iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bank Of America Countrywide Settlement: Bank To Pay $335 Million To Settle Discriminatory Lending Claims

By PALLAVI GOGOI and NEDRA PICKLER   12/21/11 04:06 PM ET  AP

-- Bank of America agreed to pay $335 million to resolve allegations that its Countrywide unit engaged in a widespread pattern of discrimination against qualified African-American and Hispanic borrowers on home loans.

The settlement with the U.S. Justice Department was filed Wednesday with the Central District court of California and is subject to court approval. The DOJ says it's the largest settlement in history over residential fair lending practices.

According to the DOJ's complaint, Countrywide charged over 200,000 African-American and Hispanic borrowers higher fees and interest rates than non-Hispanic white borrowers with a similar credit profile. The complaint says that these borrowers were charged higher fees and rates because of their race or national origin rather than any other objective criteria.

"These institutions should make judgments based on applicants' creditworthiness, not on the color of their skin," said Attorney General Eric Holder. "With today's settlement, the federal government will ensure that the more than 200,000 African-American and Hispanic borrowers who were discriminated against by Countrywide will be entitled to compensation."

Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America Corp. bought the nation's largest subprime lender, Countrywide Financial Corp., in 2008.

Dan Frahm, a Bank of America spokesman, said in a statement that the bank does not practice lending based on race.

"We discontinued Countrywide products and practices that were not in keeping with our commitment and will continue to resolve and put behind us the remaining Countrywide issues," Frahm said.

The United States' complaint says that Countrywide was aware that the fees and interest rates that its loan officers were charging discriminated against African-American and Hispanic borrowers, but failed to impose meaningful limits or guidelines to stop it.

By steering borrowers into subprime loans from 2004 to 2007, the complaint alleges, Countrywide harmed those qualified African-American and Hispanic borrowers. Subprime loans generally carried costlier terms, such as prepayment penalties and significantly higher adjustable interest rates that increased suddenly after two or three years, making the payments unaffordable and leaving the borrowers at a much higher risk of foreclosure.

"Countrywide's actions contributed to the housing crisis, hurt entire communities, and denied families access to the American dream," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division.

The settlement amount will be used to compensate victims of Countrywide's discriminatory mortgage loans from 2004 through 2007, when Countrywide originated millions of residential mortgage loans as the nation's largest single-family mortgage lenders.

___

Gogoi reported from New York, Pickler from Washington

Also on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS

Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,398
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (40 total)
09:18 AM on 12/24/2011
$1,600 per person they wronged. A sweetheart deal from the DOJ to their buddies on Wall Street.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
10:40 AM on 12/28/2011
Really, shouldn't the plaintiffs get interest on that money too?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Mason
The Debt is too Damn High!
08:37 AM on 12/24/2011
Sub prime loans are what you do when you lie about your income. I'm surprised Americans are not going to jail for mortgage fraud.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
10:41 AM on 12/28/2011
Subprime loans are used by banks to practice wealth extraction on Minority home buyers, basically anyone who is a woman or not white. It's been in practice since Reconstruction. It's a way of selling the same property multiple times, collecting "rent" because you know the buyer isn't going to be there long, and then eviction when the buyer can no longer afford the balloon rate and then start the process all over again.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Mason
The Debt is too Damn High!
11:07 AM on 12/28/2011
Subprime loans are forced on banks by the government...
08:36 PM on 12/23/2011
As I said in my earlier comment, homeowners have been left in the dark as they do not have the knowledge in the mortgage industry to fullly understand what has happened to them. Once again, I have been called a thumtack on a stool by a number of BofA employees and all I have to say is the war has just started. If the Huff Post does not want to approve this comment, then I have other news media that would be more than happy to take this story to the public. At this point, it is important that ALL homeowners who have been dupped into this three ring circus needs to come to an end. Let ALL homeowners who fall into this catagory stick together and get into the fight against Bank of America so they will not loose their homes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Lex Anton
Freedom doesn't exist in America.
11:53 AM on 12/23/2011
Settlements ARE NOT justice!
09:20 AM on 12/24/2011
Especially since the financial criminals still profit from their crimes.

