iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

In Eurozone, Year Of Deleveraging Could Prove Dangerous

Eurosign

First Posted: 12/22/11 11:57 AM ET Updated: 12/22/11 11:57 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - With governments laboring under too much debt and banks hobbled by too little capital, 2012 is shaping up as another year of hard slog for Europe's economy that could yet test the single currency to destruction.

The Netherlands on Thursday became the latest country to report that output shrank in the third quarter, lending credibility to forecasts that the broader euro zone will soon be in recession if it is not already.

A generation that gorged on debt is now adjusting to what some are calling the Great Stagnation. Talk of a lost decade, like Japan in the 1990s, no longer seems outlandish.

So far so familiar. What worries economists is that the longer the deleveraging of government and bank and household balance sheets drags on, the greater the risk of market or policy accidents.

If the economy is already at stall speed, an unexpected shock could send it into a deep dive. In an age of globally integrated supply chains and capital markets, the impact on the rest of the world could be severe.

"Entering 2012, we are facing uncertainty on the grandest of scales," HSBC economists led by Stephen King said in their latest quarterly report.

The good news was that euro zone policymakers recognized that a break-up of the 17-member bloc could spark another great depression. But, despite signs of greater urgency, investors for the most part remained unconvinced that a strategy was in place to ease the debt burdens straining the single currency.

"This loss of faith is reminiscent of the collapse in confidence in 2008, when the wheels came off the global economy. Back then, forecasters completely failed to grasp the gravity of the situation. The same may be true today," HSBC said.

TALL ORDER

As the world economy slumped after the collapse of U.S. investment bank Lehman Brothers in 2008, governments had room for maneuver. Today, with fiscal austerity in fashion and interest rates near zero across the developed world, firepower is limited.

"Indeed, with the risk of recession on the rise, debt dynamics are in danger of spinning out of control," HSBC said.

The European Central Bank acted decisively on Wednesday to limit the immediate danger by lending banks a whopping 489 billion euros in cheap three-year loans. The cash injection will reduce the risk of a credit crunch and fire sales of assets by banks shut out of the wholesale funding markets.

But the ECB is at best buying time to help weaker euro zone members put their finances back in order and recoup competitiveness lost as a result of having weaker productivity and higher labor costs than core countries led by Germany.

It is the sheer magnitude of this task that is unnerving markets. Take Greece, which is racing to thrash out sweeping pro-growth structural reforms demanded by the European Union and the International Monetary Fund to unlock a 130 billion euro loan needed to stave off default.

"This is a process, as we've seen in IMF program countries, that takes well over 10 years and that's as long as Greece will need with the help of financial support and technical assistance missions from the EU and the IMF," said Antonio Garcia Pascual, an economist at Barclays Capital in London.

Yet Greece is already in the fourth year of a deep recession. And even if the EU-IMF program succeeds, its debt in 2020 would still be a suffocating 120 percent of GDP.

How long will voters endure austerity imposed from abroad and, at the same time, go along with sweeping changes to everything from pensions to labor laws and the prizing open of long-protected professions and industries?

"Structural reform is essentially about a society changing its way of life," a senior European central banker said. "It's not obvious that creating extra liquidity can make those fundamental reforms easier."

QUESTION OF BALANCE

New modeling by Goldman Sachs dramatizes the challenge facing countries on the periphery of the euro zone.

In order to stabilize the net debt of the entire economy these countries need a sizeable adjustment in their current account deficits. This in turn points to the need for a depreciation in the real, or inflation-adjusted, exchange rate of as much as 44 percent in Portugal, 35 percent in Greece and Spain and 20 percent in Italy, Goldman estimates.

That means prices would need to rise less, or even decline, relative to the euro zone average for about 15 years in the case of Greece and Spain and almost 20 years in Portugal, requiring savage wage cuts in the process.

This required correction immediately throws up another huge problem: if the periphery is holding inflation down to zero to cut costs, core countries will have to tolerate prices rising above 3 percent if the ECB is to keep euro area average inflation on target at no more than 2 percent.

