficulty and 5 that were clearly difficult.
3. And, no discussion of whether difficult concepts really need more teaching time for mastery.

When in human endeavors, have groups of people all mastered the same skill on the same schedule? Please show me that child development specialists have found the methods that will get all children walking by their first birthday, and all children speaking in sentences by their second, for example.

The magic bullet is assumed to be good teaching, as though a good lesson is assurance that everyone reaches proficiency on all standards.

Indeed, we can look at data (which we do), students (we don't consider in the latest incarnation of "good teaching", or both (the preferred course).
foresure
Brash and Harsh
01:37 PM on 12/21/2011
"Academics have known this for a very long time," she said. But "there's been this persistent inability to really strongly take up its implications on the policy side."

What more needs to be said.

See: Daniel Patrick Moynihan. www.dol.gov./osam/programs/history/monychapter

The Kerner Commission report: “Our Nation Is Moving Toward Two Societies, One Black, One White—Separate and Unequal”: Excerpts from the Kerner Report http://history-maters.gmu.edu/d/6545.

Anyone know anything about Greek and Roman "discoveries" regarding childhood learning?

"The Hand That Rocks The Cradle Is The Hand That Rules The World" is a poem by William Ross Wallace that praises motherhood as the preeminent force for change in the world. 1865
Wikipedia.

"If we could identify strategies for improving the school readiness of disadvantaged children before they enter kindergarten, we might be able to improve their opportunities for achieving the American Dream."

The above is the most blantant, horrifying, condemnation the education industry. Anyone figure out why I said that?
Allthosewhowander
My micro-bio is a microclimate
03:29 PM on 12/21/2011
I couldn't agree with you more. The education industrial complex is completely seperating itself from authentic teaching and learning. Politicians and business people are becoming administrators, and schools, students and staff are losing their identities because of the one size fits all model.
foresure
Brash and Harsh
03:56 PM on 12/21/2011
Allthosewhowander:

I understand your objection to Charter schools, which in many cases are run "for profit".

But, correct me if I am wrong, in public schools all the administrators from the principal on up have extensive experience in taking education courses, frequently for years.

Am I wrong about that?
01:06 AM on 12/22/2011
Add the work of James Heckman et al:

http://www.heckmanequation.org/

Lots of useful material there.
12:09 PM on 12/22/2011
Thanks for the link I am looking at Heckman's site. However, as we acknowledge more and more the noncognitive aspects of success, administrators and evaluators demand that teachers demonstrate that while they are teaching a full plate of rigorous academic standards, they are also addressing these essential noncognitive skills, habits, and mindsets. The task becomes daunting when you have to demonstrate how every lesson skillfully addresses a standard while teaching and promoting one or more of these noncognitive areas.