iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Payroll Tax Cut Extension: Medicare Braces For 'Doc Fix' Lapse After Jan. 1 If Congress Doesn't Act

Payroll Tax Cut Medicare Doc Fix

RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   12/20/11 04:40 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — Nearly 650,000 doctors caring for millions of seniors will get a steep cut in Medicare payments Jan. 18 unless a gridlocked Congress issues a reprieve, program officials said Tuesday.

A provision waiving a scheduled 27.4 percent cut in physician reimbursement was included in the payroll tax legislation now ensnared in partisan political wrangling between the House and Senate.

Medicare deputy administrator Jonathan Blum told The Associated Press the cut will go through unless Congress acts, because the backlog from more than a couple of weeks of waiting for lawmakers could cause the program's computers to crash.

Tax legislation passed by the Senate last week included a two-month Medicare reprieve, but House Republicans rejected that Tuesday.

"Today's vote calls into question whether millions of seniors in Medicare will continue to get the care that they need," said Joyce Rogers, vice president of AARP, the lobby for older people. "More physicians may choose to no longer take Medicare patients due to this dramatic cut."

The recurring threat of cuts to doctors is perhaps the most visible symbol of Medicare's financial problems. Reductions are required by a 1990s budget law that failed to control spending but never got repealed. Instead, Congress passes a temporary fix each time, only to grow the size of cuts required next time around.

Medicare sent an alert to doctors on Monday telling them it will hold claims for the first 10 business days of 2012 unless Congress acts to waive the cuts.

On Tuesday, Blum said holding claims any longer than that could cause problems for Medicare's computers, designed to expedite payment. That disclosure may come as a shock to lawmakers, since Medicare was able to hold claims for more than 20 days during a similar standoff last year during the summer.

"We feel that (Medicare) came very close operationally to crashing our system back in 2010," Blum said in an interview. "From a stewardship perspective, that is something we feel we can never repeat again."

Blum said Medicare has told the contractors handling its billing to start paying claims for 2012 at the lower rate on Jan. 18.

One factor that worries officials is that claims volume is expected to be high in winter months.

After the previous prolonged standoff over cuts, Medicare also heard from many doctors who said delaying payments to wait for Congress doesn't necessarily help them. Most medical practices are small businesses with payroll and other obligations and limited ability to quickly raise cash.

"What doctors told us afterwards is that it was better to provide some cash flow than no cash flow," said Blum. Congress can restore the funds later.

If allowed to go through, such steep cuts could undermine care for millions of elderly and disabled Medicare beneficiaries, as well as military retirees. Payment rates in the Pentagon's program are pegged to Medicare.

And doctors are not the only medical providers affected. Therapists, nurse practitioners and other professionals are also covered by the same payment system. Some doctors have said they will stop taking new Medicare patients.

The American Medical Association was hoping for a permanent fix to the payment problem this year. That was thwarted by the failure of the congressional supercommittee to come up with a bipartisan plan to reduce government debt.

The payroll tax bill approved by the House included a two-year reprieve for doctors. But that was whittled down to two months in the compromise tax legislation overwhelmingly passed by the Senate passed last week, and intended as a place-holder to buy a little more time for lawmakers to negotiate. House Republicans rejected that deal.

The AMA says the annual spectacle is eroding the confidence of doctors and patients.

"Congress has again failed to fulfill its responsibilities," said Dr. Peter Carmel, the group's president. "It is shameful that patients and physicians are the collateral damage."

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON — Nearly 650,000 doctors caring for millions of seniors will get a steep cut in Medicare payments Jan. 18 unless a gridlocked Congress issues a reprieve, program officials said Tuesda...
WASHINGTON — Nearly 650,000 doctors caring for millions of seniors will get a steep cut in Medicare payments Jan. 18 unless a gridlocked Congress issues a reprieve, program officials said Tuesda...
Filed by Luke Johnson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11:17 PM on 12/22/2011
Seriously, we need to pass legislation alloting the same health care benefits to members of Congress that we provide to citizens through Medicare. No more, no less. If members of Congress want better health care, let them pay for it on their own dime. It is completely unacceptable that we allot public dollars to pay for health care for politicians full able to pay for their own health care, while refusing to pay for health care to disabled and unemployed citizens unable to afford the same benefits. We also need to pass legislation requiring ALL medical providers to provide services to a specific percentage of Medicare recipients.
03:58 AM on 12/21/2011
I am a senior with a chronic illness and live on oxygen. I live in a town with a population of 26,000. The nearest town is a half hour drive away - a drive I cannot do due to my disability. How am I to travel (Gawd knows how far) to, hopefully, find a doctor who will treat me if this bill isn't resolved? What about the other millions of others, now aged, who have lived responsible lives, paid taxes and raised decent kids? If I treated my kids this way as they grew up, I'd be called unfit, neglectful and my children taken away.