"This might be problematic for the ECB as certain core countries (such as Germany) could potentially have difficulties accepting such higher inflation for a prolonged period of time," wrote Goldman economist Lasse Holboell W. Nielsen.

GLOBAL DEBT MESS

The euro zone is not alone in its struggles to manage excessive debt. Japan's gross public debt has soared to more than 200 percent of GDP.

The deterioration has not prevented the government from selling its bonds at low and stable yields, but a new IMF working paper warns that over the medium term, the market's capacity to absorb new debt is likely to diminish as the population ages and appetite for riskier assets recovers.

The result could be a worsening of Japan's debt dynamics that poses a threat to financial stability.

"Without a significant policy adjustment, the stock of gross public debt could exceed household financial assets in around 10 years, at which point domestic financing may become more difficult," IMF economists Waikei Raphael Lam and Kiichi Tokuoka wrote.

And in the United States, alongside what most economists see as an unsustainable public-sector debt trajectory, families still have too much debt accumulated in the go-go years before the great financial crisis.

Household debt as a percentage of disposable income peaked in mid-2007 at 135 percent of GDP. It has since declined to around 120 percent but remains more than 20 percentage points above its 30-year average, according to Nathan Sheets, global head of international economics at Citi in New York.

He said it was reasonable to assume deleveraging would continue at the same steady rate - which would prolong the process into the second half of this decade - but the pace could quicken markedly in the event of a collapse of asset prices, a sharp drop in disposable income or a renewed tightening of financial conditions.

Which brings us back to the mountain the euro zone still has to climb in 2012.

"Given the ongoing stresses in Europe, such risks are not just abstract possibilities but rather all-too-plausible outcomes that need to be carefully considered, with an eye to reducing potential vulnerabilities," Sheets said in a report.

(Editing by Mike Peacock)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
LONDON (Reuters) - With governments laboring under too much debt and banks hobbled by too little capital, 2012 is shaping up as another year of hard slog for Europe's economy that could yet test t...
LONDON (Reuters) - With governments laboring under too much debt and banks hobbled by too little capital, 2012 is shaping up as another year of hard slog for Europe's economy that could yet test t...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
SoylentGreenIsPeople
You know how to use Google too !
02:22 PM on 12/23/2011
Expansionary austerity is not simply a zombie economic idea. It forms the basis of a political strategy of class war, undertaken by the financial and political elite (the “1 per cent”) to hold on to the wealth and power they accumulated during the decades of market liberalism, and to shift the costs of their own failure on to the rest of the population. An effective response must similarly combine an economic analysis with a policy program and a political movement to mobilise resistance to the push for austerity.

In economic terms, the primary need is to relearn the basic lessons of Keynesian economics. Government intervention can help to stabilise aggregate demand and, when monetary policy is ineffectual because of a liquidity trap, expansionary fiscal policy is the optimal choice.

This lesson has been reinforced in both positive and negative ways since the beginning of the crisis. Fiscal stimulus was successful, most clearly in countries like Australia and China, where governments had advance warning of an externally-generated shock. But even in the US and Europe, notably including Germany, fiscal policy softened the impact of the crisis.

http://crookedtimber.org/2011/12/23/blogging-the-zombies-expansionary-austerity-after-the-zombies/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Sheng Paule
Either we fix this planet or we all lose
03:24 AM on 12/23/2011
Isn't it odd that the name of the HSBC economist is Stephen King!
10:35 PM on 12/22/2011
Quote -- " The good news was that euro zone policymakers recognized that a break-up of the 17-member bloc could spark another great depression."
----------------------------
Now what are they going to do about it ?

The world economy is on shaky ground and politicians just argue.

In Japan they have the cost of the Nuclear melt down to deal with and those costs are astronomical.

In Europe they have too many countries and parliaments making any policy decisions messy and time consuming.

In the US we have the Republicans that want to destroy the economy for political purposes.