One justice for them. Privatised prison work camp for us.
kokobin
Against stupidity the gods contend in vain
07:17 PM on 12/22/2011
Shirley Sherrod was right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BklynDame
Now on BorderlessNewsandViews
03:41 PM on 12/22/2011
Chump change, given their profits and the fact that they're laying off thousands to help cushion their bottom line. And, on another note, for those who insist (a) racism is non-existant in the "Age of Obama" and (b) poor people/folks of colour are the ones who brought down the market because they "bought what they couldn't afford" as the banks treated them "like everyone else", WAKE UP.
http://borderlessnewsandviews.com/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TedEjr
How can they be Right when they are wrong so much
03:02 PM on 12/22/2011
335 million.

Sounds like a lot, eh? It is a record fine.

But consider this.

In 2010 BofA had a 10.2 Billion NET profit. That is AFTER expenses.

They did take a 12.2 Goodwill Impairment Charge, leaving them with a Financial Loss of 2.2 billion. But, the way the accounting rules are written, that can be for anything as mundane as negative publicity for absorbing Country Wide.

So, the 335 million fine is only 3% of their 2010 profits. And no criminal charges.

If I broke into a neighbor's house and performed unspeakable acts with the occupants, and the police subsequently told me that, not only would I NOT be charged with anything, but that also all I would need to do is pay a $600 fine, and the whole matter would be dropped, i would be whipping out my checkbook before they finished their sentence.

In essence, that is what happened here. They performed unspeakable acts (euphemistically) on minorities, and they paid a 3% fine, and received a get out of jail free card.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sf1000000
Screw being nice its highly overrated
10:06 AM on 12/23/2011
Well add that to the time they where laundering drug money for Mexican drug Cartels that was $285 million..and no one went to jail there either.
Your point is right on target..it takes years to catch them and then what? slap in the hand..I want to see butts behind bars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
10:47 AM on 12/28/2011
Dang! Now I have to look that up.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrcontinental
Expat Extraordinaire.
02:04 PM on 12/22/2011
We see once again that crime DOES pay. They made billions and have to throw back a few million. I'd take that deal anytime. Plus it goes to the government and not the people who got ripped off so what's the point?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
muck-raker
give me liberty or give me death
01:41 PM on 12/22/2011
By Matt Taibbi
Over drinks at a bar on a dreary, snowy night in Washington this past month, a former Senate investigator laughed as he polished off his beer.

"Everything's pfucked up, and nobody goes to jail," he said. "That's your whole story right there. Hell, you don't even have to write the rest of it. Just write that."

I put down my notebook. "Just that?"

"That's right," he said, signaling to the waitress for the check. "Everything's pfucked up, and nobody goes to jail. You can end the piece right there."

Nobody goes to jail. This is the mantra of the financial-crisis era, one that saw virtually every major bank and financial company on Wall Street embroiled in obscene criminal scandals that impoverished millions and collectively destroyed hundreds of billions, in fact, trillions of dollars of the world's wealth — and nobody went to jail. Nobody, that is, except Bernie Madoff, a flamboyant and pathological celebrity con artist, whose victims happened to be other rich and famous people.

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216#ixzz1hI3irRMM
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sister Bluebird
10:48 AM on 12/28/2011
Not that we didn't already know that, but the confirmation sucks!

Funny how that works!
01:30 PM on 12/22/2011
Great deal for B of A : that comes to around $1,675.00 per house. Pocket change.
01:02 PM on 12/22/2011
Lets see pay a fine and no jail time ?? So it does pay to buy and own small mined polecats
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BlairCase
12:00 PM on 12/22/2011
According to the Federal Reserve, the deliquency rate on subprime loans approached a high of 30% in 2008. This was devastating to the banks, who expected that subprime delinquency rates would never top 10%, but more than 70% of subprime borrowers are keeping up their mortgages. So, subprime mortages appear to be working out for most people. I wonder if only Hispanics and African Americans who defaulted on their mortgages are eligible for settlement funds. Are people who took subprime loans but "flipped" properties before the crash eligible?
http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2008/200863/200863pap.pdf
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FiredUpRTG
Don't start no stuff; won't be no stuff…
11:51 AM on 12/22/2011
Thusly setting them up for failure (foreclosure) and stealing their money while at it.

Cars, groceries, food… charging more has been going on for more than a century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fredpa
I will try again tomorrow.
11:46 AM on 12/22/2011
Good grief. They're agreeing to pay 300 million. Think about what they have to have profited to make that cost effective. I wish somebody would come up with the financial equivalent of the death penalty for these swine.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
henryberry
MASSACRE IN NEWTOWN Adam Lanza Passage to Madness
11:05 AM on 12/22/2011
The ever onward thrust of the banksters: Three trillion forward, $325 million backward. Do the math.