More

U.S. GDP Third Quarter 2011: U.S. Economy Grew Less Than Estimated Last Quarter

Assemblyline

First Posted: 12/22/11 09:01 AM ET Updated: 12/22/11 09:01 AM ET

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Economic growth was slower than previously estimated in the third quarter on a sharp drop in healthcare spending, but stronger business investment and a fall in inventories pointed to a pickup in output in the current period.

Gross domestic product grew at a 1.8 percent annual rate in the third quarter, the Commerce Department said in its final estimate on Thursday, down from the previously estimated 2 percent.

Economists had expected growth to be unrevised at 2 percent. Though spending on healthcare dropped by $2.2 billion, spending on durable goods was stronger than previously estimated, indicating household appetite to consume remains healthy.

Healthcare spending had previously been reported to have increased at a $19.7 billion rate. Healthcare spending subtracted about 0.1 percentage point from the GDP change in the final revision, whereas the previous estimate had it adding 0.61 percentage point to growth.

Even as much of the rest of the world is slowing down and a mild recession is forecast in Europe next year, the U.S. economy remains resilient.

The labor market is improving, households continue to spend, home building is picking up and factory output is expanding, putting the economy on course for at least a 3 percent growth pace in the fourth quarter.

That would be the fastest pace in 18 months.

Despite the downward revision, last quarter's growth is still a step-up from the April-June period's 1.3 percent pace. Part of the pick-up in output during the last quarter reflects a reversal of factors that held back growth earlier in the year.

A jump in gasoline prices had weighed on consumer spending earlier in the year, and supply disruptions from Japan's big earthquake and tsunami in March had curbed auto production.

The government revised consumer spending to a 1.7 percent growth rate from 2.3 percent because of adjustments to healthcare services, in particular nonprofit hospitals.

Spending on durable goods was, however, revised up to a 5.7 percent pace from 5.5 percent.

Business inventories dropped $2.0 billion, which sliced off 1.35 percentage points from GDP growth. Inventories had previously been estimated to have declined $8.5 billion.

The drag from inventories was offset by strong business spending, which increased at a 15.7 percent rate, instead of 14.8 percent.

Excluding inventories, the economy grew at a still brisk 3.2 percent rate, revised down from 3.6 percent pace. Final sales increased at a 1.6 percent pace in the second quarter.

The Department also said after-tax corporate profits increased at a 2.7 percent rate, revised down from 3.0 percent. After tax profits increased at a 4.3 rate in the second quarter.

Export growth was stronger than previously estimated, rising at a 4.7 percent rate instead of 4.3 percent. Imports increased at a much faster 1.2 percent rate rather than 0.5 percent.

Trade contributed 0.43 percentage point to GDP growth. Elsewhere, residential construction grew at a 1.3 percent rate instead of 1.6 percent. Government spending fell at an unrevised 0.1 percent.

The GDP report also showed some inflation pressures in the economy. A price index for personal spending rose at an unrevised 2.3 percent rate in the third quarter.

That compared to a 3.3 percent rate in the second quarter. A core inflation measure, which strips out food and energy costs, rose at a 2.1 percent rate rather than 2.0 percent. The measure -- closely watched by the Federal Reserve -- grew at a 2.3 percent rate in the prior three months

(Reporting By Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Andrea Ricci)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Related on HuffPost:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Economic growth was slower than previously estimated in the third quarter on a sharp drop in healthcare spending, but stronger business investment and a fall in inventories ...
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Economic growth was slower than previously estimated in the third quarter on a sharp drop in healthcare spending, but stronger business investment and a fall in inventories ...
Filed by Jillian Berman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vippy
Carpe Diem!
04:46 PM on 12/22/2011
This is what the other papers said:
US Summer Growth Slower Than Reported
Globe and Mail
Seems like the government always enhances figures.
06:43 PM on 12/22/2011
When you can't point to success make some up!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jackdaniel58
04:04 PM on 12/22/2011
That's an American assembly worker- no eye protection- no head protection- no hand protection. She looks more like a person looking for a misplaced iphone- A total disgrace.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trustfunded1
03:18 PM on 12/22/2011
The last paragraph of the GDP report is hilarious....

"Effective with this release, chained-dollar gross value added of nonfinancial corporate businesswas revised beginning with 1929. Chained-dollar gross value added is derived by deflating current-dollar gross value added by a revised chain-type price index for nonfinancial industries from the annualrevision of BEA’s industry accounts that was released this month."

Nothing like a little revision to make GD1 look worse than the current GD2.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trustfunded1
03:06 PM on 12/22/2011
If you read thereport you will notice the statement...

"Effective with this release, chained-dollar gross value added of nonfinancial corporate business
was revised beginning with 1929."