What is going on in Washington is beyond politics, not only will it affect millions, it can cost lives. That, in my book, borders on the criminal.
04:00 PM on 12/20/2011
Real healthcare reform should add a FREE GOVERNMENT OPTION to compete with existing systems for patients.

See Phillip Longman's book BEST CARE ANYWHERE Why VA Health Care Is Better Than Yours.

There would be no forced insurance purchases required nor copays for patients and it would all be PAID FOR BY A NATIONAL SALES TAX of pennies on every dollar spent by everyone shopping in the US rich, poor, legal, illegal, 40million tourists annually all contributing to provide a complete birth to death low cost government VA style healthcare option for civilians that would save $1trillion annually from current $2.6trillion.

All government funded care would be delivered only from government hospitals.

There would be NO RESTRICTIONS for who would be allowed to use FREE government care JUST ASK PERIOD!

Every birth to death healthcare need from preventative to primary, inpatient, outpatient, vision, dental, and medications would be FREE PERIOD!

To assure the continuation of a robust private healthcare industry all money spent for health insurance and care should be tax deductible for payers and health benefits should be tax free to recipients.

All private healthcare insurers and providers should be exempt from any government mandates or requirements to serve indigents.

No one would ever be required to use the government systems and everyone would have the option to go back and forth using free government care or paying for whatever private care their private insurance company will allow them to have or that they are willing to pay for.
02:29 PM on 12/31/2011
That last paragraph tells why that wouldn't work.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
03:31 PM on 12/20/2011
first thing, congress should go back and fix the original law so that we stop having this stupid extension. just like the stop law that forces the post office to fund retirement account in a window of 10 yrs. hence making the post office lose money every year. we the people are getting exactly what we voted for. bad congress, a republican congress that has spend a whole year attacking women, middle class workers and now the elderly. if we want change we have to be willing to vote our own interest. not the interest we wish to have, or our dreams, but our current interest.
republicans have shown they only and forever work for the rich and corporation. they have shown that they would never be able to govern this country. it is time we take our govt into our hands. we most vote and vote our interest.
03:15 PM on 12/20/2011
It's like Erector Set government with half the pieces missing. Pathetic. Having set the all-time low congressional approval rating (6% think they're doing a good job) maybe they want to make sure it's unbreakable by going for the bottom.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:02 PM on 12/20/2011
I'm sorry, I just figured out the answer to my own question. Because none of them are working Americans...... Nevermind!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:59 PM on 12/20/2011
Why do republicans hate working Americans???
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
emmanuel kalu
information is knowledge, knowledge in power
03:32 PM on 12/20/2011
because you don't donate to their election.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:39 AM on 12/21/2011
True!!!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Bronxdude
Integrity has no need of rules
01:57 PM on 12/20/2011
Is it crying time again!
photo
movingman64
Republicans are faux patriots!!
01:20 PM on 12/20/2011
I hope to GOD these republicans have to depend on medicare one day so they can see how bad the cuts they make really are!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
01:52 PM on 12/20/2011
Do you mean like the $818 billion cut from Medicare Part A (hospital insurance) from 2014-2023, the first 10 years of its full implementation, and $3.2 trillion over the first 20 years, 2014-2033. Adding in ObamaCare cuts for Medicare Part B (physicians fees and other services) brings the total cut to $1.05 trillion over the first 10 years and $4.95 trillion over the first 20 years. Is that what your talking about?
photo
tommyg54
old guys rule
03:54 PM on 12/20/2011
And the GOP plan is do nothing. Make it private is there plan.They new the boomers were retiring in droves and nobody in Congress was ready. Bot sides spent the money and now the blame game starts. The boomers payed into it and now they want there benifets.Why didn't Bush have a plan or do something when he had control. Stop pointing fingers .
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kathy smelser
12:51 PM on 12/20/2011
so just to let everyone know the Republicans plan to play this game at least till the end of Jan
12:06 PM on 12/20/2011
Just explain to me how a 27% decrease of an already low reimbursement rate does not effect 'cash flow' . Will the staff suddenly work for free? Their commercial insurance plan give them all free coverage? The landlord and malpractice insurer waive their payments? Since we don't see many millionaire physicians (in fact, most don't make as much as insurance salemen and women, who take a hefty chunk of all premiums, but do make less then their CEO bosses who make many multiple millions annually at Private Insurance co's), expect this cut to be tough - Would you work nights and weekends, take endless phone calls after hours (which are not reimbursable services) if your pay check were going down? Didn't think so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
12:00 PM on 12/20/2011
Why can't we have some permanence in our fiscal policy? Every year we seem to get bogged down on the annual AMT fix, the Doc Fix, extending the Bush tax cuts, now a two-month extension of the payroll taxes. How can business plan in this sort of ad hoc environment?