Can people and the world get any more screwed up?
05:49 PM on 12/22/2011
The only reason for the government debt is the rich not paying their fair share. Tax reform ensuring that rich pay taxes on their incomes, dividends and capital gains (both realized and not realized), wealth (money they hoarded) and properties will eliminate debt and will allow government to create millions of jobs by investing in the infrastruc­ture, education, community developmen­t and organizing­, green energy and helping poorer countries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:47 PM on 12/22/2011
I do not know why economists or anyone else could refer to or compare national (sovereign) debt and/or Federal Government annual deficit spending as a percentage of Gross (National) Domestic Product (GDP).

This GDP has nothing to do with the ability of a nation to repay their national debt, especially if the majority of the GDP activity was the government borrowing money from wealth producing entities in the industrial nations and using this borrowed money to pay for bureaucrat payrolls, unemployment benefits, welfare, retirement pensions, high speed rail, free medical services, housing, wars, social services, pork barrel projects and other tax funded bureaucrat jobs that do not produce any national wealth that the nation could use to repay national (sovereign) debt, reduce the foreign trade deficit, or to re-industrialize the nation in order to create new national wealth?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:33 PM on 12/22/2011
If the de-industrialized debtor nations (USA and/or Greece, UK, PIIGS, etc.) had a larger industrial manufacturing portion as a part of their GDP, then that would create additional new NATIONAL WEALTH more rapidly, and then these governments would be able to raise more funds to spend on government activities by CONFISCATING some of this newly created NATIONAL WEALTH from the wealth creators, and then not having to borrow WEALTH (US Dollars, Euros or other currency) back from foreign individuals (in the foreign industrialized nations) that local citizens paid to make the consumer items that they imported and consumed.

All nations must create their own new NATIONAL WEALTH to pay for all of their own government expenses without borrowing additional money from foreign individuals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_external_debt

Each nation in the entire world has always concentrated on trying to produce enough food, shelter and clothing to survive, and then also producing as much excess as possible to sell and/or trade to others outside of their own family (or tribe, state, or nation) in order to CREATE and accumulate new NATIONAL WEALTH to be used for economic security as reserve use in times of emergency, to raise the standard of living for the members of that family, and also accumulate redeemable products and commodities as redeemable value for any printed currency or securities that they might care to issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
06:12 AM on 12/23/2011
All that would be great if we were really based in a Free Market Democracy, but we are not.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
03:18 PM on 12/22/2011
Yes, too much debt! Yet everyone on Capitol Hill is fighting to continue a payroll tax cut which would be paid for out of general funds ( more debt ). Why is it 3 years into Obama's term and we still have the Bush-Obama tax rates???
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:20 PM on 12/22/2011
Agreed, but isn't this the same thing for not letting the Bush tax cuts expire?
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
10:47 AM on 12/23/2011
Yes, and Obama claimed a big bi-partisan win on that one! Republicans fighting tax hikes is not always bad, but when we are at war and/or in serious debt it is nuts. Painless war is not a good thing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Obama Is Nothing More Than A Moderate Republican
06:18 AM on 12/23/2011
"Why is it 3 years into Obama's term and we still have the Bush-Obama tax rates??? "

Because the Repugs demanded the extension of the rates in return for allowing Obama to assist the millions of unemployed Americans with an extension of Unemployment Insurance?

That is the way Repugs work. Damage Government by Cutting Revenue, Borrowing, and Spending.
photo
massjim
Dem? Repub? Is there a difference?
10:50 AM on 12/23/2011
Yeah, signing a pledge to not increase taxes is so stupid... but I don't have much faith in either party to do the right thing vs the selfish thing.
12:42 PM on 12/22/2011
Socialism fails big time yet again.
LOL
I couldn't be happier.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
greeneyes51654m
Retired, finally...
03:27 PM on 12/22/2011
I agree, fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mike Keohane
06:38 PM on 12/22/2011
Yes, Socialism has failed again but I don't now if I share your happiness about that. Look at the hole we've dug. Doesn't seem there's much hope of getting out of it. That makes me kind of sad.
11:56 AM on 12/23/2011
Sad? Yes it certainly is. The blame is on both parties....wars and welfare....they just couldn't spend fast enough. We are indeed in a hole we can never get out of.