IOW's the data they had compiled was so horrific they had to make revisions going back to 1929 to make this report look better.
06:35 PM on 12/22/2011
It means they changed the CPI index used to convert from nominal to real dollars. Intellectuals realize this is a meaningless change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
02:46 PM on 12/22/2011
1.8% is pathetic. You need at least 2% to start growing jobs enough to keep up with population growth. I long for the days of Clinton and Reagan when the economy would grow at 5% ormore after recessions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Helm
At what time does the toothheaded whale porkbelly?
02:13 PM on 12/22/2011
Less spending on healthcare is good hopefully this is due to Obamacare . This industry should see a healthy (pun intended) slide,as time goes on. But sure as rain falls from the sky when greedy shareholders demand more profit you will see layoffs be blamed on Obama instead of of a necessary reduction profit expectations.
02:12 PM on 12/22/2011
But that's what they said the previous quarter....and the quarter before that.....and the quarter before that......and..............

Obama: FAIL
02:41 PM on 12/22/2011
Hey MRonePercent2012: Unemployment is going down and wallstreet is making money. Obama Success
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
03:15 PM on 12/22/2011
When Retail Giant is notifying on line customers that it sold out of products ordered on line, asking customers if they would be okay with a substitutute, you know the economiy is moving in the right direction. When I can't find items normally found on department store shelves or in bookstores, you know the economy is moving in the right direction. Obama/WIN (Next November)
12:08 PM on 12/23/2011
Then it is time to cut off unemployment welfare.
Don't expect the value of your house to skyrocket.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:20 PM on 12/22/2011
An observation. One the campaigns end, all sides are basically identical.
02:13 PM on 12/22/2011
I disagree, look at what each party supports or disagrees with on the senate floor and in the House shows a clear struggle between the left and right all year long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Penocea
What you are, the world is ...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:15 PM on 12/22/2011
We'll be back to pre-recession prosperity. By 2025.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AlonzoQuijana
Independent, Libertarian, Skeptic
02:47 PM on 12/22/2011
At the currently rate of job growth it will be another five before we get back to 2007 levels of employment. This economy needs to pick up the pace or we'll be backsliding to 10% unemplyment.
03:05 PM on 12/22/2011
To AlonzoQuijana: Your theory that the country will slide back to 10% unemployment because of its slow recovery is not correct. Also, no economist not on "Fox News" has said this country will regain its losses anytime in the next five years. This was not the small recession of the early 1990's or 2000's and will require really hard work not another fake industry bubble to lean on.
12:31 PM on 12/22/2011
TheSilverJournal.com

Americans are suffering because artificially cheap money is destroying productivity. Mis-pricing money causes resources to flow into unproductive areas. The return of market-priced money will expose the malinvestments that have been created by artificially cheap money being pumped into the economy and cause short-term pain, but will also cause a boom in productivity because resources will once again be allocated much more efficiently.

Postponing the pain by providing more artificially cheap money only causes more malinvestments and therefore even greater pain in the future. Bankers and politicians enjoy their control over the printing press and do not want to be blamed for the pain, which is why the pain will likely be delayed until so much artificially cheap money is created that the USD becomes worthless.

http://thesilverjournal.com/?page_id=20
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:17 PM on 12/22/2011
Maybe. But from my experience, politicians seem to not be very shy about causing me pain. If this indeed is the big fix, I don't want any more, thanks.
01:33 PM on 12/22/2011
It's not a question of if the pain is going to come, it's a question of when and how much. The longest it can be dragged out until is hyperinflation and hyperinflation means max pain will ensue. If we stop the printing now, there will be less pain.
02:24 PM on 12/22/2011
To Silver Journal: I think you need to go buy some gold and sit on it so when the USD becomes worthless, say like in a thousand years, you will have a nice yellow rock to pay your bills with. As for the "mis-pricing" of currency causes goods to flow into unproductive areas I think you have no idea how commerce works. If deflated currency was the market producers aimed for then America would be shipping goods to places like China and India and not the other way around. As for the the government and federal reserve being the main cause of the great recession is a joke. Wallstreet had the handcuffs taken off in the 1990's and early 2000's and within 10-15 years they took down the American economy. If it wasnt for the Federal Reserve and politicians both on the right and the left the country would have looked like the 1930's all over again.
02:44 PM on 12/22/2011
I guess you didn't get the memo that America is broke.

I guess you also didn't get the memo that devaluing a currency is a bad thing because it makes your country poorer. Look at Zimbabwe.

And then there's the other memo that you didn't get that nothing was solved by the Fed printing a ton of money..it was just postponed. The "handcuffs" were taken off of Wall Street when the FDIC was created and backed by the government and Fed. Imagine if depositors actually cared if their bank was about to go under..but because they don't care and there's endless bailouts, the burden ultimately falls on all tax payers and all dollars holders. That's a real nice system you're supporting.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carleronn
Former bond trader
12:30 PM on 12/22/2011
Three years into O's term and the slowest recovery in US history remains the slowest, 1.2% over first three quarters yet the media talk is always positive. In the third quarter on 1992 the GDP was 4.8% but Bush was criticized constantly. It was made to seem we were in a depression then. But there is no bias in the media...lol
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:18 PM on 12/22/2011
WWJMHD? (what would john mccain have done?)
02:38 PM on 12/22/2011
To Carleronn: You claim to be a former bound trader so you should know the difference between the countries purchasing power in the early 1990's and early 2000's is not anywhere close to what it is today. Also, what brings the US economy out of less serious recessions which are what the two mentioned economic downturns were is consumers debt spending. That can happen when people have jobs and savings or a home to barrow agaist. All three of those sources of capital were very limited in the latest "great recession". Most economist and news outlets (excluding Fox News) realize a 1.5% - 2.0% increase in econmic growth is encouraging and shows the government and private sectors are heading in the right direction.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
carleronn
Former bond trader
03:29 PM on 12/26/2011
You'rein over your head....nice try
11:56 AM on 12/22/2011
There are complex calculations that are involved in this number, but one thing is clear, none of it is Obama's fault.
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
03:12 PM on 12/22/2011
You're correct. It is all to his credit.
11:46 AM on 12/22/2011
Just imagine how the economy would be doing if things like the Jobs bill would have passed. We have a lot of infrastructure projects that need to be done, a lot of people out of work. We have a government that is going to spend nearly $1 trillion on the F-35 JSF that isn't due till 2018 and is most likely going to be obsolete by the time it enters production. We can surely find around $100 billion to fund some key infrastructure projects, get local economies moving again which will in turn help the national economy.
12:26 PM on 12/22/2011
The government has spent the last 3 years borrowing and spending in order to "stimulate" the economy. Three years and $4.5T in new debt to generate 1.8% GDP growth?

We are growing the debt by 10% of GDP, and growing income by 1.8% of GDP. That debt needs to be paid back with interest at some point in the future which will cause a dollar for dollar reduction in GDP at that point. Obviously this deficit spending is not generating nearly enough economic activity to "pay for itself". Borrow 10% of GDP to grow GDP by 1.8%?

Avg. tax rate is about 15% so this year's 10% of GDP deficit spending is generating 0.27% of GDP in additional tax revenue. That's barely enough to pay the INTEREST on the new debt. Not a very good investment.

Time to re-think this insanity SOON. We can't borrow our way to prosperity.
01:02 PM on 12/22/2011
The Republicans never borrowed a dime, and there was no deficit during any Republican
President's term.

Ask any Republican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
02:10 PM on 12/22/2011
Fanned, miltonc41. So many people criticize the hapless borrowers who fell into foreclosure on their home mortgages because they bit off more than they could chew. Unfortunately, our entire nation is doing exactly the same thing, and we will have to accept a national bankruptcy down the road. Yet very few even question this out-of-control borrowing.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:22 PM on 12/22/2011
Did the jobs bill really have big amounts marked for rebuilding our infrastructure? I don't think it did. That type of investment in America at home would be terrific, but I doubt there's will to do it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Leland
11:29 AM on 12/22/2011
During the third quarter the majority of the economic reports in "The Wall Street Journal" like the "Purchasing Managers Index" were down-trending so any small (but steady) gain in GDP is good news. Now all we have to do is get the corporations to start hiring Americans to keep the Recovery going:

http://www.flixya.com/blog/3201910/Beautiful-Butterflys
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
demilieu
Texas liberal...with reservations
01:26 PM on 12/22/2011
Technology has taken away many jobs. The people who did these jobs are now too old to retrain and be realistically rehired in new careers. Sort of what happened to auto workers and machinists in the rust belt during the 1970's. Sad. Most of those cats were put out to pasture and they never found re-employment, at least at a level that allowed the prosperity promised by the American Dream.
photo
Mister Grumpy
An Angry American
02:00 PM on 12/22/2011
Sad. But true. If you're over fifty and out office work, you'd be better off by blowing your brain out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
02:12 PM on 12/22/2011
"cats out to pasture"? I think you're mixing your mammalian metaphors.
photo
1oldhippie
yes, WE can again!
10:42 AM on 12/22/2011
So the economy is 'sluggish' but growing, DESPITE the GOP games...
Imagine if they would lend a hand or get out of the way!
11:57 AM on 12/22/2011
Imagine what it would be if Obama was not focused like a laser on the economy (well, that and golf)